Democracy, institution, market: the conflicting winds of mediation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1079Keywords:
empowerment, Mediation, institutionalization, post-modernity, neoliberalism, democracy, marketAbstract
The considerable development of mediations over the past few decades in Western countries is correlated with the insufficiencies and anachronism of institutional and social regulations knocked over by postmodernity. The metamorphoses generated by their success are not without struggle between jurists weakened by the crisis of legal rationality, defending their monopoly, and the new professionals of mediation coming from social sciences. Thus, two conceptions of mediation confront one another, an idealistic vision of empowerment and emancipation of individuals, and a pragmatic or marketably vision that tends to juridicize alternatives dispute resolution.
Downloads
Metrics
Downloads:
PDF 349
References
Allain, S., 2005. La médiation environnementale comme système de régulation politique. Application au gouvernement de l’eau. Dans : J. Faget, dir., Médiation et action publique : la dynamique du fluide. Pessac : Presses Universitaires de Bordeaux, pp. 135 150.
Bauman, Z., 2000. Liquid Modernity, Cambridge : Polity Press.
Bonny, Y., 2004. Sociologie du temps présent : Modernité avancée ou postmodernité ? Paris : Armand Colin.
Callon, M., Lascoumes, P., et Barthe, Y., 2001. Agir dans un monde incertain : Essai sur la démocratie technique. Paris : Seuil.
De Singly, F., 2005. L’individualisme est un humanisme. Paris : L’Aube.
Dezalay, Y., 1992. Marchands de droit : La restructuration de l’ordre juridique international par les multinationales du droit. Paris : Fayard.
Donzelot, J., 1977. La police des familles. Paris : Minuit.
Faget, J., 1997. La médiation : essai de politique pénale. Toulouse : Erès.
Faget, J., 2008. L’impensé de la médiation. Contre culture ou soft power ? Empan, 2008/4(72), pp. 74-80.
Faget, J., 2009a. I “raggionevoli compromessi” della mediazione penale. Studi sulla questione criminale, 4(1), pp. 59-68.
Faget, J., 2009b. Les accommodements raisonnables de la médiation pénale, Revue de science criminelle et de droit pénal comparé, n°4, octobre-décembre.
Faget, J., 2011. The metamorphosis of peacemaking. Dans: J. Faget, ed., Mediation in Political Conflicts: Soft Power or Counter Culture ? Oxford: Hart, pp. 1-28.
Faget, J., 2012, As vidas divididas da mediaçao. Meritum [en ligne], 7(2-julho/dizembro), pp. 229-247. Disponible sur: http://www.fumec.br/revistas/meritum/article/view/1602/1003 [Consulté le 18 janvier 2019].
Faget, J., 2015. Médiations, les ateliers silencieux de la démocratie. 2ème ed. Toulouse: Erès.
Faget, J., ed., 2005. Médiation et action publique : La dynamique du fluide. Pessac : Presses Universitaires de Bordeaux.
Fisher, R., et Ury, W., 1982. Comment réussir une négociation? Trad.: L. Brahem. Paris: Seuil.
Folger, J.P., Bush, R.A.B., and Della Noce, D.J., eds., 2010. Transformative Mediation: A Source Book, Resources for Conflict Intervention Practitioners and Programs. Dayton, OH: Institute for the study of conflict transformation.
Fraser, N., 2005. Qu’est-ce que la justice sociale ? Reconnaissance et redistribution. Trad.: E. Ferrarese. Paris : La Découverte.
Gaddi, D., 2012. Les effets indésirables du processus d’assimilation de la médiation par le droit. Informations sociales, n°170, pp. 28-34.
Gauchet, M., 1985. Le désenchantement du monde : une histoire politique de la religion. Paris : Gallimard.
Habermas, J., 1987. Théorie de l’agir communicationnel. Paris : Bayard.
Honneth, A., 2000. La lutte pour la reconnaissance. Trad. : P. Rusch. Paris : Cerf.
Lefranc, S., 2006. Le mouvement pour la justice restauratrice. “An idea whose time has come”. Droit et société [en ligne], 63/64(2), pp. 393-409. Disponible sur : https://www.cairn.info/revue-droit-et-societe1-2006-2-page-393.htm [Consulté le 18 janvier 2019].
Nye, J.S., 1990. Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power. New York: Basic books.
Ost, F., 1991. Jupiter, Hercule ou Hermès, trois modèles du juge. Dans : P. Bouretz, dir., La force du droit. Paris : Esprit, pp. 241-272.
Schnapper, D., 2002. La démocratie providentielle : essai sur l’égalité contemporaine. Paris : Gallimard.
Supiot, A., 2000. La contractualisation de la société. Dans : Y. Michaud, dir., Qu’est-ce que l’humain ? Paris : Odile Jacob.
Taylor, C., 1994. Multiculturalisme : Différence et démocratie. Paris : Flammarion.
Unger, R.M., 1983. The Critical Legal Studies Movement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Jacques Faget
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence, further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.
