The calm after the storm? : The tricky path to restoring the enjoyment of individual rights in Intimate Partner Violence cases

Rosanna Amato; Davide Carnevali

doi:10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1272

Autores

Rosanna Amato Institute of Legal Informatics and Judicial Systems of the National Research Council of Italy (IGSG-CNR) https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9571-3182
Davide Carnevali Institute of Legal Informatics and Judicial System of the National Research Council of Italy (IGSG-CNR) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7929-275X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1272

Palavras-chave:

Intimate Partner Violence, Victim’s Rights, Gender-Based Violence, Justice System, Victim Support Organizations (VSOs)

Resumo

Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) is the main pathology that occurs within interpersonal relations, and women are the chief victims in an overwhelming majority of cases. At present, a well-established international legal framework is in place that defines IPV as violating internationally recognized human rights. However, the application of these standards has proven difficult because it requires multilayered arrangements to be effective. This paper investigates whether and how police authorities and the justice system – as parts of the victims’ support network – can assist victims in escaping from violence and restoring normality to their lives. The focus is on the gap between the law in the book and the law in action. To this end, the paper presents the findings of an Italian case study based on both document analysis and field research. The main aim is to bring to light organizational problems that can seriously jeopardize the effectiveness of systems to shield IPV victims and the full enjoyment of their individual rights.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Metrics

Views 475
Downloads:
PDF_12_3_Amato_Carnevali_OSLS (English) 331
XML_12_3_Amato_Carnevali_OSLS (English) 23

Biografia do Autor

Rosanna Amato, Institute of Legal Informatics and Judicial Systems of the National Research Council of Italy (IGSG-CNR)

Rosanna Amato is a post-doc researcher at the Institute on Legal Informatics and Judicial Systems of the National Research Council of Italy IGSG-CNR. Email: address: rosanna.amato@irsig.cnr.it Mail address: Via Zamboni 26, 40126, Bologna (Italy).

Davide Carnevali, Institute of Legal Informatics and Judicial System of the National Research Council of Italy (IGSG-CNR)

Davide Carnevali is a Researcher at the Institute on Legal Informatics and Judicial Systems of the National Research Council of Italy (IGSG-CNR). Email address: davide.carnevali@cnr .it Mail address: Via Zamboni 26, 40126, Bologna (Italy).

Referências

Akhtar, S., 2016. A Comparative Study of Sexual Crimes against Working and Homely Women. Indian Journal of Health and Wellbeing, (7)3, 363–366.

Amato, R., Carnevali, D., and Contini, F., 2020. Violenza di genere e domestica nella fase di emergenza COVID-19: Un’esplorazione della risposta di giustizia attraverso il dialogo istituzionale. IGSG-CNR Report commissioned by the Italian Ministry of Justice.

Baldry, A.C., and Roia, F., 2011. Strumenti efficaci per il contrasto ai maltrattamenti e allo stalking. Milan: Franco Angeli.

Barnett, O.W., 2001. Why battered women do not leave, part 2: External inhibiting factors–Social support and internal inhibiting factors. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 2(1), 3–35.

Bicchieri, C., 2017. Norms in the Wild: How to Diagnose, Measure, and Change Social Norms. New York: Oxford University Press.

Blázquez Peinado, M.D., 2013. La Directiva 2012/29/UE ¿Un paso adelante en materia de protección a las víctimas de la Unión Europea? Revista de derecho comunitario europeo [online], no. 46, 897–934. Available from: http://www.cepc.gob.es/sites/default/files/2021-12/3681846-02-blazquez-peinado.pdf [Accessed 11 February 2022].

Bonewit, A., and De Santis, E., 2016. The Issue of Violence Against Women in the European Union (PE 556.931) [online]. March. Study, Policy Department C: Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs European Parliament. Available from: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2016/556931/IPOL_STU(2016)556931_EN.pdf [Accessed 11 February 2022].

Brechenmacher, S., 2020. Why Are Governments Weakening Protections Against Domestic Violence? Carnegie Endowment for international peace [online], 1 September. Available from: https://carnegieendowment.org/2020/09/01/why-are-governments-weakening-protections-against-domestic-violence-pub-82632 [Accessed 1 September 2020].

Campesi, G., 2008. Norma, normatività, normalizzazione. Un itinerario teorico tra Canguilhem e Foucault. Sociologia del Diritto [online], 2, 5–30. Available from: https://www.academia.edu/1052175/Norma_normativit%C3%A0_normalizzazione._Un_itinerario_teorico_tra_Canguilhem_e_Foucault [Accessed 11 February 2022].

Canguilhem, G., 1991. The Normal and the Pathological. New York: Zone Books.

Canu, R., 2008. La violenza domestica contro le donne in Italia e nel contesto. Cagliari: La Riflessione Davide Zedda.

Carlson, B.E., and Pollitz Worden, A., 2002. Public Opinion about Domestic Violence. (Document number: 198319, Award number: 98-WT-VX-0018). Report funded by the U.S. National Institute of Justice. December. University at Albany.

Civello Conigliaro, S., 2012. La nuova normativa europea a tutela delle vittime di reato. Diritto Penale Contemporaneo [online]. Available from: https://www.penalecontemporaneo.it/upload/1353580802CONIGLIARO%202012a.pdf [Accessed 22 November 2021].

De Vido, S., 2017. The Ratification of the Council of Europe Istanbul Convention by the EU: A Step Forward in the Protection of Women from Violence in the European Legal System. European journal of legal studies [online], (9)2, 69–102. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1814/46069 [Accessed 11 February 2022].

Di Nicola Travaglini, P., and Menditto, F., 2020. Codice rosso: Il contrasto alla violenza di genere: dalle fonti sovranazionali agli strumenti applicativi. Milan: Giuffré/Francis Lefebvre.

Diamante, A., 2016. La Direttiva 2012/29/UE che istituisce norme minime in materia di diritti, assistenza e protezione delle vittime di reato. Origini, ratio, principi e contenuti della Direttiva recepita dal D.Lgs. 212/2015. Giurisprudenza penale [online], no. 3. Available from: https://www.giurisprudenzapenale.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Direttiva-vittima_Diamante_GP.pdf [Accessed 11 February 2022].

Esquivel-Santoveña, E.E., et al., 2013. Partner abuse worldwide. Partner Abuse [online], 4(1), 6–75. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.4.1.6

Flood, M., and Pease, B., 2009. Factors influencing attitudes to violence against women. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse [online], 10(2), 125–142. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838009334131 [Accessed 11 February 2022].

Foucault, M., 1977. Discipline and Punish: The birth of prison. New York: Vintage Books.

Gialuz, M., 2015. La protezione della vittima tra Corte EDU e Corte di Giustizia. In: L. Lupària, ed., Lo statuto europeo delle vittime di reato: Modelli di tutela tra diritto dell’Unione e buone pratiche nazionali. Milan: Cedam, 19–29.

Giddens, A., 1995. Beyond Left and Right: The Future of Radical Politics. Redwood City: Stanford University Press.

Gracia, E., 2014. Intimate partner violence against women and victim-blaming attitudes among Europeans. Bulletin of the World Health Organization [online], 92(5). Available from: https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.13.131391 [Accessed 11 February 2022].

Hart, H.L.A., 1961. The Concept of Law. Oxford University Press (Clarendon Law Series).

Jervis, G., 1998. Violenza (Psicologia sociale). Enciclopedia delle scienze sociali [online], vol. VIII. Rome: Istituto dell’Enciclopedia italiana. Available from: https://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/violenza_%28Enciclopedia-delle-scienze-sociali%29/ [Accessed 11 February 2022].

Johnson, M.P., 1995. Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage and the Family [online], 57(2), 283–294. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2307/353683 [Accessed 11 February 2022].

Johnson, M.P., 2008. A Typology of Domestic Violence. Lebanon: Northeastern University Press.

Johnson, M.P., and Ferraro, K.J., 2000. Research on domestic violence in the 1990s: making distinctions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62(4), 948–963.

Johnson, M.P., Leone, J.M., and Xu, Y., 2014. Intimate terrorism and situational couple violence in general surveys: ex-spouses required. Violence Against Women, 20(2), 186–207.

Jones, J., 2018. The European System: Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and The Council of Europe Convention on Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention). In: R. Manjoo and J. Jones, eds., Legal Protection of Women from Violence. London: Routledge.

Kelsen, H., 1941. The Pure Theory of Law and Analytical Jurisprudence. Harvard Law Review, 55(1).

Koepsell, J.K., Kernic, M.A., and Holt, V.L., 2006. Factors that influence battered women to leave their abusive relationships. Violence and Victims, 21(2), 131–147.

Kropp, P.R., and Hart, S.D., 2000. The Spousal Assault Risk Assessment (SARA) Guide: Reliability and validity in adult male offenders. Law and Human Behavior, 24(1), 101–118.

Kropp, P.R., et al., 1994. Manual for the Spousal Assault Risk Assessment Guide. Vancouver: British Columbia Institute on Family Violence.

Kropp, P.R., et al., 1995. Manual for the Spousal Assault Risk Assessment Guide. 2nd ed. Vancouver: British Columbia Institute on Family Violence.

Kropp, P.R., et al., 1999. Spousal Assault Risk Assessment Guide (SARA). Toronto: Multi-Health Systems, Inc.

Lanzara, G F., 1983. Ephemeral Organization in Extreme Environments: Emergence, Strategy, Extinction. Journal of Management Studies, 20(1).

Luhmann, N., 1985. Sociological Theory of Law. London: Routledge.

Luhmann, N., 2004. Law as a Social System. Oxford University Press

March, J., and Simon, H., 1958. Organizations. New York: Wiley.

McQuigg, R.J.A., 2016. Domestic Violence as a Human Rights Issue: Rumor v Italy. European Journal of International Law [online], (26)4, 1009–1025. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chv057 [Accessed 11 February 2022].

McQuigg, R.J.A., 2017. The Istanbul Convention, Domestic Violence and Human Rights. London: Routledge.

Meyersfeld, B., 2008. Domestic violence, health, and international law. Emory International Law Review, 22, 61–11.

Mintzberg, H., 1973. The Nature of Managerial Work. New York: Harper & Row.

Mintzberg, H., 1983. Structure in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations. Hoboken: Prentice-Hall.

Miyaoi, K., 2016. Developing policy and legal frameworks for ending violence against women: International experiences [online]. Minsk: United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) Belarus. Available from: https://belarus.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pub-pdf/Developing%20policy%20and%20legal%20frameworks%20for%20ending%20violence%20against%20women.pdf [Accessed 8 June 2021].

Nonet, P., and Selznick, P., 1978. Law and Society in Transition: Toward Responsive Law. New York: Harper.

Palinkas, L.A., et al., 2015. Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research. Administration and policy in mental health, 42(5), 533–544.

Pecorella, C., and Farina, P., 2018. La risposta penale alla violenza domestica: un’indagine sulla prassi del Tribunale di Milano in materia di maltrattamenti contro familiari e conviventi (art. 572 c.p.). A quarterly review for criminal justice [online], 2, 190–208. Available from: https://archiviodpc.dirittopenaleuomo.org/d/5963-la-risposta-penale-alla-violenza-domestica-un-indagine-sulla-prassi-del-tribunale-di-milano-in-mate [Accessed 11 February 2022].

Pellicani, L., 1998. Violenza (Politica). Enciclopedia delle scienze sociali, vol. VIII. Rome: Istituto dell’Enciclopedia italiana.

Pemberton, A., and Rasquete C., 2010. Victims in Europe–Assessment of the Implementation of the Framework Decision on the Standing of Victims in Criminal Proceedings: Preliminary Results. In: J. Hartmann, ed., Perspektiven professioneller Opferhilfe. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 99–113.

Pound, R., 1910. Law in Books and Law in Action. American University Law Review, no. 44, 12.

Prechal, S., 2019. The European Union’s Accession to the Istanbul Convention. In: K. Lenaerts et al., eds., An ever-changing Union?: perspectives on the future of EU law in honour of Allan Rosas. Oxford University Press, 279–292.

Rafaraci, T., 2015. New Perspectives for the Protection of the Victims in the EU. In: S. Ruggeri, ed., Human Rights in European Criminal Law. Cham: Springer, 215–225.

Sand, I.J., 2008. The Interaction of Society, Politics and Law: The Legal and Communicative Theories of Habermas, Luhmann and Teubner. Scandinavian Studies in Law, 53, 45–75.

Shreeves, R., and Prpic, M., 2019. Violence against women in the EU. State of play (PE 630.296) [online]. September. Brussels: European Parliamentary Research Service. Available from: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2018/630296/EPRS_BRI(2018)630296_EN.pdf [Accessed 11 February 2022].

Smith, B.G., 2008. Domestic violence: overview. In: B.G. Smith, ed., The Oxford Encyclopedia of Women in World History. Oxford University Press, p. 94.

Teubner, G., 1983. Substantive and reflexive elements in modern law. Law & Society Review, 17(2), 239–286.

Thompson, J.D., 1967. Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Velcikova, K., 2019. Violenza contro le donne e accesso alla giustizia. Questione Giustizia [online], 1(Fascicolo speciale “La Corte di Strasburgo”). Available from: https://www.questionegiustizia.it/speciale/articolo/violenza-contro-le-donne-e-accesso-alla-giustizia_87.php [Accessed 11 February 2022].

Vlachovà, M., and Biason, L., 2004. Women in an insecure world: violence against women: Facts, figures and analysis. 29 February. Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces, p. 55.

Zara, G., and Gino, S., 2018. Intimate Partner Violence and its Escalation into Femicide. Frailty thy Name Is “Violence Against Women.” Frontiers in Psychology [online], vol. 9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01777 [Accessed 11 February 2022].