Alternative Dispute Resolution forms
A Transformation of the Judicial Ritual to Criminal Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-0942Palavras-chave:
Mediation, conflict resolution, judicial ritual, French Caribbean islands, ethnographyResumo
Penal mediation is a judicial measure to resolve disputes. This system establishes alternative dispute resolution procedures, the creation of decentralized places of justice and the participation in the exercise of justice of non-lawyers. The ethnographic material used in this contribution deals with the house of justice and law of Fort-de-France’s jurisdiction (Martinique), its interveners and their practices of mediation during the period 2000-2006. The specificities of this conflict resolution procedure are questioned by mobilizing the anthropological literature on ritual as a device for reflexivity that is capable of reconfiguring social order and interpersonal relations. We also focus on the ritual and ceremonial dimensions of the interactions in mediation and we question the references to the symbolic and ritual panoply of the penal law and criminal trial.
La mediación penal es una medida judicial para resolver disputas, y es parte del sistema político de proximidad judicial que se comenzó a implantar en Francia en los años noventa. Dicho sistema establece procedimientos alternativos de resolución de conflictos, la creación de lugares de administración de justicia descentralizados fuera de los juzgados y la participación en el desempeño de la justicia de personas no expertas en leyes. El material etnográfico utilizado en este artículo retrata el juzgado de la jurisdicción de Fort-de-France (Martinica), sus partes interesadas y sus prácticas de mediación durante el período entre 2000 y 2006. Se cuestionan las especificidades de este procedimiento de resolución de conflictos mediante la movilización de literatura antropológica sobre el ritual como herramienta para reflexividad y capaz de reconfigurar el orden social y las relaciones interpersonales. Asimismo, nos centramos en las dimensiones ritualísticas y ceremoniales de las interacciones que se dan en la mediación, y cuestionamos las referencias a la panoplia simbólica y ritual del derecho penal y el juicio penal.
Downloads
Metrics
Downloads:
PDF (English) 1452
Referências
Abel, R.L., ed., 1982. The Politics of Informal Justice. Comparative Studies. New York: Academic Press.
Association française pour l’histoire de la justice, 1992. La justice et ses temples. Regards sur l'architecture judiciaire en France. Paris: Errance / Poitiers: Brissaud.
Berthome, F., 2009. Démêler, raccommoder: analyse interactionnelle de quelques dispositifs de conciliation. Dans: C. Severi and J. Bonhomme, eds. Paroles en acte. Paris: L’Herne, 139–161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/cas.005.0139
Bougerol, C., 1997. Une ethnographie des conflits aux Antilles. Jalousie, commérages, sorcellerie. Paris: PUF.
Branco, P., 2018. Considering a different model for the Family and Children Courthouse Building. Reflections on the Portuguese experience. Oñati Socio-legal Series [en ligne], 8 (3). Disponible sur: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3104678 [Consulté le 25 février 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-0940
Cuisenier, J., 1986. Lamentations et rituels de deuil en Roumanie. Dans: P. Centlivres et J. Hainard, eds. Les rites de passage aujourd'hui. Lausanne: L'Age d'Homme, 20-52.
Cuisenier, J., 2006. Penser le rituel. Paris: PUF. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/puf.cuise.2006.01
de Coppet, D., 1992. Understanding Rituals. Londres / New York: Routledge.
Dupret, B. 1999. Au nom de quel droit? Paris: L.G.D.J.
Felstiner, W., Abel R.L. et Sarat, A., 1991. L’émergence et la transformation des litiges: réaliser, reprocher, réclamer. Politix, 4 (16), 41-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/polix.1991.1477
Fraenkel, B. et Pontille, D., 2003. L’écrit juridique à l’épreuve de la signature électronique, approche pragmatique. Langage et société, 2 (104), 83-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/ls.104.0083
Fraenkel, B., 2008. La signature: du signe à l’acte. Sociétés et représentations, 1 (25), 13-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/sr.025.0013
Galtung, J., 1965. Institutionalized Conflict Resolution: A Theoretical Paradigm. Journal of Peace Research, 2 (4), 348-397. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002234336500200404
Garapon, A., 1985. L'âne portant des reliques. Essai sur le rituel judiciaire. Paris: Le Centurion.
Garapon, A., 1997. Bien juger. Essai sur le rituel judiciaire. Paris: Odile Jacob.
Gluckman, M., 1965. Politics, Law and Ritual in Tribal Society. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction.
Goffman, E. 1987. Calmer le jobard. Dans: Le parler frais d’Erving Goffman. Paris: Minuit, 277-300.
Greenhouse, C.J., 1985. Mediation: a comparative approach. Man, 20 (1), 90-114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2802223
Guillaume-Hoffnung, M., 2000. La médiation. Paris: PUF.
Gulliver, P.H., 1979. Disputes and Negotiations: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. New York: Academic Press.
Houseman, M., 2003. Vers un modèle anthropologique de la pratique psychothérapeutique. Thérapie familiale, 24 (3), 289-312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/tf.033.0289
Houseman, M., 2007. Relationality. Dans: J. Kreinath, J. Snoek and M. Stausberg, eds. Theorizing Rituals: Issues, Topics, Approaches, Concepts. Leiden: Brill, 413–428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047410775_020
Houseman, M., 2008. Relations rituelles et recontextualisation. Dans: H. Wazaki, ed. Multiplicity of Meaning and the Interrelationship of the Subject and the Object in Ritual and Body Texts. Aichi: Nagoya University, 1109-1114.
Houseman, M., 2012. Le Rouge est le noir. Essais sur le rituel. Toulouse: Presses Universitaires du Mirail.
Houseman, M., et Severi, C., 1994/2009. Naven ou le donner à voir. Essai d'interprétation de l'action rituelle. Paris: CNRS-MSH. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/books.editionsmsh.9552
Israël, L., 1999. Les mises en scène d’une justice quotidienne. Droit et Société, 42/43, 93-419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/dreso.1999.1483
Jacob, R., 1995. De la maison au palais de justice. Justices. Revue Générale de Droit processuel, 2 (Juillet/Décembre). Paris: Dalloz, 19-23.
Lantin Mallet, M., 2015. Porter plainte en justice. Cahiers de littérature orale, 77/78, 143-170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/clo.2361
Lejeune, A., 2007. Justice institutionnelle, justice démocratique. Clercs et profanes. La maison de justice et du droit comme révélateur de tensions entre modèles politiques de justice. Droit et Société, 66, 361-375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/drs.066.0361
Lucien, A., 2008. La justice mise en scène. Approche communicationnelle de l’institution judiciaire. Paris: L’Harmattan.
Moore, F.S. and Myerhoff, B., eds. 1977. Secular Ritual. Assen / Amsterdam: Van Gorcum and Co.
Moore, F.S., 1978. Law as Process. Londres: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Moore, F.S., 1976. Epilogue. Dans: Moore, F.S. and Myerhoff, B., eds., Symbols and Politics in Communal Ideology. Ithaca, NY: Cornell, 2010-239.
Nader, L. and Todd, H.F., 1978. The Disputing Process: Law in ten Societies. New York: Columbia Press University. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/nade93322
Noreau, P., 1998. La superposition des conflits: limites de l’institution judiciaire comme espace de résolution. Droit et Société, 40, 585-612. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/dreso.1998.1454
Parkin, D., 1991. Sacred void. Spatial images of work and ritual among the Giriama of Kenya. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511521133
Parkin, D., 1992. Ritual as spatial direction and bodily division. Dans: D. de Coppet, ed. Understanding Rituals. Londres: Routledge, 11-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203413210_chapter_1
Segalen, M., 1998. Rites et rituels contemporains. Paris: Armand Colin.
Soulier, G., 1991. Le théâtre et le procès. Droit et Société, 17/18, 9-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/dreso.1991.1100
Turner, V., 1969. The Ritual Process. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
van Gennep, A., 1909. Les rites de passage: étude systématique des rites. Paris: Librairie Nourry.
Verdier, R., ed., 1991. Le serment. Vol. 2: Théories et Devenir. Paris: CNRS. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/cnrs.verdi.1992.02.0003
Zientara-Logeay, S., 2013. La théâtralité du procès pénal: entre archaïsme et modernité. Criminocorpus [en ligne], Théâtre et Justice : autour de la mise en scène des Criminels de Ferdinand Bruckner par Richard Brunel, Le rituel du procès d’hier à aujourd’hui ou la théâtralité de la justice en question. Disponible sur: http://journals.openedition.org/criminocorpus/2376 [Consulté le 21 avril 2015]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/criminocorpus.2376
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2018 Mickaële Lantin Mallet
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence, further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.
