Image Based Sexual Abuse proclivity and victim blaming: The role of dark personality traits and moral disengagement

Afroditi Pina; Alisha Bell; Kimberley Griffin; Eduardo Vasquez

doi:10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1213

Authors

Afroditi Pina University of Kent
Alisha Bell Centre for Research and Education in Forensic Psychology (CORE-FP), School of Psychology, University of Kent.
Kimberley Griffin University of Kent
Eduardo A. Vasquez Centre for Research and Education in Forensic Psychology (CORE-FP), School of Psychology, University of Kent.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1213

Keywords:

Image Based Sexual Abuse, IBSA, perpetrators, moral disengagement, dark tetrad

Abstract

Image Based Sexual Abuse (IBSA) denotes the creation, distribution, and/or threat of distribution of intimate images of another person online without their consent. The present study aims to extend emerging research on perpetration of IBSA with the development and preliminary validation for the moral disengagement in IBSA scale, while also examining the role of the dark triad, sadism, and sexism in a person’s likelihood to perpetrate IBSA. One hundred and twenty English speaking participants (76 women, 44 men; mean age=33 years) were recruited via social media. Machiavellianism and psychopathy were found to predict IBSA proclivity, whilst rivalry narcissism predicted greater feelings of excitement and amusement towards IBSA. Moral disengagement predicted IBSA proclivity and blaming the victim. It was also positively related to greater feelings of amusement and excitement towards IBSA. This suggests a distinct personality profile of IBSA perpetrators, and that moral disengagement mechanisms play a role in facilitating and reinforcing this behaviour.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Views 2610
Downloads:
PDF 1915
XML 1276

Author Biographies

Afroditi Pina, University of Kent

Dr Afroditi Pina is a Senior Lecturer (Associate Professor) in Forensic Psychology and a member of the Centre of Research and Education in Forensic Psychology (CORE-FP) at the University of Kent. Her primary research interests include sexual violence against women and men, including rape, sexual assault and sexual harassment. She has been a data collection manager in research evaluating the mandatory use of the Polygraph as a means for managing offenders in the community for the Ministry of Justice, as well as examining the use and exposure to pornography of young people and children for the Office of the Children’s Commissioner. Her recent research focuses on online social media use and antisocial behaviours, including cyber-harassment, image based sexual abuse and cybercrime.

ORCID: 0000-0001-8850-5625

Kimberley Griffin, University of Kent

Kimberley Griffin holds an MSc in Forensic Psychology from the University of Kent and currently works as an Advanced KERS Worker (Kent Enablement Recovery Service) at Kent County Council

References

Alleyne, E., et al., 2015. Adult-perpetrated animal abuse: development of a proclivity scale. Psychology, Crime & Law [online], 21(6), 570–588. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2014.999064 [Access 12 July 2021].

Bandura, A., 1986. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

Bandura, A., 1990. Selective activation and disengagement of moral control. Journal of Social Issues [online], 46(1), 27–46. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1990.tb00270.x [Access 5 July 2021].

Bandura, A., 1999. Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review [online], 3(3), 193–209. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_3 [Access 5 July 2021].

Bandura, A., et al., 1996. Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 364–374.

Bates, S., 2017. RP and mental health: A qualitative analysis of the mental health effects of RP on female survivors. Feminist Criminology [online], 12(1), 22–42. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085116654565 [Access 5 July 2021].

Bloom, S., 2015. No vengeance for “RP” victims: Unraveling why this latest female-centric, intimate-partner offense is still legal, and why we should criminalize it. Fordham Urban Law Journal [online], 42(1), 233–289. Available from: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ulj/vol42/iss1/2 [Access 5 July 2021].

Boardley, I.D., and Kavussanu, M., 2007. Development and validation of the moral disengagement in sport scale. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 29(5), 608–628.

Bothamley, S., and Tully, R.J., 2017. Understanding revenge pornography: public perceptions of revenge pornography and victim blaming. Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, 10(1), 1–10.

Brewer, G., et al., 2015. Dark Triad traits, infidelity and romantic revenge. Personality and Individual Differences, 83, 122–127.

Buckels, E., and Paulhus, D.L., 2014. Comprehensive assessment of sadistic tendencies (CAST) (Unpublished measure). Vancouver: University of British Columbia.

Caprara, G.V., et al., 2009. Assessing civic moral disengagement: Dimensionality and construct validity. Personality and Individual Differences [online], 47(5), 504–509. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.04.027 [Access 5 July 2021].

Carroll, J.A., 2009. Impact of moral judgment and moral disengagement on rape-supportive attitudes in college males [online]. Doctoral dissertation. Philosophy. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama. Available from: https://ir.ua.edu/handle/123456789/623 [Access 5 July 2021].

Citron, D.K., and Franks, M.A., 2014. Criminalizing revenge porn. Wake Forest Law Review [online], 49, 345–391. Available from: https://repository.law.miami.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1059&context=fac_articles [Access 5 July 2021].

Clancy, E.M., Klettke, B., and Halford, D.J., 2019. The dark side of sexting. Factors predicting the dissemination of sexts. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 266–272.

Gannon, T.A., and O’Connor, A., 2011. The development of the Interest in Child Molestation Scale. Sexual Abuse, 23(4), 474–493.

Glick, P., and Whitehead, J., 2010. Hostility toward men and the perceived stability of male dominance. Social Psychology, 41(3), 177–185.

Goodboy, A.K., and Martin, M.M., 2015. The personality profile of a cyberbully: Examining the Dark Triad. Computers in Human Behavior [online], 49, 1–4. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.052 [Access 5 July 2021].

Hadwin, J., 2017. Victim Blaming and Third-person Effect: A Comparative Analysis of Attitudes for RP and Sexual Assault [online]. Master’s thesis. Science. Stillwater: University of Oklahoma. Available from: https://shareok.org/bitstream/handle/11244/54533/Hadwin_okstate_0664M_15165.pdf?sequence=1 [Access 5 July 2021].

Henry, N., and Powell, A., 2015a. Beyond the “sext”: Technology-facilitated sexual violence and harassment against adult women. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology [online], 48(1), 104–118. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0004865814524218 [Access 5 July 2021].

Henry, N., and Powell, A., 2015b. Embodied harms: Gender, shame and technology-facilitated violence. Violence Against Women [online], 21(6), 758–779. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801215576581 [Access 5 July 2021].

Henry, N., and Powell, A., 2016. Sexual violence in the digital age: The scope and limits of criminal law. Social and Legal Studies [online], 25(4), 397–418. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663915624273 [Access 5 July 2021].

Henry, N., Flynn, A., and Powell, A., 2019. Image-Based Sexual Abuse: Victims and Perpetrators. Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice [online], no. 572. Available from: https://www.aic.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-05/imagebased_sexual_abuse_victims_and_perpetrators.pdf [Access 5 July 2021].

Henry, N., Powell, A., and Flynn, A., 2018. Not Just “Revenge Pornography”: Australians’ Experiences of Image-Based Abuse. A Summary Report. Melbourne: RMIT University.

Jones, D.N., and Paulhus, D.L., 2011. Differentiating the Dark Triad within the interpersonal circumplex. In: L.M. Horowitz and S. Strack, eds., Handbook of interpersonal psychology: Theory, research, assessment, and therapeutic interventions. New York: Wiley & Sons, 249–269.

Jones, D.N., and Paulhus, D.L., 2014. Introducing the Short Dark Triad (SD3): A brief measure of dark personality traits. Assessment, 21(1), 28–41.

Lumsden, K., and Morgan, H., 2017. Media framing of trolling and online abuse: silencing strategies, symbolic violence, and victim blaming. Feminist Media Studies, 17(6), 926–940.

Martinez-Pecino, R., and Durán, M., 2019. I love you but I cyberbully you: The role of hostile sexism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence [online], 34(4). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516645817 [Access 5 July 2021].

McGlynn, C., and Rackley, E., 2017. Image-based sexual abuse. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 37(3), 534–561.

McGlynn, C., Rackley, E., and Johnson, K., 2019. Shattering Lives and Myths: A Report on Image Based Sexual Abuse [online]. Australian Research Council. Available from: https://s3-eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/victcomm2-prod-storage-119w3o4kq2z48/uploads/2019/07/ShatteringLivesandMythsFINALJuly2019.pdf [Access 5 July 2021].

Page, T.E., and Pina, A., 2015. Moral disengagement as a self-regulatory process in sexual harassment perpetration at work: A preliminary conceptualization. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 21, 73–84.

Page, T.E., and Pina, A., 2018. Moral disengagement and self-reported harassment proclivity in men: the mediating effects of moral judgment and emotions. Journal of Sexual Aggression [online], 24(2), 1–24. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2018.1440089 [Access 5 July 2021].

Page, T.E., Pina, A., and Giner-Sorolla, R., 2015. “It was only harmless banter!” The development and preliminary validation of the moral disengagement in sexual harassment scale. Aggressive Behavior, 42(3), 254–273.

Pina, A., and Johnson, A. (in preparation). The role of personality traits and RP myth acceptance on the proclivity to engage in RP. Manuscript prepared for publication.

Pina, A., Holland, J., and James, M., 2017. The malevolent side of RP proclivity: dark personality traits and sexist ideology. International Journal of Technoethics (IJT), 8(1), 30–43.

Pornari, C.D., and Wood, J., 2010. Peer and cyber aggression in secondary school students: The role of moral disengagement, hostile attribution bias, and outcome expectancies. Aggressive Behavior: Official Journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression, 36(2), 81–94.

Powell, A., 2010. Configuring consent: Emerging technologies, unauthorized sexual images and sexual assault. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 43(1), 76–90.

Powell, A., 2015. Seeking rape justice: Formal and informal responses to sexual violence through technosocial counter-publics. Theoretical Criminology, 19(4), 571–588.

Powell, A., and Henry, N., 2018. Policing technology-facilitated sexual violence against adult victims: Police and service sector perspectives. Policing and Society, 28(3), 291–307.

Powell, A., and Henry, N., 2019. Technology-facilitated sexual violence victimization: Results from an online survey of Australian adults. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(17).

Powell, A., et al., 2019. Image-based sexual abuse: The extent, nature, and predictors of perpetration in a community sample of Australian adults. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 393–402.

Powell, A., et al., 2020. Image-based sexual abuse: An international study of victims and perpetrators: A summary report [online]. Melbourne: RMIT University. Available from: https://research.monash.edu/en/publications/image-based-sexual-abuse-an-international-study-of-victims-and-pe [Access 5 July 2021].

Rentschler, C.A., 2014. Rape culture and the feminist politics of social media. Girlhood Studies [online], 7, 65–82. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3167/ghs.2014.070106 [Access 5 July 2021].

Robson, C., and Witenberg, R.T., 2013. The influence of moral disengagement, morally based self-esteem, age, and gender on traditional bullying and cyberbullying. Journal of School Violence, 12(2), 211–231.

Rollero, C., Glick, P., and Tartaglia, S., 2014. Psychometric properties of short versions of the ambivalent sexism inventory and ambivalence toward men inventory. TPM: Testing, psychometrics, methodology in applied psychology [online], 21(2), 149–159. Available from: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/301960642.pdf [Access 5 July 2021].

Smoker, M., and March, E., 2017. Predicting perpetration of intimate partner cyberstalking: Gender and the Dark Tetrad. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 390–396.

Stroud, S.R., 2014. The dark side of the online self: A pragmatist critique of the growing plague of RP. Journal of Mass Media Ethics [online], 29(3), 168–183. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/08900523.2014.917976 [Access 5 July 2021].

Suarez, E., and Gadalla, T.M., 2010. Stop blaming the victim: A meta-analysis on rape myths. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25(11), 2010–2035.

Tang, W.Y., and Fox, J., 2016. Men's harassment behavior in online video games: Personality traits and game factors. Aggressive Behavior, 42(6), 513–521.

Tungate, A., 2014. Bare necessities: The argument for a “RP” exception in Section 230 immunity. Information & Communications Technology Law [online], 23(2), 172–188. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2014.916936 [Access 5 July 2021].

Walker, K., and Sleath, E., 2017. A systematic review of the current knowledge regarding revenge pornography and non-consensual sharing of sexually explicit media. Aggression and Violent Behaviour, 36, 9–24.

Woodlock, D., 2017. The abuse of technology in domestic violence and stalking. Violence Against Women, 23 (5), 584–602.

Zaleski, K.L., et al., 2016. Exploring rape culture in social media forums. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 922–927.