Los Errores de Legislar en Paralelo: La Problemática Aplicación de las Reglas sobre Filiación (Determinación, Acciones de Reclamación e Impugnación) en la Filiación Derivada del Uso de Técnicas de Reproducción Humana Asistida (Mistakes of Legislating...)
Parole chiave:
Técnicas de reproducción humana asistida, filiación, determinación de la filiación, acciones de filiación, impugnación de la filiación, matrimonio entre personas del mismo sexo, Assisted reproductive technology, filiation, filiation determinationAbstract
The incorporation of ‘will’ as a way to define the filiation derived from the use of assisted reproduction techniques (without establishing a new determining method [against the biological and adoptive filiations]), plus the recognition of equal marriage and the consequent access to double maternity/paternity, plus the deficient regulation of the text in the assisted reproduction techniques’ law (art. 7), with a general remission to civil laws, have created a legal loophole that is being incoherently covered; all the jurisprudential decisions and disconnected resolution create (or are creating) a misadjusted situation that should be confronted with an adequate legislative reform. Are the determination, reclamation and impugnation rules (which are expected in the CC for the filiation by nature) really applicable (in a context?) out of the special rules expected in the assisted reproduction techniques’ law?
La incorporación de la voluntad como forma de determinar la filiación derivada del uso de TRHA, sin establecer una nueva modalidad de determinación (frente a la filiación por naturaleza y la adoptiva), el reconocimiento del matrimonio igualitario y el acceso a la doble paternidad/maternidad derivado de tal reconocimiento, junto con la deficiente regulación en el texto de la LTRHA (art. 7) con su remisión genérica a las leyes civiles, han creado un vacío legal que se está cubriendo de forma incoherente, al albur de decisiones jurisprudenciales y resoluciones desconexas que crean una situación de desajuste que debería afrontarse con una adecuada reforma legislativa. Fuera de las reglas especiales previstas en la LTRHA, ¿resultan aplicables realmente las reglas relativas a la determinación, reclamación e impugnación previstas en el CC para la filiación por naturaleza? Se trata de dar respuesta aquí a las soluciones a las que se llega con los diversos textos legales existentes.
DOWNLOAD THIS PAPER FROM SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2768263
Downloads
Statistiche globali ℹ️
|
144
Visualizzazioni
|
107
Download
|
|
251
Totale
|
|
##submission.downloads##
Pubblicato
Come citare
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence and it regulates how others can use your work. Further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.
