Introduction – How Magic are Rights of Nature?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/sz.iisl.2511Downloads
Global Statistics ℹ️
|
50
Views
|
51
Downloads
|
|
101
Total
|
|
References
Acosta, A., 2014. El Buen Vivir, más Allá del Desarrollo. In: G.C. Delgado Ramos, ed., Buena Vida, Buen Vivir: imaginarios alternativos para el bien común de la humanidad. Ciudad de México: Centro de Investigaciones Interdisciplinarias en Ciencias y Humanidades/Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 21-60.
Allen, J., 2008. A Theory of Adjudication: Law as Magic. Suffolk University Law Review, 41(4), 773-831. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1680/clh.2008.2008.9.831
Alvarez-Nakagawa, A., 2019. Law as Magic. Some Thoughts on Ghosts, Non-Humans, and Shamans. German Law Journal, 18(5), 1247-1276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S207183220002232X
Alvarez-Nakagawa, A., 2024. The Magico-Juridical Hypothesis. Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, 13(2), 172-188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rwae033
Benda-Beckmann, F. von, 1989. Scape-Goat and Magic Charm: Law in Development Theory and Practice. Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 21(28), 129–148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.1989.10756410
Bonilla Maldonado, D., 2023. Global Legal Pluralism and the Rights of Nature. Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Private Law Research Paper Series, 23(15), 1-42.
Bonilla Maldonado, D., Michaels, R., and Zalamea Fajardo, P., 2022. Los derechos de la naturaleza: diálogos entre el derecho y las artes. Naturaleza y Sociedad. Desafíos Medioambientales, 4, 1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53010/nys4.00
Boyd, D.R., 2017. The Rights of Nature: A Legal Revolution That Could Save the World. Toronto: ECW Press.
Cohen, F.S., 1935. Transcendental Nonsense and the Functional Approach. Columbia Law Review, 35(6), 809-849. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1116300
Colon Rios, J., and Lostal, M., 2025. «The Rights of Nature: Three Models. Sortuz: Oñati Journal of Emergent Socio-Legal Studies [online], 15(2-this issue). Available at: https://doi.org/10.35295/sz.iisl.2309 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35295/sz.iisl.2309
Cordovez, M., Romo-Leroux Chacón, R., and Villegas Pérez, M., 2021. Un acercamiento al estado plurinacional y el estado constitucional de derechos: dicotomías entre justicia indígena y ordinaria. USFQ Law Review, 8(1), 119-143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18272/ulr.v8i1.2180
de Sutter, L., 2017. On the Magic of Law. Law Text Culture, 21(1), 123-142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14453/ltc.734
Dietrich, M.C., et al., 2024. Stories of Systemic Failure? Landscaping the Rights of Nature in Europe. Journal of Legal Anthropology, 8(1), 46-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3167/jla.2024.080103
Fitz-Henry, E., 2023. The ‘rights of nature’ in an age of white supremacy?. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 41(6), 1166-1182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23996544231164508
Frank, J., 1930. Law and the Modern Mind. New York: Coward-McCann, Inc.
García Ruales, J., Eslava, L., and Morales Naranjo, V., 2025. Legal “heartfelt thinking”: How “Mingas” Help Evolving the Law. Verfassungsblog [online], 7 February. Available at: https://verfassungsblog.de/mingas-rights-of-nature/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.59704/5335c5b776a69349
García Ruales, J., forthcoming 2025. Corazonando from the Amazon. In: S. Chao, C. Winter and D. Schlosberg, eds. Worlds Beyond Bios: The Life of Matter and the Matter of Life. Durham: Duke University Press.
Gilbert, J., et al., 2023. Understanding the Rights of Nature: Working Together Across and Beyond Disciplines. Human Ecology, 51, 363–377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-023-00420-1
Green, L., 1928. The Duty Problem in Negligence Cases. Columbia Law Review, 28, 1014-1045. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1112919
Greenwood, S., 2009. The Anthropology of Magic. Oxford: Berg.
Grijalva, A., 2025. El caso Los Cedros: Interculturalidad, ciencia y ética del cuidado. Sortuz: Oñati Journal of Emergent Socio-Legal Studies [online], 15(2-this issue). Available at: https://doi.org/10.35295/sz.iisl.2323 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35295/sz.iisl.2323
Gutmann, A., and García Ruales, J., 2024. Von Flüssen und Dieselabgasen: Rechte der Natur am LG Erfurt. Verfassungsblog [online], 18 June. Available at: https://verfassungsblog.de/rechte-der-natur-rio-machangara-dieselskandal/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.59704/6dd944881e76b817
Halifax, J., 1979. Shamanic Voices: a survey of visionary narratives. New York: Arkana.
Hanschel, D., and Mehlhorn, A., forthcoming 2026a. Law and Anthropology – An Interdisciplinary Perspective on Rights of Nature, Special Report for the Conference of the International Association of Comparative Law (IACL) in Asunción, Paraguay, October 2022. In: D. Bonilla Maldonado and R. Michaels, eds., Rights of Nature and Global Legal Pluralism. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 20.
Hanschel, D., and Mehlhorn, A., forthcoming 2026b. Rights of Nature – A Critical Dialogue on Law and Environmental Anthropology. In: E. Shoreman-Ouimet, J. Fredlund and H. Kopnina, eds., Routledge International Handbook of Environmental Anthropology: 2nd Routledge Handbook of Environmental Anthropology. Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge.
Hinestroza Cuesta, L., 2025. ¡El Río es el Río! Entre Orishas, formalismos, existencias diversas y varitas mágicas: Una mirada al Río Atrato más allá de su categorización como entidad sujeto de derechos. Sortuz: Oñati Journal of Emergent Socio-Legal Studies [online], 15(2-this issue). Available at: https://doi.org/10.35295/sz.iisl.2374 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35295/sz.iisl.2374
Hubert, H., and Mauss, M., 2006. Esquisse d’une théorie générale de la magie. L’Année sociologique, 7, 1–146. (Originally published in 1902, reprinted in M. Mauss, Sociologie et anthropologie Gurvitch G ed. 11th ed 1-142, Paris).
Kirksey, E., and Chao, S., 2022. Introduction Who Benefits from Multispecies Justice?. In: S. Chao, K. Bolender and E. Kirksey, eds., The Promise of Multispecies Justice. Durham: Duke University Press, 1–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781478023524-002
Knauss, S., and Lindau, A.K., 2025. Rights of Nature as an Innovation Space for Education for Sustainable Development and Transformative Learning? The Hybrid Values and Governance Mode of Taranaki Maunga (Mount Taranaki) in New Zealand. Sortuz: Oñati Journal of Emergent Socio-Legal Studies [online], 15(2-this issue). Available at: https://doi.org/10.35295/sz.iisl.2288
Lemaitre, J., 2007. Legal Fetishism at Home and Abroad. Unbound, 3, 6-18.
Lemaitre, J., 2008. Legal Fetishism: Law, Violence, and Social Movements in Columbia. Revista Juridica Universidad de Puerto Rico, 77(2), 331-344.
Marshall, V., 2019. Removing the Veil from the ‘Rights of Nature’: The Dichotomy between First Nations Customary Rights and Environmental Legal Personhood. Australian Feminist Law Journal, 45(2), 233-248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13200968.2019.1802154
Martínez Moscoso, A., 2025. Los derechos de la naturaleza en Macondo: Lecciones aprendidas del Bosque Protector Los Cedros. Sortuz: Oñati Journal of Emergent Socio-Legal Studies [online], 15(2-this issue). Available at: https://doi.org/10.35295/sz.iisl.2300
Mehlhorn, A., 2024. Zwischen Recht und Magie: die Natur als Person. Zeitschrift für Menschenrechte, 18(1), 132-149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46499/2362.3132
Murcia, D., 2025. Derecho comparado de los derechos de la naturaleza. Sortuz: Oñati Journal of Emergent Socio-Legal Studies [online], 15(2-this issue). Available at: https://doi.org/10.35295/sz.iisl.2371 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35295/sz.iisl.2371
Murray, T., and Martínez-Moscoso, A., 2025. The Search for Standards: A Jurisprudential Analysis of the Ecuadorian Rights of Nature. Baku State University Law Review, 18(1), 1-51.
O’Donnell, E., et al., 2020. Stop Burying the Lede: The Essential Role of Indigenous Law(s) in Creating Rights of Nature. Transnational Environmental Law, 9(3), 403–427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102520000242
Orford, A., 2006. Human Rights after Faith – an Introduction to the ‘Cultures of Human Rights’ Symposium. Melbourne Journal of International Law, 7(1), 1-10
Petel, B., 2024. The Illusion of Harmony: Power, Politics, and Distributive Implications of Rights of Nature. Transnational Environmental Law, 11(3), 437–460.
Quizhpe Gualán, F.C., 2025. Materiales para una filosofía indígena: ecoespiritualidad. Sortuz: Oñati Journal of Emergent Socio-Legal Studies [online], 15(2-this issue). Available at: https://doi.org/10.35295/sz.iisl.2285
Ramos, A.R., 1994. The Hyperreal Indian. Critique of Anthropology, 14(2), 153-171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X9401400203
Rawson, A., and Mansfield, B., 2018. Producing juridical knowledge: “Rights of Nature” or the naturalization of rights? Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 1(1-2), 99-119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2514848618763807
Redford, K.H., 1991. The Ecologically Noble Savage. Cultural Survival Quarterly, 15(1), 46.
Rodríguez Garavito, C., and De Bona, M., 2024. Are rights of nature working? The impact of the Los Cedros ruling in Ecuador. Verfassungsblog [online], 8 August. Available at: https://verfassungsblog.de/rights-of-nature-implementation/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.59704/7bd6f8c268de163a
Tambiah, S.J., 1990. Magic, Science, Religion, and the Scope of Rationality. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Tănăsescu, M., 2020. Rights of Nature, Legal Personality, and Indigenous Philosophies. Transnational Environmental Law, 9(3), 429-453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102520000217
Vargas Roncancio, I., 2021. Conjuring Sentient Beings and Relations in the Law: Rights of Nature and a Comparative Praxis of Legal Cosmologies. In: K. Anker et al., eds., From Environmental to Ecological Law. London/New York: Routledge, 119-134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003001256-12
Viaene, L., 2024. La moda de los derechos de la naturaleza: consideraciones críticas. Revista de Estudios Politicos, 204, 299-326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18042/cepc/rep.204.10
Whitaker, J.A., Lewy, M., and Janik, T., eds., 2025. Sorcery in Amazonia: A Comparative Exploration of Magical Assault. Berlin: Biblioteca Antropológica Americana. Ibero-Amerikanisches Institut.
Williams, P.J., 1987. Alchemical notes: Reconstructing ideals from deconstructed rights. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 22(2), 401-434.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dirk Hanschel, Annette Mehlhorn, Jenny García Ruales

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Sortuz: Oñati Journal of Emergent Socio-Legal Studies provides immediate open access to all its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
All articles are published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and publishing rights are held by the authors of the articles. We do, however, kindly ask for later publications to indicate Sortuz as the original source.









