Sex professionals in Latin America
Observing stakeholder participation through the form of legal/illegal/non-legal differentiation
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1241Mots-clés :
Prostitution, Inclusion, Exclusion, Inequality, Systems theory, Latin AmericaRésumé
We researched political and legal communications about the sex profession through the Inclusion/Exclusion Form. The theoretical content is based on Niklas Luhmann's theory of society as a social communication system and Luis Antônio Marcuschi's theory of language as a social work. In this research we explored dates of Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay. The corpora were made up of data catalogued on institutional websites, documents obtained from directors of associations and unions of sex workers, in addition to e-mail exchanges and online conversations with directors and sex professionals via virtual meetings. In the area of political communications, we observe inclusions and exclusions at the same time, as regulation has promoted several exclusions. The participation of workers in the discussions, when that had happened, was not reflected a posteriori either in public policies or in the implementation of regulations. As for legal communications, we observe that those who practice the profession experience inclusions and exclusions at the same time, since the profession is criminalized at the same time that it is recognized as a profession. The conclusion is that the inclusion/exclusion form broadens the spectrum of observation by allowing inclusion to be observed at the same time as exclusion.
Téléchargements
Metrics
Downloads:
PDF_11_6S_Stamford_da_Silva_Silva_OSLS (English) 515
XML_11_6S_StamfordDaSilva_Silva_OSLS (English) 100
Références
Abracinskas, L., 2018. Trabajo sexual, prostitución y sistema prostituyente: contradicción fatal. Diario El Pueblo [no longer online] http://www.diarioelpueblo.com.uy/m/category/generales/page/98 ]Access 31 May 2018].
Abracinskas, L., et al., 2013. Ley 17.515: Trabajo sexual desde la experiencia de las personas Trans [online]. Montevideo: MYSU. Available from: http://www.mysu.org.uy/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Descargue-aqu%C3%AD-informe-sobre-trabajo-sexual.pdf [Access 28 May 2018].
Amar- Associação de mulheres acreana revolucionaria, 2018. [Facebook profile]. Amar- Associação de mulheres acreana revolucionaria [online]. Available from: https://www.facebook.com/Amar-Associa%C3%A7%C3%A3o-de-mulheres-acreana-revolucionaria-1777771802317475/ [Access 25 October 2021].
Andrade, N., 2006. Associação Pernambucana de profissionais do sexo: Uma experiência de organização política [online]. Dissertação (Mestrado em Serviço Social). Recife: Centro de Ciências Sociais e aplicadas, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco. Available from: https://repositorio.ufpe.br/bitstream/123456789/9799/1/arquivo8213_1.pdf [Access 25 October 2021].
APROS - Associação das Prostitutas da Paraíba, 2014. [Facebook profile]. APROSPB [online]. Available from: https://www.facebook.com/APROSPB/ [Access 25 October 2021].
Aprosba Bahia, 2018. [Facebook profile]. Aprosba Bahia [online]. Available from: https://www.facebook.com/Aprosba-Bahia-204825216935996/ [Access 25 October 2021].
Archer, M., 2009. Teoría social realista: El enfoque morfogenético. Trans.: D. Chernilo. Santiago de Chile: Universidad Alberto Hurtado.
Articulação Nacional de Profissionais do Sexo - ANPS, 2020. [Facebook profile]. anpsbrasil [online]. Available from: https://www.facebook.com/anpsbrasil/ [Access 12 March 2021].
As Amazonas- Associação de Profissionais do sexo do Amazonas, 2018. [Facebook profile]. apamasamazonas, Non-Governmental Organization (NGO) [online]. Available from: https://www.facebook.com/apamasamazonas/ [Access 25 October 2021].
Asociación de Mujeres Meretrices de la Argentina (AMMAR), 2013. Proyecto de Ley para regular el Trabajo Sexual Autónomo en Argentina [online]. Buenos Aires: AMMAR. 3 July. Available from: http://www.ammar.org.ar/Ley-de-Trabajo-Sexual-Autonomo.html [Access 27 May 2018].
Asociación de Mujeres Meretrices de la Argentina (AMMAR), 2016a. Aniversario Línea Roja: Informe resumen (Septiembre 2015–septiembre 2016) [online]. Buenos Aires: AMMAR, 7 December. Available from: http://www.ammar.org.ar/IMG/pdf/primer_informe_linea_roja.pdf [Access 25 February 2021].
Asociación de Mujeres Meretrices de la Argentina (AMMAR), 2016b. El estigma también mata: Registro nacional de femicidios hacia trabajadoras sexuales en Argentina 1996-2016 [online]. Available from: http://www.ammar.org.ar/IMG/pdf/registro_nacional_de_femicidios_de_trabajadoras_sexuales_en_argentina_1996-marzo_2016.pdf [Access 25 February 2021].
Asociación de Mujeres Meretrices de la Argentina (AMMAR), 2018. Estudio sobre la incidencia y la participación política de las mujeres trabajadoras sexuales en América Latina y el Caribe [online]. Report. Buenos Aires: AMMAR. Available from: http://www.ammar.org.ar/IMG/pdf/armado-argentina.pdf [Access 30 May 2018].
Associação Pernambucana das Profissionais do Sexo, 2014. [Facebook profile]. appspe [online]. Available from: https://www.facebook.com/appspe/ [Access 25 October 2021].
Bachur, J.P., 2012. Inclusão e exclusão na teoria dos sistemas sociais: um balanço crítico. BIB [online], 73, 55-83. Available from: https://anpocs.com/index.php/bib-pt/bib-73/8792-inclusao-e-exclusao-na-teoria-de-sistemas-sociais-um-balanco-critico/file [Access 25 October 2021].
Badinter, R., 2002. Tribune: Prostitution et pénalisation. Le Monde, 20 February.
Benites Oliveira, C., 2016. A polissemia sociológica da questão social e suas implicações para a análise de políticas públicas. Alabastro, 2(8), 19-31.
Bohn, C., 2008. Inclusion and exclusion: theories and findings from exclusion from the community to including exclusion. In: A. Gestrich, L. Raphael and H. Uerlings, eds., Inclusion/Exclusion. Strangers and poor people from the classical antiquity to the present days, 1-15.
Bora, A., 2009. Systems Theory, discourse, positionality. Towards a better understanding of the interior architecture of functional differentiation in sociological Systems Theory [online]. Systems theory seminar. Available from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/93d8/c582ac91bcdc1c6329a1e67f6d522a5bf27c.pdf [Access 3 May 2009].
Bora, A., 2017. Semantics of ruling: reflective theories of regulation, governance and law. In: R. Paul et al., eds., Society, Regulation and Governance New Modes of Shaping Social Change?. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 15–37.
Bora, A., and Hausendorf, H., 2006. Participatory science governance revisited: normative expectations versus empirical evidence. Science and Public Policy, 33(7), 478–488.
Bora, Alfons, 2019. “Quem participa?” Reflexões sobre teoria da inclusão. Revista brasileira de sociologia do direito [online], 6(3), 3–29. Available from: https://doi.org/10.21910/rbsd.v5n3.2019.339 [Access 25 October 2021].
Bringel, B., and Varella, R., 2016. A pesquisa militante na América Latina hoje: reflexões sobre as desigualdades e as possibilidades de produção de conhecimentos. Revista digital de direito administrativo [online], 3(3), 474–489. Available from: https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2319-0558.v3i3p474-489 [Access 25 October 2021].
Business insider, 2019. Prostitution is legal in countries across Europe, but it’s nothing like what you think. Business insider [online], 13 March. Available from: https://www.businessinsider.com/prostitution-is-legal-in-countries-across-europe-photos-2019-3 [Access 25 October 2021].
Cadenas, H., and Mascareño, A., 2020. Lineamientos para una sociología evolutiva de la diferenciación funcional en América Latina. Sociologia e antropología [online], 10(01), 75–98. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/2238-38752019v1012 [Access 25 October 2021].
Calderaro, C., and Giametta, C., 2019. The Problem of Prostitution: Re-pressive policies in the name of migration control, public order, and women’s rights in France. Anti-Trafficking Review [online], 12, 155–171. Available from: https://doi.org/10.14197/atr.2012191210 [Access 25 October 2021].
Caminhas, L., 2020. A regulamentação da prostituição é uma demanda por justiça? Revista brasileira de ciências sociais [online], 35(103), 1–35. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/3510310/2020 [Access 25 October 2021].
Central Única de Trabalhadoras e Trabalhadores Sexuais – CUTS, 2016. [Facebook profile]. CUTSBR [online]. Available from: https://www.facebook.com/CUTSBR/ [Access 12 March 2021].
Chagnon, M., 2017. Prostitution in the Netherlands: what is really happening here. Dutchreview [online], 10 February. Available from: https://dutchreview.com/featured/prostitution-in-the-netherlands-what-is-really-happening-here/ [Access 25 October 2021].
cmb/rt (EPD, AFP), 2019. Germany: Prostitute protection laws proving impotent. DW [online], 18 February. Available from: https://www.dw.com/en/germany-prostitute-protection-laws-proving-impotent/a-47560411 [Access 25 October 2021].
Coletivo Clã das Lobas, 2018. [Facebook profile]. cladaslobas [online]. Available from: https://www.facebook.com/cladaslobas/ [Access 25 October 2021].
Costa, S., 1995. Democracia e dinâmica da esfera pública. Lua Nova [online], 36(95), 55–95. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-64451995000200004 [Access 25 October 2021].
Costa, S., 2012a. Freezing differences: politics, law, and the invention of cultural diversity in Latin America”. In: A. Mascareño and K. Araújo, eds., Legitimization in world society. Farnham/Burlington: Ashgate, 139–156.
Costa, S., 2012b. Regimes de coexistência interétnica no Brasil e na Alemanha: Contribuições a um debate inexistente. Sociologia: Revista da Faculdade de Letras da Universidade do Porto [online], no. 1, 235–259. Available from: https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/4265/426539986011.pdf [Access 25 October 2021].
Cruz, J., and van Iterson, S., 2021. The Audacity of Tolerance: A Critical Analysis of Legalized Prostitution in Amsterdam’s Red Light District [online]. Amsterdam: Humanity in Action in the Netherlands. Available from: https://www.humanityinaction.org/knowledge_detail/the-audacity-of-tolerance-a-critical-analysis-of-legalized-prostitution-in-amsterdams-red-light-district/ [Access 25 October 2021].
Dank, B., 1998. Sex work, sex workers, and beyond. Sexuality and Culture, 2, 1–6.
Domingues, J.M., 1999. Cidadania, direito e modernidade. ANPOCS [online], 23, 1–37. Available from: https://www.anpocs.com/index.php/encontros/papers/23-encontro-anual-da-anpocs/gt-21/gt19-17/5014-jdomingues-cidadania/file [Access 30 March 2015].
Durkheim, E., 1999. Divisão social do trabalho. São Paulo: Martins Fontes.
Farley, M., 2004. Bad for the body, bad for the heart: Prostitution harms women even if legalized or decriminalized. Violence against Women, 10(10), 1087–1125.
Foerster, H. v., 2003. Understanding Understanding: Essays on Cybernetics and Cognition. New York: Springer.
Fondation Scelles, 2019. Sexual exploitation: New challenges, new answers. 5th Global Report [online]. Paris: Fondation Scelles. http://fondationscelles.org/pdf/RM5/OVERVIEW-Global-Report-2019-on-sexual-exploitation-FONDATION-SCELLES.pdf [Access 25 October 2021].
Fondation Scelles, 2021. About us [online]. Paris: Fondation Scelles. Available from: https://www.fondationscelles.org/en/about-us [Access 25 October 2021].
García Blanco, J.M., 2012. La exclusión social en la teoría social de Niklas Luhmann. Século XXI [online], 2(1), 43–71. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5902/223667256384 [Access 25 October 2021].
García Blanco, J.M., 2016. Los problemas teóricos y metodológicos del concepto de exclusión social: Una visión neofuncionalista. Revista Internacional de Sociología [online], 74(2), e029. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2016.74.2.029 [Access 25 October 2021].
Gempac - Grupo de Mulheres Prostitutas do Estado do Pará, 2015. [Facebook profile]. gempacpa [online]. Available from: https://www.facebook.com/gempacpa/ [Access 25 October 2021].
Giddens, A., 1993. Sociologia. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.
Gohn, M.G., 2018. Marcos referenciais teóricos que têm dado suporte às análises dos movimentos sociais e ações coletivas no Brasil–1970–2018. Revista brasileira de sociologia [online], 6(14), 5–33. Available from: https://www.redalyc.org/journal/5957/595765442001/movil/ [Access 25 October 2021].
Graça, M., and Gonçalves, M., 2016. Prostituição: que modelo jurídico-político para Portugal? DADOS: Revista de Ciências Sociais [online], 59(2), 449–480. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/00115258201683 [Access 25 October 2021].
Guerra, P., 2015. Tendencias sobre el delito del proxenetismo en el marco de las regulaciones sobre el trabajo sexual: Un análisis socio jurídico a partir del relato de mujeres en situación prostitucional del Uruguay. Quaestio Iuris [online], 8(2), 735–757. Available from: https://doi.org/10.12957/rqi.2015.16924 [Access 25 October 2021].
Ianni, O., 1989. A questão social. Revista USP [online], no. 3, 145–154. Available from: https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2316-9036.v0i3p145-154 [Access 25 October 2021].
International Committee on the Rights of Sex Workers in Europe (ICRSE), 2008. Prostitution Policies in the Netherlands [online]. Available from: https://www.sexworkeurope.org/sites/default/files/resource-pdfs/wijers_m_pros_policies_nl_2008.pdf [Access 25 October 2021].
Jeffreys, S., 2008. The Idea of Prostitution. Melbourne: Spinifex Press.
Kuhn, T., 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
Le Bail, H., Giametta, C., and Rassouw, N., 2018. Que pensent les travailleur.ses.s du sexe de la loi prostitution? [online]. Report. April. Paris: Médecins du Monde. Available from: https://www.medecinsdumonde.org/sites/default/files/Rapport-prostitution-BD.PDF [Access 25 October 2021].
Ley Nº 17515. Ley sobre el trabajo sexual. 04/07/2002. Registro Nacional de Leyes y Decretos [online], tomo 1, semestre 2, p. 32. Montevideo: Centro de Información Oficial. https://www.impo.com.uy/bases/leyes/17515-2002 [Access 25 October 2021].
Luhmann, N., 1993. Teoría política en el Estado de bienestar. Madrid: Alianza.
Luhmann, N., 1996. La ciencia de la sociedad. Ciudad de México/Barcelona: Universidad Iberoamericana/Herder. (Originally published in 1990 as Die wissenschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp).
Luhmann, N., 1998. Sistemas sociales: Lineamientos para una teoría general. Barcelona/Ciudad de México: Antrhorpos/Universidad Iberoamericana/Pontificia Universidad Javerina. (Originally published in 1984 as Soziale Systeme: Grundisse einer Allgenneinen Theorie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp).
Luhmann, N., 2012. Theory of society (vol. 1). California: University of Stanford. (Originally published in 1997 as Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp).
Luhmann, N., 2013. Inclusão e exclusão. In: R. Dutra and J.P. Bachur, Dossiê Niklas Luhmann. Belo Horizonte: EdUFMG, pp. 15–49. (Originally published in 1995 as Inklusion und Exklusion. Soziologische Aufklärung, Verl. 6. Opladen: Westdt, pp. 237–264).
Luhmann, N., 2005. El derecho de la sociedad. México: Herder. (Originally published in 1995 as Recht der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp).
Luhmann, N., 2007. La sociedad de la sociedad. México: Herder. (Originally published in 1997 as Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp).
Luhmann, N., 2014. Sociologia política. Trans.: I. Ortega Rodríguez. Madrid: Trotta.
Luhmann, N., 2016. Distinciones directrices. Trans.: P. Piedras Monroy. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.
Maingueneau, D., 2015. Discurso e análise de discurso. São Paulo: Parábola.
Marcuschi, L.A., 2007. Fenômenos da linguagem: Reflexões semânticas e discursivas. Rio de Janeiro: Lucerna.
Marcuschi, L.A., 2008. Processo de compreensão: Produção textual, análise de gêneros e compreensão. São Paulo: Parábola.
Mascareño, A., 2010. Diferenciación y contingencia en América Latina. Santiago de Chile: Universidad Alberto Hurtado.
Mascareño, A., 2014. Diferenciación, inclusión/exclusión y cohesión en la sociedad moderna. Revista Cis [online], 17(2), 9–25. Available from: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/6310259.pdf [Access 25 October 2021].
Mascareño, A., and Carvajal, F., 2015. Los distintos rostros de la inclusión y la exclusión. Revista CEPAL [online], 116, 131–146. Available from: https://doi.org/10.18356/087628b4-es [Access 25 October 2021].
Mascareño, A., et al., 2016. Redes informales e instituciones democráticas em América Latina. DADOS: Revista de ciências sociais [online], 59(3), 683–718. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/00115258201689 [Access 25 October 2021].
Mathis, A., 2007. Inclusão, exclusão e cidadania como desafio para apolítica em regiões de modernidade periférica. Novos cadernos NAEA [online], 10(1), 217–240. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5801/ncn.v10i1.78 [Access 25 October 2021].
Mendive, J., 2020. Putxs datos: Trabajo sexual y pandemia en Argentina. Perfil sociodemográfico de trabajadorxs sexuales alcanzadxs por AMMAR [online]. Buenos Aires: AMMAR. Available from: https://www.ammar.org.ar/IMG/pdf/informe_putxs_datos_trabajo_sexual_y_pandemia_en_arg-2.pdf [Access 25 February 2021].
Ministério do Trabalho e Emprego (MTE), no date. Classificação Brasileira de Ocupação, CBO 5198 [online]. Available from: https://www.ocupacoes.com.br/cbo-mte/5198-profissionais-do-sexo [Access 27 May 2018].
Møller, I.H., and Hespanha, P., 2002. Padrões de exclusão e estratégias pessoais. Revista crítica de ciências sociais [online], 64, 56–79. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4000/rccs.1232 [Access 25 October 2021].
Mossman, E., 2007. International Approaches to Decriminalising or Legalising Prostitution [online]. Prepared for the Ministry of Justice of New Zealand. October. Wellington: Ministry of Justice. Available from: https://prostitution.procon.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/50/newzealandreport.pdf [Access 25 October 2021].
Munro, V.E., and Giusta, M. dela, 2016. Demanding Sex: Critical Reflections on the Regulation of Prostitution. London/New York: Routledge.
Mutzenberg, R., 2011. Movimentos sociais: entre aderências, conflitos e antagonismos. Sinais [online], 9(1), 127–143. Available from: https://doi.org/10.25067/s.v1i09.2782 [Access 25 October 2021].
Neves, M., 1994. Entre subintegração e sobreintegração: A cidadania inexistente. DADOS: Revista de ciências sociais [online], 37(2), 253–276. Available from: https://www.academia.edu/29822345/Entre_subintegrac_a_o_e_sobreintegrac_a_o_a_cidadania_inexistente [Access 25 October 2021].
Neves, M., 2006. Entre Têmis e Leviatã: Uma relação difícil. São Paulo: Martins Fontes.
Neves, M., 2013. A constituição e a esfera pública. In: R. Dutra e J.P. Bachur, Dossiê Niklas Luhmann. Belo Horizonte: EdUFMG, 105–147.
Neves, M., 2018. Constituição e direito na modernidade periférica: Uma abordagem teórica e uma interpretação do caso brasileiro. São Paulo: Martins Fontes.
Nucci, G.S., 2014. Prostituição, lenocínio e tráfico de pessoas: Aspectos constitucionais e penais. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais.
Oliveira, L., 1997. Os excluídos “existem”? Notas sobre a elaboração de um novo conceito. Revista brasileira de ciências sociais [online], 12(33), 49–61. Available from: http://www.anpocs.org.br/portal/publicacoes/rbcs_00_33/rbcs33_04.htm [Access 25 October 2021].
Possenti, S., 2009. Questões para analistas do discurso. São Paulo: Parábola.
Prada, M., 2018. Putafeminista. São Paulo: Veneta.
Prange, A., 2017. Germany introduces unpopular prostitution law. DW [online], 2 July. Available from: https://p.dw.com/p/2fmoT [Access 9 October 2019].
ProCon.org, 2018. Countries and Their Prostitution Policies [online]. Last updated 23 April. Available from: https://prostitution.procon.org/countries-and-their-prostitution-policies/ [Access 25 October 2021].
Roberts, N., 1992. As prostitutas na história. Trans.: M. Lopes. Rio de Janeiro: Record: Rosa dos tempos.
Rocha, I., 2013. Como seres humanos: Una mirada al proceso de legislación de la prostitución como trabajo sexual en el Uruguay. Encuentros latinoamericanos [online], 7(2), 239–272. Available from: http://valijapedagogica.mercosursocialsolidario.org/archivos/hc/1-aportes-teoricos/2.marcos-teoricos/1.articulos/IleanaRocha.ComoSeresHumanosUnaMiradaAlProcesoDeLegislacionDeLaProstitucioncomoTrabajoSexuaEnElUruguay.pdf [Access 25 October 2021].
Rodrigues, M.T., 2009. A prostituição no Brasil contemporâneo: Um trabalho como outro qualquer? Katálysis [online], 12(1), 68–76. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1414-49802009000100009 [Access 25 October 2021].
Rodríguez, D., and Opazo, M.P., 2007. Comunicaciones de la organización. Santiago de Chile: PUC-Chile.
Scherer-Warren, I., 2010. Movimentos sociais e opôs-colonialismo na América Latina. Ciências sociais Unisinos [online], 46(1), 18–27. Available from:https://doi.org/10.4013/csu.2010.46.1.03 [Access 25 October 2021].
Simões, S.S., 2010. Identidade e política: a prostituição e o reconhecimento de um métier no Brasil. RAU: Revista de Antropologia Social da UFSCar [online], 2(1), 24–46. Available from: https://doi.org/10.52426/rau.v2i1.20 [Access 25 October 2021].
Sisters, 2018. Barbara-Künkelin-award for Sabine Constabel: laudation and speech of thanks [online]. Stuttgart: Sisters, 2 May. Available from: https://sisters-ev.de/en/2018/05/02/barbara-kuenkelin-award-for-sabine-constabel-laudation-speech-of-thanks/ [Access 25 October 2021].
Soares, L.C., 1992. Rameiras, ilhoas, polacas: A prostituição no Rio de Janeiro do século XIX. São Paulo: Ática.
Sousa, F.R. de, 2013. Participação popular e engajamento de prostitutas na luta por direitos [online]. Paper presented at Goiânia-GO: 36ª Reunião Nacional da ANPEd. 29 de setembro a 02 de outubro. Available from: http://www.anped.org.br/sites/default/files/gt06_2722_texto.pdf [Access 13 September 2017].
Souto, C., 2019. For a general theoretical unified axiomatic reduction of the natural spaces. Revista brasileira de sociologia do direito [online], 6(2), 3–12. Available from: https://doi.org/10.21910/rbsd.v5n2.2019.327 [Access 25 October 2021].
Souto, C., and Souto, S., 2003. Sociologia do direito: Uma visão substantiva. Porto Alegre: SAFE.
Spencer Brown, G., 1969. Laws of Form. London: George Allen and Unwin.
Stamford da Silva, A., 2021. Decisão jurídica na comunicativação. São Paulo: Almedina.
Stichweh, R., 2009. Leitgesichtspunkte einer Soziologie der inklusion und exklusion. In: R. Stichweh and P. Windolf, eds., Inklusion und Exklusion: Analysen zur Sozialstruktur und sozialen Ungleichheit. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 29–42.
Stichweh, R., 2013. Inclusão/exclusão, diferenciação funcional e a teoria da sociedade mundial. In: R. Dutra e J.P. Bachur, Dossiê Niklas Luhmann. Belo Horizonte: EdUFMG, 51–73.
Teubner, G., 2005. Dealing with Paradoxes of Law: Derrida, Luhmann, Wiethölter. In: O. Perez and G. Teubner, eds., Paradoxes and Inconsistencies in the Law. Oxford: Hart, 49–65.
Torres Junior, R.D., 2013. O primado da diferenciação funcional e a contingência das estruturas de desigualdade social. In: R. Dutra and J.P. Bachur, Dossiê Niklas Luhmann. Belo Horizonte: EdUFMG, 219–248.
Torres Junior, R.D., 2014. O problema da desigualdade social na teoria da sociedade de Niklas Luhmann. Caderno CRH [online], 27(72), 547–561. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-49792014000300007 [Access 25 October 2021].
Torres Nafarrate, J., 1995. Notas biográficas sobre Luhmann. Niklas Luhmann: La política como sistema. Lecciones publicadas por Javier Torres Nafarrate. Ciudad de México: Universidad Iberoamericana.
Torres Nafarrate, J., 2009. Niklas Luhmann: La política como sistema. Lecciones publicadas por Javier Torres Nafarrate. Ciudad de México: Herder.
Tulipas do Cerrado, 2017. [Facebook profile]. TulipasC [online]. Available from: https://www.facebook.com/TulipasC/ [Access 25 October 2021].
Vilhena Vieira, O., 2007. A desigualdade e a subversão do Estado de Direito. Sur, revista internacional de direitos humanos [online], 4(6), 28–51. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-64452007000100003 [Access 25 October 2021].
Weitzer, R., 2013. Researching sex work in the twenty-first century. Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews, 42(5), 713–722.
Weitzer, R., 2017. The moment to criminalize sex work in the United States. Journal of Law and Society, 37(1), 61–84.
Zveiter, A., 2017. A regulamentação profissional da prostituição [online]. Dissertação de Mestrado em Ciências do Trabalho e Relações Laborais. ISCTE — Instituto Universitário de Lisboa. Available from: https://repositorio.iscte-iul.pt/handle/10071/16087 [Access 25 October 2021].
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
(c) Tous droits réservés Artur Stamford da Silva, Mariana Farias Silva 2021
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International.
OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence, further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.
