Di-vision
The making of the “Anthropos” and the origins of the Anthropocene
##plugins.pubIds.doi.readerDisplayName##:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1176Gako-hitzak:
Anthropocene, capitalism, technoscience, rule of lawLaburpena
The current geological transition implies the necessity of a paradigm shift in dominant social practices to cope with an emerging unstable global socio-ecological complex, which is being shaped by comprehensive, irreversible and uncertain human agency. Along with sustainability, issues of justice are crucial in this context including climate justice, which addresses the most notorious phenomenon of the transition to the Anthropocene, i.e. climate change. Such a paradigm shift implies the need to go beyond established practices in research and exploring new narratives. This paper develops a possible narrative of the civilizational patterns that led to the human transformation of the planet, and shows the limits of business-as-usual responses to confronting the global crisis brought about by the geological transition, and consequently their limited ability to achieve sustainability and justice in the Anthropocene. The narrative deployed here highlights the centrality of a particular form of vision in Modernity and its contribution to the establishment of hierarchies through the di-vision between the in-di-vidual and the external world, i.e. nature, which is untenable in the Anthropocene.
##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##
Metrics
Downloads:
PDF (English) 608
Erreferentziak
Adam, B., 1998. Timescapes of Modernity: The Environment and Invisible Hazards. London: Routledge.
Al-Delaimy, W.K., and Krzyzanowski, M., 2019, A Policy Brief: Climate Change and Epidemiology. Epidemiology [online], 30(1), 1–3. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000000925 [Accessed 2 November 2020].
Alder, J., and Wilkinson, D., 1999. Environmental Law & Ethics. London: Macmillan.
Alexievich, S., 2005. Voices from Chernobyl: The Oral History of the Nuclear Disaster. Trans.: K. Gessen. Champaign: Dalkey Archive Press.
Al-Hasan ibn al-Haytham, A.A., 2014. The Optics. In: K. Klingan et al., eds., Textures of the Anthropocene: Grain Vapor Ray. Berlin: Haus der Kulturen der Welt/Cambridge, MA, London: The MIT Press, 121–131.
Andersen, K.G., et al., 2020. The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2. Nature Medicine [online], 26, 450–452. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-0820-9 [Accessed 2 November 2020].
Annunziata, F., and Colombo, G.F., 2018. Law and Opera. Cham: Springer.
Anthropocene Working Group (AWG), 2019. Results of binding vote by AWG. Released 21st May 2019 [online]. Whitehaven: Subcommission on Quaternary Stratigraphy (SQS). Available from: http://quaternary.stratigraphy.org/working-groups/anthropocene [Accessed 16 July 2019].
Antiseri, D., 2014. Ricerca scientifica e valori etici. In: E. Fiandra and L. Nuti, eds., L’atomica: Scienza, cultura, politica. Milan: Franco Angeli, 15–36.
Arias Maldonado, M., 2018. Antropoceno: La política en la era humana. Barcelona: Taurus.
Bacon, F., 1987. Novum Organum. Trans.: R. Gual. Barcelona: Laia.
Baer, S., 2012. Equality. In: M. Rosenfeld and A. Sajó, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law. Oxford University Press, 982–1001.
Bárcena, I., and Schütte, P., 1997. El principio de precaución en la Unión Europea. Aspectos jurídico-políticos. Revista de Derecho Ambiental, 19, 13–42.
Baskin, J., 2019. Global Justice and the Anthropocene: Reproducing a Development Story. In: F. Biermann and E. Lövbrand, eds., Anthropocene Encounters: New Directions in Green Political Thinking. Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, New Delhi: Cambridge University Press, 150–168.
Belshaw, C., 2005. Filosofía del medio ambiente. Trans.: I. Gutiérrez González and A. Vijande Martínez. Madrid: Tecnos.
Bonneuil, C., and Fressoz, J.B., 2017. The Shock of the Anthropocene: The Earth, History and Us. Trans.: D. Fernbach. London, Brooklyn: Verso.
Boulad-Ayoub, J., and Vernes, P.M., 2006. La révolution cartésienne. Québec: Presses de l’Université Laval.
Buck-Morss, S., 1981. Origen de la dialéctica negativa, Theodor W. Adorno, Walter Benjamin y el Instituto de Frankfurt. Trans.: N. Rabotnikof Maskivker. Madrid: Siglo XXI.
Buck-Morss, S., 1995. Envisioning capital: Political economy on display. In: L. Cooke and P. Wollen, eds., Visual Display: Culture Beyond Appearances. Winnipeg: Bay Press, 111–141.
Burckhardt, W., 1944. Die Organisation der Rechtsgemeinschaft. Untersuchungen über die Eigenart des Privatrechts, des Staatsrechts und des Völkerrechts. 2nd ed. Zurich: Schulthess.
Chandler, D., 2018. Ontopolitics in the Anthropocene: An Introduction to Mapping, Sensing and Hacking. London: Routledge.
Chevallier, J., 1998. Vers un droit post-moderne? Les transformations de la régulation juridique. Revue de Droit Public [online], 3, 659–690. Available from: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01728684 [Accessed 2 November 2020].
Chichilnisky, G., and Heal, G., 1998. Markets for Tradable Carbon Dioxide. Emission Quotas: Principles and Practice. In: G. Chichilnisky and G. Heal, eds., Environmental Markets: Equity and Efficiency. New York: Columbia University Press, 13–45.
Clark, N., 2017. Politics of Strata. Theory, Culture & Society [online], 34(2–3), 211–231. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276416667538 [Accessed 2 November 2020].
Clarkson, S., and Wood, S., 2009. A Perilous Imbalance: The Globalization of Canadian Law and Governance. Vancouver: UBC Press.
Constant, B., 1988. The Liberty of the Ancients Compared with that of the Moderns. In: B. Fontana, ed., Constant: Political Writings. Cambridge University Press.
Conti, S., 1996. Geografia economica: Teorie e metodi. Turin: UTET.
Crampton, J.W., and Krygier, J., 2006. An Introduction to Critical Cartography. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies [online], 4(1), 11–33. Available from: https://acme-journal.org/index.php/acme/article/view/723 [Accessed 2 November 2020].
Crook, S., Pakulski, J., and Waters, M., 1992. Postmodernization: Change in Advanced Society. London: Sage.
Crutzen, P.J., 2002. Geology of mankind. Nature [online], 415(23). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/415023a [Accessed 2 November 2020].
Crutzen, P.J., and Stoermer, E.F., 2000. The “Anthropocene”. Global Change Newsletter, 41, 17–18.
De Cabo, C., 2004. El elemento utópico del constitucionalismo. In: F. Balaguer Callejón, ed., Derecho constitucional y cultura: Estudios en homenaje a Peter Häberle. Madrid: Tecnos, 47–55.
Descartes, R., 1990. Discurso del método/Meditaciones metafísicas. Trans.: M. García Morente. 26th ed. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.
Errass, C., 1998. Katastrophenschutz. Freiburg: Universitätsverlag.
Estermann, J., 1998. Filosofía andina: Estudio intercultural de la sabiduría autóctona andina. Quito: Abya-Yala.
Etxeberria, X., 2006. La tradición de los derechos humanos y los pueblos indígenas: una interpretación mutual. In: M. Berraondo, ed., Pueblos indígenas y derechos humanos. Bilbao: Universidad de Deusto, 63–83.
Fath, R., 2017. Opernführer. 41st ed. Stuttgart: Reclam.
Fernández de Gatta Sánchez, D., and Nevado-Batalla Moreno, P.T., 1997. Evaluación de los sistemas de ecogestión: la auditoría ambiental, análisis y régimen jurídico, Revista de Derecho Urbanístico y Medio Ambiente, 155, 167–216.
Fischer-Kowalski, M., 1998. Society’s Metabolism: The Intellectual History of Materials Flow Analysis, Part I, 1860–1970. Journal of Industrial Ecology [online], 2(1), 61–78. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1162/jiec.1998.2.1.61 [Accessed 2 November 2020].
Fischer-Kowalski, M., and Haberl, H., 1998. Sustainable development: socio-economic metabolism and colonization of nature. International Social Science Journal [online], (50)158, 573–587. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2451.00169 [Accessed 2 November 2020].
Fischer-Kowalski, M., and Hüttler, W., 1998. Society’s Metabolism: The Intellectual History of Materials Flow Analysis, Part II, 1980–1998. Journal of Industrial Ecology [online], 2(4), 107–136. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1162/jiec.1998.2.4.107 [Accessed 2 November 2020].
Fleiner-Gerster, T., 1990. Die Zukunft des schweizerisches Rechtstaates. In: Staatskanzlei des Kantons Solothurn, ed., Festgabe Alfred Rötheli zum fünfundsechzigsten Geburstag. Staatskanzlei des Kantons Solothurns, 89–103.
Franson, R.T., Cotton, R., and Lucas, A., 2004. Introduction. In: R.T. Franson. ed., Canadian Environmental Law. 2nd ed, supplement nº 77. Salem: Buttersworth.
Garrido Gutiérrez, P., 2005. El derecho a la vivienda: ¿Un sueño irrealizable? In: M.Á. García Herrera, ed., Constitución y democracia: 25 años de Constitución democrática en España. Actas del Congreso celebrado en Bilbao los días 19 a 21 de noviembre de 2003 (I). Leioa: Servicio Editorial de la Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitateko Argitalpen Zerbitzua, 639–653.
Garrido Peña, F., 1995. El paradigma ecológico y la crisis de la ideología jurídica moderna. In: G. Ruiz-Rico Ruiz, ed., La protección del medio ambiente en el ordenamiento jurídico español. Universidad de Jaén, 15–28.
Gebser, J., 2011. Origen y presente. Trans.: J.R. Hernández. Girona: Atalanta.
Gillings, M.R., and Hagan-Lawson, E.L., 2014. The cost of living in the Anthropocene. Earth Perspectives [online], 1, 1–11. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/2194-6434-1-2 [Accessed 2 November 2020].
Goethe, J.W., 2008. Faust (Parts One and Two). Trans.: D. Luke. Oxford University Press.
Goodrich, P., 2014. Legal Emblems and the Art of Law: “Obiter depicta” as the Vision of Governance. Cambridge University Press.
Gosálvez Sologuren, G., 2010. Estructura y organización económica del Estado: Análisis y crítica en la CPE. In: Vicepresidencia del Estado Plurinacional de Bolivia, Universidad Mayor de San Andrés and Instituto Internacional para la Democracia y la Asistencia Electoral, eds., Miradas: Nuevo Texto Constitucional. Stockholm, La Paz: IDEA Internacional, 179–198.
Grear, A., 2015. Deconstructing Anthropos: A Critical Legal Reflection on “Anthropocentric” Law and Anthropocene “Humanity”. Law and Critique [online], 26, 225–249. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-015-9161-0 [Accessed 2 November 2020].
Greenwood, B., 1994. Looking Ahead: Environmental Regulation. In: A.E. Boyle, ed., Environmental Regulation and Economic Growth. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 99–130.
Gruszczynski, L., 2010. Regulating Health and Environmental Risks under WTO Law. Oxford University Press.
Häberle, P., 2004. La “teoría de la Constitución como ciencia cultural” en el ejemplo de los cincuenta años de la Ley Fundamental. In: F. Balaguer Callejón, ed., Derecho constitucional y cultura: Estudios en homenaje a Peter Häberle. Madrid: Tecnos, 23–41.
Hamilton, C., 2016. The Anthropocene as rupture. The Anthropocene Review [online], 3(2), 93–106. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019616634741 [Accessed 2 November 2020].
Haraway, D., 2015. Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Plantationocene, Chthulucene: Making Kin. Environmental Humanities [online], 6(1), 159–165. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-3615934 [Accessed 2 November 2020].
Harley, J.B., 1989. Deconstructing the Map. Cartographica [online], 26(2), 1–20. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3138/E635-7827-1757-9T53 [Accessed 9 June 2020].
Heidegger, M., 1998. La época de la imagen del mundo. In: M. Heidegger, Caminos del bosque. Trans.: H. Cortés and A. Leyte. Madrid: Alianza, 69–90.
Hobbes, T., 2012. Leviathan. Oxford University Press.
Hornborg, A., 2009. Zero-Sum World. Challenges in Conceptualizing Environmental Load Displacement and Ecologically Unequal Exchange in the World-System. International Journal of Comparative Sociology [online], 50(3–4), 237–262. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0020715209105141 [Accessed 2 November 2020].
Humphreys, S., 2010. Competing claims: human rights and climate harms. In: S. Humphreys, ed., Human Rights and Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, 37–68.
Iranzo Dosdad, Á., 2006. Religión y Relaciones Internacionales. Genealogías. Foro Interno [online], 6, 39–65. Available from: https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/FOIN/article/view/FOIN0606110039A [Accessed 2 November 2020].
Jamieson, D., 2011. The Nature of the Problem. In: J.S. Dryzek, R.B. Norgaard and D. Schlosberg, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society. Oxford University Press, 38–54.
Jaria-Manzano, J., 2011. La cuestión ambiental y la transformación de lo público. Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch.
Jaria-Manzano, J., 2020. La constitución del Antropoceno. Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch.
Johnson, J.T., Louis, R.P. and Pramono, A.H., 2006. Facing the Future: Encouraging Critical Cartographic Literacies in Indigenous Communities. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies [online], 4(1), 80–98. Available from: https://acme-journal.org/index.php/acme/article/view/729 [Accessed 2 November 2020].
Jonas, H., 1985. The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age. University of Chicago.
Keller, H., 1999. Klimaregime an der Schwelle zum 21. Jahrhundert. Durchbruch dank ökonomischer Instrumente oder Aushöhlung durch Flexibilisierung? Umweltrecht in der Praxis/Le Droit de l’environnement dans la pratique, 13(5), 353–387.
Kiss, A., 1999. International Common Trade and the Common Concern of Humankind. In: K. Bosselmann and B.J. Richardson, eds., Environmental Justice and Market Mechanisms. Key Challenges for Environmental Law and Policy. Den Haag: Kluwer, 143–153.
Kiss, A., and Shelton, D., 1993. Manual of European Environmental Law. Cambridge University Press.
Klingan, K., et al., 2014. Introduction. In: K. Klingan et al., eds., Textures of the Anthropocene: Grain Vapor Ray. Berlin: Haus der Kulturen der Welt/Cambridge, MA, London: The MIT Press, 8–11.
Koskenniemi, M., 2011. Empire and International Law: The real Spanish contribution. University of Toronto Law Journal [online], 61(1), 1–36. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3138/utlj.61.1.001 [Accessed 2 November 2020].
Kotzé, L.J., 2016. Global Environmental Constitutionalism in the Anthropocene. London: Hart.
Kriedte, P., 1982. Feudalismo tardío y capital mercantil. Trans.: J.L. Vermal. Madrid: Crítica.
Laplace, P.S., 1951. A Philosophical Essay on Probabilities. Trans.: F.W. Truscott and F.L. Emory. New York: Dover.
Last, A., 2017. We Are the World? Anthropocene Cultural Production between Geopoetics and Geopolitics. Theory, Culture & Society [online], 34(2–3), 147–168. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276415598626 [Accessed 2 November 2020].
Latour, B., 2014. Agency at the time of the Anthropocene. New Literary History [online], 45(1), 1–18. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2014.0003 [Accessed 2 November 2020].
Latour, B., 2017. Why Gaia is not a God of Totality. Theory, Culture & Society [online], 34(2–3), 61–81. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276416652700 [Accessed 2 November 2020].
Lewanski, R., 1997. Governare l’ambiente. Attori e processi della politica ambientale: Interessi in gioco, sfide, nuove strategie. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Llano, A., 1988. La nueva sensibilidad. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.
Locke, J., (with C.B. McPherson, ed.,) 1980. Second Treatise of Government. London: Hackett.
Lovelock, J., and Margulis, L., 1974. Atmospheric homeostasis by and for the biosphere: the Gaia hypothesis. Tellus [online], 26(1–2), 2–10. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v26i1-2.9731 [Accessed 2 November 2020].
Malm, A., and Hornborg, A., 2014. The geology of mankind? A critique of the Anthropocene narrative. The Anthropocene Review [online], 1(1), 2014, 62–69. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019613516291 [Accessed 2 November 2020].
Manaster, K.A., 1978. Law and the Dignity of Nature: Foundations of Environmental Law. Land Use and Environment Law Review [online], 26(4), 3–26. Available from: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/232968068.pdf [Accessed 2 November 2020].
Mann, T., 1992. Doktor Faustus. Trans.: E. Xammar. Barcelona: Edhasa.
Mannix, D.P., and Cowley, M., 1968. Historia de la trata de negros. Trans.: E. Bolívar Rodríguez. Madrid: Alianza.
Margalef, R., 2000. Lo que se llama ecología y posibles condicionantes de nuestro futuro. In: J. Alcina Franch and M. Calés Bourdet, eds., Hacia una ideología para el siglo XXI: Ante la crisis civilizatoria de nuestro tiempo. Madrid: Akal, 329–344.
Mayer, R., 2016. Beyond the Blue Marble: Artistic research on space and ecology. Acta Astronautica [online], 128, 573–579. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2016.08.015 [Accessed 2 November 2020].
Meineke, E.K., et al., 2018. Biological collections for understanding biodiversity in the Anthropocene. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society [online], 374(1736), 1–9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0386 [Accessed 2 November 2020].
Melucci, A., 2001. Vivencia y convivencia: Teoría social para una era de la información. Trans.: J. Casquette. Madrid: Trotta.
Mickelson, K., and Rees, W., 1993. The Environment: Ecological and Ethical Dimensions. In: E.L. Hughes, A.R. Lucas and W.A. Tilleman II, eds., Environmental Law and Policy. Aurora: Emond Montgomery.
Mirzoeff, N., 2014. Visualizing the Anthropocene, Public Culture [online], 26(2–(73)), 213–232. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-2392039 [Accessed 2 November 2020].
Moore, J.W., 2016. Introduction. In: J.W. Moore, ed., Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, History, and the Crisis of Capitalism. Oakland: Kairos, 1–11.
Moreno Navarro, I., 2000. Quiebra de los modelos de modernidad, globalización e identidades colectivas. In: J. Alcina Franch and M. Calés Bourdet, eds., Hacia una ideología para el siglo XXI: Ante la crisis civilizatoria de nuestro tiempo. Madrid: Akal, 102–131.
Müller, J.P., 1982. Elemente einer schweizerischen Grundrechtstheorie. Bern: Stämpfli.
Mumford, L., 1974. The Pentagon of Power. New York: Harvest/HBJ.
Nagel, E., 1961. La lógica sin metafísica. Trans.: J. Melgar Botassis. Madrid: Tecnos.
New Mexico Museum of Space History, 2019. Neil A. Armstrong. Available from: http://www.nmspacemuseum.org/halloffame/detail.php?id=1 [Accessed 16 July 2019].
Paine, T., 2008. Rights of Man. In: T. Paine, Rights of Man, Common Sense and Other Political Writings. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press.
Petrarca, F., 1366. Epistolae familiares [online]. Cassago Brianza: Associazione Storico-Culturale S. Agostino. Available from: http://www.cassiciaco.it/navigazione/scriptorium/testi%20medioevo/petrarca/familiares/familiares.html [Accessed 7 June 2020].
Pont Castejón, I., 1989. Medio ambiente y Constitución española de 1978. In: Fomento del Trabajo Nacional, ed., La empresa en la Constitución española. Pamplona: Aranzadi, 315–352.
Preuß, U.K., 2012. Associative Rights (The Rights to the Freedoms of Petition, Assembly, and Association). In: M. Rosenfeld and A. Sajó, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law. Oxford University Press, 948–965.
Reid, W.V., et al., 2010. Earth System Science for Global Sustainability: Grand Challenges. Science [online], 330(6006), 916–917. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1196263 [Accessed 2 November 2020].
Reinert, A., 2011. The Blue Marble Shot: Our First Complete Photograph of Earth. The Atlantic [online]. 12 April. Available from: https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2011/04/the-blue-marble-shot-our-first-complete-photograph-of-earth/237167/ [Accessed 20 April 2019].
Ribot, J., 2014. Cause and Response: Climate Vulnerability in the Anthropocene. Journal of Peasant Studies [online], 41(5), 2014, 667–705. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2014.894911 [Accessed 2 November 2020].
Roberts, J.T., and Parks, B.C., 2009. Ecologically Unequal Exchange, Ecological Debt, and Climate Justice. The History and Implications of Three Related Ideas for a New Social Movement. International Journal of Comparative Sociology [online], 50(3–4), 385–409. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0020715209105147 [Accessed 2 November 2020].
Robinson, J.H., ed. and trans., 1898. Petrarch: The First Modern Scholar and Man of Letters. New York: G.P. Putnam.
Rolston, H. III, 1993. Rights and Responsibilities on the Home Planet. Yale Journal of International Law [online], 18, 251–279. Available from: https://mountainscholar.org/bitstream/handle/10217/39373/Rights-Resp-Yale-updated.pdf;sequence=1 [Accessed 2 November 2020].
Ross, A., 1991. Strange Weather. Culture, Science and Technology in the Age of Limits. London: Verso.
Sáez Valcárcel, R., 2018. Ausencia y desaparición en el derecho. Oñati Socio-Legal Series [online], 9(2), 198–208. Available from: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1022 [Accessed 2 November 2020].
Sainz Moreno, F., 1998. Artículo 132. Dominio público, bienes comunales, patrimonio del Estado y patrimonio nacional. In: Ó. Alzaga Villaamil, ed., Comentarios a la Constitución española de 1978 (X). Madrid: Edersa, 181–263.
Serrano Moreno, J.L., 1992. Ecología y Derecho: Principios de Derecho Ambiental y Ecología jurídica. Granada: Comares.
Sloterdijk, P., 2014a. Crítica de la razón cínica. Madrid: Siruela.
Sloterdijk, P., 2014b. The Anthropocene: A Process-State on the Edge of Geohistory. In: K. Klingan et al., eds., Textures of the Anthropocene: Grain Vapor Ray. Berlin: Haus der Kulturen der Welt/Cambridge, MA, London: The MIT Press, 257–271.
Spade, P.V., 2019. William of Ockham. In: E.N. Zalta et al., eds., Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy [online]. Available from: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ockham/ [Accessed 20 April 2019].
Steffen W., et al., 2004. Global Change and the Earth System: A Planet Under Pressure. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.
Steffen, W., Crutzen, P.J., and McNeill, J.R., 2007. The Anthropocene: Are Humans Now Overwhelming the Great Forces of Nature? Ambio [online], 36(8), 614–621. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[614:TAAHNO]2.0.CO;2 [Accessed 2 November 2020].
Stiglitz, J., 2013. The Price of Inequality. New York: Norton.
Stolleis, M., 1998. Histoire du droit public en Allemagne: Droit public impérial et science de la police 1600–1800. Trans.: M. Senellant. Paris: PUF.
Stone Sweet, A., 2012. Constitutional Courts. In: M. Rosenfeld and A. Sajó, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law. Oxford University Press, 816–830.
Szerszynski, B., 2017. Gods of the Anthropocene: Geo-Spiritual Formations in the Earth’s New Epoch. Theory, Culture & Society [online], 34(2–3), 253–275. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276417691102 [Accessed 2 November 2020].
Tavares, P., 2014. Stratoshield. In: K. Klingan et al., eds., Textures of the Anthropocene: Grain Vapor Ray. Berlin: Haus der Kulturen der Welt/Cambridge, MA, London: The MIT Press, 61–71.
Taylor, A., 2007. El mundo de Gerard Mercator. Trans.: C. Riba García. Barcelona: Juventud.
Touraine, A., 1992. Critique de la modernité. Paris: Fayard.
Vaughan, F., 1974, Ecology and the Concept of Nature. In: O.P. Dwivedi, ed., Protecting the Environment: Issues and Choices – Canadian Perspectives. Toronto: Coop Clark, 9–20.
Vespucci, A., 1916. Mundus Novus: Letter to Lorenzo Pietro di Medici. Trans.: G.T. Northup. Princeton University Press. (Part of the text is available from: https://www.encyclopediavirginia.org/mundus_novus_1503 [Accessed 24 April 2019]).
Vidal, J., 2020. “Tip of the iceberg”: Is our destruction of nature responsible for Covid-19? The Guardian [online], 18 March. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/mar/18/tip-of-the-iceberg-is-our-destruction-of-nature-responsible-for-covid-19-aoe [Accessed 4 May 2019].
Virgilio, 2003. Obras completas. Trans.: A. Espinosa Pólit and A. Soler Ruiz. Madrid: Cátedra.
Virginia Declaration of Rights, 1776. Available from: https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/virginia-declaration-of-rights [Accessed 5 December 2020].
von Bogdandy, A., 2006. Constitutional Principles for Europe. In: E. Riedel and R. Wolfrum, eds., Recent Trends in German and European Constitutional Law. Berlin: Springer, 1–35.
Wagley, C.C., 2016. The Whole Earth: The Story of an Image that Changed the World. Adobe Create Magazine [online], 18 April. Available from: https://create.adobe.com/2016/4/18/the_whole_earth_the_story_of_an_image_that_changed_the_world.html [Accessed 20 April 2019].
Wallerstein, I., 1974. The Modern World-System, vol. I: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
Weber, M. 1922. Wissenschaft als Beruf [online]. Available from: http://www.textlog.de/weber_wissen_beruf.html [Accessed 8 June 2020].
Weber-Fas, R., 2002. Der Verfassungsstaat des Grundgesetzes. Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck.
Weisz, H., 2007. Combining Social Metabolism and Input-Output Analysis to Account for Ecologically Unequal Trade. In: A. Hornborg, J.R. McNeill and J. Martínez-Alier, eds., Rethinking Environmental History: World-System History and Global Environmental Change. Lanham: AltaMira Press, 289-306.
Whitt, L., 2009. Science, Colonialism, and Indigenous Peoples. Cambridge University Press.
Wolf, N., 2003. Caspar David Friedrich. Trans.: J. García. Madrid: Taschen.
World Commission on Environment and Development, 1987. Our Common Future [online]. Report. Available from: http://www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf [Accessed 24 April 2019].
Wuebbles, D.J., 2012. Celebrating the “Blue Marble”. Eos [online], 93(49), 509-511. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1029/2012EO490001 [Accessed 2 November 2020].
Yussof, K., 2017. Geosocial strata. Theory, Culture & Society [online], 34(2-3), 105-127. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276416688543 [Accessed 2 November 2020].
Zalasiewicz, J., et al., 2017. Petrifying Earth Process: The Stratigraphic Imprint of Key Earth System Parameters in the Anthropocene. Theory, Culture & Society [online], 34(2-3), 83-104. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276417690587 [Accessed 2 November 2020].
##submission.downloads##
Argitaratuta
##submission.howToCite##
Zenbakia
Atala
##submission.license##
##submission.copyrightStatement##
##submission.license.cc.by-nc-nd4.footer##OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence, further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.
