Cultural competence amidst evidentiary transformations
Why culture still matters
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.2504Palabras clave:
prueba, cultura, comprobación de hechos, atrocidades en masaResumen
Los juicios penales internacionales han enfrentado diversos obstáculos a la hora de determinar los hechos con precisión. Algunos de estos obstáculos se derivan de diferencias culturales entre los testigos, que a menudo proceden del Sur Global, y el personal de los tribunales, muchos de los cuales proceden de Occidente. El personal de los tribunales desarrolló estrategias para esclarecer las diferencias culturales; asimismo, los psicólogos, sociólogos y antropólogos del ámbito jurídico se han centrado en estas cuestiones. De hecho, académicos e investigadores han generado una amplia bibliografía que plantea interrogantes, explora y explica las divergencias entre diferentes grupos culturales. Esta sofisticada investigación es bienvenida, y muchos estudiosos de estos campos recomiendan continuar con el estudio para esclarecer y comprender aún más los componentes culturales del testimonio de los testigos en los juicios de derecho penal internacional. Al mismo tiempo, los cambios en el perfil probatorio de muchos juicios por atrocidades masivas han restado influencia al testimonio de los testigos, lo que podría hacer que la comprensión cultural cobrara, en consecuencia, menor relevancia. Sin embargo, en este estudio se defiende que se siga prestando atención a la competencia cultural como medio para aumentar la precisión y la legitimidad de las sentencias dictadas en casos de atrocidades masivas.
Descargas
Metrics
Estadísticas globales ℹ️
|
45
Visualizaciones
|
22
Descargas
|
|
67
Total
|
|
Citas
Aksamitowska, K., 2021. Digital evidence in domestic core international crimes prosecutions. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 19, 189-206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqab035
Almqvist, J., 2006. The impact of cultural diversity on international criminal proceedings. Journal of International Criminal Justice [online], 4(4), 745-764. Available at: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqi091 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqi091
Amnesty International, 2008. Kosovo (Serbia): The challenge to fix a failed UN justice mission. London: Amnesty International.
Amnesty International, 2025. CAR: Urgent financial support needed to prevent catastrophic closure of Special Criminal Court [online], 17 October. Available at: https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2025/10/car-special-criminal-court/
Anakwah, N., et al., 2020. Cross cultural differences in eyewitness memory reports. Applied Cognitive Psychology [online], 34(2), 504-512. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3637 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3637
Andersson, A., 2020. Outrage upon the personal dignity of the dead in international and Swedish war crimes legislation and case law. Scandinavian Studies in Law, 66, 245-277.
Bishay, J. I., 2021. Cultural experts at the International Criminal Court (ICC): The local and the international. Nordic Journal of Law and Social Research, 11, 123-138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7146/nnjlsr.vi11.132006
Bostian, I. L., 2005. Cultural relativism in international war crimes prosecutions: The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda. ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law, 12(1), 1-12.
Boyle, A., 2018. A long time coming: Understanding a landmark ruling in the Khmer Rouge Trials, Just Security [online], 19 November. Available at: https://www.justsecurity.org/61514/long-time-coming-understanding-landmark-ruling-khmer-rouge-trials/
Brigham, J. C., et al., 1983. The effect of arousal on facial recognition. Basic and Applied Social Psychology [online], 4, 279-291. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp0403_6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp0403_6
Buisman, C., 2012. Ascertainment of the truth in international criminal justice. PhD Thesis. Brunel University.
Buzo, E., 2020. Capturing a crisis: What lessons can we learn from the “overdocumentation” of the Rohingya crisis? Justice in Conflict Blog [online], 20 May. Available at: https://justiceinconflict.org/2020/05/20/capturing-a-crisis-what-lessons-can-we-learn-from-the-overdocumentation-of-the-rohingya-crisis/
Cannock, M., and O’Donohue, J., 2018. Don’t ask and you won’t receive - Will the ICC request the resources it needs in 2019? Human Rights International Justice [online], 2 May. Available at: https://hrij.amnesty.nl/icc-zero-growth-dont-ask-and-you-wont-receive/
Chin, W. Y., 2005. Multiple cultures, one criminal justice system: The need for a “cultural ombudsman” in the courtroom. Drake Law Review, 53, 651-659.
Christianson, S. A., and Loftus, E. F., 1987. Memory for traumatic events. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 1, 225-227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350010402
Cohen, A. B., and Varnum, M. E. W., 2016. Beyond East vs. West: Social class, region, and religion as forms of culture. Current Opinion in Psychology [online], 8, 5. Available at: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.09.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.09.006
Combs, N. A., 2009. Testimonial deficiencies and evidentiary uncertainties in international criminal trials. UCLA Journal of International Law and Foreign Affairs, 14(1), 235.
Combs, N. A., 2010. Fact-finding without facts: The uncertain evidentiary foundations of international criminal convictions. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511760259
Combs, N. A., 2017. Grave crimes and weak evidence: A fact-finding evolution in international criminal law. Harvard International Law Journal, 58(1), 47.
Combs, N. A., forthcoming 2026. Transforming evidence and institutions, the changing face and prospects of international criminal law. Stanford Journal of International Law. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6438347
Conway, M. A., et al., 2005. A cross-cultural investigation of autobiographical memory: On the universality and cultural variation of the reminiscence bump. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology [online], 36(6), 739-760. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022105280512 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022105280512
Cruvellier, T., 2024. The Massaquoi affair: Epilogue to a fiasco. Justice Info [online]. Available at: https://www.justiceinfo.net/en/128015-massaquoi-affair-epilogue-fiasco.html
d’Hondt, S., et al., 2024. Trajectories of spirituality: Producing and assessing cultural evidence at the International Criminal Court. Language in Society [online], 54(2), 1-5. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404523001008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404523001008
Davidson, C., 2021. Explaining inhumanity: The use of crime-definition experts at international criminal courts. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 48(2), 359-406.
de Bruïne, G., Vredeveldt, A., and van Koppen, P. J., 2018. Cross‐cultural differences in object recognition: Comparing asylum seekers from Sub‐Saharan Africa and a matched Western European control group. Applied Cognitive Psychology [online], 32(4), 463-470. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3419 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3419
de Bruïne, G., Vredeveldt, A., and van Koppen, P. J., 2026. Culture and credibility: The assessment of asylum seekers’ statements. Psychology, Crime & Law [online], 32(1), 321-343. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2023.2279328 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2023.2279328
DeMuniz, P., 1999. Introduction. In: J. I. Moore and M. Fisher, eds., Immigrants in courts. Seattle: University of Washington Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780295980614-003
Eltringham, N., 2013. “Illuminating the broader context”: Anthropological and historical knowledge at the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 19, 338-348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.12036
Ferme, M., 2001. The underneath of things: Violence, history, and the everyday in Sierra Leone. Berkeley: University of California Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520925717
Ford, S., 2015. Funding the court. In: C. Stahn, ed., The law and practice of the International Criminal Court. Oxford University Press.
Freeman, L., 2018. Digital evidence and war crimes prosecutions: The impact of digital technologies on international criminal investigations and trials. Fordham International Law Journal, 41(2), 283-335.
Freeman, L., and Vazquez Llorente, R., 2021. Finding the silence in the noise: International criminal evidence and procedure in the digital age. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 19, 163-173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqab023
Friedman, M. J., et al., 2004. The Hawaii Vietnam veterans project: Is minority status a risk factor for posttraumatic stress disorder? Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease [online], 192(1), 42-49. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.nmd.0000105999.57129.ee DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.nmd.0000105999.57129.ee
Fyfe, S., 2018. The office of the prosecutor: Seeking justice or serving global imperialism? International Criminal Law Review, 18, 988-989. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15718123-01806005
Ghosh, A., 2011. Power distance in organizational contexts—A review of collectivist cultures. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 47(1), 89-102.
Gutchess, A. H., et al., 2006. Cultural differences in neural function associated with object processing. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience [online], 6, 102. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.6.2.102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.6.2.102
Hageboutros, J., 2016. The evolving role of the security council in the post-Cold War period. Swarthmore International Relations Journal [online], 1(1). Available at: https://works.swarthmore.edu/swarthmoreirjournal/vol1/iss1/6/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.24968/2574-0113.1.6
Herlihy, J., Gleeson, K., and Turner, S., 2010. What assumptions about human behaviour underlie asylum judgments? International Journal of Refugee Law, 22, 354. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/eeq027
Hofstede, G., 1983. Dimensions of national cultures in fifty countries and three regions. In: J. Deręgowski, S. Dzuirawuec and R. Annis, eds. Explications in cross-cultural psychology. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger, 335-336.
Hubley, H., 2022. Bad speech, good evidence: Content moderation in the context of open-source investigations. International Criminal Law Review, 22(5-6), 989-1026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15718123-bja10124
ICTR, 2001. Statement of Judge Pillay, President of the Tribunal [online], 14 December. Available at: https://unictr.irmct.org/en/news/statement-judge-pillay-president-tribunal
International Criminal Court, 2020. Situation in the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan Case No. ICC-02/17 OA4, Appeals Judgment. 5 March.
International Criminal Court, 2024. Benjamin Netanyahu [online]. Available at: https://www.icc-cpi.int/defendant/netanyahu
International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH), 2002. Victims in the balance: Challenges ahead for the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda. Report no. 329/2 [online]. Available at: https://www.refworld.org/reference/countryrep/ifhr/2002/en/49110.
International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH), 2012. Cutting the weakest link: Budget discussions and their impact on victims’ rights to participate in the proceedings. Position Paper.
Jobson, L., and O’Kearney, R., 2006. Cultural differences in autobiographical memory of trauma. Clinical Psychologist [online], 10(3), 89-98. Available at: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/13284200600939892 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13284200600939892
Johannesson, L., 2012. Performing credibility: Assessments of asylum claims in Swedish migration courts. Retfærd Årgang, 35, 69-82.
Jones, B., and Stedman, S., 2017. Civil wars & the post-Cold War international order. Daedalus [online], 146(4), 33-44. Available at: https://www.amacad.org/sites/default/files/publication/downloads/Fa17_Daedalus_04_Jones%20%26%20Stedman.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/DAED_a_00457
Kagan, M., 2003. Is truth in the eye of the beholder? Objective credibility assessment in refugee status determination. Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, 17, 374-386.
Kelsall, T., 2009. Culture under cross-examination: International justice and the Special Court for Sierra Leone. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511642173
Kelsall, T., 2010. International criminal justice and non-Western cultures. Oxford Transitional Justice Working Paper Series [online]. Available at: https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/migrated/kelsall_internationalcriminaljustice_final1.pdf
Keselman, O., et al., 2010. Asylum-seeking minors in interpreter-mediated interviews: What do they say and what happens to their responses? Child & Family Social Work [online], 15(3), 325. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2010.00681.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2010.00681.x
Kidane, W. L., 2017. Does cultural diversity improve or hinder the quality of arbitral justice? Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 31 March.
Krever, T., 2014. Unveiling (and veiling) politics in international criminal trials. In: C. Schwöbel, ed. Critical approaches to international criminal law: An introduction. Abingdon: Routledge, 117-134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315855943-6
Langer, M., and Eason, M., 2019. The quiet expansion of universal jurisdiction. European Journal of International Law, 30(3), 779-817. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chz050
Laville, S., 2005. UK court convicts Afghan warlord: Zardad found guilty of torture after landmark Old Bailey retrial. The Guardian [online], 19 July. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2005/jul/19/afghanistan.world
Leal, S., et al., 2018. Cross-cultural verbal deception. Legal and Criminological Psychology [online], 23(2), 192-201. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12131 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12131
Littlejohn, J., 1963. Temne space. Anthropological Quarterly, 36(1), 1-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3316519
Loftus, E. F., 1975. Leading questions and the eyewitness report. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 560-571. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(75)90023-7
Loftus, E. F., 2011. Eyewitness testimony. Film. USA: Films on Demand [online]. Available at: https://fod.infobase.com/PortalPlaylists.aspx?wID=104757&xtid=94186.
Loftus, E. F., 2019. Eyewitness testimony. Applied Cognitive Psychology [online], 33(4), 498-501. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3542?urlappend=%3Futm_source%3Dresearchgate.net%26utm_medium%3Darticle DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3542
Malephane, L., 2022. Digital divide: Who in Africa is connected and who is not. Afrobarometer Dispatch [online], no. 582. Available at: https://www.afrobarometer.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/AD582-PAP18-Digital-divide-Who-in-Africa-is-connected-and-who-is-not-Afrobarometer-Pan-Africa-Profile-12dec22.pdf
Maučec, G., 2020. The power of culture and judicial decision-making at the ICC. In: J. Fraser and B. McGonigle Leyh, eds., Intersections of Law and Culture at the International Criminal Court [online]. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 190-208. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839107306.00018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839107306.00018
McDermott, Y., Koenig, A., and Murray, D., 2021. Open source information’s blind spot. Journal of International Criminal Justice [online], 19(1), 85-101. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqab006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqab006
McKay, F., 2020. A delicate mosaic: The ICC, culture and victims. In: J. Fraser and B. McGonigle Leyh, eds., Intersections of Law and Culture at the International Criminal Court [online]. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 288-310. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839107306.00024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839107306.00024
Miyamoto, Y., Nisbett, R., and Masuda, T., 2006. Culture and the physical environment: Holistic versus analytic perceptual affordances. Psychological Science [online], 17(2), 113-119. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01673.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01673.x
Moore, J. I., and Fisher, M., eds., 1999. Immigrants in courts. Seattle: University of Washington Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780295980614
MTV Uutiset, 2017. Suomen kallein oikeudenkäynti oli lopulta halpa. MTV Uutiset [online], 21 April. Available at: https://www.mtvuutiset.fi/artikkeli/suomen-kallein-oikeudenkaynti-oli-lopulta-halpa/6283180#gs.51l918.
Murray, D., McDermott, Y., and Koenig, K. A., 2022. Mapping the use of open source research in UN human rights investigations. Journal of Human Rights Practice [online], 14(2), 554-581. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huab059 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huab059
Nisbett, R. E., et al., 2001. Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review [online], 108, 291. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.108.2.291 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.291
Nistor, A. L., Merrylees, R., and Holá, B., 2020. Spellbound at the ICC: The intersection of spirituality and international criminal law. In: J. Fraser and B. McGonigle Leyh, eds., Intersections of Law and Culture at the International Criminal Court [online]. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 147-168. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839107306.00016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839107306.00016
Nuzban, Y., 2023. Context matters: The use of overview expert evidence in ICC trials. Journal of International Criminal Justice [online], 21(4), 931-955. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqad049 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqad049
Ogora, L. O., 2019. Electing the next ICC prosecutor: Perspectives from civil society in Uganda. International Justice Monitor [online], 28 August. Available at: https://www.ijmonitor.org/2019/08/electing-the-next-icc-prosecutor-perspectives-from-civil-society-in-uganda/
Onyia, C. A., 2023. The special criminal court must fill the justice gap left by the ICC in Central African Republic. Opinio Juris [online], 23 October 2023. Available at: https://opiniojuris.org/2023/10/23/the-special-criminal-court-must-fill-the-justice-gap-left-by-the-icc-in-central-african-republic/ .
Oosterveld, V., 2014. Procedural steps addressing sexual and gender-based violence: The legacy of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda and its application in the Special Court for Sierra Leone [online]. The Hague/Arusha: UN International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. Available at: https://unictr.irmct.org/sites/unictr.org/files/publications/compendium-documents/ii-procedures-adressing-sexual-gender-violence-legacy-application-oosterveid.pdf.
Oyserman, D., 2006. High power, low power, and equality: Culture beyond individualism and collectivism. Journal of Consumer Psychology [online], 16, 352-353. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1604_6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1604_6
Petit, F., 2023. Central African Republic: Special court “in the starting block” Part 2. Justice Info [online], 16 January. Available at: https://www.justiceinfo.net/en/111260-central-african-republic-special-court-starting-block-2.html
Petrović, V., 2014. A crack in the wall of denial: The Scorpions video in and out of the courtroom. In: D. Zarkov and M. Glasius, eds., Narratives of Justice in and out of the Courtroom: Former Yugoslavia and Beyond. Cham: Springer, 89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04057-8_5
Pinsolle, P., 2023. Cross-examination of fact witnesses: The civil law perspective. Global Arbitration Review [online], 18 August. Available at: https://globalarbitrationreview.com/guide/the-guide-advocacy/sixth-edition/article/cross-examination-of-fact-witnesses-the-civil-law-perspective
Powderly, J., 2019. International criminal justice in an age of perpetual crisis. Leiden Journal of International Law [online], 32(1), 1-11. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156518000675 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156518000675
Ruppel, J., 1992. The need for a benefit of the doubt standard in credibility evaluation of asylum applicants. Columbia Human Rights Law Review, 23, 1.
Sagiv, M., 2015. Cultural bias in judicial decision making. Boston College Journal of Law & Social Justice, 35(2), 229-262.
Sambira, J., 2013. Africa’s mobile youth drive change. Africa Renewal [online], 11 April. Available at: https://africarenewal.un.org/en/magazine/africas-mobile-youth-drive-change
Sander, B., 2015. International criminal justice as progress: From faith to critique. In: Bergsmo, M., et al., eds., Historical origins of international criminal law: Volume 4. Brussels: Torkel Opsahl Academic, 753-832.
Sander, B., 2019. The expressive limits of international criminal justice: victim trauma and local culture in the iron cage of the law. International Criminal Law Review, 19(6), 1014-1045. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15718123-02002002
Schot, S., 2020. “Questioned by the Court”: The role of judges and sociocultural aspects of testimonial evidence in Katanga. In: J. Frasier and B. McGonigle Leyh, eds., Intersections of law and culture at the International Criminal Court. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 169-178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839107306.00017
Schwöbel, C., ed., 2014. Critical approaches to international criminal law: An introduction. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315855943
Seroussi, J., 2018. How do international lawyers handle facts? The role of folk sociological theories at the International Criminal Court. British Journal of Sociology, 69, 962-976. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12604
Shepherd, J. W., et al., 1982. Identification evidence: A psychological evaluation. Aberdeen University Press, 80-86.
Skrifvars, J., et al., 2024. Psychological assumptions underlying credibility assessments in Finnish asylum determinations. Nordic Psychology [online], 76(1), 55. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/19012276.2022.2145986 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19012276.2022.2145986
Stanley, S. E., and Benjamin, A. S., 2016. That’s not what you said the first time: A theoretical account of the relationship between consistency and accuracy of recall. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications [online], 1, 1-9. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41235-016-0012-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-016-0012-9
Stephens, A., 2024. Liberia: Gibril Massaquoi due large compensation payment after acquittal in war crimes trial. FrontPage Africa [online], 2 February. Available at: https://frontpageafricaonline.com/liberia-war-crimes-trial/liberia-gibril-massaquoi-due-large-compensation-payment-after-acquittal-in-war-crimes-trial/
Swigart, L., 2015. African languages in international criminal justice. In: C. C. Jalloh and A. B. M. Marong, eds., Promoting accountability under international law for gross human rights violations in Africa: Essays in honour of prosecutor Hassan Bubacar Jallow. Leiden/Boston: Brill Nijhoff, 578-584. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004271753_028
Swigart, L., 2017. Linguistic and cultural diversity in international criminal justice: Toward bridging the divide. University of the Pacific Law Review, 48(1), 197.
Swigart, L., 2020. Now you see it, now you don't: Culture at the International Criminal Court. In: J. Fraser, and B. McGonigle Leyh, eds. Intersections of law and culture at the International Criminal Court [online]. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 14-36. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839107306.00008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839107306.00008
Taylor, P. J., et al., 2015. Cross-cultural deception detection. In: P.A. Granhag, A. Vrij and B. Verschuere, eds., Detecting deception: Current challenges and cognitive approaches. Abingdon: Routledge, 175-176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118510001.ch8
Taylor, P. J., et al., 2017. Culture moderates changes in linguistic self-presentation and detail provision when deceiving others. Royal Society Open Science [online], 4(6), 1-2. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170128 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170128
Tomić, A., and Beltrán Montoliu, A., 2013. Translation at the International Criminal Court. The Legal Translator in Context, 4, 221-235.
Tri, N.M., 2024 Culture as a Dynamic Product of Socially and Historically Situated Discourse Communities: A Review of Literature, VMOST J. Soc. Sci. & Humanities 66(1), 121-128. Available at: https://doi.org/10.31276 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31276/VMOSTJOSSH.66(1).121-128
Trial International, 2017. Make way for justice #3: Universal jurisdiction annual review 2017 [online]. Available at: https://trialinternational.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/UJAR-MEP_A4_012.pdf.
Trial International, 2021. Universal jurisdiction annual review 2021. Geneva: Trial International.
Tusa, A., and Tusa, J, 1983. The Nuremberg Trial. New York: Atheneum.
Van Veldhuizen, T., 2023. Fact finding in asylum cases. In : S. Landström, P. A. Granhag and P. J. van Koppen, eds., The future of forensic psychology: Core topics and emerging trends. London: Routledge, 160-170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003308546-19
Vredeveldt, A., and de Bruïne, G., 2022. Not universally sinful: Cultural aspects of memory sins. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition [online], 11(4), 465. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1037/mac0000089 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/mac0000089
Vredeveldt, A., Given-Wilson, Z., and Memon, A., 2026. Culture, trauma, and memory in investigative interviews. Psychology, Crime & Law [online], 32(1), 300-320. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2023.2209262 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2023.2209262
Wang, B. Y., et al., 2013. Problems from hell, solution in the heavens?: Identifying obstacles and opportunities for employing geospatial technologies to document and mitigate mass atrocities. Stability: International Journal of Security & Development [online], 2(3), Art. 53, 1-18. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5334/sta.cn DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/sta.cn
White, E., 2024. Closing cases with open-source: facilitating the use of user-generated open-source evidence in international criminal investigations through the creation of a standing investigative mechanism. Leiden Journal of International Law [online], 37(1), 228-245. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156523000444 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156523000444
Wiebelhaus-Brahm, E., and Ainley, K., 2023. The evolution of funding for the International Criminal Court: Budgets, donors and gender justice. Journal of Human Rights [online], 22(1), 31. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14754835.2022.2156276 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14754835.2022.2156276
Wilson, R. A., 2016. Expert evidence on trial: Social researchers in the International Criminal Courtroom. American Ethnologist, 43(4), 730-731. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12387
Witkin, H. A., and Berry, J. W., 1975. Psychological differentiation in cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 6, 1-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.1975.tb01043.x
Yuille, J. C., Marzsen, D., and Cooper, B., 1999. Training investigative interviewers: Adherence to the spirit, as well as the letter. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry [online], 22(3-4), 323-36. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0160-2527(99)00012-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-2527(99)00012-6
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Nancy Amoury Combs
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Los autores conservan el copyright de sus trabajos, que se publicarán en OSLS bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento NoComercial SinObraDerivada. Puede consultar más detalles en: http://es.creativecommons.org/licencia/. Si no está de acuerdo con esta licencia, por favor, póngase en contacto con nosotros.
El autor concede los permisos necesarios para difundir la información bibliográfica del artículo, incluyendo el resumen, y autorizar a otros, incluyendo las bases de datos bibliográficas, de índices y servicios de alerta de contenidos, a copiar y comunicar esta información.
Para más información sobre los permisos para distribuir su artículo en cada fase de la producción, por favor, lea nuestra Política de Autoarchivo y Divulgación (en inglés).
Las condiciones de copyright con el nombre de autores y co-autores, y la licencia Creative Commons se mostrarán en el artículo. Estas condiciones se deben aceptar como parte del proceso de envío de un artículo a la revista. Por favor, asegúrese de que todos los co-autores se mencionan correctamente, y que entienden y aceptan estos términos.
