Collaboration as Feminist Methodology: Experiences from the Feminist International Judgments Project

Loveday Hodson

doi:10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-0998

Autores/as

Loveday Hodson University of Leicester

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-0998

Palabras clave:

metodología feminista, sentencias feministas, colaboración, leyes internacionales

Resumen

Las participantes del Proyecto Internacional de Sentencias Feministas han aportado sus perspectivas feministas individuales sobre leyes internacionales a un pequeño grupo (una cámara de redacción de sentencias), y han procurado aplicar su conocimiento y métodos a un proceso muy colaborativo de reescritura de sentencias. Apartarse de las convenciones académicas y explorar las posibilidades y límites de la colaboración y el compromiso de escribir sentencias han supuesto un constante desafío a los puntos de vista personales de las participantes. En este artículo, explico cómo dicho proyecto ha traído a primer plano la experiencia compartida en metodología, creando una importante conexión entre teoría y metodología del feminismo. Asimismo, se explican los desafíos y las soluciones de tipo práctico que se encontraron las participantes.

Descargas

Metrics

Estadísticas globales

436 Visualizaciones	224 Descargas
660 Total

Citas

Bernays, A., and Kaplan, J., 2004. Can this Collaboration be Saved?. In: D. Salwak, ed., Living with a Writer. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 142-145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-07998-5_20

Binion, G., 1995. Human Rights: A Feminist Perspective. Human Rights Quarterly [online], 17 (3), 509-526. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/762391 [Accessed 15 October 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.1995.0022

Buss, D., and Manji, A., eds., 2005. International Law: Modern Feminist Approaches. Portland, OR / London: Hart.

Charlesworth, H., 1993. Alienating Oscar? Feminist Analysis of International Law. Studies in Transnational Legal Policy [online], 25, 1-18. Available from: https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/stdtlp25&div=7&id=&page= [Accessed 15 October 2018].

Charlesworth, H., 1999. Feminist Methods in International Law. American Journal of International Law [online], 93 (2) 379-394. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2307/2997996 [Accessed 15 October 2018].

Charlesworth, H., and Chinkin, C., 2000. The Boundaries of International Law: a Feminist Analysis. Manchester University Press.

Charlesworth, H., Chinkin, C., and Wright, S., 1991. Feminist Approaches to International Law. American Journal of International Law [online], 85 (4), 613-645. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2307/2203269 [Accessed 15 October 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2203269

Charlesworth, H., Chinkin, C., and Wright, S., 2005. Feminist Approaches to International Law: Reflections from another Century. In: D.E. Buss and A. Manji, eds., International Law: Modern Feminist Approaches. Oxford: Hart, 17-47.

Dallmeyer, D., 1993. Reconceiving Reality: Women and International Law. Washington, DC: American Society of International Law.

Eichler, M., 1997. Feminist Methodology. Current Sociology [online], 45 (2), 9-36. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F001139297045002003 [Accessed 15 October 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001139297045002003

Engle, K., 1992. International Human Rights and Feminism: When Discourses Meet. Michigan Journal of International Law [online], 13 (3), 517-610. Available from: http://repository.law.umich.edu/mjil/vol13/iss3/1 [Accessed 15 October 2018].

Fineman, M., and Zinsstag, E., eds., 2013. Feminist Perspectives on Transitional Justice: from International and Criminal to Alternative Forms of Justice. Cambridge: Intersentia. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781839700682.001

Gilligan, C., 1990. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Reissue. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Gunning, I., 1991-2. Arrogant Perception, World-Travelling and Multicultural Feminism: The Case of Female Genital Surgeries. Columbia Human Rights Law Review [online], 23 (2), 189-248. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10822/843439 [Accessed 15 October 2018].

Hafernik, J.J., Messerschmitt, D.S., and Vandrick, S., 1997. Collaborative Research: Why and How? Educational Researcher [online], 26 (9-December), 31-35. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1176273 [Accessed 15 October 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X026009031

Harrison, J., MacGibbon, L., and Morton, M., 2001. Regimes of Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research: The Rigors of Reciprocity. Qualitative Inquiry [online], 7 (3) 323-345. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F107780040100700305 [Accessed 15 October 2018].

Heathcote, G., 2012. The Law on the Use of Force: a Feminist Analysis. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203802618

Heydon, J.D., 2013. Threats to Judicial Independence: the Enemy Within. Law Quarterly Review, 129 (2), 205-222.

Heyes, C.J., 1997. Anti-Essentialism in Practice: Carol Gilligan and Feminist Philosophy. Hypatia [online], 12 (3-summer), 142-163. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1997.tb00009.x [Accessed 15 October 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1997.tb00009.x

Hunter, R., McGlynn, C., and Rackley E., eds., 2010. Feminist Judgments: from Theory to Practice. Oxford: Hart.

Kiefel, S., 2014. The Individual Judge. Australian Law Journal, vol. 88, 554-560.

Knop, K., 1993. Re/Statements: Feminism and State Sovereignty in International Law. Transnational Law and Contemporary Problems, 3 (2), 293-344.

Kouvo, S., and Pearson, Z., eds., 2011. Feminist Perspectives on International Law: Between Resistance and Compliance? Oxford: Hart.

MacKinnon, C.A., 2006. Are Women Human? And Other International Dialogues. Cambridge, MA / London: Harvard University Press.

McGuire, G.M., and Reger, J., 2003. Feminist Co-Mentoring: A Model for Academic Professional Development. NWSA Journal, 15 (1-spring), 54-72. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/4316944 [Accessed 15 October 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/nwsa.2003.0036

Meyersfeld, B.C., 2003-4. Reconceptualizing Domestic Violence in International Law. Albany Law Review, 67, 371-426.

Monk, J., Manning, P., and Denman, C., 2003. Working Together: Feminist Perspectives on Collaborative Research Action. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies [online], 2 (1), 91-106. Available from: https://www.acme-journal.org/index.php/acme/article/view/710 [Accessed 15 October 2018].

Orford, A., 2002. Feminism, Imperialism and the Mission of International Law. Nordic Journal of International Law [online], 71 (2), 275-296. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1163/157181002761931387 [Accessed 15 October 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/157181002761931387

Orford, A., 2007. Reading Humanitarian Intervention: Human Rights and the Use of Force in International Law. Cambridge University Press.

Otto, D., 2006. Lost in translation: Re-scripting the sexed subjects of international human rights law. In: A. Orford, ed., International Law and its Others. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511494284.012

Otto, D., 2009. The Exile of Inclusion: Reflections on Gender Issues in International Law Over the Last Decade. Melbourne Journal of International Law [online], 10 (1), 11-26. Available from: http://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/MelbJIL/2009/2.html [Accessed 15 October 2018].

Rhoades, K., 2000. Collaboration and Collaborative Research. In: L. Code, ed., Encyclopedia of Feminist Theories. New York / London: Routledge, 96.

White, R.C.A., and Boussiakou, I., 2009. Separate Opinions in the European Court of Human Rights. Human Rights Law Review [online], 9 (1), 37-60. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngn033 [Accessed 15 October 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngn033