The role of cultural pluralism in Indigenous peoples’ defense of nature’s rights
A case study of Ecuador
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.2228Palavras-chave:
Cultural Pluralism, Indigenous Peoples, constitution of Ecuador, granting legal personality to the Amazon, rights of natureResumo
Ecuador, by incorporating the Rights of Nature into its constitution, has presented an innovative approach to environmental protection, recognizing nature as a subject with rights. This legal transformation emphasizes the intrinsic value of ecosystems and affirms the right of natural entities to exist, grow, and regenerate. Alongside this, the rights of Indigenous peoples, as guardians of biodiversity, have been strengthened, and their deep connection to ancestral lands is formally recognized. However, the implementation of this legal framework faces challenges, primarily stemming from the conflict between economic priorities and environmental protection. Deforestation in the Amazon, intensified by resource extraction and infrastructure development, poses a threat to global climate balance. Despite international and Indigenous efforts to counter this trend, ineffective law enforcement continues to hinder sustainable conservation. This article, through a dogmatic and analytical approach, concludes that improving this situation requires the development of legal mechanisms, increased participation of Indigenous communities, and a redefinition of economic growth with an emphasis on the long-term health of the planet.
Downloads
Metrics
Global Statistics ℹ️
|
88
Views
|
10
Downloads
|
|
98
Total
|
|
Referências
Acevedo-Ortiz, M.A., et al., 2024. Nature-based solutions for conservation and food sovereignty in Indigenous communities of Oaxaca. Sustainability [online], 16(18), 8151. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16188151
Acosta, A., 2008. La naturaleza como sujeto de derechos. Peripecias, No. 87.
Acosta, J.S., Martínez, E., and Padilla, N., 2022. La hermenéutica del término biodiversidad en la Constitución de Ecuador. Andares: Revista de Derechos Humanos y de la naturaleza [online], 2, 49–60. Available at: https://doi.org/10.32719/29536782.2022.2.5
Añazco Aguilar, N.S.C., 2020. Aproximaciones sobre pluralismo jurídico y la justicia indígena en el Derecho Constitucional ecuatoriano: Análisis a partir de la regla jurisprudencial contenida en la sentencia No. 113-14-SEP-CC, caso “La Cocha 2” [online]. Master’s thesis. Quito: Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar. Available at: https://repositorio.uasb.edu.ec/handle/10644/7439
Barahona Néjer, A., and Añazco Aguilar, A., 2020. La naturaleza como sujeto de derechos y su interpretación constitucional: interculturalidad y cosmovisión de los pueblos originarios. Foro: Revista de Derecho [online], 34, 45–60. Available at: https://doi.org/10.32719/26312484.2020.34.3
Barelli, M., 2012. Free, prior and informed consent in the aftermath of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples: Developments and challenges ahead. The International Journal of Human Rights [online], 16(1), 1–24. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2011.597746
Bonilla Maldonado, D., 2019. El constitucionalismo radical ambiental y la diversidad cultural en América Latina. Los derechos de la naturaleza y el buen vivir en Ecuador y Bolivia. Revista Derecho del Estado [online], 42, 3–23. Available at: https://doi.org/10.18601/01229893.n42.01
Brahmbhatt, S., 2020. Understanding of interculturalism and human solidarity in MG Vassanji’s No New Land. Towards Excellence [online], 12(2), 133. Available at: https://doi.org/10.37867/TE120213
Buschman, V.Q., and Sudlovenick, E., 2022. Indigenous-led conservation in the Arctic supports global conservation practices. Arctic Science [online], 9(3), 714–719. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1139/as-2022-0025
Cabrera Ormaza, M.V., 2019. ABS in Ecuador and Peru: Between the Andean sub-regional regime and the Nagoya Protocol. In: E.C. Kamau, ed., Implementation of the Nagoya Protocol [online]. Bonn: Bundesamt für Naturschutz (BfN), 83, 86. Available at: https://ri.conicet.gov.ar/bitstream/handle/11336/126672/CONICET_Digital_Nro.bb7a30c5-83fa-4f02-8863-1126dca82060_X.pdf?sequence=5
CARE, Ciespal and Casa Ochún, eds., 2016. Etnohistoria de los pueblos y nacionalidades originarias de Ecuador: Guía. Módulos de capacitación, Módulo 2. Etnohistoria de los pueblos y nacionalidades originarias de Ecuador [online]. Quito Available at: https://www.care.org.ec/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Modulo-2.pdf
Clement, C.R., et al., 2021. Naturalness Is in the Eye of the Beholder. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change [online], 4, 800294. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2021.800294
Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador, 2008 [online]. Quito: National Assembly. Available at: https://www.constituteproject.org/constitution/Ecuador_2008
Dawson, N.M. et al., 2021. The role of Indigenous peoples and local communities in effective and equitable conservation. Ecology & Society [online], 26(3), 2–3. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-12625-260319
Dwyer, O., 2024. “Unprecedented” stress in up to half of the Amazon may lead to tipping point by 2050. Carbon Brief [online], 14 February. Available at: https://www.carbonbrief.org/unprecedented-stress-in-up-to-half-of-the-amazon-may-lead-to-tipping-point-by-2050/?utm_source=
Franklin, J.C., 2020. Human rights on the march: Repression, oppression, and protest in Latin America. International Studies Quarterly [online], 64(1), 97–110. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqz083
Gabay, A., 2024. One year after oil referendum, what’s next for Ecuador’s Yasuní National Park? Mongabay [online], 20 August. Available at: https://news.mongabay.com/2024/08/one-year-after-oil-referendum-whats-next-for-ecuadors-yasuni-national-park/
Garibaldi, L.A., et al., 2011. Global growth and stability of agricultural yield decrease with pollinator dependence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences [online], 108(14), 5909–5914. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1012431108
GARN Communications, 2011. Celebran el primer caso exitoso de exigibilidad de los Derechos de la Naturaleza en Ecuador [online]. 24 June. Available at: https://www.garn.org/celebran-el-primer-caso-exitoso-de-exigibilidad-de-los-derechos-de-la-naturaleza-en-ecuador/.
Hazlewood, J., 2018. La corte dicta la sentencia en el primer juicio de “derechos de la naturaleza” del mundo. ICmagazine [online], 16 February. Available at: https://intercontinentalcry.org/es/la-corte-dicta-la-sentencia-en-el-primer-juicio-de-derechos-de-la-naturaleza-del-mundo22/
Houballah, M., Cordonnier, T., and Mathias, J.D., 2020. Which infrastructures for which forest function? Analyzing multifunctionality through the social-ecological system framework. Ecology & Society [online], 25(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11424-250122
Igini, M., 2024. Up to 47% of Amazon Rainforest at Risk of Collapse by Mid-Century Due to “Unprecedented Stress” From Global Warming and Deforestation. Earth.org [online], 15 February. Available at: https://earth.org/up-to-47-of-amazon-rainforest-at-risk-of-collapse-by-mid-century-due-to-unprecedented-stress-from-global-warming-and-deforestation/?utm_source=
Inksater, K., 2010. Transformative juricultural pluralism: Indigenous justice systems in Latin America and international human rights. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law [online], 42(60), 105–142. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2010.10756638
Jaria i Manzano, J., 2013. Si fuera sólo una cuestión de fe. Una crítica sobre el sentido y la utilidad del reconocimiento de derechos a la naturaleza en la Constitución del Ecuador. Revista Chile de Derecho y ciencia política [online], 4(1), 43–86, p. 44, pp. 45–47. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7770/rchdcp-V4N1-art441
Jia, Y., and, Jia, X.L., 2017. A dialogic approach to intercultural conflict management and harmonious relationships: Dialogue, ethics and culture. In: X. Dai and G.M. Chen, eds., Conflict Management and Intercultural Communication [online]. London: Routledge, 29–37. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315266916-3
Kaiser, A.J., 2019. AP Explains: Role of the Amazon in global climate change. AP News [online]. 27 August. Available at: https://apnews.com/article/384fdb5ee7654667b53ddb49efce8023?utm_source=
Kalaba, F.K., 2014. A conceptual framework for understanding forest socio-ecological systems. Biodiversity and Conservation [online], 23(14), 3391–3403. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-014-0792-5
Kanwal, P., 2023. Ecocentric Governance: Recognising the Rights of Nature. Indian Journal of Public Administration [online], 69(2), 440–452. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/00195561221141457
Kim, J.J.H., et al., 2023. Conceptualizing human–nature relationships: Implications of human exceptionalist thinking for sustainability and conservation. Topics in Cognitive Science [online], 15(3), 357–387. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12653
Kotzé, L.J., and Villavicencio Calzadilla, P., 2017. Somewhere between rhetoric and reality: environmental constitutionalism and the rights of nature in Ecuador. Transnational Environmental Law [online], 6(3), 401–433. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102517000061
Lalander, R., 2016. The Ecuadorian resource dilemma: Sumak Kawsay or development? Critical Sociology [online], 42(4–5), 623–642, 1-3. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920514557959
Martínez-Echazábal, L., 1998. Mestizaje and the discourse of national/cultural identity in Latin America, 1845–1959. Latin American Perspectives [online], 25(3), 21–42. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X9802500302
Mohammed, A.J., Inoue, M., and Shivakoti, G., 2017. Moving forward in collaborative forest management: Role of external actors for sustainable Forest socio-ecological systems. Forest Policy and Economics [online], 74, 13–19. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2016.10.010
Montalvo, P.T., 2018. Identificación y dinámica de los pueblos indígenas en aislamiento voluntario (PIAV) en el Yasuní (Ecuador). Boletín de Antropología Universidad de Antioquia [online], 33(55), 271–296. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.boan.v33n55a12
Montambeault, F., and Papillon, M., 2023. Repoliticising indigenous participation: FPIC protocols in Canada and Brazil. The International Journal of Human Rights [online], 27(2), 335–358. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2022.2121707
Narváez Álvarez, M.J., and Escudero Soliz, J.M., 2021. The rights of nature in Ecuadorian courts. Iuris Dictio [online], 27, 15–15. Available at: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=8175909
Nowak, E., Oliveira, J., and Tibaldeo, R.F., 2024. The nomos of the water: Indigenous narrative identity claims to justify granting legal personhood to a river. Bialostockie Studia Prawnicze [online], 29(3), 235. Available at: https://doi.org/10.15290/bsp.2024.29.03.13
Oikonomakis, L., 2024. Protecting the Forest Beings that Protect Us: The Cosmo‐Political Challenge Kawsak Sacha Poses to Ecuador’s Extraction‐Based Development. Bulletin of Latin American Research [online], 43(2), 145–158. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/blar.13535
Organic Code of the Judicial Function. 9 Mar. 2009.
Pacheco, L., et al., 2012. Perspectives on sustainable resource conservation in community nature reserves: A case study from Senegal. Sustainability [online], 4(11), 3158–3179. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su4113158
Papillon, M., Leclair, J., and Leydet, D., 2020. Free, prior and informed consent: Between legal ambiguity and political agency. International Journal on Minority and Group Rights [online], 27(2), 223–232. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1163/15718115-02702015
Parry, I.M., Ritchie, P.D.L., and Cox, P.M., 2022. Evidence of localised Amazon rainforest dieback in CMIP6 models. Earth System Dynamics [online], 13(4), 1667–1675. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-1667-2022
Peng, B., Sheng, X., and Wei, G., 2020. Does environmental protection promote economic development? From the perspective of coupling coordination between environmental protection and economic development. Environmental Science and Pollution Research [online], 27, 39135–39148. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09871-1
Plotkin, M.J., 2020. The Amazon: what everyone needs to know [online]. Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/wentk/9780190668297.001.0001
Quijano Vallejos, P., et al., 2020. Undermining rights: Indigenous lands and mining in the Amazon [online]. Report. World Resources Institute. Available at: https://doi.org/10.46830/wrirpt.19.00085
Rahier, J.M., 2011. From invisibilidad to participation in state corporatism: Afro-Ecuadorians and the constitutional processes of 1998 and 2008. Identities [online], 18(5), 502–527. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.2011.671712
Reuters, 2024., Ecuador Indigenous, environmental groups protest Petroecuador gas flaring [online]. 5 June. Available at: https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/ecuador-indigenous-environmental-groups-protest-petroecuador-gas-flaring-2024-06-05/
Ritchie, H., 2024. Deforestation and Forest Loss., Our World in Data [online]. Available at: https://ourworldindata.org/deforestation
Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung, 2023. Ecuador says no to extractivism [online]. 11 September. Available at: https://www.rosalux.de/en/news/id/51220/ecuador-says-no-to-extractivism
Sarmento-Pantoja, A., 2021. Margins, power and insurgencies in Latin America. Margins [online], 15(24). Available at: https://doi.org/10.18542/rmi.v15i24.10716
Sawyer, S.M., and Gomez, E.T., eds., 2014. The Politics of resource extraction: indigenous peoples, multinational corporations, and the State. UN Research Institute for Social Development.
Scherrer, Y.M., 2009. Environmental conservation NGOs and the concept of sustainable development: a research into the value systems of Greenpeace International, WWF International and IUCN International. Journal of Business Ethics [online], 85, 555–571. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0211-0
Schwartzman, S., and Zimmerman, B., 2005. Conservation alliances with indigenous peoples of the Amazon. Conservation Biology [online], 19(3), 721–727. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00695.x
Sing, L., Ray, D., and Watts, K., 2015. Ecosystem services and forest management [online]. Research note. September. Roslin: Forestry Commission, 10. Available at: https://www.charteredforesters.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/FCRN020.pdf
Slate, N., 2011. Translating race and caste. Journal of Historical Sociology [online], 24(1), 62–79. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6443.2011.01389.x
Spracklen, D.V., and Garcia‐Carreras, L., 2015. The impact of Amazonian deforestation on Amazon basin rainfall. Geophysical Research Letters [online], 42(21), 9546–9552. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL066063
Storini, C., 2021. Los derechos de la naturaleza y un nuevo orden cósmico. Andina [online], 4, pp. 16–22. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10644/8133
Suárez, S., 2013. Defending Nature: Challenges and Obstacles in the Implementation of the Rights of Nature – The Vilcabamba River Case. Energía y Clima [online]. Quito: CEDA /ILDIS, 4–14. Available at: https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/quito/10386.pdf
Tanjung, M.A., 2023. Legal Pluralism and Indigenous Justice Systems: An Anthropological Analysis. Jurnal Ar Ro’is Mandalika (Armada) [online], 3(2), 84–91, 84–86. Available at: https://doi.org/10.59613/armada.v3i2.2838
Tapia, A., et al., 2023. REDD+ en comunidades indígenas: Oportunidades y desafíos en la Nacionalidad Sápara del Ecuador. Green World Journal [online], 6(2). Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.53313/gwj62065.
Telles, E., and Bailey, S., 2013. Understanding Latin American beliefs about racial inequality. American Journal of Sociology [online], 118(6), 1559–1595. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1086/670268
Tomlinson, K., 2019. Indigenous rights and extractive resource projects: Negotiations over the policy and implementation of FPIC. The International Journal of Human Rights [online], 23(5), 880–897. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2017.1314648
Valenta, L., 2003. Disconnect: the 1988 Brazilian constitution, customary international law, and indigenous land rights in Northern Brazil. Texas International Law Journal, 38, 643.
Vergara, A., et al., 2022. Living Amazon Report [online]. Quito: World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF). Available at: https://www.wwf.de/fileadmin/fm-wwf/Publikationen-PDF/Amazonas/Living-Amazon-Report-2022.pdf
Vernaza Arroyo, G., and Cutié Mustelier, D., 2022. Los Derechos de la Naturaleza desde la mirada de los jueces en Ecuador. Ius. Revista del Instituto de Ciencias Jurídicas de Puebla [online], 16(49), 285–311. Available at: https://doi.org/10.35487/rius.v16i49.2022.760
Villén-Pérez, S., et al., 2020. Brazilian Amazon gold: Indigenous land rights under risk. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene [online], 8, 31. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.427
Walsh, C., 2012. The plurinational and intercultural state: decolonization and state re-founding in Ecuador. RUDN Journal of Philosophy [online], 1, 103–115. Available at: https://journals.rudn.ru/philosophy/article/view/11290
Walter, R.K., and Hamilton, R.J., 2014. A cultural landscape approach to community-based conservation in Solomon Islands. Ecology and Society [online], 19(4). Available at: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06646-190441
Ward, T., 2011. The right to free, prior, and informed consent: Indigenous peoples’ participation rights within international law. Northwestern University Journal of International Human Rights [online], 10(2), 54. Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njihr/vol10/iss2/2/
World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF), 2022. Deforestation in the Amazon is accelerating the point of no return [online]. WWF Newsroom. 8 November. Available at: https://wwf.panda.org/wwf_news/?6802466%2FDeforestation-in-the-Amazon-is-accelerating-the-point-of-no-return=&utm_source=
Zaffaroni, E.R., 2011. Pacha Mama and the Human Being. Buenos Aires: Madres de la Plaza de Mayo/Colihue.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2023 Mohammadreza Jodyvash
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence and it regulates how others can use your work. Further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.
