Introduction. Access to justice from a multi-disciplinary and socio-legal perspective: Barriers and facilitators
##plugins.pubIds.doi.readerDisplayName##:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1351Gako-hitzak:
Access to justice, multi-disciplinary, socio-legal, barriers, facilitatorsLaburpena
Since access to justice scholarship has gradually become a more multifaceted, international and empirical endeavour, this special issue illustrates a broader scope of contemporary access to justice research from a multi-disciplinary and socio-legal perspective. The issue gathers contributions from European and US scholars, representing different disciplinary backgrounds, such as law, sociology of law, political science, philosophy, social work, and criminology, yet with a common interest in access to justice. This includes the study of various contexts (apart from the courts) and actors (apart from lawyers) who make unilateral legally based decisions that have direct consequences for individuals, or in other ways facilitates or hinders access to justice in a (broader) democratic sense. Through its contributions, this special issue identifies and discusses a variety of barriers and facilitators in areas where access to justice is deemed problematic and therefor highly important for policy and practice development.
##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##
Metrics
Downloads:
13(4)_Intro_OSLS (English) 614
XML_13(4)_Intro_OSLS (English) 125
Erreferentziak
Albiston, C.R., and Sandefur, R.L., 2013. Expanding the empirical study of access to justice. Wisconsin Law Review, 2013(1), 101.
Bajpai, A., 2016. Learning by Doing?Promoting Access to Justice to the Marginalized and Vulnerable Groups in India. Asian Journal of Legal Education, 3, 201–08. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2322005816652472
Balmer, N., 2013. English and Welsh Civil and Social Justice Panel Survey: Wave 2: Summary Findings of Wave 2 of the English and Welsh Civil and Social Justice Panel Survey [online]. London: Legal Services Commission. Available at: https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130403062222/http://www.justice.gov.uk/downloads/publications/research-and-analysis/lsrc/lsrc-report-csjps-wave-2.pdf
Cappelletti, M., 1978. Access to justice. Alphen aan den Rijn: Sijthoff/Noordhoff.
Chen, K.P., et al., 2012. The Legal Problems of Everyday Life: The Nature, Extent and Consequences of Justiciable Problems Experienced by Taiwanese. Paper presented at the Law and Society Association Conference, Honolulu, 7 June.
Coumeralos, C., et al., 2012. Legal Australia-Wide Survey: Legal Need in Australia [online]. Sydney: Law and Justice Foundation of New South Wales. Available at: http://www.lawfoundation.net.au/ljf/site/templates/LAW_NSW/$file/Chapter1.pdf
Council of Europe, 2010. Guidelines of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on child-friendly justice. Adopted by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on 17 November 2010 and explanatory memorandum. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
Currie, A., 2009a. The Incidence of Justiciable Problems in Civil Matters in Canada: Three National Surveys in 2004, 2006 and 2008. Ottawa: Department of Justice.
Currie, A., 2009b. The legal problems of everyday life. In: R. Sandefur, ed., Access to Justice. Bingley: Emerald. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S1521-6136(2009)0000012005
Dignan, F., Grimes, R., and Parker, R., 2017. Pro Bono and Clinical Work in Law Schools: Summary and Analysis. Asian Journal of Legal Education, 4(1), 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2322005816662392
Eriksson, M., Källström, Å., and Näsman, E., 2023. Barns röster om våld: Att lyssna, tolka och förstå. Malmö: Gleerups.
Flynn, A., and Hodgson, J., 2017. Access to Justice and Legal Aid Cuts: A Mismatch of Concepts in the Contemporary Australian and British Legal Landscapes. In: A. Flynn and J. Hodgson, eds., Access to Justice and Legal Aid. Oxford: Hart. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2976482
Francioni, F., ed., 2007. Access to justice as a human right. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199233083.001.0001
Genn, H., and Beinart, S., 1999. Paths to Justice: What People do and think about going to law. Oxford: Hart.
Johansson, S., 2017. Power dynamics in Barnahus collaboration. In: S. Johansson et al., eds., Collaborating against child abuse: Exploring the Nordic Barnahus Model. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21428/cb6ab371.ba468ca5
Kilian, M., and Kothe, F., 2015. Speculative Fees and their Impact on Access to Justice: German Experiences. International Journal of the Legal Profession, 22(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09695958.2015.1114948
Leitch, J.A., 2013. Looking for quality: The empirical debate in access to justice research. The Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice, 31(2), 229–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22329/wyaj.v31i2.4421
McDermont, M., 2015. Access to Justice, Advice Agencies & the Impact of Funding. Paper presented at the International Legal Aid Group Conference. Edinburgh.
McQuoid-Mason, D., 2017. Challenges When Drafting Legal Aid Legislation to Ensure Access to Justice in Developing Countries with Small Numbers of Lawyers: Thinking Outside the Box. Paper presented at the International Legal Aid Group Conference. South Africa. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17159/1996-2096/2018/v18n2a3
Moorhead, R., and Cumming, R., 2009. Contingency Fees in England & Wales: Access to Justice in Employment Tribunals. Paper presented at the International Legal Aid Group Conference. Wellington.
Neiman, R., 2016. Down but not out! How law school clinics can help bridge the small claims court access to justice gap. Buffalo Public Interest Law Journal, 35, 119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2825126
Palmer, E., et al., eds., 2016. Access to Justice: Beyond the Policies and Politics of Austerity. Oxford: Hart.
Pleasence, P., Balmer, N.J., and Sandefur, R.L., 2013. Paths to Justice: A past, present and future roadmap. London: The Nuffield Foundation.
Pleasence, P., et al., 2004. Causes of Action: Civil Law and Social Justice. Norwich: The Stationery Office.
Rhode, D.L., 2004a. Access to justice. Oxford University Press.
Rhode, D.L., 2004b. Access to justice: Connecting principles to practice. Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics, 17, 369.
Rhode, D.L., 2013. Access to Justice: An Agenda for Legal Education and Research. Journal of Legal Education, 62, 531–50.
Sandefur, R., and Clark, T., 2015. Designing the Competition: A Future of Roles Beyond Lawyers? The Case of the USA. Paper presented at the International Legal Aid Group Conference. Edinburgh.
Sandefur, R., and Clark, T., 2016. Designing the competition: a future of roles beyond lawyers? The case of the USA. Hastings Law Journal, 67(4), 1467-1492.
Sandefur, R., ed., 2009. Access to justice. Bingley: Emerald. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S1521-6136(2009)12
Sandefur, R.L., 2015. Bridging the gap: Rethinking outreach for greater access to justice. University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review, 37, 721.
Schneider, C.D., 2017. Another Bridge Across the Access to Justice Gap: LII’s Virtual Reference Desk. Legal Reference Services Quarterly, 36(2), 85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0270319X.2017.1359062
Smith, R., 2017. Legal Aid, Technology and Access to Justice 2017. Paper presented at the International Legal Aid Group Conference. South Africa.
Smith, R., 2019. Law, Technology and Access to Justice: Where are We Now? Paper presented at the International Legal Aid Group Conference. Ontario.
Smith, R.H., 2008. Justice and the Poor : A Study of the Present Denial of Justice to the Poor and of the Agencies Making More Equal Their Position Before the Law, with Particular Reference to Legal Aid Work in the United States. Whitefish: Kessinger. (Originally published in 1919).
Staudt, R.W., 2011. Justice and Technology Clinic: A New Model of Delivery. Paper presented at the International Legal Aid Group Conference. Helsinki.
Zorza, R., 2013. Review of the Status and Potential of Access to Justice Technology in the United States of America. Paper presented at the International Legal Aid Group Conference. Hague.
In this issue
Storgaard, A., 2023. Access to justice research: On the way to a broader perspective. Oñati Socio-Legal Series [online], 13(4-this issue). Available at: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1352 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1352
Svensson, K., 2023. Advocating access to justice: Facilitating or gatekeeping? Oñati Socio-Legal Series [online], 13(4-this issue). Available at: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1356 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1356
Pedersen, K.H., and Johannsen, L., 2023. When corruption hits the judiciary: A global perspective on access to justice and corruption. Oñati Socio-Legal Series [online], 13(4-this issue). Available at: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1354 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1354
Lemann Kristiansen, B., 2023. Welcome to McDenmark. Oñati Socio-Legal Series [online], 13(4-this issue). Available at: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1353 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1353
Graebsch, K., and Storgaard, A., 2023. Prison leave and access to justice: An insight into Danish and German law in action. Oñati Socio-Legal Series [online], 13(4-this issue). Available at: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1355 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1355
Sandefur, R.L., and Burnett, M., 2023. All together now: Building a shared access to justice research framework for theoretical insight and actionable intelligence. Oñati Socio-Legal Series [online], 13(4-this issue). Available at: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1357 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1357
##submission.downloads##
Argitaratuta
##submission.howToCite##
Zenbakia
Atala
##submission.license##
##submission.copyrightStatement##
##submission.license.cc.by-nc-nd4.footer##OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence, further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.
