Collaboration as Feminist Methodology: Experiences from the Feminist International Judgments Project

Loveday Hodson

doi:10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-0998

Autores/as

Loveday Hodson University of Leicester

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-0998

Palabras clave:

metodología feminista, sentencias feministas, colaboración, leyes internacionales

Resumen

Las participantes del Proyecto Internacional de Sentencias Feministas han aportado sus perspectivas feministas individuales sobre leyes internacionales a un pequeño grupo (una cámara de redacción de sentencias), y han procurado aplicar su conocimiento y métodos a un proceso muy colaborativo de reescritura de sentencias. Apartarse de las convenciones académicas y explorar las posibilidades y límites de la colaboración y el compromiso de escribir sentencias han supuesto un constante desafío a los puntos de vista personales de las participantes. En este artículo, explico cómo dicho proyecto ha traído a primer plano la experiencia compartida en metodología, creando una importante conexión entre teoría y metodología del feminismo. Asimismo, se explican los desafíos y las soluciones de tipo práctico que se encontraron las participantes.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Metrics

Views 384
Downloads:
PDF (English) 205

Citas

Bernays, A., and Kaplan, J., 2004. Can this Collaboration be Saved?. In: D. Salwak, ed., Living with a Writer. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 142-145.

Binion, G., 1995. Human Rights: A Feminist Perspective. Human Rights Quarterly [online], 17 (3), 509-526. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/762391 [Accessed 15 October 2018].

Buss, D., and Manji, A., eds., 2005. International Law: Modern Feminist Approaches. Portland, OR / London: Hart.

Charlesworth, H., 1993. Alienating Oscar? Feminist Analysis of International Law. Studies in Transnational Legal Policy [online], 25, 1-18. Available from: https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/stdtlp25&div=7&id=&page= [Accessed 15 October 2018].

Charlesworth, H., 1999. Feminist Methods in International Law. American Journal of International Law [online], 93 (2) 379-394. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2307/2997996 [Accessed 15 October 2018].

Charlesworth, H., and Chinkin, C., 2000. The Boundaries of International Law: a Feminist Analysis. Manchester University Press.

Charlesworth, H., Chinkin, C., and Wright, S., 1991. Feminist Approaches to International Law. American Journal of International Law [online], 85 (4), 613-645. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2307/2203269 [Accessed 15 October 2018].

Charlesworth, H., Chinkin, C., and Wright, S., 2005. Feminist Approaches to International Law: Reflections from another Century. In: D.E. Buss and A. Manji, eds., International Law: Modern Feminist Approaches. Oxford: Hart, 17-47.

Dallmeyer, D., 1993. Reconceiving Reality: Women and International Law. Washington, DC: American Society of International Law.

Eichler, M., 1997. Feminist Methodology. Current Sociology [online], 45 (2), 9-36. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F001139297045002003 [Accessed 15 October 2018].

Engle, K., 1992. International Human Rights and Feminism: When Discourses Meet. Michigan Journal of International Law [online], 13 (3), 517-610. Available from: http://repository.law.umich.edu/mjil/vol13/iss3/1 [Accessed 15 October 2018].

Fineman, M., and Zinsstag, E., eds., 2013. Feminist Perspectives on Transitional Justice: from International and Criminal to Alternative Forms of Justice. Cambridge: Intersentia.

Gilligan, C., 1990. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Reissue. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Gunning, I., 1991-2. Arrogant Perception, World-Travelling and Multicultural Feminism: The Case of Female Genital Surgeries. Columbia Human Rights Law Review [online], 23 (2), 189-248. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10822/843439 [Accessed 15 October 2018].

Hafernik, J.J., Messerschmitt, D.S., and Vandrick, S., 1997. Collaborative Research: Why and How? Educational Researcher [online], 26 (9-December), 31-35. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1176273 [Accessed 15 October 2018].

Harrison, J., MacGibbon, L., and Morton, M., 2001. Regimes of Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research: The Rigors of Reciprocity. Qualitative Inquiry [online], 7 (3) 323-345. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F107780040100700305 [Accessed 15 October 2018].

Heathcote, G., 2012. The Law on the Use of Force: a Feminist Analysis. London: Routledge.

Heydon, J.D., 2013. Threats to Judicial Independence: the Enemy Within. Law Quarterly Review, 129 (2), 205-222.

Heyes, C.J., 1997. Anti-Essentialism in Practice: Carol Gilligan and Feminist Philosophy. Hypatia [online], 12 (3-summer), 142-163. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1997.tb00009.x [Accessed 15 October 2018].

Hunter, R., McGlynn, C., and Rackley E., eds., 2010. Feminist Judgments: from Theory to Practice. Oxford: Hart.

Kiefel, S., 2014. The Individual Judge. Australian Law Journal, vol. 88, 554-560.

Knop, K., 1993. Re/Statements: Feminism and State Sovereignty in International Law. Transnational Law and Contemporary Problems, 3 (2), 293-344.

Kouvo, S., and Pearson, Z., eds., 2011. Feminist Perspectives on International Law: Between Resistance and Compliance? Oxford: Hart.

MacKinnon, C.A., 2006. Are Women Human? And Other International Dialogues. Cambridge, MA / London: Harvard University Press.

McGuire, G.M., and Reger, J., 2003. Feminist Co-Mentoring: A Model for Academic Professional Development. NWSA Journal, 15 (1-spring), 54-72. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/4316944 [Accessed 15 October 2018].

Meyersfeld, B.C., 2003-4. Reconceptualizing Domestic Violence in International Law. Albany Law Review, 67, 371-426.

Monk, J., Manning, P., and Denman, C., 2003. Working Together: Feminist Perspectives on Collaborative Research Action. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies [online], 2 (1), 91-106. Available from: https://www.acme-journal.org/index.php/acme/article/view/710 [Accessed 15 October 2018].

Orford, A., 2002. Feminism, Imperialism and the Mission of International Law. Nordic Journal of International Law [online], 71 (2), 275-296. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1163/157181002761931387 [Accessed 15 October 2018].

Orford, A., 2007. Reading Humanitarian Intervention: Human Rights and the Use of Force in International Law. Cambridge University Press.

Otto, D., 2006. Lost in translation: Re-scripting the sexed subjects of international human rights law. In: A. Orford, ed., International Law and its Others. Cambridge University Press.

Otto, D., 2009. The Exile of Inclusion: Reflections on Gender Issues in International Law Over the Last Decade. Melbourne Journal of International Law [online], 10 (1), 11-26. Available from: http://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/MelbJIL/2009/2.html [Accessed 15 October 2018].

Rhoades, K., 2000. Collaboration and Collaborative Research. In: L. Code, ed., Encyclopedia of Feminist Theories. New York / London: Routledge, 96.

White, R.C.A., and Boussiakou, I., 2009. Separate Opinions in the European Court of Human Rights. Human Rights Law Review [online], 9 (1), 37-60. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngn033 [Accessed 15 October 2018].