From legal consciousness to systems theory

Ha Nguyen

doi:10.35295/sz.iisl.2572

Authors

Ha Ngoc Nguyen Monash University https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1647-9514

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35295/sz.iisl.2572

Keywords:

Legal consciousness, organisational systems theory, global legal sociology, theoretical comparison

Abstract

Socio-legal scholars have greatly favoured the theory of legal consciousness. Some have advocated for more studies of law in Asian societies to adopt legal consciousness theory. Others argued that such application would be deemed inappropriate and bring adverse effects to socio-legal scholarship. This paper argues that the theoretical design of legal consciousness has three crucial shortcomings, and the revised systems theory can overcome these shortcomings with greater potential to advance the socio-legal scholarship. One, systems theory can overcome the rule of law problem by focusing on discourse rather than law. Two, the ubiquitous law problem can be overcome by the conception of law as communication offered by systems theory. Three, the individual focus problem can be redressed by the intersubjective focus required by systems theory’s theoretical design. It is time to reconsider the revised version of systems theory for the advancement of socio-legal studies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Global Statistics

16 Views	7 Downloads
23 Total

References

Atuahene, B., 2011. Paying for the past: Addressing past property violations in South Africa. Law & Society review, 955(January), 955–989. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00462.x

Baranov, P. P., et al., 2021. Legal consciousness and legal culture in the era of total digitalization: Theoretical methodological and legal-technical problems. Revista Gênero e Interdisciplinaridade [online], 2(01). Available at: https://periodicojs.com.br/index.php/gei/article/view/145 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51249/gei.v2i01.145

Besio, C., and Tacke, V., 2024. Old and new organizational forms in a complex society: A systems-theoretical perspective. Critical Sociology [online], 50(7–8), 1361–1377. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/08969205231189472 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/08969205231189472

Black, J., 2002. Regulatory conversations. Journal of Law and Society [online], 29(1), 163–196. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6478.00215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6478.00215

Boittin, M. L., 2013. New perspectives from the oldest profession : Abuse and the legal consciousness of sex workers in China. Law & Society Review [online], 47(2), 245–278. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12016

Capra, F., and Mattei, U., 2015. The ecology of law: Toward a legal system in tune with nature and community. Oakland: Berrett-Koehler.

Chamberlain, N., 1968. Enterprise and environment: The firm in time and place. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Chen, P., and Gallagher, M., 2018. Mobilization without movement: How the Chinese state ‘fixed’ labor insurgency. ILR Review [online], 71(5), 1029–1052. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0019793918759066. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0019793918759066

Chua, L. J., 2014. Charting socio-legal scholarship on southeast Asia: Key themes and future directions. Asian Journal of Comparative Law [online], 9(1), 5–27. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/asjcl-2014-0067. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2194607800000910

Chua, L. J., 2022. Constitutional interpretation and legal consciousness: Out of the courts and onto the ground. International Journal of Constitutional Law [online], 20(5), 1937–1957. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moac110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moac110

Chua, L. J., and Crouch, M., 2014. Socio-legal scholarship on southeast Asia: Themes and directions. Asian Journal of Comparative Law [online], 9(1), 1–4. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/asjcl-2014-0083. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/asjcl-2014-0083

Chua, L. J., and Engel, D. M., 2018. Legal consciousness in Asia - Editors’ note to special issue. Asian Journal of Law and Society [online], 5(1), 1–4. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2017.26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2017.26

Chua, L. J., and Engel, D. M., 2019. Legal consciousness reconsidered. Annual Review of Law and Social Science [online], 15, 335–353. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042717. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042717

Chua, L. J., Engel, D. M., and Liu, S., 2023. The Asian law and society reader. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108864824

Cotterrell, R., 1998. Why must legal ideas be interpreted sociologically? Journal of Law and Society, 25(2), 171–192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6478.00086

Creutzfeldt, N., 2021. Towards a digital legal consciousness ? European Journal of Law and Technology, 12(3).

DiMaggio, P., 1997. Culture and cognition. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 263–287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.23.1.263

Engel, D. M., and Munger, F., 2003. Rights of inclusion: Law and identity in the life stories of americans with disabilities. University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226208343.001.0001

Fforde, A., 1986. The unimplementability of policy and the notion of law in Vietnamese communist thought. Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science [online], 14(1), 60–70. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1163/080382486X00074. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/080382486X00074

Fletcher, G. P., 1985. Paradoxes in legal thought. Columbia Law Review, 85(6), 1263–1292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1122394

Galanter, M., 2006. Why the ‘haves’ come out ahead: Speculations on the limits of legal change. In: D. Kennedy and W. W. Fisher, eds., The canon of American legal thought. Princeton University Press, 484–544.

Gallagher, M. E., 2006. Mobilizing the law in China: ‘Informed disenchantment’ and the development of legal consciousness. Law and Society Review [online], 40(4), 783–816. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2006.00281.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2006.00281.x

Gallagher, M. E., and Wang, Y., 2011. Users and non-users: Legal experience and its effect on legal consciousness. In: M. Woo and M. Gallagher, eds., Chinese justice: Civil dispute resolution in contemporary China [online]. Cambridge University Press, 204–233. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511977008.008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511977008.009

García-Villegas, M., 2006. Comparative sociology of law: Legal fields, legal scholarships, and social sciences in Europe and the United States. Law and Social Inquiry [online], 31(2), 343–382. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2006.00014.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2006.00014.x

Gillespie, J. S., 2002a. The political-legal culture of anti-corruption reforms in Vietnam. In: T. Lindsey and H. Dick, eds., Corruption in Asia: Rethinking the governance paradigm. Sydney: Federation Press.

Gillespie, J. S., 2002b. Transplanted company law: An ideological and cultural analysis of market-entry in Vietnam. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 51(3), 641–672. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/iclq/51.3.641

Gillespie, J. S., 2006. Transplanting commercial law reform: Developing a “rule of law” in Vietnam. Aldershot: Ashgate.

Gillespie, J. S., 2007. Towards a discursive analysis of legal transfers into developing East Asia. International Law and Politics, 40(657), 657–722.

Gillespie, J. S., 2009. Testing the limits to the ‘rule of law’: Commercial regulation in Vietnam. In: R. Tomasic, ed., Commercial law in East Asia [online]. London: Taylor & Francis Group, 95–122. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315095585. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315095585-5

Gillespie, J. S., 2011. Exploring the limits of the judicialization of urban land disputes in Vietnam. Law & Society Review, 45(2), 241–275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00434.x

Gillespie, J. S., 2017. Transforming land-taking disputes in socialist Asia: Engaging an authoritarian state. Law and Policy [online], 39(3), 280–303. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12078. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12078

Gillespie, J. S., and Nguyen, Q. H., 2019. Between authoritarian governance and urban citizenship: Tree-felling protests in Hanoi. Urban Studies [online], 56(5), 977–991. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018784865. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018784865

Ginsburg, T., and Moustafa, T., eds., 2008. Rule by law: The politics of courts in authoritarian regime. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511814822

Goddard, S. E., and Nexon, D. H., 2005. Paradigm lost? Reassessing theory of international politics. European Journal of International Relations [online], 11(1), 9–61. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066105050136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066105050136

Halliday, S., 2019. After hegemony: The varieties of legal consciousness research. Social & Legal Studies [online], 28(6), 859–878. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663919869739. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663919869739

Hertogh, M., 2018. Nobody’s law: Legal consciousness and legal alienation in everyday life. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-60397-5

Hiller, P., 2010. Understanding corruption: How systems theory can help. In: G. Graaf, P. Maravic and P. Wagenaar, eds., The good cause: Theoretical perspectives on corruption. Opladen: B. Budrich, 64–82.

Hull, K. E., 2003. The cultural power of law and the cultural enactment of legality: The case of same-sex marriage. Law & Social Inquiry [online], 28(3), 629–657. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2003.tb00210.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2003.tb00210.x

Khorakiwala, R., 2018. Legal consciousness as viewed through the judicial iconography of the Madras High Court. Asian Journal of Law and Society [online], 5(1), 111–133. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2017.33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2017.33

King, M., 2013. The radical sociology of Niklas Luhmann. Oxford: Hart.

Liu, Q., 2018. Legal consciousness of the leftover woman: Law and qing in Chinese family relations. Asian Journal of Law and Society [online], 5(1), 7–27. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2017.28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2017.28

Liu, S., 2015. Law’s social forms: A powerless approach to the sociology of law. Law and Social Inquiry [online], 40(1), 1–28. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/lsi.12105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lsi.12105

Liu, S., 2025. Against digital superstition: On the pseudoscientific development of the sociology of law in China. China Law and Society Review [online], 10(1), 51–73. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1163/25427466-20250002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/25427466-20250002

Luhmann, N., 1977. Differentiation of society. The Canadian Journal of Sociology, 2(1), 29–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3340510

Luhmann, N., 1982. The world society as a social system. International Journal of General Systems [online], 8(3), 131–138. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/03081078208547442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03081078208547442

Luhmann, N., 1983. Insistence on systems theory: Perspectives from Germany-An essay. Social Forces, 61(4), 987–998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/61.4.987

Luhmann, N., 1986. The autopoiesis of social systems. In: F. Geyger and J. van der Zouwen, eds., Sociocybernetic paradoxes. London: Sage, 172–192.

Luhmann, N., 1995. Social systems. Stanford University Press.

Luhmann, N., 2020, Organization, membership and the formalization of behavioural expectations. Systems Research & Behavioral Science [online], 37(3), 425–449. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2689. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2689

Merry, S. E., 1990. Getting justice and getting even: Legal consciousness among working-class Americans. University of Chicago Press.

Meyer, J. W., and Rowan, B., 1977. Organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. The American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/226550

Minow, M., 1990. Making all the difference: Inclusion, exclusion, and American law. New York: Cornell University Press.

Nassehi, A., 2005. Organizations as decision machines: Niklas Luhmann’s theory of organized social systems. The Sociological Review [online], 53(1_suppl), 178–191. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2005.00549.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2005.00549.x

Nelken, D., 2001. Beyond the metaphor of legal transplants? Consequences of autopoietic theory for the study of cross-cultural legal adaptation. In: J. Priban and D. Nelken, eds., Law’s new boundaries: The consequences of legal autopoiesis. Aldershot: Ashgate, 265–302.

Nguyen, T. P., 2018. Labour law and (in)justice in workers’ letters in Vietnam. Asian Journal of Law and Society [online], 5(1), 29–47. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2017.29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2017.29

Nicholson, P., 2001. Judicial independence and the rule of law: The Vietnam court experience. Asian Law Journal, 3(57), 37–58.

Nobles, R., and Schiff, D., 2012. Using systems theory to study legal pluralism: What could be gained? Law and Society Review [online], 46(2), 265–296. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2012.00489.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2012.00489.x

Palladino, N., 2021. The role of epistemic communities in the ‘constitutionalization’ of internet governance: The example of the European Commission High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence. Telecommunications Policy [online], 45(6), 102149. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102149

Peerenboom, R., 2002. Rule of law, democracy, and human rights. In: R. Peerenboom, China's long march toward rule of law. Cambridge University Press, 513-557 Available at https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511493737.012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511493737.012

Polletta, F., 2000. The structural context of novel rights claims: Southern civil rights organizing. Law & Society Review [online], 34(2), 367–406. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/3115087 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3115087

Pound, R., 1910. Law in books and law in action. American Law Review, 12(February), 12–36.

Poundstone, W., 2013. The recursive universe: Cosmic complexity and the limits of scientific knowledge. North Chelmsford: Courier Corporation.

Powell, W. W., and DiMaggio, P. J., eds., 2012. The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. University of Chicago Press.

Reichman, N. J., and Sterling, J. S., 2004. Sticky floors, broken steps, and concrete ceilings in legal careers. Texas Journal of Women and the Law, 14(27), 27–76.

Rogowski, R., 2023. The Anthem companion to Niklas Luhmann. London/New York/Melbourne/Delhi: Anthem Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.766968

Sarat, A., 1985. Legal effectiveness and social studies of law: On the unfortunate persistence of a research tradition. The Legal Studies Forum, 9(1), 23–31.

Schmidt, V. A., 2017. Theorizing ideas and discourse in political science: Intersubjectivity, neo-institutionalisms, and the power of ideas. Critical Review [online], 29(2), 248–263. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2017.1366665. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2017.1366665

Siems, M., 2018. Comparative law. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316856505

Silbey, S. S., 2005. After legal consciousness. Annual Review of Law and Social Science [online], 1(1), 323–368. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.1.041604.115938. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.1.041604.115938

Silbey, S. S., and Bittner, E., 1982. The availability of law. Law & Policy [online], 4(4), 399–434. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-9930.1982.TB00284.X. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9930.1982.tb00284.x

Somanawat, K., 2018. Constructing the identity of the Thai judge: Virtue, status, and power. Asian Journal of Law and Society [online], 5(1), 91–110. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2017.32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2017.32

Stockmann, D., and Gallagher, M. E., 2011. Remote control: How the media sustain authoritarian rule in China. Comparative Political Studies [online]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414010394773. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414010394773

Tamanaha, B. Z., 1997. Realistic socio-legal theory: Pragmatism and a social theory of law. Oxford University Press.

Teece, D. J., 2018. Dynamic capabilities as (workable) management systems theory. Journal of Management and Organization [online], 24(3), 359–368. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2017.75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2017.75

Teubner, G., 1983. Substantive and reflexive elements in modern law. Law & Society Review, 17(2), 239–286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3053348

Teubner, G., 1989. How the law thinks: Toward a constructivist epistemology of law. Law and Society Review, 23(89), 1–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3053760

Teubner, G., 1998. Legal irritants : Good faith in British law or how unifying law ends up in new divergences. The Modern Law Review [online], 61(1), 11–32. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.00125 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.00125

Teubner, G., 2016. Legal pluralism as a form of structural coupling. In: G. Harste (with A. Febbrajo, ed.), Law and intersystemic communication: Understanding ‘structural coupling’ [online]. Oxfordshire: Routledge, 355–372. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315591483. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315591483-23

Thayer, C. A., 2014. The apparatus of authoritarian rule in Vietnam. Politics in contemporary Vietnam. In: J. D. London, ed., Politics in contemporary Vietnam [online]. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137347534_7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137347534_7

Tungnirun, A., 2018. Practising on the moon: Globalization and legal consciousness of foreign corporate lawyers in Myanmar. Asian Journal of Law and Society, 5(1), 49–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2017.30

Valcke, C., 2018. Comparing law: Comparative law as reconstruction of collective commitments. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108555852

Verschraegen, G., 2002. Human rights and modern society: A sociological analysis from the perspective of systems theory. Journal of Law and Society, 29(2), 258–281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6478.00218

Wilkins, D. B., and Gulati, G. M., 1996. Why are there so few black lawyers in corporate law firms? An institutional analysis. California Law Review [online], 84(3), 493. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/3480962. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3480962