The calm after the storm?
The tricky path to restoring the enjoyment of individual rights in Intimate Partner Violence cases
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1272Palavras-chave:
Intimate Partner Violence, Victim’s Rights, Gender-Based Violence, Justice System, Victim Support Organizations (VSOs)Resumo
Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) is the main pathology that occurs within interpersonal relations, and women are the chief victims in an overwhelming majority of cases. At present, a well-established international legal framework is in place that defines IPV as violating internationally recognized human rights. However, the application of these standards has proven difficult because it requires multilayered arrangements to be effective. This paper investigates whether and how police authorities and the justice system – as parts of the victims’ support network – can assist victims in escaping from violence and restoring normality to their lives. The focus is on the gap between the law in the book and the law in action. To this end, the paper presents the findings of an Italian case study based on both document analysis and field research. The main aim is to bring to light organizational problems that can seriously jeopardize the effectiveness of systems to shield IPV victims and the full enjoyment of their individual rights.
Downloads
Metrics
Downloads:
PDF_12_3_Amato_Carnevali_OSLS (English) 353
XML_12_3_Amato_Carnevali_OSLS (English) 26
Referências
Akhtar, S., 2016. A Comparative Study of Sexual Crimes against Working and Homely Women. Indian Journal of Health and Wellbeing, (7)3, 363–366.
Amato, R., Carnevali, D., and Contini, F., 2020. Violenza di genere e domestica nella fase di emergenza COVID-19: Un’esplorazione della risposta di giustizia attraverso il dialogo istituzionale. IGSG-CNR Report commissioned by the Italian Ministry of Justice.
Baldry, A.C., and Roia, F., 2011. Strumenti efficaci per il contrasto ai maltrattamenti e allo stalking. Milan: Franco Angeli.
Barnett, O.W., 2001. Why battered women do not leave, part 2: External inhibiting factors–Social support and internal inhibiting factors. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 2(1), 3–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838001002001001
Bicchieri, C., 2017. Norms in the Wild: How to Diagnose, Measure, and Change Social Norms. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190622046.001.0001
Blázquez Peinado, M.D., 2013. La Directiva 2012/29/UE ¿Un paso adelante en materia de protección a las víctimas de la Unión Europea? Revista de derecho comunitario europeo [online], no. 46, 897–934. Available from: http://www.cepc.gob.es/sites/default/files/2021-12/3681846-02-blazquez-peinado.pdf [Accessed 11 February 2022].
Bonewit, A., and De Santis, E., 2016. The Issue of Violence Against Women in the European Union (PE 556.931) [online]. March. Study, Policy Department C: Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs European Parliament. Available from: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2016/556931/IPOL_STU(2016)556931_EN.pdf [Accessed 11 February 2022].
Brechenmacher, S., 2020. Why Are Governments Weakening Protections Against Domestic Violence? Carnegie Endowment for international peace [online], 1 September. Available from: https://carnegieendowment.org/2020/09/01/why-are-governments-weakening-protections-against-domestic-violence-pub-82632 [Accessed 1 September 2020].
Campesi, G., 2008. Norma, normatività, normalizzazione. Un itinerario teorico tra Canguilhem e Foucault. Sociologia del Diritto [online], 2, 5–30. Available from: https://www.academia.edu/1052175/Norma_normativit%C3%A0_normalizzazione._Un_itinerario_teorico_tra_Canguilhem_e_Foucault [Accessed 11 February 2022].
Canguilhem, G., 1991. The Normal and the Pathological. New York: Zone Books.
Canu, R., 2008. La violenza domestica contro le donne in Italia e nel contesto. Cagliari: La Riflessione Davide Zedda.
Carlson, B.E., and Pollitz Worden, A., 2002. Public Opinion about Domestic Violence. (Document number: 198319, Award number: 98-WT-VX-0018). Report funded by the U.S. National Institute of Justice. December. University at Albany.
Civello Conigliaro, S., 2012. La nuova normativa europea a tutela delle vittime di reato. Diritto Penale Contemporaneo [online]. Available from: https://www.penalecontemporaneo.it/upload/1353580802CONIGLIARO%202012a.pdf [Accessed 22 November 2021].
De Vido, S., 2017. The Ratification of the Council of Europe Istanbul Convention by the EU: A Step Forward in the Protection of Women from Violence in the European Legal System. European journal of legal studies [online], (9)2, 69–102. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1814/46069 [Accessed 11 February 2022].
Di Nicola Travaglini, P., and Menditto, F., 2020. Codice rosso: Il contrasto alla violenza di genere: dalle fonti sovranazionali agli strumenti applicativi. Milan: Giuffré/Francis Lefebvre.
Diamante, A., 2016. La Direttiva 2012/29/UE che istituisce norme minime in materia di diritti, assistenza e protezione delle vittime di reato. Origini, ratio, principi e contenuti della Direttiva recepita dal D.Lgs. 212/2015. Giurisprudenza penale [online], no. 3. Available from: https://www.giurisprudenzapenale.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Direttiva-vittima_Diamante_GP.pdf [Accessed 11 February 2022].
Esquivel-Santoveña, E.E., et al., 2013. Partner abuse worldwide. Partner Abuse [online], 4(1), 6–75. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.4.1.6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.4.1.6
Flood, M., and Pease, B., 2009. Factors influencing attitudes to violence against women. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse [online], 10(2), 125–142. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838009334131 [Accessed 11 February 2022]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838009334131
Foucault, M., 1977. Discipline and Punish: The birth of prison. New York: Vintage Books.
Gialuz, M., 2015. La protezione della vittima tra Corte EDU e Corte di Giustizia. In: L. Lupària, ed., Lo statuto europeo delle vittime di reato: Modelli di tutela tra diritto dell’Unione e buone pratiche nazionali. Milan: Cedam, 19–29.
Giddens, A., 1995. Beyond Left and Right: The Future of Radical Politics. Redwood City: Stanford University Press.
Gracia, E., 2014. Intimate partner violence against women and victim-blaming attitudes among Europeans. Bulletin of the World Health Organization [online], 92(5). Available from: https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.13.131391 [Accessed 11 February 2022]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.13.131391
Hart, H.L.A., 1961. The Concept of Law. Oxford University Press (Clarendon Law Series).
Jervis, G., 1998. Violenza (Psicologia sociale). Enciclopedia delle scienze sociali [online], vol. VIII. Rome: Istituto dell’Enciclopedia italiana. Available from: https://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/violenza_%28Enciclopedia-delle-scienze-sociali%29/ [Accessed 11 February 2022].
Johnson, M.P., 1995. Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage and the Family [online], 57(2), 283–294. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2307/353683 [Accessed 11 February 2022]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/353683
Johnson, M.P., 2008. A Typology of Domestic Violence. Lebanon: Northeastern University Press.
Johnson, M.P., and Ferraro, K.J., 2000. Research on domestic violence in the 1990s: making distinctions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62(4), 948–963. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00948.x
Johnson, M.P., Leone, J.M., and Xu, Y., 2014. Intimate terrorism and situational couple violence in general surveys: ex-spouses required. Violence Against Women, 20(2), 186–207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801214521324
Jones, J., 2018. The European System: Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and The Council of Europe Convention on Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention). In: R. Manjoo and J. Jones, eds., Legal Protection of Women from Violence. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315185002-6
Kelsen, H., 1941. The Pure Theory of Law and Analytical Jurisprudence. Harvard Law Review, 55(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1334739
Koepsell, J.K., Kernic, M.A., and Holt, V.L., 2006. Factors that influence battered women to leave their abusive relationships. Violence and Victims, 21(2), 131–147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1891/088667006780644299
Kropp, P.R., and Hart, S.D., 2000. The Spousal Assault Risk Assessment (SARA) Guide: Reliability and validity in adult male offenders. Law and Human Behavior, 24(1), 101–118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005430904495
Kropp, P.R., et al., 1994. Manual for the Spousal Assault Risk Assessment Guide. Vancouver: British Columbia Institute on Family Violence.
Kropp, P.R., et al., 1995. Manual for the Spousal Assault Risk Assessment Guide. 2nd ed. Vancouver: British Columbia Institute on Family Violence. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/t38062-000
Kropp, P.R., et al., 1999. Spousal Assault Risk Assessment Guide (SARA). Toronto: Multi-Health Systems, Inc.
Lanzara, G F., 1983. Ephemeral Organization in Extreme Environments: Emergence, Strategy, Extinction. Journal of Management Studies, 20(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1983.tb00199.x
Luhmann, N., 1985. Sociological Theory of Law. London: Routledge.
Luhmann, N., 2004. Law as a Social System. Oxford University Press DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198262381.001.0001
March, J., and Simon, H., 1958. Organizations. New York: Wiley.
McQuigg, R.J.A., 2016. Domestic Violence as a Human Rights Issue: Rumor v Italy. European Journal of International Law [online], (26)4, 1009–1025. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chv057 [Accessed 11 February 2022]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chv057
McQuigg, R.J.A., 2017. The Istanbul Convention, Domestic Violence and Human Rights. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315652436
Meyersfeld, B., 2008. Domestic violence, health, and international law. Emory International Law Review, 22, 61–11.
Mintzberg, H., 1973. The Nature of Managerial Work. New York: Harper & Row.
Mintzberg, H., 1983. Structure in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations. Hoboken: Prentice-Hall.
Miyaoi, K., 2016. Developing policy and legal frameworks for ending violence against women: International experiences [online]. Minsk: United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) Belarus. Available from: https://belarus.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pub-pdf/Developing%20policy%20and%20legal%20frameworks%20for%20ending%20violence%20against%20women.pdf [Accessed 8 June 2021].
Nonet, P., and Selznick, P., 1978. Law and Society in Transition: Toward Responsive Law. New York: Harper.
Palinkas, L.A., et al., 2015. Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research. Administration and policy in mental health, 42(5), 533–544. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
Pecorella, C., and Farina, P., 2018. La risposta penale alla violenza domestica: un’indagine sulla prassi del Tribunale di Milano in materia di maltrattamenti contro familiari e conviventi (art. 572 c.p.). A quarterly review for criminal justice [online], 2, 190–208. Available from: https://archiviodpc.dirittopenaleuomo.org/d/5963-la-risposta-penale-alla-violenza-domestica-un-indagine-sulla-prassi-del-tribunale-di-milano-in-mate [Accessed 11 February 2022].
Pellicani, L., 1998. Violenza (Politica). Enciclopedia delle scienze sociali, vol. VIII. Rome: Istituto dell’Enciclopedia italiana.
Pemberton, A., and Rasquete C., 2010. Victims in Europe–Assessment of the Implementation of the Framework Decision on the Standing of Victims in Criminal Proceedings: Preliminary Results. In: J. Hartmann, ed., Perspektiven professioneller Opferhilfe. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 99–113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92431-1_6
Pound, R., 1910. Law in Books and Law in Action. American University Law Review, no. 44, 12.
Prechal, S., 2019. The European Union’s Accession to the Istanbul Convention. In: K. Lenaerts et al., eds., An ever-changing Union?: perspectives on the future of EU law in honour of Allan Rosas. Oxford University Press, 279–292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509923694.ch-019
Rafaraci, T., 2015. New Perspectives for the Protection of the Victims in the EU. In: S. Ruggeri, ed., Human Rights in European Criminal Law. Cham: Springer, 215–225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12042-3_11
Sand, I.J., 2008. The Interaction of Society, Politics and Law: The Legal and Communicative Theories of Habermas, Luhmann and Teubner. Scandinavian Studies in Law, 53, 45–75.
Shreeves, R., and Prpic, M., 2019. Violence against women in the EU. State of play (PE 630.296) [online]. September. Brussels: European Parliamentary Research Service. Available from: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2018/630296/EPRS_BRI(2018)630296_EN.pdf [Accessed 11 February 2022].
Smith, B.G., 2008. Domestic violence: overview. In: B.G. Smith, ed., The Oxford Encyclopedia of Women in World History. Oxford University Press, p. 94.
Teubner, G., 1983. Substantive and reflexive elements in modern law. Law & Society Review, 17(2), 239–286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3053348
Thompson, J.D., 1967. Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Velcikova, K., 2019. Violenza contro le donne e accesso alla giustizia. Questione Giustizia [online], 1(Fascicolo speciale “La Corte di Strasburgo”). Available from: https://www.questionegiustizia.it/speciale/articolo/violenza-contro-le-donne-e-accesso-alla-giustizia_87.php [Accessed 11 February 2022].
Vlachovà, M., and Biason, L., 2004. Women in an insecure world: violence against women: Facts, figures and analysis. 29 February. Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces, p. 55.
Zara, G., and Gino, S., 2018. Intimate Partner Violence and its Escalation into Femicide. Frailty thy Name Is “Violence Against Women.” Frontiers in Psychology [online], vol. 9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01777 [Accessed 11 February 2022]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01777
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2022 Rosanna Amato, Davide Carnevali
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence, further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.
