Vulnerability and ability to exercise one’s rights
The right to free development of personality constitutionally enshrined
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1201Keywords:
vulnerability, autonomy, free development of personalityAbstract
We intended to discuss the relationship between the right to the free development of personality constitutionally enshrined and the conditions placed by specific situations of vulnerability to the exercise of fundamental rights. Vulnerability appears as a transversal and universal phenomenon, episodic or permanent. The reflection and legal intervention on vulnerability are thus justified as a view of respecting human dignity and of promoting values such as autonomy, health, physical or mental integrity. The respect for the different personal needs precludes normalization and imposes the substitution of the medical model for a social model of vulnerability. This results in an eventually generic duty of care committed to the State, which – in a non-paternalistic way – must deal with situations of discriminatory imbalance (eg people with disabilities, but also children or the elderly), requiring the analysis of the specific problems of vulnerable groups that demand consideration specific to the principle of equality.
Downloads
Metrics
Downloads:
PDF_12_1_Neto_OSLS 409
XML_12_1_Neto_OSLS 172
References
Arlettaz, F., e Palacios Sanabria, M.T., 2015. Reflexiones en torno a derechos humanos y grupos vulnerables. Bogotá: Editorial Universidad del Rosario. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1ffjr6g
Association Henri Capitant, 2020. Vulnerabilité, 2018. Journées Québécoises (tome LXVIII). Bruxelas: Bruylant/LB2V.
Barranco Avilés, M.C., e Churruca Muguruza, C., eds., 2014. Vulnerabilidad y protección de los derechos humanos. Madrid: Tirant lo Blanch
Brodiez-Dolino, A., 2015. La vulnérabilité, nouvelle catégorie de l’action publique. Informations sociales [em linha], 2, 188, 10. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.3917/inso.188.0010 [Com acesso em 26 de abril de 2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/inso.188.0010
Campos, D.L., 1991. Lições de direito da personalidade, Lições de Direitos da personalidade. Boletim da Faculdade de Direito: Universidade de Coimbra [em linha], vol. 67, pp. 158 e 161.
Campos, D.L., 1993. O Direito e os Direitos de personalidade. Revista da Ordem dos Advogados, Ano 53/II, Abril/Junho, p. 224.
Canotilho, J.J.G., 1982. Constituição Dirigente e vinculação do legislador, contributo para a compreensão das normas constitucionais programáticas. Coimbra Editora Limitada.
Canotilho, J.J.G., e Moreira, V., 1991. Fundamentos da Constituição. Coimbra: Coimbra Editora.
Council of Europe, 2017. Cultural participation and inclusive societies – A thematic report based on the Indicator Framework on Culture and Democracy [em linha]. Folheto. Estrasburgo: Council of Europe Publishing. Disponível em: https://edoc.coe.int/en/culture-and-democracy/7285-pdf-cultural-participation-and-inclusive-societies-a-thematic-report-based-on-the-indicator-framework-on-culture-and-democracy.html [Com acesso em 26 de abril de 2021].
Davaki, K., et al., 2013. Discrimination generated by the intersection of gender and disabilities [em linha]. Bruxelas: Parlamento Europeu. Disponível em: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=IPOL-FEMM_ET%282013%29493006 [Com acesso em 26 de abril de 2021].
Fineman, M.A., 2008. The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition. Yale Journal of Law & Feminism, 20(1).
Fineman, M.A., 2013. Equality, Autonomy, and the Vulnerable Subject in Law and Politics. Abingdon: Routledge.
Fineman, M.A., 2017. Vulnerability and Inevitable Inequality. Oslo Law Review [em linha], vol. 4, pp. 133–149. Emory Legal Studies Research Paper. Disponível em: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3087441 [Com acesso em 26 de abril de 2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.2387-3299-2017-03-02
Gomes, J.C., Neto, L., e Vítor, P.T., eds., 2020. Comentário à Convenção sobre Proteção das Pessoas com Deficiência, com prefácio do Secretário-General das Nações Unidas, Eng. António Guterres. Lisboa: INCM.
Gonçalves, D.C., 2008. Pessoa e direitos de personalidade, fundamentação ontológica da tutela. Coimbra: Almedina.
Leão, A., Gracia Ibáñez, J., e Neto, L, eds., 2019. Atas do Seminário Nós e os Outros: Alteridade, Políticas Públicas e Direito [em linha]. Faculdade de Direito da Universidade do Porto/Centro de Investigação Jurídico Económica. Disponível em: https://cije.up.pt//client/files/0000000001/atas-seminario-nos-e-os-outros-2019-fdup_1573.pdf [Com acesso em 26 de abril de 2021].
Meijer, C.J.W., Pijl, S.J., e Hegarty, S., eds., 1995. New Perspectives in special education: A six-country study of integration. Londres/Nova Iorque: Routledge.
Miranda, J., 2000. Manual de Direito Constitucional (tomo IV). 3.ª ed. Coimbra: Coimbra Editora.
Miranda, J., e Medeiros, R., 2005. Constituição Portuguesa Anotada (Tomo I). Coimbra: Coimbra Editora.
Neto, L., e Pedro, R.T., 2020. Rapport portugais Questionnaire Vulnerabilité et integrité physique. Em: Association Henri Capitant, Vulnerabilité, 2018. Journées Québécoises (tome LXVIII). Bruxelas: Bruylant/LB2V, pp. 485–510.
Nussbaum, M. 2011. Creating capabilities: the human development approach. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674061200
Nussbaum, M. e Levmore, S. 2017. Aging Thoughtfully. Oxford University Press
Organização Mundial de Saúde, 1980. International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps: A Manual of Classification Relating to the Consequences of Disease. International classification of impairments, disabilities, and handicaps: A manual of classification relating to the consequences of disease, published in accordance with resolution WHA29.35 of the Twenty-ninth World Health Assembly, May 1976. Geneva: OMS.
Otero, P., 2007. Instituições políticas e constitucionais (vol. 1). Coimbra: Almedina
Pautassi, L.C., 2007. El cuidado como cuestión social desde un enfoque de derechos (ST/CEPAL(05)/M953/no.87) [em linha]. Santiago: Nações Unidas, CEPAL, Unidade Mulher e Desenvolvimento. Disponível em: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/618658?ln=es [Com acesso em 26 de abril de 2021].
Pereira, C.M.S., 1971. Instituciones de derecho civil (vol. I). Rio de Janeiro. Forense.
Peroni, L., e Timmer, A., 2013. Vulnerable groups: The promise of an emerging concept in European Human Rights Convention law. International Journal of Constitutional Law [em linha], 11(4), pp. 1056–1085. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mot042 [Com acesso em 26 de abril de 2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mot042
Pinto, P.M., 1999. O Direito ao Livre Desenvolvimento da Personalidade. Boletim da Faculdade de Direito de Coimbra, Portugal-Brasil ano 2000. Coimbra: Coimbra Editora, pp. 149–246.
Rey Martínez, F., 2008. La discriminación múltiple, una realidad antigua, un concepto nuevo. Revista española de derecho constitucional [em linha], 28(84), pp. 251–283. Disponível em: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=2775864 [Com acesso em 26 de abril de 2021].
Sen, A., 2013. A ideia de justiça. Coimbra: Almedina.
Silva, V.P., 1988. Estruturas da sociedade: Liberdade e solidariedade. Lisboa: Rei dos Livros, separata da obra Gaudium et Spes.
Soder, M., 1980. School integration of the mentally retarded: Analysis of concepts, research and research needs, in research and development concerning integration of handicapped pupils into the ordinary school system. Estocolmo: National Swedish Board of Education.
Sousa, R.C., 1995. O direito geral de personalidade. Coimbra: Coimbra Editora.
Timmer, A., 2015. Judging Stereotypes: What the European Court of Human Rights Can Borrow from American and Canadian Equal Protection Law. The American Journal of Comparative Law [em linha], 63(1), pp. 239–284. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.5131/AJCL.2015.0007 [Com acesso em 26 de abril de 2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5131/AJCL.2015.0007
UNESCO, 1977. Table ronde international: Images du handicappé proposés au grand public. Paris: UNESCO.
Vasconcelos, P.P., 2006. Direitos da Personalidade, Relatório sobre o programa e o método no ensino de uma disciplina de mestrado em Direito Civil. Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Lisboa.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Luísa Neto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence, further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.
