Participatory embeddedness and democratic deepening
Feminist Subaltern Counterpublics
##plugins.pubIds.doi.readerDisplayName##:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.1887Gako-hitzak:
Participatory embeddedness, Feminist Subaltern Counterpublics, democratic deepeningLaburpena
The objective of this research is to analyze how participatory embeddedness through Feminist Subaltern Counterpublics is related to democratic deepening. To this end, two cases have been selected in the towns of Ripollet (Catalonia) and Etxebarri (Basque Country) developing a multi-method design that triangulates interviews, a direct observation and a discussion group. After applying a cross-case analysis, the findings reveal how the practical and spatial dimensions produce temporary rooting oriented towards democratic deepening from a gender perspective. Firstly, the dissolution of the public/private tension leads to inclusive practices and –therefore– to the politicization of subjects and problems previously excluded from the public sphere. Secondly, the institutionalization processes of social movements can favor spaces of hybridization where the concerns of the subalternized are mobilized in order to –thirdly– be transformed into public policies sustained over time.
##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##
Metrics
Downloads:
14(4)_Ureta_OSLS (English) 273
XML_14(4)_Ureta_OSLS (English) 3
Erreferentziak
Andrew, M., 2010. Women's movement institutionalization: The need for new approaches. Politics & Gender [online], 6(4), 609–616. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X10000395 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X10000395
Angell, A., 1993. Chile de Alessandri a Pinochet: en Busca de la Utopía. Santiago de Chile: Andrés Bello.
Bericat, E., 1998. La integración de los métodos cuantitativo y cualitativo en la investigación social. Barcelona: Ariel.
Blanco, I., Gomà, R., and Subirats, J., 2018. El Nuevo Municipalismo: Derecho a la Ciudad y Comunes Urbanos. Gestión y Análisis de Políticas Públicas, (20), 14–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24965/gapp.v0i20.10491
Blanco, I., Salazar, Y., and Bianchi, I., 2020. Urban governance and political change under a radical left government: The case of Barcelona. Journal of Urban Affairs [online], 42(1), 1–21. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2018.1559648 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2018.1559648
Blatter, J., and Haverland, M., 2012. Designing Case Studies: Explanatory Approaches in Small-N Research. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137016669
Bloor, M., et al., 2000. Focus Groups in Social Research [online]. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Available at: https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781849209175 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209175
Borman, K.M., LeCompte, M.D., and Goetz, J.P., 1986. Ethnographic and Qualitative Research Design and Why it Doesn't Work. American Behavioral Scientist [online], 30(1), 42–57. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/000276486030001006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/000276486030001006
Bua, A., and Bussu, S., 2021. Between governance‐driven democratisation and democracy-driven governance: Explaining changes in participatory governance in the case of Barcelona. European Journal of Political Research [online], 60(3), 716–737. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12421 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12421
Bussu, S., et al., 2022. Introduction: Embedding participatory governance. Critical Policy Studies [online], 16(2), 133–145. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2022.2053179 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2022.2053179
Callejo, J., 2001. El Grupo de Discusión: Introducción a una Práctica de Investigación. Barcelona: Ariel. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1558/sols.v3i1.91
Cloward, R., and Piven, F., 1977. Poor People’s Movements. New York: Pantheon.
Coglianese, C., 2001. Social Movements, Law, and Society: The Institutionalization of the Environmental Movement. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 150(1), 85–118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3312913
Dube, R., 2011. Making your Own Media: The Oaxacan Feminist Subaltern Counterpublic Sphere. Works and Days, 29, 217–240.
Duverger, M., 1957. Los Partidos Políticos. Ciudad de México: FCE.
Eckstein, H., 1975. Case Study and Theory in Political Science. In: F. Greenstein and N.W. Polsby, eds., Handbook of Political Science. Boston: Addison-Wesley, 79–138.
Farquhar, C. (with R. Das), 1999. Are Focus Groups Suitable for ‘Sensitive’ Topics? Developing Focus Group Research: Politics. Theory and Practice [online], 47–63. Available at: https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781849208857.n4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208857.n4
Felski, R., 1989. Feminist Theory and Social Change. Theory, Culture & Society [online], 6(2), 219–240. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/026327689006002003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026327689006002003
Fraser, N., 1990. Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy. SocialText [online], 25/26, 56–80. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/466240 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/466240
Fraser, N., 1996. Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the “Postsocialist” Condition. London: Routledge.
Gamson, W., 1990. The strategy of social protest. Belmont: Wadsworth Press.
Gelambí, M., 2015. La gestión transversal de género en momentos de crisis. Análisis de los municipios catalanes. Gestión y Análisis de Políticas Públicas [online], (14), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.24965/gap.v0i14.10285
Giugni, M.G., and Passy, F., 1998. Contentious Politics in Complex Societies: New Social Movements between Conflict and Cooperation. In: M.G. Giugni, D. McAdam and C. Tilly, eds., From Contention to Democracy [online]. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 81–107. https://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:112895
Guha, R., and Spivak, R.G.G.C., 1988. Selected Subaltern Studies. Oxford University Press.
Gunther, R., and Diamond, L., 2003. Species of Political Parties: A New Typology. Party Politics [online], 9(2), 167–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688030092003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688030092003
Ibarra, P., Gomà, R., and Martí, S., 2002. Algunas Cuestiones Introductorias. In: P. Ibarra, S. Martí and R. Gomà, eds., Creadores de democracia radical: movimientos sociales y redes de políticas públicas. Barcelona: Icaria, 9–23.
Ízcara-Palacios, S.P., 2014. Manual de Investigación Cualitativa. Ciudad de México: Fontamara.
Jung, J.K., 2010. Disentangling Protest Cycles: An Event-History Analysis of New Social Movements in Western Europe. Mobilization: An International Quarterly [online], 15(1), 25–44. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17813/maiq.15.1.86260543m3110705 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17813/maiq.15.1.86260543m3110705
Karpowitz, C.F., Raphael, C., and Hammond, A.S., 2009. Deliberative Democracy and Inequality: Two Cheers for Enclave Deliberation among the Disempowered. Politics & Society [online], 37(4), 576–615. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329209349226 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329209349226
Katz, R.S., and Mair, P., 1993. The Evolution of Party Organizations in Europe: The Three Faces of Party Organization. American Review of Politics [online], 14, 593–617. https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2374-7781.1993.14.0.593-617 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2374-7781.1993.14.0.593-617
Katz, R.S., and Mair, P., 1995. Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy: The Emergence of the Cartel Party. Party Politics [online], 1(1), 5–28. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068895001001001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068895001001001
Khan, S., and Vanwynsberghe, R. 2008. Cultivating the Under-Mined: Cross-Case Analysis as Knowledge Mobilization. Forum: Qualitative Social Research [online], 9(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-9.1.334
Kirchheimer, O., 1966. The Transformation of the Western European Party Systems. In: J. LaPalombara and M. Weiner, eds., Political Parties and Political Development [online]. Princeton University Press, 177–200. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400875337-007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400875337-007
Klandermans, B., Roefs, M., and Olivier, J., 1998. A Movement Takes Office. In: D.S. Meyer and S. Tarrow, eds., The Social Movement Society. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 173–194.
Kriesi, H.P., 1999. La Estructura Organizacional de los Nuevos Movimientos Sociales en su Contexto Político. In: D. McAdam, J.D. McCarthy and M.N. Zald, eds., Movimientos sociales, perspectivas comparadas: oportunidades políticas, estructuras de movilización y marcos interpretativos culturales. Madrid: Istmo, 221–261.
Krouwel, A., 2006. Party models. In: J.W. Crotty and R.S. Katz, eds., Handbook of Party Politics. New York: Sage, 249–262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608047.n22
Mansbridge, J., 1996. Using/Fighting Power: the Polity. In: S. Benhabib, ed., Democracy and Difference. Contesting the Boundaries of the Political. Princeton University Press, 46–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691234168-004
Martínez-Palacios, J., 2017. Democratizing participation through feminism. The role of feminist subaltern counterpublics in the expansion of the Basque public sphere. Revista Española de Ciencia Política [online], 43, 37–59. Available at: https://doi.org/10.21308/recp.43.02 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21308/recp.43.02
McCarthy, J.D., and Zald, M.N., 1977. The Trend of Social Movements in America: Professionalization and Resource Mobilization [online]. Northbrook: General Learning Corporation. Available at: https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/50939/164.pdf
Michels, R., 1915. Los partidos políticos. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.
Morgan, D.L., 1996. Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984287
Morgan, K., 2007. The Learning Region: Institutions, Innovation and Regional Renewal. Regional Studies [online], 41(S1), 147–159. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400701232322 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400701232322
Noel, M., 2019. Arreglos Institucionales para la Transversalidad de Género: Desarrollo y Organización de Entramados de Actores de las Políticas de Igualdad de Género en Montevideo. In: A.L. Rodríguez, ed., Desafíos Territoriales para la Igualdad de Género. Dinámicas de Acción Colectiva e Instrumentos de Política Pública. Buenos Aires: CLACSO, 113–142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1gm00tr.7
Pavan, E., 2017. The Integrative Power of Online Collective Action Networks beyond Protest. Exploring Social Media use in the Process of Institutionalization. Social Movement Studies [online], 16(4), 433–446. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2016.1268956 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2016.1268956
Ragin, C.C., 2004. Turning the Tables: How Case-oriented Research Challenges. In: H. Brady and D. Collier, eds., Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 123–138.
Röcke, A., 2014. Framing Citizen Participation: Participatory Budgeting in France, Germany and the United Kingdom. New York: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137326669
Rohrschneider, R., 1994. How Iron is the Iron Law of Oligarchy? Robert Michels and National Party delegates in Eleven West European Democracies. European Journal of Political Research [online], 25(2), 207–238. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1994.tb00418.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1994.tb00418.x
Ruiz-Olabuénaga, J.I., 2007. Metodología de la Investigación Cualitativa. Bilbao: Universidad de Deusto.
Rupp, L., and Taylor, V., 1987. Survival in the Doldrums: The American Women's Rights Movement, 1945 to the 1960s. New York: Oxford University Press.
Santos, B.S., and Avritzer, L., 2005. Introduction: Opening up the Canon of Democracy. In: B.S. Santos, ed., Democratizing Democracy: Beyond the Liberal Democratic Canon. London/New York: Verso, xxxv–ixxiii.
Seippel, Ø., 2001. From Mobilization to Institutionalization? The Case of Norwegian Environmentalism. Acta Sociologica [online], 44(2), 123–137. Available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/000169930104400202 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/000169901300346873
Serra, M., y Ubasart, G., 2019. Municipalismo Político, Social y Económico: un Motor de cambio. Desacatos: Revista de Ciencias Sociales [online], (61), 70–79. Available at: https://desacatos.ciesas.edu.mx/index.php/Desacatos/article/view/2133
Squires, C.R., 2002. Rethinking the Black Public Sphere: An Alternative Vocabulary for Multiple Public Spheres. Communication Theory [online], 12(4), 446–468. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00278.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/12.4.446
Suh, D., 2011. Institutionalizing Social Movements: The Dual Strategy of the Korean Women's Movement. The Sociological Quarterly [online], 52(3), 442–471. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01214.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01214.x
Tarrow, S., 1994. Social Movements in Europe: Movement Society or Europeanization of Conflict? Florence: European University Institute.
Tilly, C., 2004. Contention and Democracy in Europe, 1650–2000. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511756092
Tilly, C., 2010. Regimes and Repertoires. University of Chicago Press.
Ureta, M., 2022. Partidos-movimiento y profundización democrática. Gobiernos locales en Catalunya y País Vasco. Los casos de Decidim Ripollet y La Voz del Pueblo (2017–2022) [online]. 26 de mayo. Tesis doctoral. Universidad del País Vasco (EHU/UPV). Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10810/57248
Weisser, C.R., 2008. Subaltern Counterpublics and the Discourse of Protest. JAC, 28(3–4), 608–620.
Wilson, J., 1973. Introduction to Social Movements. New York: Basic Books.
Yin, R.K., 1981. The Case Study as a Serious Research Strategy. Knowledge, 3(1), 97–114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/107554708100300106
Zald, M.N., and Ash, R., 1966. Social Movement Organizations: Growth, Decay and Change. Social Forces [online], 44(3), 327–41. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/44.3.327 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/44.3.327
##submission.downloads##
Argitaratuta
##submission.howToCite##
Zenbakia
Atala
##submission.license##
##submission.copyrightStatement##
##submission.license.cc.by-nc-nd4.footer##OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence, further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.
