Próximo(s)

Between Silos and Networks

Digital Infrastructures and Reconfiguration of Expertise in the Belgian Justice System

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.2341

Palabras clave:

transformación digital, redes de expertos, ANT, trabajo fronterizo, conectividad protectora, cadena de suministro del sector público

Resumen

Este artículo investiga cómo la introducción del sistema digital de gestión de casos Mammoet at Central Hosting (MaCH) está transformando la experiencia dentro de la cadena de suministro de la justicia penal en materia de tráfico rodado en Bélgica. Conceptualizando la cadena de suministro como una red multinivel compuesta por actores interconectados pero institucionalmente distintos, el estudio se basa en la teoría del actor-red (ANT) y en las perspectivas del trabajo fronterizo. Emplea un enfoque cualitativo y multicaso para analizar cómo MaCH media en las prácticas profesionales entre jueces, fiscales, secretarios y tecnólogos. Los resultados revelan que MaCH agiliza significativamente las tareas administrativas antes y después de las audiencias judiciales, redistribuyendo las responsabilidades y provocando cambios en los límites de la experiencia profesional. Los profesionales judiciales adoptan estratégicamente un enfoque de “conectividad protectora”, equilibrando la colaboración con la protección de los límites para preservar la experiencia básica y mantener el control sobre los procesos críticos de toma de decisiones. En última instancia, el artículo contribuye a comprender el complejo papel de la digitalización en la reconfiguración de la experiencia profesional en los contextos judiciales de la cadena de suministro.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

        Metrics

Estadísticas globales ℹ️

Totales acumulados desde su publicación
30
Visualizaciones
29
Descargas
59
Total

Biografía del autor/a

Lisa Pelssers, University of Liège

Lisa Pelssers is a PhD candidate in political and social sciences at the Centre de Recherche et d’Interventions Sociologiques (CRIS) of the University of Liège (ULiège) in Belgium. Her main research interest are the digitalization of courts and tribunals, and more specifically, on the role of digital instruments in redefining practices, knowledge, and interactions among the actors involved in the making of law. Her articles have appeared in journals such as Revue interdisciplinaire d'études juridiques and Recht der Werkelijkheid. Email: lisa.pelssers@uliege.be

Citas

Abbott, A., 1988. The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor [online]. The University of Chicago Press, pp. xvi, 435. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226189666.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226189666.001.0001

Akrich, M., 1987. Comment décrire les objets techniques? Techniques et culture [online], 9, 49. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4000/tc.863 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/tc.863

Akrich, M., Callon, M., and Latour, B., 2006. Sociologie de la traduction: Textes fondateurs [online]. Paris: Presses des Mines. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4000/books.pressesmines.1181 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/books.pressesmines.1181

Allen, D., 1997. The nursing-medical boundary: A negotiated order? Sociology of Health and Illness [online], 19(4), 498–520. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.1997.tb00415.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.1997.tb00415.x

Ambe, I.M., 2012. The perspectives of supply chain management in the public sector. Journal of Contemporary Management, 9(1), 132–149.

Apesoa-Varano, E.C., and Varano, C.S., 2014. Conflicted health care: Professionalism and caring in an urban hospital [online]. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv167550d DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv167550d

Barrett, M., et al., 2012. Reconfiguring Boundary Relations: Robotic Innovations in Pharmacy Work. Organization Science [online], 23(5), 1448–1466. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0639 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0639

Bastard, J., and Dubois, C., 2016. Making Sense or/of Decisions? Collective Action in Early Release Process. In: A. Hondeghem, X. Rousseaux and F. Schoenaers, eds., Modernisation of the Criminal Justice Chain and the Judicial System. Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice (Vol. 50) [online]. Cham: Springer International, 159–172. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25802-7_11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25802-7_11

Braun, V., and Clarke, V., 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology [online], 3(2), 77–101. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Callender, G., 2011. Alignment of inter‐agency supply chains to enhance public sector performance management. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management [online], 60(1), 9–23. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/17410401111094286 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/17410401111094286

Cappellina, B., 2018. Quand la gestion s’empare de la Justice: De la fabrique européenne aux tribunaux [online]. PhD thesis. Université de Bordeaux. Available at: https://theses.hal.science/tel-02074161

Code d’instruction Criminelle, Art. 216ter, Moniteur Belge, Pub. L. No. Belgique, Code d’instruction criminelle (2005).

Conseil des ministres, 2008. ICT Justice: Mammouth et “MACH”. News.belgium [online], 13 June. Available at: https://news.belgium.be/fr/ict-justice-mammouth-et-MaCH

Constitution, Art. 151, Moniteur Belge, Pub. L. No. Belgique, Constitution (1994).

Contini, F., and Fabri, M., 2001. Justice and Technology in Europe: How ICT is Changing the Judicial Business. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.

Contini, F., and Mohr, R., 2007. Reconciling independence and accountability in judicial systems. Utrecht Law Review [online], 26–43. Available at: https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.46 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.46

de Blok, C., et al., 2015. Applying supply chain logic to criminal law enforcement: The case of The Netherlands. In: Z. Radnor et al., eds., Public Service Operations Management. London: Routledge.

de Leval, G., and Georges, F., 2010. Culture et droit processuel en Belgique. Droit et culture [online], 445-459. Available at: https://orbi.uliege.be/handle/2268/75475

Dumoulin, L., and Licoppe, C., 2011. La visioconférence dans la justice pénale: Retour sur la fabrique d’une politique publique à la fin des années 1990-2010. Les Cahiers de la Justice [online], 2, 29–52. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3917/cdlj.1102.0029 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/cdlj.1102.0029

Elmholdt, K., and Elmholdt, C., 2017. Networks of expertise: An example from process consulting. Akademisk kvarter | Academic Quarter [online], 15(autumn), 102-120. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5278/OJS.AK.V0I15.2694

European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ), 2020. European judicial systems—CEPEJ Evaluation report—2020 Evaluation cycle (2018 data) [online]. Evaluation report. Available at: https://www.coe.int/en/web/cepej/special-file-publication-of-the-report-european-judicial-systems-cepej-evaluation-report-2020-evaluation-cycle-2018-data-

European Commission, 2008. Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the European Economic and Social Committee—Towards a European e Justice Strategy (SEC(2008)1947 SEC(2008)1944) [online]. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52008DC0329

European Commission, 2019. 2019-2023 Action Plan European e-Justice. Official Journal of the European Union [online], C 96/9. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A52019XG0313%2802%29

Evetts, J., 2011. A new professionalism? Challenges and opportunities. Current Sociology [online], 59(4), 406–422. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392111402585 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392111402585

Eyal, G., 2013. For a Sociology of Expertise: The Social Origins of the Autism Epidemic. American Journal of Sociology [online], 118(4), 863–907. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1086/668448 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/668448

Fabri, M., 2009. E-justice in Finland and in Italy: Enabling versus constraining models. In F. Contini and G.F. Lanzara, eds., ICT and Innovation in the Public Sector: European Studies in the Making of E-Government [online]. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 115–146. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230227293_6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230227293_6

Faulconbridge, J., Folke Henriksen, L., and Seabrooke, L., 2021. How professional actions connect and protect. Journal of Professions and Organization [online], 8(2), 214–227. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/joab008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/joab008

Féry, B., 2015. Gouverner par les données ? : Pour une analyse des processus de traduction dans l’usage des systèmes d’information : Déploiement et utilisations de Cassiopée dans l’Institution pénale [online]. These de doctorat. Versailles-St Quentin en Yvelines. Available at: https://theses.fr/2015VERS020S

Freidson, E., 2017. Professional Dominance: The Social Structure of Medical Care. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315127491

Garapon, A., and Lassègue, J., 2018. Justice digitale: Révolution graphique et rupture anthropologique. Paris: PUF.

Gieryn, T.F., 1983. Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists. American Sociological Review [online], 48(6), 781–795. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/2095325 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2095325

Holvast, N., and Mascini, P., 2020. Is the Judge or the Clerk Making the Decision? Measuring the Influence of Judicial Assistants via an Experimental Survey among Dutch District Court Judges. International Journal for Court Administration [online], 11(3), 1. Available at: https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.358 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.358

Kaplan, S., Milde, J., and Cowan, R.S., 2017. Symbiont Practices in Boundary Spanning: Bridging the Cognitive and Political Divides in Interdisciplinary Research. Academy of Management Journal [online], 60(4), 1387–1414. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0809 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0809

Karwan, K.R., and Markland, R.E., 2006. Integrating service design principles and information technology to improve delivery and productivity in public sector operations: The case of the South Carolina DMV. Journal of Operations Management [online], 24(4), 347–362. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2005.06.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2005.06.003

Kellogg, K.C., Orlikowski, W.J., and Yates, J., 2006. Life in the Trading Zone: Structuring Coordination Across Boundaries in Postbureaucratic Organizations. Organization Science [online], 17(1), 22–44. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0157 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0157

Lamont, M., and Molnár, V., 2002. The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences. Annual Review of Sociology [online], 28(Volume 28, 2002), 167–195. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141107 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141107

Langley, A., et al., 2019. Boundary Work among Groups, Occupations, and Organizations: From Cartography to Process. Academy of Management Annals [online], 13(2), 704–736. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2017.0089 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2017.0089

Latour, B., 2005. Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory [online]. Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199256044.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199256044.001.0001

Levina, N., and Vaast, E., 2005. The Emergence of Boundary Spanning Competence in Practice: Implications for Implementation and Use of Information Systems. MIS Quarterly [online], 29(2), 335–363. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/25148682 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/25148682

Lindgren, I., and Jansson, G., 2013. Electronic services in the public sector: A conceptual framework. Government Information Quarterly [online], 30(2), 163–172. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.10.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.10.005

McCue, C.P., and Pitzer, J.T., 2005. Fundamentals of leadership and management in public procurement. Herndon: NIGP.

Montesquieu, C.d., 1989. The Spirit of the Laws. Cambridge University Press.

Noordegraaf, M., 2007. From “Pure” to “Hybrid” Professionalism: Present-Day Professionalism in Ambiguous Public Domains. Administration & Society [online], 39(6), 761–785. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399707304434 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399707304434

Noordegraaf, M., 2015. Hybrid professionalism and beyond: (New) Forms of public professionalism in changing organizational and societal contexts. Journal of Professions and Organization [online], 2(2), 187–206. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/jov002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/jov002

Noordegraaf, M., 2016. Reconfiguring Professional Work: Changing Forms of Professionalism in Public Services. Administration & Society [online], 48(7), 783–810. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399713509242 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399713509242

Noordegraaf, M., 2020. Protective or connective professionalism? How connected professionals can (still) act as autonomous and authoritative experts. Journal of Professions and Organization [online], 7(2), 205–223. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/joaa011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/joaa011

Petrakaki, D., Barber, N., and Waring, J., 2012. The possibilities of technology in shaping healthcare professionals: (Re/De-)Professionalisation of pharmacists in England. Social Science & Medicine [online], 75(2), 429–437. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.03.033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.03.033

Phillips, N., and Lawrence, T.B., 2012. The turn to work in organization and management theory: Some implications for strategic organization. Strategic Organization [online], 10(3), 223–230. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127012453109 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127012453109

Ponsignon, F., Smart, P.A., and Maull, R.S., 2011. Service delivery system design: Characteristics and contingencies. International Journal of Operations & Production Management [online], 31(3), 324–349. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/01443571111111946 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/01443571111111946

Road Traffic Police Law, coordinated by the Royal Decree of 16 March 1968 [online]. Available at: https://etaamb.openjustice.be/fr/loi-du-16-mars-1968_n1998000446

Sanders, A., 2020. Judicial Assistants in Europe – A Comparative Analysis. International Journal for Court Administration [online], 11(2), 12. Available at: https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.360 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.360

Schoenaers, F., 2015. Modernisation des institutions judiciaires belges: Vers un management de type 2.0. Cahiers de la Sécurité [online], 32. Available at: https://orbi.uliege.be/handle/2268/187925

Schoenaers, F., 2021. Le Nouveau management public et la justice: Les enjeux de la réforme du système judiciaire belge. Revue Juridique Themis [online], 54, 458–485. Available at: https://ssl.editionsthemis.com/uploaded/revue/article/10367_15-Schoenaers.pdf

Seepma, A.P., de Blok, C., and Van Donk, D.P., 2021. Designing digital public service supply chains: Four country-based cases in criminal justice. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal [online], 26(3), 418–446. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-03-2019-0111 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-03-2019-0111

Service Public Fédéral Justice, 2019. Centralisation et numérisation des dossiers dans “MaCH” [online]. Press release. 15 May. Available at: https://justice.belgium.be/fr/nouvelles/communiques_de_presse/centralisation_et_numerisation_des_dossiers_dans_MaCH

Strauss, A.L., 1988. Negotiations: Varieties, contexts, processes, and social order. 1st ed., 4th pr. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Susskind, R., and Susskind, D., 2022. The Future of the Professions: How Technology Will Transform the Work of Human Experts. Updated ed. Oxford University Press.

Tsingou, E., 2018. New governors on the block: The rise of anti-money laundering professionals. Crime, Law and Social Change [online], 69(2), 191–205. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-017-9751-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-017-9751-x

Uyttendaele, M., 2017. Trente leçons de droit constitutionnel. Limal: Anthemis.

Venkatesh, V., Chan, F.K.Y., and Thong, J.Y.L., 2012. Designing e‐government services: Key service attributes and citizens’ preference structures. Journal of Operations Management [online], 30(1–2), 116–133. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2011.10.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2011.10.001

Vigour, C., 2004. Réformer la justice en Europe. Analyse comparée des cas de la Belgique, de la France et de l’Italie. Droit et société [online], 5657(1), 291–323. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3917/drs.056.0291 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/drs.056.0291

Vigour, C., 2008. Ethos et légitimité professionnels à l’épreuve d’une approche managériale: Le cas de la justice belge. Sociologie du travail [online], 50(1), Article 1. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4000/sdt.18544 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soctra.2007.12.005

Vigour, C., 2018. Réformes de la justice en Europe: Entre politique et gestion. Louvain-la-Neuve: De Boeck Superieur. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/dbu.vigou.2018.01

Whalen, R., 2022. Defining legal technology and its implications. International Journal of Law and Information Technology [online], 30(1), 47–67. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eaac005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eaac005

Wynsdau, S., and Jongen, F., 2015. Les procédures électroniques: Réalisations, échecs et perspectives. In: J.F. Henrotte and F. Jongen, eds., Pas de droit sans technologie. Brussels: Larcier, 87–123.

Yang, T.M., and Maxwell, T.A., 2011. Information-sharing in public organizations: A literature review of interpersonal, intra-organizational and inter-organizational success factors. Government Information Quarterly [online], 28(2), 164–175. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.06.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.06.008

Yin, R.K., 2009. Case study research: Design and methods. 4th ed.. London: Sage.

Publicado

22-09-2025

Cómo citar

Pelssers, L. (2025) «Between Silos and Networks: Digital Infrastructures and Reconfiguration of Expertise in the Belgian Justice System», Oñati Socio-Legal Series. doi: 10.35295/osls.iisl.2341.

Número

Sección

Artículos individuales

Datos de los fondos