The International Persistence and Resilience of Solitary Confinement

Keramet Reiter

doi:10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-0930

Autores

Keramet Reiter University of California, Irvine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-0930

Palavras-chave:

Solitary confinement, human rights, incarceration, legal reform

Resumo

Drawing on a combination of legal analysis and fieldwork conducted with prisoners and administrators in both Denmark and the United States, this article interrogates how solitary confinement has been defined and constrained – or not – in the context of U.S., European, and international law over time. Solitary confinement has existed consistently in prisons across the world, since the first prisons opened. Solitary has been surprisingly predictable over its long history: resilient to criticism, subject to ongoing debates about just how detrimental it is, and repeatedly producing instances of extreme and de-humanizing brutality. This consistency and predictability suggests substantial limitations inherent in the newest barrage of critiques leveled by courts, scholars, international human rights bodies, and professional associations against the practice of solitary confinement. Indeed, this reveals that many critiques of solitary confinement have failed because they have promoted reformist rather than non-reformist (or abolition) agendas – a distinction articulated by Mathiesen (1974/2014).

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Metrics

Views 429
Downloads:
PDF (English) 634

Biografia do Autor

Keramet Reiter, University of California, Irvine

Keramet Reiter studies prisons, prisoners’ rights, and the impact of prison and punishment policy on individuals, communities, and legal systems. She uses a variety of methods in her work — including interviewing, archival and legal analysis, and quantitative data analysis — in order to understand both the history and impact of criminal justice policies, from medical experimentation on prisoners and record clearing programs to the use of long-term solitary confinement in the United States.

Referências

Adams, J., 2001. “The wildest show in the south”: tourism and incarceration at Angola. Drama Review, 45 (2), 94–108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/105420402760157709

Ahmad v United Kingdom, 2012. Applications nos. 24027/07, 11949/08, 36742/08, 66911/09 and 67354/09 (Strasbourg: 9 Sept.).

American Medical Association, 2014. AMA Adopts New Policies to Improve Health of Nation at Interim Meeting [online]. Press release, 10 November. Available from: http://www.marketwired.com/press-release/ama-adopts-new-policies-to-improve-health-of-nation-at-interim-meeting-1966544.htm [Accessed 31 May 2017].

American Public Health Association, 2013. Solitary Confinement as a Public Health Issue [online]. Policy statement, 5 November. Available from: https://www.apha.org/policies-and-advocacy/public-health-policy-statements/policy-database/2014/07/14/13/30/solitary-confinement-as-a-public-health-issue [Accessed 31 May 2017].

Amnesty International, 2012. USA: The Edge of Endurance – Prison Conditions in California’s Security Housing Units. AMR 51/060/2012 [online]. London. Available from: http://www.amnestyusa.org/sites/default/files/edgeofendurancecaliforniareport.pdf [Accessed 31 May 2017].

Amnesty International, 2014. Entombed: Isolation in the U.S. Federal Prison System. AMR 51/040/2014 [online]. London. Available from: http://www.amnestyusa.org/sites/default/files/amr510402014en.pdf [Accessed 31 May 2017].

Appelbaum, K.L., 2016. American Psychiatry Should Join the Call to Abolish Solitary Confinement. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 43 (4), 406–415.

Ashker v Brown. 2015. Case No.: 4:09-cv-05796-CW (N.D. Cal.).

Attorney General v Damache, 2013. 51 EXT, 2013 670 JR & 2014 112 JR (High Court of Ireland, 21 May 2015).

Ayan, A., et al., 2007. The Istanbul statement on the use and effects of solitary confinement. Adopted at the International Psychological Trauma Symposium, Istanbul [online], 9 December. Available from: http://solitaryconfinement.org/uploads/Istanbul_expert_statement_on_sc.pdf [Accessed 31 May 2017].

Baumgartel, S., et al., 2015. Time-In-Cell: The ASCA- Liman 2014 National Survey of Administrative Segregation in Prison [online]. New Haven, CT: Arthur Liman Public Interest Program, Yale Law School, with the Association of State Correctional Administrators, 31 August. Available from: https://law.yale.edu/system/files/documents/pdf/asca-liman_administrative_segregation_report_sep_2_2015.pdf [Accessed 31 May 2017]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2655627

Beaumont, G. (de), and Tocqueville, A. (de), 1833. On the Penitentiary System in the United States and Its Application to France [online]. Trans.: F. Lieber. Philadelphia, PA: Casey, Lea & Blanchard. Available from: http://www.archive.org/details/onpenitentiarysy00beauuoft [Accessed 31 May 2017].

Beck, A.J., 2015. Use of Restrictive Housing in U.S. Prisons and Jails, 2011–12 [online]. Special report. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, Government Printing Office. October. Available from: http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/urhuspj1112.pdf [Accessed 31 May 2017].

Blatt-Herold, S., 2016. Settlement in 11-Year Lawsuit Promises Relief from Abuse for Mentally Ill in South Carolina’s Prisons. Solitary Watch [online], 10 June. Available from: http://solitarywatch.com/2016/06/10/settlement-in-11-year-lawsuit-promises-relief-from-abuse-for-mentally-ill-in-south-carolinas-prisons/ [Accessed 31 May 2017].

Blume, J.H., Johnson, S.L., and Seeds, C., 2008. An Empirical Look at Atkins v. Virginia and Its Application in Capital Cases. Tennessee Law Review, 76, 625–639.

Brown, M., 2009. The Culture of Punishment: Prison, Society, and Spectacle. New York University Press.

Brown, R.E., and Milner, P.M., 2003. The Legacy of Donald O. Hebb: More than the Hebb Synapse. Nature Reviews: Neuroscience, 4 (December), 1013–1019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1257

Carlton, B., 2007. Imprisoning Resistance: Life and Death in an Australian Supermax. Sydney: Institute of Criminology Press.

Carlton, B., 2016. Penal reform, anti-carceral feminist campaigns and the politics of change in women’s prisons, Victoria, Australia. Punishment and Society [online], 24 November. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1462474516680205 [Accessed 9 January 2018].

Champion, M.K., 2007. Commentary: Seclusion and Restraint in Corrections—A Time for Change. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry Law, 35 (4), 426–430.

Davis v Ayala, 135 S. Ct. 2187 (Kennedy, J., concurring) (2015), reh’g denied, 136 S. Ct. 14 (2015).

Dey, E., 2009. Prison tours as a research tool in the golden gulag. Journal of Prisoners on Prisons, 18 (1&2), 119–125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18192/jpp.v18i1-2.5323

Dickens, C., 1842. Philadelphia and Its Solitary Prison. American Notes for General Circulation. The Literature Network [online]. Available from: http://www.online-literature.com/dickens/americannotes/8 [Accessed 31 May 2017].

Feeley, M.M., and Rubin, E.L., 1998. Judicial Policy Making and the Modern State: How the Courts Reformed America’s Prisons. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Fellner, J., 2015. Callous and Cruel [online]. Report. New York: Human Rights Watch. Available from: https://www.hrw.org/report/2015/05/12/callous-and-cruel/use-force-against-inmates-mental-disabilities-us-jails-and [Accessed 31 May 2017].

Friedman, L.M., 1993. Crime and punishment in American history. New York: BasicBooks.

Gibbons, J.J., and Katzenbach, N.D., 2006. Confronting confinement: a report of the Commission on Safety and Abuse in America's Prisons. New York: Vera Institute of Justice.

Gonnerman, J., 2014. Before the Law. The New Yorker [online], 6 October. Available from: http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2014/10/06/before-the-law [Accessed 31 May 2017].

Gonnerman, J., 2016. Kalief Browder Learned How to Commit Suicide on Rikers. The New Yorker [online], 2 June. Available from: http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/kalief-browder-learned-how-to-commit-suicide-on-rikers [Accessed 31 May 2017].

Gottschalk, M., 2014. Caught: The Prison State and the Lockdown of American Politics. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400852147

Grassian, S., 2010. ‘Fatal Flaws’ in the Colorado Solitary Confinement Study. Solitary Watch [online], 15 November. Available from: http://solitarywatch.com/ 2010/11/15/fatal-flaws-in-the-colorado-solitary-confinement-study/ [Accessed 31 May 2017].

Guenther, L., 2013. Solitary Confinement: Social Death and Its Afterlives. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816679584.001.0001

Haney, C., and Lynch, M., 1997. Regulating prisons of the future: A psychological analysis of supermax and solitary confinement. New York University Review of Law and Social Change, 23 (4), 477–570.

Hawkley, L.C., 2015. Expert Report for Ashker v Brown (2015), Case No.: 4:09-cv-05796-CW (N.D. Cal.). United States District Court, Northern District of California, Oakland division, 12 March. Available from: https://ccrjustice.org/sites/default/files/attach/2015/07/Hawkley%20Expert%20Report.pdf [Accessed 31 May 2017].

Henley, J., 2016. Anders Breivik’s human rights violated in prison, Norway court rules. The Guardian [online], 20 April. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/apr/20/anders-behring-breiviks-human-rights-violated-in-prison-norway-court-rules [Accessed 31 May 2017].

In Re Medley, 134 U.S. 160 (1890).

Johnston, N., 2000. Forms of Constraint. A History of Prison Architecture. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.

Keltner, D., 2015. Expert Report for Ashker v. Brown (2015), Case No.: 4:09-cv-05796-CW (N.D. Cal.). United States District Court, Northern District of California, Oakland division, 11 March. Available from: https://ccrjustice.org/sites/default/files/attach/2015/07/Keltner%20Expert%20Report.pdf [Accessed 31 May 2017].

Lieberman, M.D., 2015. Expert Report for Ashker v. Brown (2015), Case No.: 4:09-cv-05796-CW (N.D. Cal.). United States District Court, Northern District of California, Oakland division, 11 March. Available from: https://ccrjustice.org/sites/default/files/attach/2015/07/Lieberman%20Expert%20Report.pdf [Accessed 31 May 2017].

Madrid v Gomez, Case No. 90-3094, 899 F. Supp 1146 (N.D. Cal. 1995).

Mathiesen, T., 1974/2014. The Politics of Abolition of Revisited. New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315777900

McCaffrey, S.C., 2013. There’s a Whole World Out There: Justice Kennedy’s Use of International Sources. McGeorge Law Review, 44 (1), 201-10.

Méndez, J.E., 2011. Torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment [online]. Interim report of the Special Rapporteur of the Human Rights Council. United Nations General Assembly, 66th Session, Item 69(b), A/66/268, 5 August. Available from: http://solitaryconfinement.org/uploads/SpecRapTortureAug2011.pdf [Accessed 31 May 2017].

Nowak, M., 2008. Torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment [online]. Interim report of the Special Rapporteur of the Human Rights Council. United Nations General Assembly, 63rd Session, A/63/175, 28 July. Available from: http://www.refworld.org/docid/48db99e82.html [Accessed 31 May 2017].

O’Donnell, I., 2014. Prisoners, Solitude and Time. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199684489.001.0001

O’Hearn, D., 2013. Diaspora of Practice: Northern Irish Imprisonment and the Transnational Rise of Cellular Isolation. Breac: A Digital Journal of Irish Studies [online], 12 April. Available from: https://breac.nd.edu/articles/diaspora-of-practice-northern-irish-imprisonment-and-the-transnational-rise-of-cellular-isolation/ [Accessed 31 May 2017].

O’Keefe, M.L., et al., 2011. One Year Longitudinal Study of the Psychological Effects of Administrative Segregation [online]. Colorado Department of Corrections and University of Colorado. Document No. 232973. Washington, D.C.: National Criminal Justice Research Service, National Institute of Justice. Available from: https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/232973.pdf [Accessed 31 May 2017].

Obama, B., 2016. Why we must re-think solitary confinement. The Washington Post [online], 25 January. Available from: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/barack-obama-why-we-must-rethink-solitary-confinement/2016/01/25/29a361f2-c384-11e5-8965-0607e0e265ce_story.html [Accessed 31 May 2017].

Odier, P., 1982. The rock: A history of the fort/the prison. Eagle Rock, CA: L’Image Odier.

Peoples v Fischer, Index No. 11 CIV 2964 SAS (S.D.N.Y. 2016).

Piché, J., and Walby, K., 2010. Problematizing Carceral Tours. British Journal of Criminology, 50 (3), 570–581. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azq014

Piché, J., and Walby, K., 2012. Carceral Tours and the Need for Reflexivity: A Response to Wilson, Spina and Canaan. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 51 (4), 411–418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2311.2012.00706.x

Pifer, N., 2016. The Scientific and the Social in Implementing Atkins V. Virginia. Law and Social Inquiry, 41 (4), 1036–1060. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lsi.12156

Press, E., 2016. Madness. The New Yorker [online], 2 May. Available from: http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2016/05/02/the-torturing-of-mentally-ill-prisoners [Accessed 31 May 2017].

Rakia, R., 2015. Rikers Is Reforming Solitary Confinement—With More Solitary Confinement? The Nation [online], 10 November. Available from: http://www.thenation.com/article/rikers-is-reforming-solitary-confinement-with-more-solitary-confinement/ [Accessed 31 May 2017].

Reiter, K., 2012. The Most Restrictive Alternative: A Litigation History of Solitary Confinement in U.S. Prisons, 1960–2006. Studies in Law, Politics and Society, 57, 69–123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S1059-4337(2012)0000057006

Reiter, K., 2014. Punitive Contrasts: United States vs. Denmark – A Socio-Legal Comparison of Two Prison Systems. In: L. Sullivan, ed., The Criminal Justice and Law Enforcement Annual: Global Perspectives. Brooklyn, NY: AMS Press, Inc., 139–176.

Reiter, K., 2016. 23/7: Pelican Bay Prison and the Rise of Long-term Solitary Confinement. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Reiter, K., and Blair, T., 2015. Punishing Mental Illness: Trans-institutionalization and Solitary Confinement in the United States. In: K. Reiter and A. Koenig, eds., Extreme Punishment: Comparative Studies in Detention, Incarceration, and Solitary Confinement. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 177–196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137441157_10

Reiter, K., and Koenig, A., eds., 2015. Extreme Punishment: Comparative Studies in Detention, Incarceration and Solitary Confinement. New York: Palgrave MacMillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137441157

Reiter, K., Sexton, L., and Sumner, J., 2017. Negotiating Imperfect Humanity in the Danish Penal System. In: P.S. Smith and T. Ugelvik, eds., Embraced by the welfare state? Scandinavian penal history, culture and prison practice. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 481-508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58529-5_20

Ross, J.I., 2013. The Globalization of Supermax Prisons. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

Rubin, A., 2015. A Neo-Institutional Account of Prison Diffusion. Law & Society Review, 49 (2), 365–399. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12136

Rubin, A., and Reiter, K., 2017. Continuity in the Face of Penal Innovation: Revisiting the History of American Solitary Confinement. Law and Social Inquiry [online], 5 November. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lsi.12330/full [Accessed 10 January 2018].

Rubin, A., forthcoming. The Birth of the Penal Organization: Why Prisons Were Born to Fail. In: J. Simon, H. Aviram and R. Greenspan, eds., The Legal Process and the Promise of Justice: Studies Inspired by the Work of Malcolm Feeley. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Rytter, T., 2015. DIGNITY speaks to the UN Committee Against Torture [online]. News. 13 November. Copenhagen, Denmark: DIGNITY, Danish Institute Against Torture. Available from: https://dignityinstitute.org/news-and-events/news/2015/dignity-presents-report-on-denmark-before-the-un-committee-against-torture/dignity-speeks-to-the-un-committee-against-torture/ [Accessed 31 May 2017].

Samuels, C.E., et al., 2016. Report and Recommendations Concerning the Use of Restrictive Housing [online]. Final report. U.S. Department of Justice, January. Available from: https://www.justice.gov/dag/file/815551/download [Accessed 31 May 2017].

Schept, J., 2015. Progressive Punishment: Job Loss, Jail Growth, and the Neoliberal Logic of Carceral Expansion. New York University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479876532.001.0001

Shames, A., Wilcox, J., and Subramanian, R., 2015. Solitary Confinement: Common Misconceptions and Emerging Safe Alternatives [online]. New York: Vera Institute of Justice, Center on Sentencing and Corrections: The Robert W. Wilson Charitable Trust Series. May. Available from: https://storage.googleapis.com/vera-web-assets/downloads/Publications/solitary-confinement-common-misconceptions-and-emerging-safe-alternatives/legacy_downloads/solitary-confinement-misconceptions-safe-alternatives-report_1.pdf [Accessed 9 January 2018].

Silverstein v Federal Bureau of Prisons, No. 12-1450, D.Ct. No. 1:07-CV-02471-PAB-KMT (10th Cir. May 22, 2014).

Simon, J., 2014. Mass Incarceration on Trial: A Remarkable Court Decision and the Future of Prisons in America. New York: The New Press.

Smith, P.S., 2009. Solitary Confinement – History, Practice, and Human Rights Standards. Prison Service Journal, 181 (special issue), 3–11.

Smith, P.S., 2011. A Critical look at Scandinavian Exceptionalism: Welfare State theories, Penal Populism, and Prison Conditions in Denmark and Scandinavia. In: T. Ugelvik and J. Dullum, eds., Nordic prison practice and policy - exceptional or not?: Exploring penal exceptionalism in the Nordic context. New York: Routledge.

Smith, P.S., 2017. Punishment without sentence? Scandinavian pre-trial practices and the power of the “benevolent” state. In: P.S. Smith and T. Ugelvik, eds., Embraced by the welfare state? Scandinavian penal history, culture and prison practice. New York: Palgrave MacMillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58529-5_6

Spade, D., 2001. Normal Life: Administrative Violence, Critical Trans Politics, and the Limits of Law. Brooklyn, NY: South End Press.

Susman, T.M., 2014. Statement of the American Bar Association before the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee of the American Bar Association before the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Human Rights for the hearing on “Reassessing Solitary Confinement II: The human rights, fiscal, and public safety consequences for the Hearing Record” [online]. Available from: http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/uncategorized/GAO/2014feb25_solitaryconfinements_t.authcheckdam.pdf [Accessed 31 May 2017].

United Nations General Assembly, 2016. United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners (the Nelson Mandela Rules). (A/RES/70/175) [online]. Resolution adopted by the UN General Assembly on 17 December 2015 on the report of the Third Committee (A/70/490). Available from: https://www.penalreform.org/wp-content/uploads/1957/06/ENG.pdf [Accessed 9 January 2018].