From environmental governance to climate citizenship
Rethinking state authority, climate vulnerability and conflict dynamics in Pakistan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.2556Palabras clave:
Gobernanza medioambiental, ciudadanía climática, política medioambiental, fragmentación institucional, PakistánResumen
Este artículo replantea el cambio climático en Pakistán no solo como una cuestión medioambiental, sino como un profundo desafío para la autoridad estatal, la ciudadanía y la pertenencia política. Aborda la brecha existente entre el amplio marco de políticas climáticas de Pakistán y la limitada capacidad del Estado para proteger a las poblaciones vulnerables, debido a una gobernanza fragmentada, una aplicación deficiente de la ley y la ausencia de un enfoque basado en los derechos. Mediante el análisis jurídico doctrinal, la revisión de políticas, el mapeo institucional y entrevistas con informantes clave, el estudio examina la interacción entre las disposiciones constitucionales, las leyes medioambientales, los regímenes de gestión de desastres y los sistemas de protección social. Los resultados muestran que los desplazamientos provocados por el clima, la inseguridad en el acceso a los recursos y la alteración de los medios de subsistencia están generando nuevas formas de ciudadanía precaria que, en gran medida, no se reconocen dentro de la estructura jurídica y administrativa de Pakistán. El artículo sostiene que una resiliencia climática efectiva requiere una reforma institucional y el reconocimiento constitucional de las poblaciones vulnerables al clima como sujetos políticos de pleno derecho, lo que contribuye a los debates globales sobre el cambio climático, los derechos y las relaciones entre el Estado y la sociedad en el Sur Global en un sentido más amplio.
Descargas
Metrics
Estadísticas globales ℹ️
|
35
Visualizaciones
|
5
Descargas
|
|
40
Total
|
|
Citas
Abbott, K. W., and Snidal, D., 2009. The governance triangle: Regulatory standards institutions and the shadow of the state. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt7rgmj.6
Ali, S., 2016. Environmental law and governance in Pakistan. Karachi: Oxford University Press.
Arif, M. I. U., and Mahsud, M. I., 2024. Disentangling Pakistan’s climate change governance challenges: Trajectories and underpinnings. Pakistan Journal of Law, Analysis & Wisdom, 3, 36.
Arif, M. I. U., 2025. Climate change and governance: A thematic analysis of environmental laws and practices in Pakistan. PhD Thesis. University of Peshawar/UMass Boston.
Bashir, H., and Ahmed, Z., 2019. Climate change governance in Pakistan: Institutional complexities and pathways. Environmental Policy and Law, 49(2), 83–94.
Bashir, H., and Ahmed, Z., 2020. Environmental governance and legal pluralism in South Asia. Islamabad: National Institute of Public Policy Press.
Beck, U., 1992. Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.
Benson, D., and Jordan, A., 2017. Environmental governance. In: D. Richardson et al., eds., International encyclopedia of geography: People, the Earth, environment and technology [online]. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118786352.wbieg0631 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118786352.wbieg0631
Biermann, F., et al., 2010. Earth system governance: A research framework. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics [online], 10, 277–298. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10784-010-9137-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-010-9137-3
Bulkeley, H., and Betsill, M., 2013. Revisiting the urban politics of climate change. Environmental Politics [online], 22(1), 136–154. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2013.755797 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2013.755797
Burchell, G., Gordon, C., and Miller, P., 1991. The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality. University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226028811.001.0001
Busby, J., 2022a. States and nature: The effects of climate change on security. Cambridge University Press.
Busby, J. W., 2022b. The politics of climate change - States and nature: The effects of climate change on security. 1st ed. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108957922
Callon, M., 1986. Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay. In: J. Law, ed., Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? London/Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 196–233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1984.tb00113.x
Carroll, A., and Shabana, K., 2010. The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews [online], 12(1), 85–105. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00275.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00275.x
Cashore, B., and Vertinsky, I., 2000. Policy networks and firm behaviours: Governance systems and firm responses to external demands for sustainable forest management. Policy Sciences [online], 33(1), 1–30. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004728206505 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004728206505
Elman, C., and Elman, M. F., 2001. Reflections on the use of case studies in international relations research. In: C. Elman and M. F. Elman, eds., Progress in international relations theory: A critical assessment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 3–22.
Evans, M., 2012. Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Fairclough, N., 2010. Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. 2nd ed. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Foucault, M., 1991. Governmentality. In: G. Burchell, C. Gordon and P. Miller, eds., The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality. University of Chicago Press, 87–104.
Griffiths, J., 1986. What is legal pluralism? Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law [online], 24(1), 1–55. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.1986.10756387 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.1986.10756387
Gunningham, N., and Sinclair, D., 1999. Regulatory pluralism: Designing policy mixes for environmental protection. Law & Policy, 21(1), 49–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9930.00065
Haq, I., and Hussain, S., 2021. Risk society and environmental policy in Pakistan. Environmental Sociology, 7(3), 198–214.
Hecht, G., 2023. Residual governance: How South Africa foretells planetary futures. Durham: Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/book.118775
Hulme, M., 2023. Climate change isn’t everything: Liberating climate politics from alarmism. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
Jordan, A., et al., eds., 2018. Governing climate change: Polycentric in action? Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108284646
Eckstein, D., et al., 2020. Global climate risk index 2020: Who suffers most from extreme weather events? Bonn: Germanwatch.
Keohane, R. O., and Victor, D. G., 2011. Global governance and regime complexes in climate change. Perspectives on Politics [online], 9(1), 7–23. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228212111_The_Regime_Complex_for_Climate_Change DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592710004068
Keohane, R. O., and Victor, D. G., 2016. Cooperation and discord in global climate policy. Nature Climate Change [online], 6, 570–575. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2937 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2937
Klijn, E. H., 2008. Governance and governance networks in Europe. Public Management Review [online], 10(4), 506–525. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030802263954 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030802263954
Ladores, I. M., 2017. In the name of climate change: How Leghari v. Federation of Pakistan is instrumental to the pursuit of the right to life in the Philippines. Groningen Journal of International Law [online], 5(2). Available at: https://doi.org/10.21827/5a6af9f49574a DOI: https://doi.org/10.21827/5a6af9f49574a
Lane, M., and Rosenblum, N. L., 2017. The political theory of climate change: State of the field (Report No. 3, 2017). SSRC.
Latour, B., 2005. Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199256044.001.0001
Law, J., 1992. Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity. Systems Practice, 5, 379–393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01059830
Marks, G., and Hooghe, L., 2004. Contrasting visions of multi-level governance. In: I. Bache and M. Flinders, eds., Multi-level governance. Oxford University Press, 15–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0199259259.003.0002
Ministry of Climate Change, 2016. Pakistan Climate Change Act. Islamabad: Government of Pakistan.
Ministry of Climate Change, 2021. Pakistan National Adaptation Plan framework. Islamabad: Government of Pakistan.
Munir, M., 2004. Environmental law: Policy and practice in Pakistan. Lahore: Vanguard Press.
Najam, A., Christopoulou, I., and Moomaw, W. R., 2004. The emergent “system” of Global Environmental Governance. Cambridge, MA: Global Environmental Politics. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2004.4.4.23
Najam, A., Huq, S., and Sokona, Y., 2004. Climate negotiations beyond Kyoto: Developing countries concerns and interests. Climate Policy [online], 3(3), 211–231. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1469-3062(03)00057-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3763/cpol.2003.0329
Najam, A., Rahman, A., and Rauf, M., 2007. Environmental institutions in Pakistan: Strengthening governance for sustainable development. Islamabad: Sustainable Development Policy Institute.
Osborne, D., and Gaebler, T., 1992. Reinventing government: How the entreprenurial spirit is transforing the public sector. Reading: Addison-Wesly.
Ostrom, E., 2010. Beyond markets and states: polycentric governance of complex economic systems. American Economic Review [online], 100(3), 641–672. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.3.641 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.3.641
Peet, R., Robbins, P., and Watts, M., eds., 2011. Global political ecology [online]. 1st ed. London: Routledge. Available at: https://www.routledge.com/Global-Political-Ecology/Peet-Robbins-Watts/p/book/9780415548151 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203842249
Post-Disaster Needs Assessment (PDNA), 2023. Pakistan floods 2022: Post-disaster needs assessment. Islamabad: Government of Pakistan/World Bank.
Rhodes, R. A. W., 1997. Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Rosenau, J. N., and Czempiel, E. O., 1992. Governance without government: Order and change in world politics. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511521775
Saad, S., Mahsud, M. I., and Mian, G., 2024. Climate change impacts: exploring the rising climate-security nexus in Pakistan. Liberal Arts and Social Sciences International Journal (LASSIJ) [online], 8(1), 177-190. Available at: https://doi.org/10.47264/idea.lassij/8.1.10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47264/idea.lassij/8.1.10
Siddiqui, N., and Iqbal, Z., 2021. Assessing Pakistan’s environmental law and governance framework. Environmental Law Review, 23(2), 142–159.
Siddiqui, N., and Raza, S., 2019. Federal–provincial relations and the environmental policy gap in Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Public Policy, 5(1), 57–72.
Sil, R., Katzenstein, P.J., 2010. Analytical Eclecticism in the Study of World Politics: Reconfiguring Problems and Mechanisms across Research Traditions. Perspectives on Politics 8, 411–431. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592710001179
Sørensen, E., and Torfing, J., 2007. Theories of democratic network governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230625006
Steinberg, P., and VanDeveer, S., 2012. Comparative environmental politics: Theory, practice, and prospects. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sultana, F., 2021. Political ecology II: Conjunctures, crises, and critical publics. Progress in Human Geography [online], 45, 1721-1730. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/03091325211028665 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03091325211028665
United Nations Committee for Development Policy, 2014. Global governance and sustainable development. New York: United Nations.
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), 2000. The Montreal protocol on substances that deplete the ozone layer. Nairobi: UNEP Ozone Secretariat.
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), 2021. Inclusive wealth report: Measuring progress toward sustainability. Nairobi: UNEP.
Van Djik, T. A., 2008. Discourse and context: A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511481499
Wodak, R., and Meyer, M., 2009. Methods of critical discourse analysis. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
World Bank, 2022. Pakistan country climate and development report. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Yoshida, F., 2012. Governance, environmental regimes, and sustainable development. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Dr Muhammad Iqbal Uddin Arif, Dr Muhammad Irfan Mahsud, Dr Sumeera Imran
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Los autores conservan el copyright de sus trabajos, que se publicarán en OSLS bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento NoComercial SinObraDerivada. Puede consultar más detalles en: http://es.creativecommons.org/licencia/. Si no está de acuerdo con esta licencia, por favor, póngase en contacto con nosotros.
El autor concede los permisos necesarios para difundir la información bibliográfica del artículo, incluyendo el resumen, y autorizar a otros, incluyendo las bases de datos bibliográficas, de índices y servicios de alerta de contenidos, a copiar y comunicar esta información.
Para más información sobre los permisos para distribuir su artículo en cada fase de la producción, por favor, lea nuestra Política de Autoarchivo y Divulgación (en inglés).
Las condiciones de copyright con el nombre de autores y co-autores, y la licencia Creative Commons se mostrarán en el artículo. Estas condiciones se deben aceptar como parte del proceso de envío de un artículo a la revista. Por favor, asegúrese de que todos los co-autores se mencionan correctamente, y que entienden y aceptan estos términos.
