Algonormative expectations
##plugins.pubIds.doi.readerDisplayName##:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.1864Gako-hitzak:
Algonorms, normative expectations, algonormative expectations, algorithms, law systemLaburpena
Contemporary society has developed, for itself, a way of reducing its own complexity: algorithms. Their basic function is precisely that of reducing the complexity of expectations – cognitive and normative – and those of the expectations of expectations (juridical decisions). When observed under this lens, algorithms, by way of their artificial communication, equally influence normative expectations (Luhmann) and juridical norms (Hydén). In this article we will attempt to respond to the following question: is it possible to defend the existence of algonormative expectations? In order to respond, methodologically, one seeks to define in what way the employment of the theories of these authors contribute to the development of the concept of algonormative expectations. It is in this direction that one initially approaches Hydén’s bases for algo norms and, at a second stage, one seeks to conjugate them with Luhmannian cognitive expectations. The final question is to verify, alongside the artificial intelligence defended by Esposito, what the conditions are for the observation of algonormative expectations.
##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##
Metrics
Downloads:
14(5)_Schwartz_Costa_OSLS (English) 282
XML_14(5)_Schwartz_Costa_OSLS (English) 12
Erreferentziak
Aho, A.V., Hopcroft, J.E., and Ullmann, J.D., 1974. The Design and Analysys of Computer Algorithms. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Baraldi, C., Corsi, G., and Esposito, E., 2021. Unlocking Luhmann. A Keyword Introduction to Systems Theory [online]. Bielefeld University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839456743 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839456743
Bora, A., 2012. Capacidade de Lidar com o Futuro e a Responsabilidade por Inovações. Para o Trato Social com a Temporalidade Complexa. In: G. Schwartz, ed., Juridicização das esferas sociais e fragmentação do direito na sociedade contemporânea. Porto Alegre: Livraria do Advogado, 127–146.
Bullynck, M., 2015. Histories of algorithms: Past, present and future. Historia Mathematica [online], 43(3), 332–341. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hm.2015.07.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hm.2015.07.002
Covas, A., 2017. Vem aí a sociedade algorítmica. Observador [online], 1 January. Available at: https://observador.pt/opiniao/vem-ai-a-sociedade-algoritmica/
Ebers, M., and Navas, S., eds., 2020. Algorithms and Law [online]. Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108347846 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108347846
Esposito, E., 2017. Artificial Communication? The Production of Contingency by Algorithms. Zeitschrift für Soziologie [online], 46(4), 249–265. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsoz-2017-1014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsoz-2017-1014
Esposito, E., 2022. Artificial Communication. How Algorithms Produce Social Intelligence [online]. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/14189.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/14189.001.0001
Febbrajo, A., 2013. Introduction. In: A. Febbrajo and G. Harste, eds., Law and Intersystemic Communication. Understanding “Structural Coupling”. Surrey: Ashgate, 1–16.
Ferrari, V., 2020. Note Socio-Giuridiche Introduttive per una Discussione su Diritto, Intelligenza Artificiale e Big Data. Sociologia del diritto [online], vol. 3, 9–32. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3280/SD2020-003001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3280/SD2020-003001
Guibentif, P., 2012. Os Direitos Subjectivos na Teoria dos Sistemas de Niklas Luhmann. In: G. Schwartz, ed., Juridicização das esferas sociais e fragmentação do direito na sociedade comtemporânea. Porto Alegre: Livraria do Advogado, 109–126.
Hydén H., 2020. AI, Norms, Big Data, and the Law. Asian Journal of Law and Society [online], 7(3), 409–436. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2020.36 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2020.36
Hydén, H., 2022. Sociology of Law as The Science of Norms [online]. London/New York: Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003241928 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003241928
Kelsen, H., 2009. Teoria pura do direito. São Paulo: Martins Fontes.
Lévy, P., 2010. Cibercultura. São Paulo: Editora 34.
Luhmann, N., 1969. Legitimation durch Verfahren. Suhrkamp: Frankfurt am Main.
Luhmann, N., 1971. Die Weltgesellschaft. Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, 57(1), 1–35.
Luhmann, N., 1983. Sociologia do Direito I e II. Rio de Janeiro: Tempo Brasileiro.
Luhmann, N., 1984. Soziale Systeme: Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Luhmann, N., 1993. Sociologische Aufklärung 5: konstruktivistische Perspektiven. Opladen: Westdeutscher. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/protosociology1993535
Luhmann, N., 1995. The Paradox of Observing Systems. Cultural Critique [online], 31, 37–55. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/1354444 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1354444
Luhmann, N., 1997. Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Franfkurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Luhmann, N., 2000. O paradoxo dos direitos humanos e três formas de seu desdobramento. Themis [online], 3(1), 153–161. Available at: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/79069869.pdf
Luhmann, N., 2002. Theories of Distinction [online]. Redwood City: Stanford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503619340 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503619340
Luhmann, N., 2006. A improbabilidade da comunicação. Lisbon: Vega.
Luhmann, N., 2007. La sociedad de la sociedad. Ciudad de México: Herder.
Luhmann, N., 2016. O direito da sociedade. São Paulo: Martins Fontes.
Luhmann, N., 2018. Sistema jurídico y dogmática jurídica. Santiago de Chile: Olejnik.
Luhmann, N., 2019. Contingencia y derecho. Madrid: Trotta.
Moeller, H.G., 2011. The Radical Luhmann. New York: Columbia University Press.
Schwartz, G., 2013. A fase pré-autopoiética do sistemismo luhmanniano. In: L.S. Rocha, G. Schwartz and J. Clam, eds., Introdução à Teoria do Sistema Autopoiético do Direito. Porto Alegre: Livraria do Advogado, 45–76.
Stamford, A., 2021. Decisão jurídica na comunicativação. São Paulo: Almedina.
Stichweh, R., 2019. World Society. In: L. Kühnhardt and T. Mayer, eds., The Bonn Handbook of Globality (volume 1) [online]. Cham: Springer, 515–526. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90377-4_44 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90377-4_44
Teubner, G., 1990. Social Order from Legislative noise? Autopoietic Closure as a Problem for Legal Regulation. In: G. Teubner and A. Febbrajo, eds., State, Law, Economy as Autopoietic Systems. Milan: Giuffrè, 609–649.
##submission.downloads##
Argitaratuta
##submission.howToCite##
Zenbakia
Atala
##submission.license##
##submission.copyrightStatement##
##submission.license.cc.by-nc-nd4.footer##OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence, further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.
