O processo judicial de acompanhamento de maior
The judicial process for “adult accompaniment”
Keywords:
Maior acompanhado, processo de acompanhamento de maior, Adult accompanied, monitoring process for the accompanying adultAbstract
O anterior regime civil português previa situações em que, devido a algumas deficiências físicas ou mentais, a capacidade de exercício de direitos era limitada, no próprio interesse do incapaz. Nestes casos, quando as pessoas não se encontrassem em condições de reger a sua pessoa e os seus bens, ou apenas os seus bens, poderia ser judicialmente solicitada a aplicação, respetivamente, dos regimes da interdição e da inabilitação, com vista a proteger os interesses do incapaz. No entanto, este regime não satisfazia as exigências da especificidade dos problemas das pessoas com capacidade diminuída, estando longe de proporcionar boas soluções. Neste enquadramento, surgiu a proposta de lei n.º 110/XIII, que deu origem à Lei n.º 49/2018, de 14 de agosto, que criou o regime jurídico do maior acompanhado, eliminou os institutos da interdição e da inabilitação e instituiu o processo judicial de acompanhamento de maior, cuja análise realizamos neste artigo.
The Portuguese previous civil regime provided for situations in which, due to some physical or mental deficiencies, the capacity to exercise rights was limited, in the interests of the incapable. In those cases, when people were not in a position to govern their person and their property or only their property, the application of the interdiction and incapacitation regimes could be judicially requested in order to protect the interests of the incapable. However, this scheme did not meet the requirements of the specificity of the problems of people with diminished capacity and was far from providing good solutions. In this framework, Law 110 / XIII was proposed, which gave rise to Law no. 49/2018, of 14th of August, that established the legal system of the adult accompanied, eliminated legal institutes of interdiction and incapacitation and instituted the judicial process of adult accompaniment, whose analysis we carry out in this article.
Available from: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1219
Downloads
Downloads:
PDF_12_1_Carvalho_OSLS 181
XML_12_1_Carvalho_OSLS 1263
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Ana Sofia Carvalho
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence, further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.