General Introduction: Autonomy and Heteronomy of the Judiciary in Europe

Egileak

  • Joxerramon Bengoetxea Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea - Universidad del País Vasco
  • Heike Jung Universität des Saarlandes

Gako-hitzak:

Autonomy of Judges, Judicial Decision-Making, Judicial Adjudication, ADR, Judicial collaborators, Justice as service, Justice as power, conform interpretation

Laburpena

Judges and the judiciary have always been a subject of debate. The questions of legitimacy, activism v self-restraint; appointment or selection, accountability, the rise of alternatives to formal justice, ADR, are at the heart of the discussion. However, the law-job of dispute resolution is not actually done by the judges on their own, nor in isolation; judges have many different sorts of collaborators and some of these can develop some scope for autonomy. At the same time the judiciary claims to be an independent power, but it is also a basic public service to the citizens; how can the public administration be involved in securing-facilitating this service? Finally, when deciding and interpreting the law judges often need to take into account norms belonging to different but coordinated legal systems and find coherence between them, and it can be questioned whether the method of conform interpretation they resort to might enhance or diminish their autonomy.

DOWNLOAD THIS PAPER FROM SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1991696

##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##

##plugins.generic.usageStats.noStats##
Views 142
Downloads:
PDF (English) 100


##submission.authorBiography##

##submission.authorWithAffiliation##

Reviewing interests: legal philosophy; legal theory; legal reasoning; EU law; Legal cultures and comparative law (legal pluralism, globalisation and law); Judiciary; Labour law-employment policy, lifelong learning policy; governance; regionalism and nationalism in Europe; European Integration and Constitutional Pluralism; European Human Rights; Soft Law and policy makin; Law-making, legislative drafting; Multilingualism; Reasonable Accommodation; Anti-terrorism in EU, risk and security; Sources of law; General Legal Principles; Cohesion policy; Serives of General Public Interest; Judicial dialogues

##submission.downloads##

Argitaratuta

2012-01-25

##submission.howToCite##

Bengoetxea, J. eta Jung, H. (2012) «General Introduction: Autonomy and Heteronomy of the Judiciary in Europe», Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 1(9), or. 3. Available at: https://opo.iisj.net/index.php/osls/article/view/176 (Eskuratua: 3 uztailak 2024).

Zenbakia

bol: 1 zk: 9 (2011): Autonomy and Heteronomy of the Judiciary in Europe

Atala

Individual Articles

##submission.license##

OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence, further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.

The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.

For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.

The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.