Watching justice from afar
Children’s experiences in remote criminal hearings
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.2684Palavras-chave:
Remote hearings, Children's Rights, Digital Justice, Procedural FairnessResumo
Children in criminal justice systems are inherently vulnerable, yet digitalisation of court proceedings is accelerating without adequate consideration of their human rights. This research examines how remote hearings impacts children’s human rights in four European jurisdictions. Drawing upon interviews and surveys with children and justice professionals across Romania, Ireland, Spain, and Ukraine, we find that remote hearings systematically disadvantage children experiencing poverty, neurodivergence, language barriers, and other vulnerabilities. Children report feeling excluded, confused, and exposed during remote proceedings, comparing experiences to “watching a YouTube video” rather than participating in legal processes. The pervasive myth of “digital natives” obscures profound disparities in device ownership, connectivity, digital literacy, and safe access among children—disparities intensified along intersecting lines of race, socioeconomic status, and disability. Considering the broader moves towards digitalisation of justice systems, we contend that digitalisation without comprehensive equality impact assessments entrenches structural discrimination and produces injustice.
Downloads
Metrics
Estatísticas globais ℹ️
|
54
Visualizações
|
28
Downloads
|
|
82
Total
|
|
Referências
Allmann, K., 2022. UK digital poverty evidence review 2022 [online]. Digital Poverty Alliance. Available at: https://kiraallmann.com/2022/06/28/uk-digital-poverty-evidence-review-2022/
Charles, A., et al., 2024. Challenging notions of children’s “participation” in the youth justice system: The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, Article 12. The International Journal of Children’s Rights [online], 32(1), 9-44. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-32010002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-32010002
Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, 2007. 2515 UNTS 3, opened for signature 30 March 2007, entered into force 3 May 2008.
Council of Europe, 2011. Guidelines of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on child-friendly justice, adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 17 November 2010 at the 1098th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies [online]. Available at: https://rm.coe.int/16804b2cf
Directive (EU) 2016/800 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2016 on procedural safeguards for children who are suspects or accused persons in criminal proceedings. OJ [online], L 132, 21.5.2016. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2016/800/oj/eng
EU Agency for Fundamental Rights, 2022. Children as suspects or accused persons in criminal proceedings – procedural safeguards [online]. Available at: https://fra.europa.eu/en/publication/2022/children-criminal-proceedings
Eurostat, 2024. Young people - digital world [online]. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Young_people_-_digital_world#Context
Fekete, G., 2021. Videoconference hearings after the times of pandemic. EU and Comparative Law Issues and Challenges Series (ECLIC) [online], 5, 468-486. Available at: https://doi.org/10.25234/eclic/18316 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25234/eclic/18316
Fleming, M., et al., 2020. Neurodevelopmental multimorbidity and educational outcomes of Scottish schoolchildren: A population-based record linkage cohort study. PLoS Medicine [online], 17(10), e1003290. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003290 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003290
Foussard, C., Vigil, A., and Perez, M., 2023. Impact on child justice in a world of digital courts: Perspectives from the bench. Intersections. East European Journal of Society and Politics [online], 9(2), 29-53. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17356/ieejsp.v9i2.1143 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17356/ieejsp.v9i2.1143
Hansen, B. H., et al., 2018. Neurodevelopmental disorders: prevalence and comorbidity in children referred to mental health services. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry [online], 72(4), 285-291. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/08039488.2018.1444087 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08039488.2018.1444087
Harris, H. M., 2023. The impact of remote hearing policies on racial equity in criminal case outcomes during the pandemic. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences [online], 9(3), 252-279. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2023.9.3.11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2023.9.3.11
Hughes, N., et al., 2020. Ensuring the rights of children with neurodevelopmental disabilities within child justice systems. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health [online], 4(2), 163-166. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(19)30401-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(19)30401-8
Kamber, K., 2022. The right to a fair online hearing. Human Rights Law Review [online], 22(2). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngac006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngac006
Landström, S., and Granhag, P. A., 2010. In‐court versus out‐of‐court testimonies: Children’s experiences and adults’ assessments. Applied Cognitive Psychology [online], 24(7), 941-955. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1606 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1606
Liefaard, T., 2015. Child-friendly justice: Protection and participation of children in the justice system. Temple Law Review, 88, 905.
Lynch, N., and Kilkelly, U., 2021. ‘Zooming in’ on children’s rights during a pandemic: Technology, child justice and COVID-19. The International Journal of Children’s Rights [online], 29(2), 286-304. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-29020010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-29020010
McVilly, K., et al., 2023. Identifying and responding to young people with cognitive disability and neurodiversity in Australian and Aotearoa New Zealand youth justice systems. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law [online], 30(6), 789-811. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2022.2124548 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2022.2124548
Mulcahy, L., and Tsalapatanis, A., 2022. Exclusion in the interests of inclusion: who should stay offline in the emerging world of online justice? Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law [online], 44(4), 455-476. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2022.2136713 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2022.2136713
Nixon, C., et al., 2024. Virtual hearings and their impact on children’s participation in decisions about their care and protection. In: T. Disney and L. Grimshaw, eds., Care and coronavirus [online]. Leeds: Emerald, 191-207. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83797-310-120241015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83797-310-120241015
Nixon, C., et al., 2023. The rapid development of a virtual children’s hearings system in Scotland: A realist-inspired synthesis assessing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the participation and rights of children. Adoption & Fostering [online], 47(3), 347-372. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/03085759231197229 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03085759231197229
Porter, R. B., et al., 2021, Children’s rights in children’s hearings: The impact of COVID-19. The International Journal of Children’s Rights [online], 29(2), 426-446. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-29020012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-29020012
Rap, S., 2016. A children’s rights perspective on the participation of juvenile defendants in the youth court. The International Journal of Children’s Rights [online], 24(1), 93-112. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-02303006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-02303006
Rossner, M., and Tait, D., 2023. Presence and participation in a virtual court. Criminology & Criminal Justice [online], 23(1), 135-157. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/17488958211017372 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17488958211017372
Sacco, R., et al., 2024. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the prevalence of mental disorders among children and adolescents in Europe. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry [online], 33(9), 2877-2894. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-022-02131-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-022-02131-2
Sossin, L. and Thompson, D., 2021. Digitalisation and administrative justice: An access to justice perspective. In: M. Hertogh et al., eds., The Oxford handbook of administrative justice [online]. Oxford Handbooks. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190903084.013.26 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190903084.013.26
Townend, J., and Welsh, L., 2023. Justice system modernisation, digitalisation and data. In: J. Townend and L. Welsh, eds., Observing justice [online]. Bristol University Press, 40-64. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781529228670.003.0003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51952/9781529228694.ch003
UN Committee on the Rights of the Child. General Comment No. 25 (2021) on children’s rights in relation to the digital environment. CRC/C/GC/25, 2 March 2021.
UN General Assembly, 1985. United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice (“The Beijing Rules”), resolution adopted by the General Assembly, A/RES/40/33, 29 November.
United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child, 2019. General comment No. 24 (2019) on children’s rights in the child justice system (CRC/C/GC/24).
UNICEF, 2024. Digital technologies, child rights and well-being: The state of children in the European Union 2024 [online]. Available at: https://www.unicef.org/eu/reports/report-state-children-european-union
Van den Brink, Y., 2022. Equality in the youth court: Meaning, perceptions and implications of the principle of equality in youth justice. Youth Justice [online], 22(3), 245-271. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/14732254211013420 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14732254211013420
Williams, H., et al., 2021. Neurodisability and trauma in children and young people in contact with the law. In: G. T. Lansdell, B. J. Saunders and A. Eriksson, eds., Neurodisability and the criminal justice system [online]. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 91-109. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789907636.00014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789907636.00014
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2026 Dr Oscar O'Mara, Professor Nessa Lynch
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence and it regulates how others can use your work. Further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.
