Stabilising Collective Agreements in Continental Europe
How Contract Law Principles Reinforce the Right to Collective Bargaining
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1012Mots-clés :
collective agreement, after-effects, contract law principles, promotion of collective bargainingRésumé
Most continental European legal systems where normative value is conferred on collective bargaining agreements also include a legal mechanism, known as after-effects, whereby the content of such agreements survives after they expire. After-effects can be regulated by specific legislative provisions. Where such provisions are absent, jurisprudential constructions based on the application of general principles of contract law have been applied instead. This comparative study reveals an important convergence between these models, in terms of both the legal techniques adopted and in the objectives pursued. The study also reveals that states share common concerns around maintaining a certain balance between negotiating parties, whether through consolidating the respective models of collective bargaining or via correcting dysfunctions introduced by emergency measures. Those solutions can be embedded in the international definition of the right to collective bargaining, revealing the importance of a holistic vision on regulations underpinning the European collective bargaining model.
Téléchargements
Metrics
Downloads:
PDF (English) 291
Références
Antonmattei, P.H., 2015. Avantages individuels acquis. Droit Social, nº 1, 95-96.
Beltzer, R.M., 2010. De wenselijkheid van nawerking van algemeen verbindend verklaarde caobepalingen in het licht van het juridische systeem. ARBAC [online], Oktober-December. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.5553/ARBAC/.000006 [Accessed 5 July 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5553/ARBAC/.000006
Cordier, J.P., 2008. La théorie de l’incorporation des dispositions normatives individuelles dans le contrat de travail. In: J.P. Cordier, ed., Les 40 ans de la loi du 5 décembre 1968 sur les conventions collectives du travail. Brussels: Bruylant, 46.
Dukes, R., 2014. The Labour Constitution: The Enduring Idea of Labour Law. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199601691.001.0001
Eurofound, 2015. Collective bargaining in Europe in the 21st century [online]. Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.2806/135652 [Accessed 5 July 2018].
Frenkel, B.S., 1979. De nawerking van de collectieve arbeidsovereenkomst. Sociaal Maandblad Arbeid, p. 293.
Horion, P., 1969. Syndicats, Conventions collectives de travail, Organes paritaires. Annuaire de la Faculté de Droit de Liège, p. 113.
Houben, C.A., 2008. Nachbindung und Nachwirkung im Tarifrecht – Zu Struktur und Anwendungsbereich von §§ 3 III und 4 V TVG. Neue Juristische Online-Zeitschrift, Heft 30, 2170-2182.
Houweling, A.R., and van der Voet, G.W., 2006. Het leerstuk nawerking van collectieve arbeidsvoorwaarden op de helling. Arbeidsrechtelijke Annotaties [online], nº 3. Available from: http://www.openaccessadvocate.nl/tijdschrift/arbeidsrechtelijkeannotaties/2006/03/ArA_2006_006_003_002 [Accessed 5 July 2018].
Jansen, J., 2013. De automatische doorwerking van de cao-arbeidsvoorwaarden op ongeorganiseerde werknemers bekeken vanuit rechtsvergelijkend perspectief [online]. Afstudeerscriptie Rechtsgeleerdheid. Universiteit Tilburg, 16 September. Available from: http://arno.uvt.nl/show.cgi?fid=133443 [Accessed 5 July 2018].
López López, J., 2015. La extinción del contrato como última ratio: los mecanismos de protección del contrato de trabajo. Albacete: Bomarzo.
López López, J., ed., 2019. Collective Bargaining and Collective Action: Labour Agency and Governance in the 21st Century? Oxford: Hart. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509923199
López, J., de le Court, A., and Canalda, S., 2014. Breaking the Equilibrium between Flexibility and Security. European Labour Law Journal, 5(1), 18-42. First published [online] 1 March 2014. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F201395251400500104 [Accessed 5 July 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/201395251400500104
Mazars, M.F., and Géa, F., 2012. Contrat de travail et norme collective. Bulletin d’information de la Cour de Cassation [online], nº 13, 40. Available from: https://www.courdecassation.fr/IMG/pdf/Bicc_768.pdf [Accessed 5 July 2018].
Müller-Glöge, R., 2012. BGB § 611 Vertragstypische Pflichten beim Dienstvertrag. Münchener Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch: BGB, Band. 6. Munich: C.H. Beck.
Pélissier, J., Auzero, G., and Dockès, E., 2010. Droit du Travail. 25th ed. Paris: Dalloz.
Radé, C., 2013. Statut collectif et égalité de traitement: l'employeur peut harmoniser « par le haut ». Droit Social, nº 6, 567.
Rodríguez-Piñero, M., 2019. Collective Bargaining in the Renewed Spanish Labour Law: a New Tool for Economic Policy? Oñati Socio-legal Series [online], 9(1-this issue). Available from: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1009 [Accessed 6 May 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1009
Van Hoek, A.A.H, 2003. Collective Agreements and Individual Contracts in Labour Law – the Netherlands. In: M. Sewerynski, ed., Collective Agreements and Individual Contracts in Labour Law. Zuidpoolsingel: Kluwer Law International.
Verhulp, E., 2002. Nawerking: het volle pond graag! Arbeidsrecht, nº 10, 13.
Ysàs Molinero, H., 2014. La pérdida de vigencia de los convenios colectivos en Francia: ultra-actividad y derechos adquiridos. In: N. Pumar Beltrán, ed., La flexibilidad interna y los despidos colectivos en el sistema español de relaciones laborales. Barcelona: Huygens.
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
(c) Tous droits réservés Alexandre de le Court 2019
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International.
OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence, further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.