Gerrymandering Hypothesis in the Italian Constituencies
The Case of Genoa’s District
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1039Palavras-chave:
Gerrymandering, redistricting, constituencies, Italy, USAResumo
Gerrymandering is a practice intended to establish a political advantage for a particular party or group by manipulating district boundaries. The term gerrymandering has negative connotations. Two principal tactics are used in gerrymandering: “cracking” (i.e. diluting the voting power of the opposing party’s supporters across many districts) and “packing” (concentrating the opposing party’s voting power in one district to reduce their voting power in other districts). Partisan gerrymandering to increase the power of a political party has been practiced since the beginning of the US. What’s happening in Italy? The paper examines a hypothesis of Italian gerrymandering: the uninominal constituencies of the Genoa’s District where typically progressive voting areas are united with conservative suburbs and municipalities. Last but not least the initiatives against the gerrymandering in American history to understand how to identify and contrast the techniques of gerrymandering.
Downloads
Metrics
Downloads:
PDF (English) 690
Referências
Altman, M., et al., 2010. Principles for Transparency and Public Participation in Redistricting. Brookings Institution [online], 17 June. Available from: https://www.brookings.edu/opinions/principles-for-transparency-and-public-participation-in-redistricting/ [Accessed 10 June 2019].
Anderson, J.M., 1987. Politics and Purpose: Hide and Seek in the Gerrymandering Thicket after Davis v. Bandemer. University of Pennsylvania Law Review [online], 136(1), 183–237. Available from: https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/penn_law_review/vol136/iss1/5/ [Accessed 10 June 2019].
Bernstein, M., and Duchin, M., 2017. A Formula Goes to Court: Partisan Gerrymandering and the Efficiency Gap. Notices of the American Mathematical Society [online], 9. Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.10812v1 [Accessed 10 June 2019].
Billias, G.A., 1976. Elbridge Gerry, Founding Father and Republican Statesman. New York: McGraw-Hill, 317.
Blinder, A., and Wines, M., 2018. North Carolina Is Ordered to Redraw Its Congressional Map. The New York Times [online], 9 January. Available from: http://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/09/us/north-carolina-gerrymander.html?emc=edit_na_20180109&nl=breaking-news&nlid=32291497&ref=headline [Accessed 5 June 2019].
Bognetti, G., 1966. Malapportionment ideale democratico e potere giudiziario nell’evoluzione costituzionale degli Stati Uniti. Milan: Giuffrè.
Burke, C.M., 1999. The Appearance of Equality: Racial Gerrymandering, Redistricting and the Supreme Court. Santa Barbara, CA: Greenwood.
Cain, B.E., and Mac Donald, K., 2006. Transparency and Redistricting. A supplemental report to Competition and Redistricting in California: Lessons for Reform Funded by the James Irvine Foundation [online]. Berkeley: University of California, 26 November. Available from: http://statewidedatabase.org/resources/redistricting_research/Transparency_&_Redistricting.pdf [Accessed 10 June 2019].
Cerreti, C., and Fusco, N., 2007. Geografia e minoranze. Rome: Carocci, 136-141.
Cook, E., 2007. Legislative Guide to Redistricting in Iowa [online]. Des Moines: Legal Services Division of the Iowa Legislative Services Agency. Available from: https://www.legis.iowa.gov/docs/publications/LG/9461.pdf [Accessed 10 June 2019].
Cox, A.B., 2006. Designing Redistricting Institutions. Election Law Journal [online], 5(4). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1089/elj.2006.5.412 [Accessed 10 June 2019].
Duchin, M., 2018a. Geometry versus Gerrymandering. Scientific American [online], November. Available from: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/geometry-versus-gerrymandering/?redirect=1 [Accessed 10 June 2019].
Duchin, M., 2018b. Gerrymandering Metrics: How to measure? What’s the Baseline? ArXiv [physics.soc-ph] [online]. Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.02064v1 [Accessed 10 June 2019].
Duchin, M., and Levine, P., 2017. Rebooting the Mathematics behind Gerrymandering. The Conversation [online], 24 October. Available from: http://theconversation.com/rebooting-the-mathematics-behind-gerrymandering-73096 [Accessed 10 June 2019].
Eisler, K.I., 1993. A Justice for All: William J. Brennan, Jr., and the Decisions that Transformed America. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Filippi, S., 2017. Partisan e racial gerrymandering: quattro recenti sentenze della Corte Suprema americana. Diritti comparati [online], 16 July. Available from: http://www.diritticomparati.it/partisan-e-racial-gerrymandering-quattro-recenti-sentenze-della-corte-suprema-americana/ [Accessed 10 June 2019].
Filippi, S., 2018. Recenti evoluzioni nella giurisprudenza della Corte Suprema USA in materia di “redistricting”. Diritto pubblico, Rivista fondata da Andrea Orsi Battaglini [online], 2/2018, 645-681. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1438/91836 [Accessed 10 June 2019].
Foley, E.B., 2017. The Gerrymander and the Constitution: Two Avenues of Analysis and the Quest for a Durable Precedent. Ohio State Public Law Working Paper [online], 401. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2999738 [Accessed 10 June 2019].
Fukurai, H., 2001. Critical Evaluations of Hispanic Participation on the Grand Jury: Key-Man Selection, Jurymandering Language, and Representative Quotas. Texas Hispanic Journal of Law & Policy [online], 5. Available from: https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/thlp5&div=5&id=&page=&t=1560157020 [Accessed 10 June 2019].
Green, R., 2018. Redistricting Transparency. William & Mary Law Review [online], 59(5), 1787-1836. Available from: https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr/vol59/iss5/7/ [Accessed 10 June 2019].
Grofman, B., ed., 1990. Political Gerrymandering and the Courts. New York: Agathon Press.
Gwynn, S.L., 1911. The Case for Home Rule. Dublin: Maunsel & Co.
Hart, A.B., ed., 1927. Commonwealth History of Massachusetts, Colony, Province and State. New York: The States History Company.
Issacharoff, S., Karlan, P.S., and Pildes, R.H., 2012. The Law of Democracy: Legal Structure of the Political Process. 4th ed. New York: Foundation Press.
Johnston, R., et al., 2001a. Fifty Years of Bias in the UK’s Electoral System. APSA: Elections, Public Opinion and Voting Behaviour Section Website. Danny Dorling [online]. Available from: http://www.dannydorling.org/wp-content/files/dannydorling_publication_id1322.pdf [Accessed 10 June 2019].
Johnston, R., et al., 2001b. From Votes to Seats: The Operation of the UK Electoral System since 1945. Manchester University Press.
King, N.J., 1993. Racial Jurymandering: Cancer or Cure. A Contemporary Review of Affirmative Action in Jury Selection. New York University Law Review [online], 68. Available from: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/faculty-publications/784/ [Accessed 10 June 2019].
Levitt, J., 2010. A Citizen’s Guide to Redistricting. New York University School of Law Brennan Center for Justice.
Levitt, J., 2011. Essay: Weighing the Potential of Citizen Redistricting. Loyola Los Angeles Law Review [online], 44(2). Available from: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/llr/vol44/iss2/4 [Accessed 10 June 2019].
Levitt, J., and McDonald, M.P., 2007. Taking the “Re” out of Redistricting. Geography Law Journal [online], vol. 95. Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=986081 [Accessed 10 June 2019].
Lublin, D., 1997. The Paradox of Representation: Racial Gerrymandering and Minority Interests in Congress. Princeton University Press.
Maag, C.D., 2017. Partisan Gerrymandering: Re-Establishing the Political Question Doctrine in Gill v. Whitford. UCLA School of Law Working Paper [online]. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3089830 [Accessed 10 June 2019].
McCarty, N., Poole, K.T., and Rosenthal, H., 2009. Does Gerrymandering Cause Polarization? American Journal of Political Science [online], 53(3), 666-680. Available from: https://legacy.voteview.com/pdf/ajps_393.pdf [Accessed 10 June 2019].
McGann, A.J., et al., 2016. Gerrymandering in America: The House of Representatives, the Supreme Court, and the Future of Popular Sovereignty. Cambridge University Press.
Musgrove, P., 1977. General Theory of Gerrymandering. London: Sage.
Powers, W.B, 1984. Karcher v. Daggett: The Supreme Court Draws the Line on Malapportionment and Gerrymandering in Congressional Redistricting? Indiana Law Review [online], 17(2), 651-686. Available from: https://doi.org/10.18060/2588 [Accessed 10 June 2019].
Ratto Trabucco, F., 2007. Sulla presunta incostituzionalità del quorum della maggioranza assoluta degli iscritti alle liste elettorali per i referendum territoriali ex art. 132 Cost. Le Istituzioni del federalismo [online], 6, 847. Available from: https://www.regione.emilia-romagna.it/affari_ist/rivista_6_2007/843%20ratto%20trabucco.pdf [Accessed 10 June 2019].
Ratto Trabucco, F., 2009. Riflessioni sulla prima attuazione dell’art. 132, secondo comma, Cost., dopo sessantuno anni di vita: l’esame del disegno di legge di variazione territoriale regionale e l’acquisizione dei pareri regionali sulla scorta del “caso Alta Valmarecchia”. Le Istituzioni del federalismo [online], 3-4, 603-628. Available from: https://www.regione.emilia-romagna.it/affari_ist/rivista_3-4_2009/603%20ratto%20trabucco.pdf [Accessed 10 June 2019].
Ratto Trabucco, F., 2013. Regional Democracy in the Slovak Republic. The Journal of Comparative Law [online], 8. Available from: https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.kluwer/epl0020&div=24&id=&page=&t=1560158725 [Accessed 10 June 2019].
Seabrook, N.R., 2017. Drawing the Lines: Constraints on Partisan Gerrymandering in U.S. Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Semeraro, S., 2017. Partisan Gerrymandering: Is There no Shame in It or Have Politicians Become Shameless? University of Memphis Law Review [online], vol. 48. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3024108 [Accessed 10 June 2019].
Spini, G., 1962. America 1962: Nuove tendenze della sinistra americana. Florence: La Nuova Italia.
Stephanopoulos, N., 2012. Redistricting and the Territorial Community. University of Pennsylvania Law Review [online], 160. Available from: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=11766&context=journal_articles [Accessed 10 June 2019].
Stephanopoulos, N., and McGhee, E., 2014. Partisan Gerrymandering and the Efficiency Gap. University of Chicago Law Review [online], 82, 831-900. Available from: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2457468 [Accessed 10 June 2019].
Trucco, L., 2017. A volte ritornano: la Corte Suprema USA alle prese col gerrymandering. DPCE online, 2, 421-424. Available from: http://www.dpceonline.it/index.php/dpceonline/article/view/410/400 [Accessed 10 June 2019].
Wagner, P., 2008. New York Times Profiles Anamosa Iowa, where a District is Almost Entirely People in Prison. Prison Gerrymandering Project [online], 24 October. Available from: http://www.prisonersofthecensus.org/news/2008/10/24/anamosa/ [Accessed 5 June 2019].
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2019 Fabio Ratto Trabucco
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence, further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.
