Law and cognition
On some issues and developments
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.2314Palabras clave:
derecho, cognición, sentido comúnResumen
Este artículo explora el papel que juega el amplio ámbito de lo “cognitivo”, especialmente entendido como “sentido común”, dentro de la experiencia jurídica, con el fin de mostrar algunos aspectos tanto del derecho como del ámbito político-institucional. El análisis del área semántica compleja ampliamente relacionada con lo “cognitivo” pone de relieve sus múltiples dimensiones, con especial atención al conocimiento social, el concepto de sentido común, el horizonte presuposicional, las nociones de creencia, la idea de confianza y la dimensión psicológica. Partiendo de este marco metodológico, la atención se centra en el “derecho en acción”, es decir, en dos niveles subyacentes al círculo conceptual compuesto por el horizonte cognitivo, la experiencia jurídica y el sentido común: por un lado, la estructura del orden jurídico y, por otro, la dimensión político-institucional. De esta manera, el análisis permite pensar en la posibilidad de repensar el concepto de derecho para construir un modelo de derecho multifactorial o integrado que abarque los resultados proporcionados por otros enfoques teóricos.
Descargas
Metrics
Estadísticas globales ℹ️
|
15
Visualizaciones
|
3
Descargas
|
|
18
Total
|
|
Citas
Agazzi, E., 2014. L’oggettività scientifica e i suoi contesti. Milan: Bompiani.
Alford, J. R., and Hibbing, J. R., 2010. The ultimate source of political opinions: Genes and the environment. In: B. Norrander and C. Wilcox, eds., Understanding Public Opinion. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 175-195.
Alford, J. R., et al., 2011. The politics of mate choice. The Journal of Politics [online], 73(2), 362-379. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381611000016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381611000016
Allport, G. W., 1947. Scientific models and human morals. Psychological Review [online], 54(4), 182-192. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0059200 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0059200
Antiseri, D., 1981. Teoria unificata del metodo. Padua: Liviana.
Arnaudo, L., 2010. Diritto cognitivo. Prolegomeni a una ricerca. Politica del diritto, 61(1),101-135.
Bertea, S., 2019. A theory of legal obligation [online]. New York: Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108566216 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108566216
Bombelli, G., 2017. Diritto, comportamenti e forme di “credenza”. Turin: Giappichelli.
Bombelli, G., 2018. Emotion and rationality in Aristotle’s Model: From anthropology to politics. In: L. Huppes-Cluysenaer and N. M. M. S. Coelho, eds., Aristotle on Emotion in Law and Politics [online]. Cham: Springer, 53-89. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66703-4_4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66703-4_4
Bombelli, G., 2020a. Migrations and security. The problematic circularity “Philosophy, Law and Politics”. Revista de Estudios de Seguridad Internacional [online], 6(1), 1-17. Available at: https://doi.org/10.18847/1.11.2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18847/1.11.2
Bombelli, G., 2020b. Sulla democrazia come modello esigente: soggetto, procedure e senso comune. In: C. Danani, ed., Democrazia e verità. Tra degenerazione e rigenerazione. Brescia: Morcelliana, 141-151.
Bombelli, G., 2021. Categorie giuridiche, giusrealismo e neuroscienze. Sulla nozione di rule-following. Teoria e critica della regolazione sociale [online], 1(22), 73-102. Available at: https://www.mimesisjournals.com/ojs/index.php/tcrs/article/view/1335
Bombelli, G., 2022a. Causalità e diritto: paradigmi e alcune questioni teoriche. Jus, 1-2, 177-230.
Bombelli, G., 2022b. Cognitive Turn? Tra giuspositivismo e giuscognitivismo. Alcuni riflessi socio-giuridici. Sociologia del diritto [online], 1, 71-97. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3280/SD2022-001004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3280/SD2022-001004
Bombelli, G., 2023. Normativity, truth, validity and effectiveness. Remarks starting from the horizon of the “Common Sense”. Phenomenology and Mind [online], 24, 226-236. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17454/pam-2417 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17454/pam-2417
Bombelli, G., 2025. Il Rule of Law e il giurista cognitivo (ed etico), Riflessioni tra modernità e post-modernità. In: L. Corso, G. Barcellona and A. Scaravilli, eds., Quali virtù per il rule of law? Prospettive di giuristi e filosofi. Turin: Giappichelli, 203-223.
Bombelli, G., and Heritier, P., eds., 2022-2024. I volti molteplici della consuetudine. Milan/Udine: Mimesis (two volumes).
Bratman, M., 1987. Intention, plans, and practical reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bratman, M., 1992. Shared cooperative activity. The Philosophical Review [online], 101(2), 327-341. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/2185537 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2185537
Bratman, M., 1993. Shared intention. Ethics [online], 104, 97-113. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1086/293577 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/293577
Bratman, M., 1999. Faces of intention. Selected essays on intention and agency [online]. Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625190 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625190
Bratman, M., 2007. Structures of agency: Essays [online]. Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195187717.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195187717.001.0001
Brozek, B., 2013. Rule-following: From imitation to the normative mind. Krakow: Copernicus Center Press.
Brozek, B., 2019. The legal mind: A new introduction to legal epistemology [online]. New York: Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108695084 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108695084
Calabresi, G., 1985. Ideals, beliefs, attitudes, and the law. New York: Syracuse University Press.
Calabresi, G., and Bobbitt, P., 1978. Tragic choices. The conflict society confronts in the allocation of tragically scarce resources. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
Cattani, A., 1994. Forme dell’argomentare. Il ragionamento tra logica e retorica. Padua: GB.
Churchland, P. S., 2011. Braintrust. What neuroscience tells us about morality [online]. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400838080 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400838080
Coleman, J., 2001. The practice of principle. In defence of a pragmatist approach to legal theory. Oxford University Press.
Coliva, A., 2003. Moore e Wittgenstein. Scetticismo, certezza e senso commune. Padua: Il Poligrafo.
Cominelli, L., 2018. Cognition of the law: Toward a cognitive sociology [online]. Cham: Springer. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89348-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89348-8
Dworkin, R., 1977. Taking rights seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Dworkin, R., 1986. Law’s empire. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.
Farrell, H., and Shalizi, C. R., 2015. Pursuing cognitive democracy. In: D. Allen and J. S. Light, eds., From voice to influence. Understanding citizenship in a digital age. University of Chicago Press.
Ferrajoli, L., 2016. Eurotecnocrazia. Il suicidio dell’Unione europea. Teoria politica. Nuova serie Annali [online], 6(6), 173-192. Available at: http://journals.openedition.org/tp/652
Fittipaldi, E., 2016. Leon Petrażicki’s Theory of Law. In: E. Pattaro and C. Roversi, eds., A Treatise of Legal Philosophy and General Jurisprudence [online]. Cham: Springer, vol. 12, 443-503. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1479-3_46 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1479-3_46
Fuller, L. 1965. The Morality of Law. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.
Gehring, T., 1988. The connection between democracy and cognitive processes in correctional education. Journal of Correctional Education, 39(2), 62-29.
Greco, T., 2021. La legge della fiducia. Alle radici del diritto. Bari/Rome: Laterza.
Hägerström, A., 1953. Inquiries into the nature of law and moral. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.
Hart, H., 1994. The concept of law. Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Originally published in 1961).
Hatemi, P. K., et al., 2010. Not by twins alone: Using the extended twin family design to investigate the genetic basis of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science [online], 54(3), 798-814. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00461.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00461.x
Hatemi, P., and McDermott, R., 2011, eds., 2011. Man is by nature a political animal. Evolution, biology and politics [online]. The University of Chicago Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226319117.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226319117.001.0001
Heritier, P., 2025. Lo schermo del diritto. Milan/Udine: Mimesis (four volumes).
Irti, N., 1986. L’età della decodificazione. Milan: Giuffrè.
Jori, M., 2010. Del diritto inesistente. Saggio di meta giurisprudenza descrittiva. Pisa: ETS.
Keating, G.C., 1922. Reasonableness and risk: Right and responsibility in the law of torts. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kelsen, H., 1924. The concept of the state and social psychology with special reference to Freud’s Group Theory. The International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 5, 1-38.
Kozulin, A., 1990. Vygotsky’s psychology: A biography of ideas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kuhn, T., 1962. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago University Press.
Kurek, L., 2013. Philosophical issues in the neuroscience of mindreading: The case of belief. In: J. Stelmach, B. Brozek and L. Kurek, eds., Philosophy in neuroscience. Krakow: Copernicus Center Press, 175-200.
Luhmann, N., 2000. Trust and power. Avon: Pitman Press. (Originally published in 1979).
Luhmann, N., 2004. Law as a social system. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. (Originally published in 1993).
Marra, R., 2022. L’eredità di Max Weber. Cultura, diritto e realtà. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Massa, M., 2023. Minimalismo giudiziario. L’opzione per la moderazione nella giurisprudenza costituzionale. Milan: Franco Angeli.
McGinnis, J., and Rappaport, M. B., 2013. Originalism and the good Constitution [online]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674726260 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674726260
Meinong, A., 1977. Über Annahmen. Graz: Akademische Druck. (Originally published in 1902).
Morin, E., and Ceruti, M., 2013. La nostra Europa. Milan: Cortina.
Mortati, C., 1940. La Costituzione in senso materiale. Milan: Giuffré.
Mudde, C., and Rovira Kaltwasser, C., 2017. Populism. A very short introduction [online]. New York: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780190234874.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780190234874.001.0001
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Learning from the science of cognition and perception for decision making: Proceedings of a workshop [online]. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17226/25118 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17226/25118
Olivecrona, K., 1971. Law as fact. London: Oxford University Press.
Pera, M., and Shea, W. R., 1992. L’arte della persuasione scientifica. Milan: Guerini e Associati.
Perelman, C., and Olbrechts-Tyteca, L., 1958. Traité de l’argumentation. La nouvelle rhétorique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Perreau-Saussine, A., and Murphy, J. B., eds., 2007. The nature of customary law. Legal, historical and philosophical perspectives [online]. Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511493744 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511493744
Petrażicki L., 1908. Vvedenie v izučenie prava i nravstvennosti. Osnovy Ėmocional’ nojpsihologii [Introduction to the investigation of law and morals: Foundation of the psychology of emotions]. Sankt Peterburg: Ėrlih.
Petrażicki, L., 2011. Law and morality. New Brunswick: Transactions.
Popper, K., 1959. The logic of the scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.(Originally published in 1935).
Preti, G., 1968. Retorica e logica. Le due culture. Turin: Einaudi.
Raspa, V., 2012. Sollen. Il dover essere è un oggetto? Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia del diritto, (89)2,239-262.
Raz, J., 1979. The authority of law. essays on law and morality [online]. New York: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198253457.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198253457.001.0001
Reid, C. J., 2014. Sovereignty and belief: Thoughts on H. L. A. Hart and the crisis in Iraq. University of St. Thomas (Minnesota) Legal Studies Research Paper No. 14-42 [online]. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2528345
Rodriguez-Blanco, V., 2014. Law and authority under the guise of the good. Oxford: Hart.
Ross, A., 1959. On law and justice. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Ross, A., 1968. Directive and norms. New York: Humanities Press.
Rovira Kaltwasser, C., et al., eds., 2017. The handbook of populism [online]. Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198803560.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198803560.001.0001
Schaeffer, J., 2019. Giambattista Vico on natural law: Religion, rhetoric, and sensus communis [online]. New York: Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429201042 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429201042
Serpe, A., 2017. I «credo» di Alf Ross. Scienza, democrazia, giustizia nelle pagine del “Demokrati, magt og ret”. Materiali per una storia della cultura giuridica, 2, 421-448.
Serpe, A., 2020. Il pensiero filosofico giuridico danese. Tra comunità democrazia e diritto. Turin: Giappichelli.
Shapiro, S. J., 2006. What is the internal point of view? [online] Available at: https://law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/documents/pdf/Faculty/Shapiro_Internal_Point_of_View.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.937337
Shiner, R. A., 1992. Norm and nature. The movements of legal thought [online]. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198257196.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198257196.001.0001
Stout, R., ed., 2018. Process, action, and experience [online]. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198777991.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198777991.001.0001
Tarde, G., 1890. Le lois de l’imitation: étude sociologique [online]. Paris: Alcan. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/1411168 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1411168
Tarde, G., 1895. La logique sociale. Paris: Alcan.
Thaler, R.H., and Sunstein, C.R., 2008. Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Travi, A., 2023. Il metodo nel diritto amministrativo e gli “altri saperi”. In: A. Travi, Scritti scelti. Naples: Jovene, 1-18.
Van der Veer, R., and Valsiner, J., 1991. Understanding Vygotsky. A quest for synthesis. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Veber, F., 2004. Die Natur des Sollens und sein Verhältnis zum Werte unter kritischer Würdigung namentlich der neusten einschlägigen Theorien zu untersuchen und das Ergebnis wo möglich den Grundproblemen der Ethik nutzbar zu machen. Graz: Bad Radkersburg.
Voigt, S., 2019. Institutional economics. An introduction [online]. Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108573719 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108573719
Vygotski, L. S., 1929.The problem of the cultural development of the child II. Journal of Genetic Psychology [online], 36, 415-32. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/08856559.1929.10532201 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08856559.1929.10532201
Vygotski, L.S., 1978. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Weber, M., 1978. Economy and society. An outline of interpretive sociology. Los Angeles: University of California Press. (Originally published in 1922).
Wertsch, J. V., 1985. Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.
Wittgenstein, L., 1969-1974. On certainty. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Yolles, M., and Fink, G., 2021. A configuration approach to mindset agency theory: A formative trait psychology with affect, cognition and behavior. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108974028
Zanetti, G., 2011. Vico eversivo. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Zelazo, P. D., 2003. The development of executive function in early childhood. Boston/Oxford: Blackwell.
Zelazo, P. D., 2008. The development of rule use in childhood. In: S. A. Bunge and J. D. Wallis, eds., Neuroscience of rule-guided behaviour. Oxford University Press, 441-455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195314274.003.0023
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Giovanni Bombelli
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Los autores conservan el copyright de sus trabajos, que se publicarán en OSLS bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento NoComercial SinObraDerivada. Puede consultar más detalles en: http://es.creativecommons.org/licencia/. Si no está de acuerdo con esta licencia, por favor, póngase en contacto con nosotros.
El autor concede los permisos necesarios para difundir la información bibliográfica del artículo, incluyendo el resumen, y autorizar a otros, incluyendo las bases de datos bibliográficas, de índices y servicios de alerta de contenidos, a copiar y comunicar esta información.
Para más información sobre los permisos para distribuir su artículo en cada fase de la producción, por favor, lea nuestra Política de Autoarchivo y Divulgación (en inglés).
Las condiciones de copyright con el nombre de autores y co-autores, y la licencia Creative Commons se mostrarán en el artículo. Estas condiciones se deben aceptar como parte del proceso de envío de un artículo a la revista. Por favor, asegúrese de que todos los co-autores se mencionan correctamente, y que entienden y aceptan estos términos.
