Conducting socio-legal research in Portugal: From the experience of the Permanent Observatory for Justice to the study of working conditions in courts
##plugins.pubIds.doi.readerDisplayName##:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.1735Gako-hitzak:
Socio-legal studies, judicial system, trust and involvement, judicial institutions and professionals, methodologies, PortugalLaburpena
Empirical research on judicial systems requires diversified methodologies adapted to the contexts of courts and judicial actors. The experience gathered through the Permanent Observatory for Justice tells us that the support of judicial and political institutions and professionals’ associations are essential to reach a ‘hard-to-reach population’ and obtain robust results. The Observatory, with its interdisciplinary approach, had a significant public impact and contributed to public policies on justice. It was also fundamental to design and implement judicial training actions, through the Observatory’s Legal and Judicial Training Unit. The aim is to discuss the developed strategies to ensure the involvement of the institutional and judicial actors, build trust, and achieve valid results. The use of the project QUALIS, which assessed working conditions in Portuguese courts, allows us to focus on a concrete example of use of strategies and methodologies, with impacts on the improvement of the judicial system.
##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##
Metrics
Downloads:
13(S1)_Dias_et_al_OSLS (English) 265
XML_13(S1)_Dias_et_al_OSLS (English) 13
Erreferentziak
Blackham, A., 2022. When law and data collide: the methodological challenge of conducting mixed methods research in law. Journal of Law and Society [online], 49(S1), S87–S104. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12373 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12373
Branco, P., Casaleiro, P., and Pedroso, J., 2018. Sociologia do Direito made in Portugal: o contributo do CES no panorama nacional. E-Cadernos [online], 29, 237–252. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4000/eces.3529 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/eces.3529
Casaleiro, P., Relvas, A.P., and Dias, J. P., 2021. A Critical Review of Judicial Professionals Working Conditions' Studies. International Journal for Court Administration [online], 12(1), 1–28. Available at: https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.334 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.334
Cowan, D., et al. 2006. District Judges and Possession Proceedings. Journal of Law and Society [online], 33(4), 547–71. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2006.00370.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2006.00370.x
Dias, J.P., 2004. O mundo dos magistrados: a evolução da organização e do auto-governo judiciário [online]. Coimbra: Almedina. Available at: https://estudogeral.uc.pt/bitstream/10316/79933/1/O%20mundo%20dos%20magistrados.pdf
Dias, J.P., 2015. Ciências em sociedade: diálogos interculturais e ecologias de saberes perante ameaças neocoloniais. Textos & Debates [online], 27(2), 257–278. Available at: https://doi.org/10.18227/2317-1448ted.v2i27.3205 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18227/2317-1448ted.v2i27.3205
Dias, J.P., and Azevedo, R.G., eds., 2008. O papel do Ministério Público: estudo comparado dos países latino-americanos [online]. Coimbra: Almedina. Available at: https://estudogeral.uc.pt/bitstream/10316/96243/1/O%20papel%20do%20ministerio%20publico.pdf
Dias, J.P., and Gomes, C., 2018. Judicial Reforms 'Under Pressure': The New Map/Organisation of the Portuguese Judicial System. Utrecht Law Review [online], 14(1), 174–186. Available at: https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.448 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.448
Dias, J.P., Casaleiro, P., and Gomes, C., 2020. Os "invisíveis" da justiça: condições de trabalho dos/as oficiais de justiça em Portugal. Revista Culturas Jurídicas [online], 7, 1–31. Available at: https://estudogeral.uc.pt/bitstream/10316/90961/1/Os_as%20invisiveis%20da%20justica.pdf
Dobbin, S.A., et al., 2001. Surveying Difficult Populations: Lessons Learned from a National Survey of State Trial Court Judges. Justice System Journal, 22(3), 287–307. https://biblioteca.cejamericas.org/bitstream/handle/2015/3479/ncsc-survey-judges.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Dodds, S., and Hess, A.C., 2021. Adapting research methodology during COVID-19: lessons for transformative service research. Journal of Service Management [online], 32(2), 203–217. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-05-2020-0153 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-05-2020-0153
Douzinas, C., and Perrin, C., eds., 2011. Critical Legal Theory – 4 volumes. London: Routledge.
Felt, U., 2017. Under the shadow of time: Where indicators and academic values meet. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society [online], 3, 53–63. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2017.109 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2017.109
Ferreira, A.C., and Pedroso, J., 1999. Entre o passado e o futuro: contributos para o debate sobre a Sociologia do Direito em Portugal. Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais [online], 52, 333–361. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/40644
Ferreira, A.C., et al. 2014. Quem são os nossos magistrados? Caracterização profissional dos juízes e magistrados do Ministério Público em Portugal [online]. Coimbra: Centro de Estudos Sociais. Available at: https://estudogeral.uc.pt/bitstream/10316/86801/1/Relat%c3%b3rio%20Final%20Quem%20s%c3%a3o%20os%20nossos%20magistrados%202014.pdf
Frade, C., Fernando, P., and Conceição, A.F., 2020. The performance of the courts in the digital era: The case of insolvency and restructuring proceedings. International Insolvency Review [online], 29(3), 346–359. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/iir.1390 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/iir.1390
Gomes, C., 2018. A formação de magistrados como instrumento de transformação da justiça. Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais [online], Special Issue, 237–260. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4000/rccs.7881 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/rccs.7881
Gomes, C., and Fernando, P., 2016. Justiça e eficiência. O caso dos Tribunais Administrativos e Fiscais. February. Coimbra: Centro de Estudos Sociais.
Gomes, C., et al., 2016. Violência Doméstica. Estudo avaliativo das decisões judiciais [online]. Coleção Estudos de Género 12. Lisbon: Comissão para a Cidadania e Igualdade de Género. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10316/44015
Gomes, C., et al., 2021. Para uma reforma do sistema prisional. Caso da aplicação do Estatuto do Corpo da Guarda Prisional [online]. Coimbra: Centro de Estudos Sociais. Available at: https://opj.ces.uc.pt/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Relato%CC%81rio-Aplicac%CC%A7a%CC%83o-do-Estatuto-do-CGP-vFinal.pdf
Guibentif, P., 2014. Law in the semi-periphery: revisiting an ambitious theory in the light of recent Portuguese socio-legal research. International Journal of Law in Context [online], 10(4), 538–558. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552314000305 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552314000305
Hammond, C., 2005. The Wider Benefits of Adult Learning: An Illustration of the Advantages of Multi‐method Research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology [online], 8(3), 239–255. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570500155037 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570500155037
Hunter, C., Nixon, J., and Blandy, S., 2008. Researching the Judiciary: Exploring the Invisible in Judicial Decision Making. Journal of Law and Society [online], 35(S1), 76–90. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2008.00426.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2008.00426.x
Lima, T.M., 2019. A reparação dos acidentes de trabalho em Portugal e as influências do modelo de proteção social da OIT. In: A.C. Ferreira, ed., A Organização Internacional do Trabalho no Direito do Trabalho português: reflexos e limitações de um paradigma sociojurídico. Coimbra: Almedina, 151–178.
Lourenço, R. P., Fernando, P., and Gomes, C., 2017. From eJustice to Open Judiciary. An Analysis of the Portuguese Experience. In: C.E. Jiménez-Gómez and M. Gascó-Hernández, eds., Achieving Open Justice through Citizen Participation and Transparency. Hershey: IGI Global, 111–136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0717-8.ch006
Newman, P.A., Guta, A., and Black, T., 2021. Ethical Considerations for Qualitative Research Methods During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Other Emergency Situations: Navigating the Virtual Field. International Journal of Qualitative Methods [online], 20, 1–12. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211047823 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211047823
Nielsen, L.B., 2012. The Need for Multi-Method Approaches in Empirical Legal Research. In: P. Cane and H.M. Kritzer, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research [online]. Oxford Academic, 951–975. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199542475.013.0040 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199542475.013.0040
Pedroso, J., Dias, J.P., and Trincão, C., 2003. Por caminhos da(s) reforma(s) da justiça. Coimbra Editora.
Roach Anleu, S., and Mack, K., 2013. Judicial authority and emotion work. The Judicial Review, 11(3), 329–347.
Roach Anleu, S., and Mack, K., 2014. Job Satisfaction in the Judiciary. Work, Employment and Society [online], 28(5), 683–701. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017013500111 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017013500111
Roach Anleu, S., and Mack, K., 2016. Managing work and family in the judiciary: Metaphors and strategies. Flinders Law Journal [online], 18(2), 213–239. Available at: http://www.austlii.com/au/journals/FlinLawJl/2016/8.pdf
Santos, B.S., 1974. Law Against Law: Legal Reasoning in Pasargada Law. Cuernavaca: CIDOC.
Santos, B.S., 1995. Toward a new common sense: law, science and politics in the paradigmatic transition. New York: Routledge.
Santos, B.S., 2002. Toward a new legal common sense: globalization and emancipation. London: Butterworths.
Santos, B.S., 2005. A justiça em Portugal: diagnósticos e terapêuticas. Manifesto, 7, 76–87.
Santos, B.S., 2014. O direito dos oprimidos. Coimbra: Almedina.
Santos, B.S., 2015. A justiça popular em Cabo Verde. Coimbra: Almedina.
Santos, B.S., 2017. The Resilience of Abyssal Exclusions in Our Societies: Toward a Post-Abyssal Law. Tilburg Law Review [online], 22(1-2), 237–258. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1163/22112596-02201011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/22112596-02201011
Santos, B.S., and Gomes, C., 1998. Macau: O Pequeníssimo Dragão. Porto: Afrontamento.
Santos, B.S., and Trindade, J.C., eds., 2003. Conflito e transformação social: uma paisagem das justiças em Moçambique. Porto: Afrontamento.
Santos, B.S., and Van Dúnen, J.O.S., eds., 2012. Sociedade e Estado em Construção: Desafios do Direito e da Democracia em Angola – Luanda e Justiça: Pluralismo jurídico numa sociedade em transformação (Vol. I). Coimbra: Almedina.
Santos, B.S., and Villegas, M.G., eds., 2001. El Caleidoscopio de las Justicias en Colombia. Bogotá: Uniandes/Siglo del Hombre.
Santos, B.S., et al., 1996. Os Tribunais nas Sociedades Contemporâneas: O Caso Português. Porto: Afrontamento.
Santos, B.S., et al., 1999. Porquê tão lentos? três casos especiais de morosidade na administração da justiça. Coimbra: Centro de Estudos Sociais.
Santos, B.S., et al., 2007. Tráfico de mulheres em Portugal para fins de exploração sexual. Lisbon: CIG.
Santos, B.S., Trindade, J.C., and Meneses, M.P., eds., 2006. Law and Justice in a Multicultural Society: The Case of Mozambique. Dakar: CODESRIA.
Seawright, J., 2016. Multi-method social science: combining qualitative and quantitative tools. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316160831
Van der Ven, L.G.L., et al. 2022. How to involve ‘hard to reach’ population groups in research projects. European Journal of Public Health [online], 32(3). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.476 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.476
Ylijoki, O.H., 2016. Projectification and Conflicting Temporalities in Academic Knowledge Production. Teorie vědy/Theory of Science [online], 38(1), 7–26. Available at: https://doi.org/10.46938/tv.2016.331 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46938/tv.2016.331
##submission.downloads##
Argitaratuta
##submission.howToCite##
Zenbakia
Atala
##submission.license##
##submission.copyrightStatement##
##submission.license.cc.by-nc-nd4.footer##OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence, further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.
