Introduction
Critical Prison Studies, Carceral Ethnography, and Human Rights: From Lived Experience to Global Action
##plugins.pubIds.doi.readerDisplayName##:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-0934Gako-hitzak:
Human rights, incarceration, critical research, prison ethnography, critical prison studiesLaburpena
This collection of essays grew out of the workshop Critical Prison Studies, Carceral Ethnography, and Human Rights: From Lived Experience to Global Action held at the International Institute for the Sociology of Law (Oñati, Spain) in June 2016. The papers explore some of the challenges and possibilities of critical prison research, ranging from issues arising in university research ethics reviews to the limitations of penal reform efforts to end the practice of solitary confinement. Each essay is embedded in a different penal context: Australia, Italy, Russia, Canada, and the United States; and each contributes to broader discussions of critical prison research, utilizing new and old methods and sources, including the ‘netnography’ of prisoner websites and the archives of anti-carceral feminist campaigners. Collectively, the essays bring new insights and methods into scholarly and activist conversations aimed at understanding and responding to the harms of incarceration.
##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##
Metrics
Downloads:
PDF (English) 890
Erreferentziak
Behan, C., and Kirkham, R., 2016. Monitoring, inspection and complaints adjudication in prison: the limits of prison accountability frameworks. The Howard journal of crime and justice [online], 55 (4), 432–454. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/hojo.12184 [Accessed 21 May 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/hojo.12184
Borins, S., 2000. New public management, North American style. In: K. McLaughlin, S. Osborne and E. Ferlie, eds., New public management: current trends and future prospects. London: Routledge, 181–194.
Calavita, K., and Jenness, V., 2013. Inside the pyramid of disputes: naming problems and filing grievances in California prisons. Social problems [online], 60 (1), 50–80. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2013.60.1.50 [Accessed 21 May 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2013.60.1.50
Cooper, D.J., and Ogata, K., 2005. New public management reforms in Canada: success or failure? In: J. Guthrie et al., eds., International public financial management reform: progress, contradictions, and challenges. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing, 55–86.
Crewe, B., 2009. The prisoner society: power, adaptation and social life in an English prison. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199577965.001.0001
Fitzpatrick, B., et al., 2000. New courts management and the professionalisation of summary justice in England and Wales. Criminal law forum, 11 (1), 1–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009492402869
Hannah-Moffat, K., 2010. Criminological cliques: narrowing dialogues, institutional protectionism and the next generation. In: M. Bosworth and C. Hoyle, eds., What is criminology? Oxford University Press, 440–455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571826.003.0030
Jackson, M., 2002. Justice behind the walls: human rights in Canadian prisons. Vancouver: Douglas & McIntyre.
Liebling, A. (assisted by Arnold, H.), 2004. Prisons and their moral performance: a study of values, quality and prison life. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199271221.001.0001
Liebling, A., 2006. Prisons in transition. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry [online], 29 (5), 422–430. Available from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/cd4c/617c28a73f15237c7c8afd8230871bdb6623.pdf [Accessed 21 May 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2006.03.002
Liebling, A., 2011. Moral performance, inhuman and degrading treatment and prison pain. Punishment & Society [online], 13 (5), 530–550. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1462474511422159 [Accessed 21 May 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474511422159
Mackay, A., 2014. Operationalising Human Rights Law in Australia: Establishing a Human Rights Culture in the New Canberra Prison and Transforming the Culture of Victoria Police. Law in context, 31 (1), 261–294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1323-238X.2014.11882140
Martel, J., 2004. Policing Criminological Knowledge: the Hazards of Qualitative Research on Women in Prison. Theoretical criminology [online], 8 (2), 157–189. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1362480604042242 [Accessed 21 May 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480604042242
Merry, S.E., et al., 2010. Law from Below: Women’s Human Rights and Social Movements in New York City. Law and Society Review, 44 (1), 101–128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2010.00397.x
O’Brien, D., 2006. Post-bureaucracy or Post-public Good? New Public Management and the Policy Process Constraints in Ontario [online]. Ontario Legislature Internship Program. Canadian Political Science Association, 2 June. Available from: https://www.cpsa-acsp.ca/papers-2006/O%27Brien.pdf [Accessed 21 May 2018].
Parkes, D., 2017. Solitary Confinement, Prisoner Litigation, and the Possibilities of a Prison Abolitionist Lawyering Ethic. Canadian Journal of Law and Society [online], 32 (3), 165–185. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/cls.2017.16 [Accessed 21 May 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/cls.2017.16
Raine, J.W., and Willson, M.J., 1997. Beyond Managerialism in Criminal Justice. The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice 36 (1), 80-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2311.00040
S. 20 — 103rd Congress: Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 [online]. Available from: https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/103/s20 [Accessed 21 May 2018].
Savoie, D.J., 1999. Governing from the Centre: the Concentration of Power in Canadian Politics. University of Toronto Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442675445
Scraton, P., and McCulloch, J., eds., 2009. The Violence of Incarceration. New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203892916
van Zyl Smit, D., 2013. Punishment and human rights. In: J. Simon and R. Sparks, eds., The SAGE handbook of punishment and society. London: Sage, 395-425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446247624.n20
Wacquant, L., 2002. The Curious Eclipse of Prison Ethnography in the Age of Mass Incarceration. Ethnography [online], 3 (4), 371-397. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1466138102003004012 [Accessed 21 May 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138102003004012
Wright, K.N., 2005. Designing a National Performance Measurement System. Prison journal [online], 85 (3), 368-393. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0032885505279389 [Accessed 21 May 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885505279389
##submission.downloads##
Argitaratuta
##submission.howToCite##
Zenbakia
Atala
##submission.license##
##submission.copyrightStatement##
##submission.license.cc.by-nc-nd4.footer##OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence, further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.
