Doing (Prison) Research Differently
Reflections on Autoethnography and ‘Emotional Recall’
##plugins.pubIds.doi.readerDisplayName##:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-0932Gako-hitzak:
Qualitative methodology, emotional recall, discretion, prison officers, Mafioso, autoethnographyLaburpena
This paper offers a reflection on both the family of methods called autoethnography and on the experience of doing autoethnography in practice as a follow-up to a prison ethnography. By engaging with the literature on autoethnography, it provides an overview of the methodology and focuses on one particular experience of doing (prison) research differently by adopting the notion of emotional recall as a heuristic tool. More specifically, this paper shows how emotional recall was vital to yielding a substantive research finding through autoethnographic re-engagement with data collected during an ethnography of prison officers’ threat of the use of force in an Italian prison. Through autoethnography, prison officers’ favouritism towards Mafioso was found to be a key aspect of officers’ use of discretion in the prison setting.
##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##
Metrics
Downloads:
PDF (English) 354
Erreferentziak
Adams, T.E., Holman Jones, S., and Ellis, C., 2015. Autoethnography. Oxford University Press.
Anderson, L., and Glass-Coffin, B., 2013. I Learn by Going: Autoethnographic Modes of Inquiry. In: S. Holman Jones, T.E. Adams and C. Ellis, eds. Handbook of Autoethnography. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press, pp. 57–83.
Anderson, L., 2006. Analytic autoethnography. Journal of contemporary ethnography, 35 (4), 373–395. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241605280449
Antigone, n.d. Antigone. Per i diritti e le garanzie nel sistema penale [online]. Available from: http://www.associazioneantigone.it/english [Accessed 11 January 2018].
Arnold, H., 2005. The effects of prison work. In: A. Liebling and S. Maruna, eds. The Effects of Imprisonment. Cullompton: Willan, pp. 391–420.
Boylorn, R.M., and Orbe, M.P., 2014. Critical Autoethnography: Intersecting Cultural Identities in Everyday Life. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
Cardano, M., 2009. Ethnography and Reflexivity. Notes on the Construction of Objectivity in Ethnographic Research. NetPaper [online], 1/2009. University of Turin, Department of Social Sciences. Available from: https://iris.unito.it/retrieve/handle/2318/75133/10019/Netpaper_Cardano_2009.pdf [Accessed 11 January 2018].
Chang, H., 2008. Autoethnography as method. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
Chaplin, E., 2011. The photo diary as an autoethnographic method. In: E. Margolis and L. Pawels, eds., The Sage handbook for visual research methods. London: Sage, pp. 241–262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446268278.n13
Charmaz, K., 2006. The power of names. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 35 (4), 396–399. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241606286983
Chiarelli, A., 2011. Malapolizia. Rome: Newton Compton.
Crawley, E., 2013. Doing prison work: the public and private lives of prison officers. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781843924432
Crewe, B., 2009. The Prisoner Society. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199577965.003.0006
Crewe, B., 2014. Not looking hard enough: masculinity, emotion, and prison research. Qualitative Inquiry [online], 20 (4), 392–403. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1077800413515829?journalCode=qixa [Accessed 11 January 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800413515829
De Carolis, F., ed., 2012. Urla a bassa voce. Dal buio del 41 bis e del fine pena mai. Salerno: Eretica.
Denejkina, A., 2017. Exo-Autoethnography: An Introduction. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research [online], 18 (3). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/fqs-18.3.2754 [Accessed 11 January 2018].
Denzin, N.K., 2006. Analytic autoethnography, or déjà vu all over again. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 35 (4), 419–428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241606286985
Douglas, K., and Carless, D., 2013. A History of Autoethnography Inquiry. In: S. Holman Jones, T.E. Adams and C. Ellis, eds., Handbook of Autoethnography. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press, pp. 84–106.
Dworkin, R., 1977. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ellis, C., 1991. Sociological Introspection and Emotional Experience. Symbolic Interaction, 14, 23–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/si.1991.14.1.23
Ellis, C., 1999. Heartful Autoethnography. Qualitative Health Research, 9 (5), 669–683. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/104973299129122153
Ellis, C., 2004. The Ethnographic I: A Methodological Novel about Autoethnography, Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
Ellis, C., 2008. Systematic Sociological Introspection. In: L. Given, ed., The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. London: Sage, pp. 853-854.
Ellis, C., 2009. Fighting Back or Moving on: an Autoethnographic Response to Critics. International Review of Qualitative Research, 2 (3), 371–378. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/irqr.2009.2.3.371
Ellis, C., Adams, T.E., and Bochner, A.P., 2011. Autoethnography: An overview. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research [online], 12 (1). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/fqs-12.1.1589 [Accessed 12 January 2018].
Ellis, C., and Bochner, A.P., 2000. Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity. In: N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln, eds., Handbook of Qualitative Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 733–768.
Ellis, C., and Bochner, A.P., 2006. Analyzing Analytic Autoethnography: An Autopsy. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 35 (4), 429-449. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241606286979
Ellis, C., and Bochner, A.P., 2016. Evocative Autoethnography: Writing Lives and Telling Stories. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315545417
Ellis, C., and Bochner, A.P., eds., 1996. Composing Ethnography: Alternative Forms of Qualitative Writing. Walnut Creek, CA: Alta Mira Press.
Ellis, C., et al., 2017. Coming Unhinged: A Twice-Told Multivoiced Autoethnography. Qualitative Inquiry [online], 24 (2). First published 9 January. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1077800416684874, pp. 1–15. [Accessed 12 January 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800416684874
Fassin, D., 2017. Prison Worlds: an Ethnography of the Carceral Condition. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Gariglio, L., 2010. I visual studies e gli usi sociali della fotografia. Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia, 1, 117–140.
Gariglio, L., and Ellis, C., forthcoming, 2018. Good Ethnography is Autoethnographic and Good Autoethnography is Ethnographic: A Dialogue between an Ethnographer and an Autoethnographer. Rivista Italiana di Sociologia [in press].
Gariglio, L., 2016a. Photo-elicitation in Prison Ethnography: Breaking the Ice in the Field and Unpacking Prison Officers’ Use of Force. Crime, Media, Culture [online], 12 (3), 367–379. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1741659015614223?journalCode=cmca [Accessed 11 January 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1741659015614223
Gariglio, L., 2016b. Threats of Force by Prison Officers in a Male Custodial Institution: An Ethnographic Account. Etnografia e Ricerca Qualitativa, 2, 287–305.
Gariglio, L., 2017. L’autoetnografia nel campo etnografico. Etnografia e Ricerca Qualitativa, 3, 467-484.
Gariglio, L., 2018a. ‘Doing Coercion’ in Male Custodial Setting: An Ethnography of Italian Prison Officers Using Force. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315462691
Gariglio, L., 2018b. Challenging Prison Officers’ Discretion: “Good reasons” to Treat Courteously Mafiosi in Custody in Italy. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography [online], first published 10 January. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241617749012 [Accessed 12 January 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241617749012
Gobo, G., and Molle, A., 2016. Doing Ethnography. 2nd ed. London: Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529682847
Gonnella, P., 2013a. Italy: between Amnesties and Emergencies. In: V. Ruggero and M. Ryan, eds., Punishment in Europe: a critical anatomy of penal systems. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 226–244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137028211_11
Gonnella, P., 2013b. La tortura in Italia. Parole, luoghi e pratiche della violenza pubblica. Rome: Derive e Approdi.
Holman Jones, S., Adams, T.E,. and Ellis, C., eds., 2013. Handbook of Autoethnography. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
Jewkes, Y., 2011. Autoethnography and emotion as intellectual resources: doing prison research differently. Qualitative Inquiry, 18 (1), 63–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800411428942
Kalica, E., 2016. Ergastolo ostativo e negazione degli affetti. Una prospettiva interna sul 41 bis. Etnografia e ricerca qualitativa, 2, 323–338.
Kane, S.C., 2004. The unconventional methods of cultural criminology. Theoretical Criminology, 8 (3), 303-321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480604044611
Kauffman, K., 1988. Prison officers and their world. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Liebling, A., 2000. Prison Officers, Policing and the Use of Discretion. Theoretical criminology, 4 (3), 333–357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480600004003005
Liebling, A., 2004. Prisons and their Moral Performance: a Study of Values, Quality, and Prison Life. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199271221.001.0001
Liebling, A., Price, D., and Shefer, D., 2011. The Prison Officer. 2nd ed. Abingdon, UK: Willan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203832998
Lipsky, M., 2010. Street-level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. 30th anniversary expanded ed. New York: The Russell Sage Foundation.
Phillips, C., 2012. The Multicultural Prison: Ethnicity, Masculinity, and Social Relations among Prisoners. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199697229.001.0001
Phillips, C., and Webster, C., 2013. New Directions in Race, Ethnicity and Crime. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203107287
Ploder, A., and Stadlbauer, J., 2016. Strong Reflexivity and its Critics: Responses to Autoethnography in the German-speaking Cultural and Social Sciences. Qualitative Inquiry [online], 22 (9), 753–765. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1077800416658067?journalCode=qixa [Accessed 12 January 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800416658067
Poulos, C.N., 2016. An Autoethnography of Memory and Connection. Qualitative Inquiry [online], 22 (7), 552–558. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1077800415622506?journalCode=qixa [Accessed 12 January 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800415622506
Puma, G., 2016. The Section 41-bis of the Italian Prison Administration Act again under Scrutiny of the European Court of Human Rights: The Paolello case. Diritti umani e diritto internazionale, 10 (1), 240–246.
Reed-Danahay, D.E., 1997. Auto/ethnography: Rewriting the Self and the Social. Oxford: Berg.
Siino, A.R., 2015. The Article 41-bis of the Italian Criminal Jurisdiction: Indispensable Instrument or Basis for Torture? Sicurezza e scienze sociali, 2, 122-134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3280/SISS2015-002009
Spry, T., 2011. Body, Paper, Stage: Writing and Performing Autoethnography. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Cross Press.
Sykes, G.M., 1958. The Society of Captive: A Study of a Maximum Security Prison. NJ: Princeton University Press.
Torrente, G., 2016. «Mi raccomando, non fategli del male». La violenza del carcere nelle pratiche decisionali degli operatori. Etnografia e ricerca qualitativa, 2, 267–284.
Wakeman, S., 2014. Fieldwork, Biography and Emotion: Doing Criminological Autoethnography. British Journal of Criminology [online], 54 (5), 705–721. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azu039 [Accessed 12 January 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azu039
Wall, S., 2006. An Autoethnography on Learning about Autoethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5 (2), 146–160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500205
Wall, S., 2008. Easier Said than Done: Writing an Autoethnography. International journal of qualitative methods, 7 (1), 38-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690800700103
Wall, S., 2016. Toward a Moderate Autoethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Methods [online], 15 (1), 1–9. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1609406916674966 [Accessed 12 January 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406916674966
##submission.downloads##
Argitaratuta
##submission.howToCite##
Zenbakia
Atala
##submission.license##
##submission.copyrightStatement##
##submission.license.cc.by-nc-nd4.footer##OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence, further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.
