Turning Feminist Judgments into Jurisprudence
The Women’s Court of Canada on Substantive Equality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-0994Palabras clave:
Equality, substantive equality, context, Igualdad, igualdad sustantiva, contextoResumen
El proyecto del Tribunal de Mujeres de Canadá (WCC, por su nombre en inglés, Women’s Court of Canada) es único en el sentido de que se ha centrado en reescribir, sobre todo, sentencias de un área específica del derecho – casos de igualdad constitucional –. Esta estrategia permite una valoración de la jurisprudencia del WCC para ver si brinda una "teoría" alternativa de derechos de igualdad que se pueda usar para producir argumentaciones capaces de redirigir el derecho real. Este esfuerzo revela la importancia general de la atención al contexto, y la representación de éste, a la hora de dotar de vida los compromisos abstractos de igualdad sustantiva. Si bien no se trata de una novedad, es esclarecedora esta demostración de lo que el contexto de trabajo puede hacer en un número de casos relacionados.
Descargas
Metrics
Estadísticas globales ℹ️
|
660
Visualizaciones
|
536
Descargas
|
|
1196
Total
|
|
Citas
Abrams, K., 1991. Hearing the Call of Stories. California Law Review [online], 79 (4), 971-1052. Available from: http://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/californialawreview/vol79/iss4/1 [Accessed 18 July 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3480793
Baines, B., 2000. Law v Canada: Formatting Equality. Constitutional Forum [online], 11 (1-4), 65-73. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.21991/C96M2S [Accessed 18 July 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21991/C96M2S
Brodsky, G., and Day, S., 2002. Beyond the Social and Economic Rights Debate: Substantive Equality Speaks to Poverty. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, vol. 14, 185-220.
Brodsky, G., et al., 2006. Gosselin v Quebec (Attorney General). Canadian Journal of Women and the Law [online], 18 (1), 189-250. Available from: http://www.thecourt.ca/the-womens-court-of-canada-gosselin-v-quebec-attorney-general-2006-1-w-c-r-193/ [Accessed 24 July 2018].
Buckley, M., 2006. Symes v Canada. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law [online], 18 (1), 27-66. Available from: http://www.thecourt.ca/womens-court-symes-v-canada-2006-1-wcr-31/ [Accessed 24 July 2018].
Conaghan, J., 2000. Reassessing the Feminist Theoretical Project in Law. Journal of Law & Society [online], 27 (3), 351-385. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6478.00159 [Accessed 18 July 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6478.00159
Day, S., and Brodsky, G., 1998. Women and the Equality Deficit: the Impact of Restructuring Canada’s Social Programs. Ottawa: Status of Women Canada.
Eberts, M., McIvor, S., and Nahanee, T., 2006. Native Women’s Association of Canada v Canada. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law [online], 18 (1), 67-120. Available from: http://www.thecourt.ca/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/womenscourt-nativewomens1.pdf [Accessed 18 July 2018].
Faraday, F., Denike, M., and Stephenson, M.K., 2009a. In Pursuit of Substantive Equality. In: Making Equality Rights Real: Securing Substantive Equality under the Charter. 2nd ed. Toronto: Irwin Law, 9-28.
Faraday, F., Denike, M., and Stephenson, M.K., eds., 2009b. Making Equality Rights Real: Securing Substantive Equality under the Charter. 2nd ed. Toronto: Irwin Law.
Froc, K.A., 2010. Multidimensionality and the Matrix: Identifying ‘Charter’ Violations in Cases of Complex Subordination. Canadian Journal of Law and Society [online], 25 (1), 21-49. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0829320100010206 [Accessed 18 July 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0829320100010206
Gilbert, D., 2003a. Time to Regroup: Rethinking Section 15 of the ‘Charter’. McGill Law Journal, 48 (4), 627-649.
Gilbert, D., 2003b. Unequaled: Justice Claire L’Heureux-Dubé’s Vision of Equality and Section 15 of the ‘Charter’. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, 15 (1), 1-27.
Gilbert, D., and Majury, D., 2006. Critical Comparisons: The Supreme Court of Canada Dooms Section 15. Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice [online], vol. 24, 111-142. Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2261900 [Accessed 18 July 2018].
Greschner, D., 2002. The Purpose of Canadian Equality Rights. Review of Constitutional Studies, 6 (2), 291-232.
Hughes, P., 1999. Recognizing Substantive Equality as a Foundational Constitutional Principle. Dalhousie Law Journal, 22, 5-50.
Hunter, R., 2010. An Account of Feminist Judging. In: R. Hunter, C. McGlynn and E. Rackley, eds., Feminist Judgments: from Theory to Practice. Oxford: Hart, 30-43.
Jackman, M., 2005. Sommes-nous dignes? L’égalité et l’arrêt ‘Gosselin’. Revue femmes et droits, 17, 161-176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jwl.2006.0010
Koshan, J., 2006. Newfoundland (Treasury Board) v NAPE (Women’s Court of Canada). Canadian Journal of Women and the Law [online], 18 (1), 321-371. Available from: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/230236 [Accessed 24 July 2018].
Koshan, J., and Watson Hamilton, J., 2011. Meaningless Mantra: Substance Equality after “Withler”. Review of Constitutional Studies [online], 16 (1), 31-62. Available from: https://ualawccsprod.srv.ualberta.ca/images/journals/review/16RevConstStud31.pdf [Accessed 18 July 2018].
Koshan, J., and Watson Hamilton, J., 2013. The Continual Reinvention of Section 15 of the Charter. University of New Brunswick Law Journal, 64, 19-53.
Koshan, J., et al., 2010. Rewriting Equality: The Pedagogical Use of Women’s Court of Canada Judgments. Canadian Legal Education Annual Review, 4, 121-148.
Lawrence, S., 2006. Choice, Equality and Tales of Racial Discrimination: Reading the Supreme Court on Section 15. In: S. McIntyre and S. Rodgers, eds., Diminishing Returns: Inequality and the “Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms”. Markham: LexisNexis, 115-133.
Lewis, J., ed., 2006. Children, Changing Families, and the Welfare State. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781847204363
Majury, D., 1987. Strategizing in Equality. Wisconsin Women’s Law Journal, vol. 3, 169-187.
Majury, D., 1990. Equality and Discrimination According to the Supreme Court of Canada. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, vol. 4, 407-439.
Majury, D., 2002. The Charter, Equality Rights, and Women: Equivocation and Celebration. Osgoode Hall Law Journal [online], 40 (3/4), 297-336. Available from: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/ohlj/vol40/iss3/4 [Accessed 18 July 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.60082/2817-5069.1438
McIntyre, S., 2006. Deference and Dominance: Equality without Substance. In: S. McIntyre and S. Rodgers, eds., Diminishing Returns: Inequality and the “Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms”. Markham: LexisNexis, 95-114.
McIntyre, S., and Rodgers, S., eds., 2006. Diminishing Returns: Inequality and the “Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms”. Markham: LexisNexis.
Minow, M., and Spelman, E.V., 1990. In Context. Southern California Law Review, 63, 1597-1652.
Monture, P., 1986. Ka-Nin-Geh-Heh-Gah-E-Sa-Nonh-Yah-Gah. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, 2, 159-171.
Neysmith, S.M., ed., 2000. Restructuring Caring Labour: Discourse, State Practice, and Everyday Life. Oxford University Press.
Pothier, D., 2001. Connecting Grounds of Discrimination to Real People’s Real Experiences. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, 13, 37-73.
Pothier, D., 2006a. Eaton v Brant County Board of Education. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law [online], 18 (1), 121-142. Available from: http://www.thecourt.ca/the-womens-court-of-canada-eaton-v-brant-county-board-of-education-2006-1-wcr-124/ [Accessed 24 July 2018].
Pothier, D., 2006b. Equality as a Comparative Concept: Mirror, mirror, on the Wall, What’s the Fairest of Them All? In: S. McIntyre and S. Rodgers, eds. Diminishing Returns: Inequality and the “Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms”. Markham: LexisNexis, 135-150
Radin, M.J., 1990. The Pragmatist and the Feminist. Southern California Law Review, vol. 63, 1699-1726.
Réaume, D., 2006. Law v Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration). Canadian Journal of Women and the Law [online], 18 (1), 143-188. Available from: http://www.thecourt.ca/the-womens-court-of-canada-law-v-canada-minister-of-employment-and-immigration-1999-1-scr-497/ [Accessed 24 July 2018].
Réaume, D., 2013. Dignity, Equality, and Comparison. In: D. Hellman and S. Moreau, eds., Philosophical Foundations of Discrimination Law. Oxford University Press, 7-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199664313.003.0002
Rioux, M., 1994. Towards a concept of Equality of Well-Being: Overcoming the Social and Legal Construction of Inequality. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence [online], 7 (1), 127-147. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0841820900002605 [Accessed 18 July 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0841820900002605
Scott, J., Dex, S., and Plagnol, A.C., eds., 2012. Gendered Lives: Gendered Inequalities in Production and Reproduction. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849806275
Sheppard, C., 1990a. Equality in Context: Judicial Approaches in Canada and the United States. University of New Brunswick Law Journal, 39, 111-125.
Sheppard, C., 1990b. Recognition of the Disadvantaging of Women: The Promise of Andrews v Law Society of British Columbia. McGill Law Journal [online], vol. 35, 207-234. Available from: http://lawjournal.mcgill.ca/userfiles/other/8055201-Sheppard.pdf [Accessed 18 July 2018].
Sheppard, C., 2010. Inclusive Equality: The Relational Dimensions of Systemic Discrimination in Canada. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780773580886
Williams, J., 2000. Unbending Gender: Why Family and Work Conflict and What to Do about It. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195094640.001.0001
Williams, S.H., 1993. Feminist Legal Epistemology. Berkeley Women’s Law Journal [online], 8 (1), 63-105. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38FW1S [Accessed 18 July 2018].
Young, M., 1997-98. Sameness / Difference: A Tale of Two Girls. Review of Constitutional Studies [online], 4 (1), 150-166. Available from: https://ualawccsprod.srv.ualberta.ca/images/journals/review/4-1young.pdf [Accessed 18 July 2018].
Young, M., 2006. Blissed Out: Section 15 at Twenty. In: S. McIntyre and S. Rodgers, eds., Diminishing Returns: Inequality and the “Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms”. Markham: LexisNexis, 45-69.
Young, M., 2013. Social Justice and the Charter: Comparison and Choice. Osgoode Hall Law Journal [online], 50 (3), 669-698. Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2310253 [Accessed 18 July 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.60082/2817-5069.1020
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2018 Denise Réaume
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Los autores conservan el copyright de sus trabajos, que se publicarán en OSLS bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento NoComercial SinObraDerivada. Puede consultar más detalles en: http://es.creativecommons.org/licencia/. Si no está de acuerdo con esta licencia, por favor, póngase en contacto con nosotros.
El autor concede los permisos necesarios para difundir la información bibliográfica del artículo, incluyendo el resumen, y autorizar a otros, incluyendo las bases de datos bibliográficas, de índices y servicios de alerta de contenidos, a copiar y comunicar esta información.
Para más información sobre los permisos para distribuir su artículo en cada fase de la producción, por favor, lea nuestra Política de Autoarchivo y Divulgación (en inglés).
Las condiciones de copyright con el nombre de autores y co-autores, y la licencia Creative Commons se mostrarán en el artículo. Estas condiciones se deben aceptar como parte del proceso de envío de un artículo a la revista. Por favor, asegúrese de que todos los co-autores se mencionan correctamente, y que entienden y aceptan estos términos.
