Introduction
Minority families and the law. Interactions of ethnic, religious, and cultural minorities with law and state institutions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1210Palavras-chave:
Encounters with the state, migration law, avoiding the lawResumo
The state is an important presence in the lives of many minority families. This special issue aims to investigate the interactions of minority families with law and state institutions from a socio-legal perspective, with a particular focus on issues relating to children. This introduction focuses on two observations. First of all, minority families tend to get into contact with law and state institutions relatively often. For migrant and transnational families, migration law can have a large and enduring impact on many aspects of their lives. Furthermore, marginalisation of minorities and differences in decision-making by state actors can contribute to an overrepresentation of minority families in state interventions such as the child protection or criminal justice systems. Secondly some minority families tend to avoid state law and institutions. Especially in family matters such as marriage or divorce, minority family members may look for alternative options outside of the state, concluding religious marriages or divorces.
Downloads
Metrics
Downloads:
PDF (English) 341
XML (English) 126
Referências
Abrego, L.J., 2011. Legal consciousness of undocumented Latinos: Fear and stigma as barriers to claims‐making for first‐and 1.5‐generation immigrants. Law & Society Review, 45(2), 337–370.
Akhtar, R.C., 2013. British muslims and transformative processes of the Islamic legal traditions: Negotiating law, culture and religion with specific reference to Islamic family law and faith based alternative dispute resolution. PhD Thesis. University of Warwick.
Alqawasmi, A.Y.O., 2021. Marriage and divorce practices in Islamic centers in Italy. Oñati Socio-Legal Series [online], 11(4-this issue). Available from: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1198 [Access 15 July 2021].
Al-Sharmani, M., 2017. Divorce among Transnational Finnish Somalis: Gender, Religion, and Agency. Religion and Gender [online], 7, 70–87. Available from: https://doi.org/10.18352/rg.10207 [Access 15 July 2021].
Andrikopoulos, A., 2021. Love, money and papers in the affective circuits of cross-border marriages: beyond the “sham”/“genuine” dichotomy. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies [online], 47(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2019.1625129 [Access 15 July 2021].
Bakker, L.G.H., et al., 2010. Sharia in Nederland. Een studie naar islamitische advisering en geschilbeslechting bij moslims in Nederland [online]. Nijmegen: Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen, Instituut voor Culturele Antropologie en Ontwikkelingsstudies/Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen, Instituut voor Rechtssociologie/WODC. Available from: https://repository.ubn.ru.nl/bitstream/handle/2066/90171/90171.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y [Access 15 July 2021].
Bano, S., 2007. Islamic Family Arbitration, Justice and Human Rights in Britain. Law, Social Justice & Global Development [online]. Available from: https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/elj/lgd/2007_1/bano [Access 15 July 2021].
Bano, S., 2012. Muslim Women, Divorce and Shari’ah Councils in Brittain. In: R. Mehdi, W. Menski and J.S. Nielsen, eds., Interpreting divorce law in Islam. Copenhagen: DJØF.
Blom, N., Huijts, T., and Kraaykamp, G., 2016. Ethnic health inequalities in Europe. The moderating and amplifying role of healthcare system characteristics. Social Science & Medicine, 158, 43–51.
Bowen, J.R., 2016. On British Islam: Religion, Law, and Everyday Practice in Shariʿa Councils. Princeton University Press.
Charsley, K., 2005. Vulnerable Brides and Transnational Ghar Damads: Gender, Risk and 'Adjustment' among Pakistani Marriage Migrants to Britain. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 12(2–3), 381–406.
Coutin, S.B., 2003. Legalizing moves: Salvadoran immigrants' struggle for US residency. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
de Hart, B., and Besselsen, E., 2021. “Everything went according to the rules”. Female citizen sponsors’ legal consciousness, intimate citizenship and family migration law. Identities [online], 28(1), 37–55. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.2020.1723310 [Access 15 July 2021].
Feldman-Savelsberg, P., 2016. Mothers on the Move. University of Chicago Press.
Feldman-Savelsberg, P., 2017. Mothers on the move: Reproducing belonging between Africa and Europe. University of Chicago Press.
Fresnoza-Flot, A., 2021. The best interests of the child in “mixed” couples’ divorce in Belgium and the Netherlands: Filipino mothers’ socio-legal encounters about their children. Oñati Socio-Legal Series [online], 11(4-this issue). Available from: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1180 [Access 15 July 2021].
Gleeson, S., 2010. Labor Rights for All? The Role of Undocumented Immigrant Status for Worker Claims Making. Law & Social Inquiry [online], 35(3), 561–602. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2010.01196.x [Access 15 July 2021].
Griffiths, M., 2021. “My passport is just my way out of here”. Mixed-immigration status families, immigration enforcement and the citizenship implications. Identities [online], 28(1), 1–19. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.2019.1625568 [Access 15 July 2021].
Hiitola, J., 2021. Family separation and everyday (in)security in the lives of unaccompanied refugee minors. Oñati Socio-Legal Series [online], 11(4-this issue). Available from: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1202 [Access 15 July 2021].
Jaraba, M., 2020. Khul‘ in Action: How Do Local Muslim Communities in Germany Dissolve an Islamic Religious-Only Marriage? Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs [online], 40(1), 26–47. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/13602004.2020.1737414 [Access 15 July 2021].
Jones, J., 2020. Muslim Alternative Dispute Resolution: Tracing the Pathways of Islamic Legal Practice between South Asia and Contemporary Britain. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs [online], 40(1), 48–66. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/13602004.2020.1741170 [Access 15 July 2021].
Jones, J., and Shanneik, Y., 2020. Reformulating Muslim Matrimony: Islamic Marriage and Divorce in the Contemporary United Kingdom and Europe. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs [online], 40(1), 1–5. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/13602004.2020.1744841 [Access 15 July 2021].
Jones, R., 2012. State Encounters. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 30, 805–821.
Keshavjee, M., 2007. Alternative Dispute Resolution in a Diasporic Muslim Community in Britain. In: P. Shah, ed., Law and Ethnic Plurality. Socio-Legal Perspectives. Leiden/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.
Kubal, A., 2014. Struggles against subjection. Implications of criminalization of migration for migrants’ everyday lives in Europe. Crime, Law and Social Change, 62, 91–111.
Leerkes, A., Martinez, R., and Groeneveld, P., 2019. Minority Paradoxes: Ethnic Differences in Self-reported Offending and Official Crime Statistics. The British Journal of Criminology, 59(1), 166–187.
Malheiros, J., 2002. Ethni‐cities: residential patterns in the Northern European and Mediterranean metropolises – implications for policy design. International Journal of Population Geography [online], 8(2), 107–134. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijpg.247 [Access 15 July 2021].
Menjívar, C., and Lakhani, S.M., 2016. Transformative effects of immigration law: Immigrants’ personal and social metamorphoses through regularization. American Journal of Sociology [online], 121(6), 1818–1855. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1086/685103 [Access 15 July 2021].
Mustasaari, S., 2021. Affective constructions of justice: ISIS-families and the law in the Finnish public debate. Oñati Socio-Legal Series [online], 11(4-this issue). Available from: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1159 [Access 15 July 2021].
Petintseva, O., 2018. Youth justice and migration: Discursive harms. New York: Springer.
Ragazzi, F., 2016. Countering terrorism and radicalisation: Securitising social policy? Critical Social Policy, 37(2), 163–179.
Rohe, M., 2018. Alternative Dispute Resolution among Muslims in Germany and the Debate on “Parallel Justice”. In: N.V. Vinding, E. Racius and J. Thielmann, eds., Exploring the Multitude of Muslims in Europe. Leiden/Boston: Brill.
Rohe, M., and Jaraba, M., 2015. Paralleljustiz. Berlin: Senatsverwaltung für Justiz und Verbraucherschutz.
Sarat, A., 1990. The law is all over: power, resistance and the legal consciousness of the welfare poor. Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities, 2, 343.
Shinozaki, K., 2015. Migrant citizenship from below: Family, domestic work, and social activism in irregular migration. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Siddiqui, M., et al., 2018. The independent review into the application of sharia law in England and Wales. London: Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for the Home Department by Command of Her Majesty.
Sportel, I., 2016. Divorce in Transnational Families. Marriage, Migration and Family Law. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sportel, I., 2021. Claims-making in court cases on children: Religion, ethnicity, and culture in cases of Dutch minority families against the state. Oñati Socio-Legal Series [online], 11(4-this issue). Available from: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1209 [Access 15 July 2021].
Sportel, I., Hart, B.D., and Kulk, F., 2019. Transnational Families Navigating the Law: Marriage, Divorce and Wellbeing. In: M. Tiilikainen, M. Al-Sharmani and S. Mustasaari, eds., Wellbeing of Transnational Muslim Families: Marriage, Law and Gender. London: Routledge.
Tas, L., 2013. Resolving Family Disputes in the Gurbet: The Role of Kurdish Peace Committee and Roj Women. Oñati Socio-Legal Series [online], 3(6), 1111–1135. Available from: https://www.opo.iisj.net/index.php/osls/article/view/237/0 [Access 15 July 2021].
van Rossum, W.M., 1999. Winnende onderzoeksprojecten: Culturele minderheden en eigen vormen van rechtspleging; een rechtsantropologisch onderzoek naar het rechtspreken van alevitische Turken. Recht der Werkelijkheid, 2, 102–109.
Vinnerljung, B., et al., 2008. Out‐of‐home care among immigrant children in Sweden: a national cohort study. International Journal of Social Welfare, 17(4), 301–311.
Walker, G., 2008. Overrepresented Minorities in Special Education in the United States and Romania: Comparison between African-American and Roma Populations in Disability Studies. Research in Comparative and International Education, 3(4), 394–403.
Webster, C., 2018. “Race”, ethnicity, social class and juvenile justice in Europe. In: B. Goldson, ed., Juvenile Justice in Europe. London: Routledge.
Yuval-Davis, N., Wemyss, G., and Cassidy, K., 2019. Bordering. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
Zivi, K., 2011. Making rights claims: A practice of democratic citizenship. Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2021 Iris Sportel
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence, further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.
