Courts-as-bureaucracies
Taxonomies and tautologies in the Chilean criminal justice system
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.2554Palavras-chave:
criminal justice system, anthropology of the state, bureaucracies, ChileResumo
Scholarly work in the social sciences has described the “bureaucratization” of criminal justice systems, denouncing the introduction of managerial logics into legal fields. This paper contributes to that work by focusing on the characteristics of criminal justice organizations that make them “bureaucracies”. Drawing on observations in lower criminal courts in Santiago, Chile, I show that these organizations face the same challenges as other bureaucracies: They manage many cases simultaneously, they rely on both formal and informal classifications to address them, and they move each case forward by transferring it either to another organization or into another legal procedure. In doing so, they render cases legible in ways that depend less on the specificities of one case and more on the coordinated labor that leads to the judicial and administrative “death” of the case. This, far from being solely the result of a trend toward the managerialization of the justice system, is tied to the very nature of law.
Downloads
Metrics
Estatísticas globais ℹ️
|
0
Visualizações
|
0
Downloads
|
|
0
Total
|
|
Referências
Araya-Moreno, J., 2021. Pandemic documents: The case of mobility permits during lockdown in Chile. Anthropologica [online], 63(2), 1-21. Available at: https://doi.org/10.18357/anthropologica63220211031 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18357/anthropologica63220211031
Araya-Moreno, J., 2022. How to not have to know: Legal technicalities and flagrant criminal offenses in Santiago, Chile. Law & Society Review [online], 56(3), 329-343. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12624 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12624
Ballestero, A., 2019. A future history of water [online]. Durham: Duke University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781478090946 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781478090946
Ballestero, A., and Winthereik, B. R., 2021. Introduction: Analysis as experimental practice. In: A. Ballestero and B. R. Winthereik, eds., Experimenting with ethnography: A companion to analysis [online]. Durham: Duke University Press, 1-12. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1215/9781478013211-001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9781478013211-001
Bear, L., and Mathur, N., 2015. Introduction: Remaking the public good: a new anthropology of bureaucracy. Cambridge Anthropology [online], 33(1), 18-34. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3167/ca.2015.330103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3167/ca.2015.330103
Bierschenk, T., and Olivier de Sardan, J. P., 2019. How to study bureaucracies ethnographically? Critique of Anthropology [online], 39(2), 243-257. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X19842918. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X19842918
Bolívar, D., Sánchez-Gómez, V., and de Haan, M., 2024. Uncovering justice interests of victims of serious crimes: A cross-sectional study. Victims & Offenders [online], 19(2), 137-159. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2022.2067278 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2022.2067278
Canfield, M. C., 2023. The anthropology of legal form: Ethnographic contributions to the study of transnational law. Law & Social Inquiry [online], 48(1), 31-47. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2022.19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2022.19
Clements, R., 2023. The justice factory: Management practices at the International Criminal Court [online]. Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009153102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009153102
Cowan, D., and Hitchings, E., 2007. “Pretty boring stuff’: District judges and housing possession proceedings. Social & Legal Studies [online], 16(3), 363-382. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663907079764 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663907079764
Das, V., 2004. The signature of the state: The paradox of illegibility. In: V. Das and D. Poole, eds., Anthropology in the margins of the state. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press, 225-252.
Das, V., and Poole, D., 2004. Anthropology in the margins of the state. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.
Edelman, L. B., 2016. Working law: Courts, corporations, and symbolic civil rights [online]. University of Chicago Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226400938.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226400938.001.0001
Feeley, M. M., 1992. The process is the punishment: Handling cases in a lower criminal court. New York: Russell Sage. (Originally published in 1979).
Feldman, I., 2008. Governing Gaza: Bureaucracy, authority, and the work of rule, 1917-1967 [online]. Durham: Duke University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781478091394 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781478091394
Ferguson, J., 2015. Give a man a fish: Reflections on the new politics of distribution [online]. Durham: Duke University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822375524 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822375524
González Guarda, C., 2018. Gestión, gerencialismo y sistema penal. Montevideo: B de F.
Göpfert, M., 2013. Bureaucratic aesthetics: Report writing in the Nigérien gendarmerie. American Ethnologist [online], 40(2), 324-334. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12024
Graeber, D., 2012. Dead zones of the imagination: On violence, bureaucracy, and interpretive labor. The 2006 Malinowski Memorial Lecture. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory [online], 2(2), 105-128. Available at: https://doi.org/10.14318/hau2.2.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14318/hau2.2.007
Gupta, A., 2012. Red tape: Bureaucracy, structural violence, and poverty in India [online]. Durham: Duke University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822394709 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822394709
Handelman, D., 1995. Comment. Current Anthropology, 36(2), 261-287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/204354
Hersant, J., and Miranda-Pérez, F., 2023. Observing courtrooms in contexts of exceptionality. In: L. Flower and S. Klosterkamp, eds., Court ethnography: Exploring contemporary approaches, fieldwork and challenges [online]. Cham: Springer. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37985-7_13 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37985-7_13
Herzfeld, M., 1992. The social production of indifference: Exploring the symbolic roots of Western bureaucracy. Oxford: Berg.
Hetherington, K., 2011. Guerrilla auditors: The politics of transparency in neoliberal Paraguay [online]. Durham: Duke University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822394266 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822394266
Hetherington, K., 2020. The government of beans: Regulating life in the age of monocrops [online]. Durham: Duke University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1215/9781478007487 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9781478007487
Hoag, C., 2011. Assembling partial perspectives: Thoughts on the anthropology of bureaucracy. PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review [online], 34(1), 81-94. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1555-2934.2011.01140.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1555-2934.2011.01140.x
Hoag, C., 2014. Dereliction at the South African Department of Home Affairs: Time for the anthropology of bureaucracy. Critique of Anthropology [online], 34(4), 410-428. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X14543395. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X14543395
Hull, M. S., 2012. Government of paper: The materiality of bureaucracy in urban Pakistan [online]. Oakland: University of California Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520272149.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520272149.001.0001
Johnston, E., and Pivaty, A., 2023. Efficiency and bureaucratisation of criminal justice: Global trends [online]. London: Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003207818 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003207818
Kohler-Hausmann, I., 2018. Misdemeanorland: Criminal courts and social control in an age of broken windows policing [online]. Princeton University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.23943/9781400890354 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23943/9781400890354
La Tercera, 2016. Jorge Abbott: “El sistema penal no puede ser una máquina de moler carne de gente pobre”. La Tercera [online], 25 June. Available at: https://www.latercera.com/diario-impreso/jorge-abbott-el-sistema-penal-no-puede-ser-una-maquina-de-moler-carne-de-gente-pobre/
Langer, M., and Sozzo, M., 2023. Justicia penal y mecanismos de condena sin juicio. Madrid: Marcial Pons.
Mack, K., and Anleu, S. R., 2007. “Getting through the list”: Judgecraft and legitimacy in the lower courts. Social & Legal Studies [online], 16(3), 341-361. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663907079763 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663907079763
Mathur, N., 2015. Paper tiger: Law, bureaucracy and the developmental state in Himalayan India [online]. Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316227367 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316227367
Michaels, R., and Riles, A., 2022. Law as technique. In: M. C. Foblets et al., eds., The Oxford handbook of law and anthropology [online]. Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198840534.013.50 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198840534.013.50
Navaro, Y., 2012. The make-believe space: Affective geography in a postwar polity. Durham: Duke University Press.
Riles, A., 2011. Collateral knowledge: Legal reasoning in the global financial markets. University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226719344.001.0001
Rose, N., and Miller, P., 1992. Political power beyond the State: problematics of government. British Journal of Sociology, 43(2), 173-204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/591464
Scott, J. C., 1998. Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Sharma, A., and Gupta, A., 2006. The anthropology of the state: A reader. Hoboken: Blackwell.
Soubise, L., 2018. Guilty pleas in an inquisitorial setting - An empirical study of France. Journal of Law and Society [online], 45(3), 398-426. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12121 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12121
Travers, M., 2017. Business as usual? Bail decision making and “micro politics” in an Australian magistrates court. Law & Social Inquiry [online], 42(2), 325-346. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/lsi.12264 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lsi.12264
Ulmer, J. T., 2019. Criminal courts as inhabited institutions: Making sense of difference and similarity in sentencing. Crime and Justice [online], 48, 483-522. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1086/701504. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/701504
Valverde, M., 2015. Chronotopes of law [online]. London: Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315881614 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315881614
Van Oorschot, I., 2021. The law multiple: Judgement and knowledge in practice [online]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108859981 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108859981
Velásquez, J., and Riquelme, I., 2024. Prisión preventiva en Chile: Presión de la gestión del tiempo y estandarización. Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal [online], 10(3). Available at: https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v10i3.998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v10i3.998
Weber, M., 1978. Economy and society. Oakland: University of California Press. (Originally published in 1922).
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2026 Javiera Araya-Moreno
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence and it regulates how others can use your work. Further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.
