Law as Imagination
Feminist Rethinkings of Legal Pluralism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.2210Palabras clave:
Pluralismo jurídico, subjetividad feminista, enfoques epistemológicos, desobediencia epistémica, construcción del mundo, continuidades colonialesResumen
En el panorama político actual, el auge de los populismos de derecha en diferentes regiones ha reavivado las gramáticas coloniales de la diferencia, replanteando los derechos de las mujeres en todo el mundo como marcadores de distinción civilizatoria, al tiempo que se ignoran las persistentes desigualdades de género en sus propias agendas. En este contexto, el presente artículo revisa el legado conceptual del pluralismo jurídico desde una perspectiva feminista y poscolonial. Ofrece un examen crítico de los enfoques clásicos, nuevos, instrumentales, globales e interculturales, mostrando cómo el reconocimiento suele funcionar como control. Desde la codificación colonial del «derecho consuetudinario» hasta el pluralismo tecnocrático de la gobernanza global, la pluralidad ha servido con frecuencia a fines administrativos. El artículo propone una reconceptualización epistemológica del pluralismo jurídico, yendo más allá de las interpretaciones centradas en el arraigo cultural del derecho hacia una comprensión del derecho como un sistema de imaginación, un ámbito controvertido en el que se negocian la autoridad, el significado y las posibilidades. Basándose en el pensamiento feminista, negro e indígena, posiciona la subjetividad feminista como un método de desobediencia epistemológica, ampliando la imaginación jurídica y abriendo un espacio para la justicia más allá de los límites de la legalidad moderna y sus contrapuntos tradicionales imaginarios.
Descargas
Metrics
Estadísticas globales ℹ️
|
346
Visualizaciones
|
363
Descargas
|
|
709
Total
|
|
Citas
Abel, R.L., ed., 1982. The Politics of Informal Justice, Vols. 1–2. New York: Academic Press.
Abu-Lughod, L., 2013. Do Muslim Women Need Saving? [online] Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674726338 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674726338
Anderson, B., 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso Books.
Araújo, S., 2012. Toward an ecology of justices: an Urban and Rural Study of Mozambican Plurality. In: H. Kyed et al., eds., The dynamics of legal pluralism in Mozambique. Maputo: Kapicua, 2012.
Araújo, S., 2023. Modern Constitutionalism, Legal Pluralism and the Waste of Experience. In: B.S. Santos, S. Araújo and O. Aragón Andrade, eds., Decolonizing Constitutionalism: Beyond False or Impossible Promises [online]. London: Routledge, 159–174. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003391920-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003391920-7
Benda-Beckmann, F. Von, 1981. Forum Shopping And Shopping Forums: Dispute Processing in a Minangkabau Village in West Sumatra. Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law [online], 13(19), 117–159. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.1981.10756260 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.1981.10756260
Bhandar, B., 2018 Colonial Lives of Property: Law, Land, and Racial Regimes of Ownership [online]. Durham: Duke University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822371571 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11smjpm
Bonafé-Schmitt, J.P., 1987. La médiation: une justice douce. Paris: Syros.
Cappelletti, M. and Garth, B., eds., 1978. Access to Justice. Alphen aan den Rijn: Sijthoff/Noordhoff.
Chakrabarty, D., 2000. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton University Press.
Chanock, M., 1985. Law, Custom and Social Order: The Colonial Experience in Malawi and Zambia. Cambridge University Press.
Chanock, M., 1991. Paradigms, Policies and Property: A Review of the Customary Law of Land Tenure. In: K. Mann and R. Roberts, eds., Law in Colonial Africa. Portsmouth: Heinemann, 61–84.
Chanock, M., 1998. Law, Custom and Social Order: The Colonial Experience in Malawi and Zambia. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
Collins, P.H., 2002. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
Comaroff, J., and Roberts, S., 1981. Rules and Processes: The Cultural Logic of Dispute in an African Context. University of Chicago Press.
Darian-Smith, E., 2001. Laws of the Postcolonial: Law, Meaning and Violence. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Duve, T., 2014. Entanglements in Legal History: Introductory Remarks. Max Planck Institute for European Legal History Research Paper Series, No. 2014–09. Available at: https://doi.org/10.12946/rg22/051-051 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12946/rg22/051-051
Ehrlich, E., 1936. Fundamental Principles of the Sociology of Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Originally published in 1913).
Farris, S.R., 2017. In the Name of Women’s Rights: The Rise of Femonationalism [online]. Durham: Duke University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822372929 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822372929
Federici, S., 2004. Caliban and the Witch: Women, the Body and Primitive Accumulation. New York: Autonomedia.
Ferguson, J., 1990. The Anti-Politics Machine: “Development,” Depoliticization, and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho. Cambridge University Press.
Fitzpatrick, P., 1992. The Mythology of Modern Law. London: Routledge.
Foucault, M., 1991. Governmentality. In: G. Burchell, C. Gordon and P. Miller, eds., The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. University of Chicago Press, 87–104. (Originally published in 1978).
Fricker, M., 2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing [online]. Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237907.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237907.001.0001
Galanter, M., 1981. Justice in Many Rooms: Courts, Private Ordering, and Indigenous Law. Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law [online], 13(19), 1–47. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.1981.10756257 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.1981.10756257
Gentili, A., 1998. A África e a Invenção da Tradição: Tradição, Modernidade e Colonialismo. Lisbon: Vega.
Gluckman, M., 1955. The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia. Manchester University Press.
Griffiths, J., 1986. What is Legal Pluralism? Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law [online], 24, 1–55. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.1986.10756387 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.1986.10756387
Hernández Castillo, R.A., 2023. Indigenous Women: Towards a New Transformative Constitutionalism? In: B.S. Santos, S. Araújo and O. Aragón Andrade, eds., Decolonizing Constitutionalism: Beyond False or Impossible Promises. [online]. London: Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003391920-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003391920-6
Hobsbawm, E., and Ranger, T., eds., 1992. The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge University Press.
Hooker, M.B., 1975. Legal Pluralism: An Introduction to Colonial and Neo-Colonial Laws [online]. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5771/0506-7286-1976-3-400 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/0506-7286-1976-3-400
Janse, R., 2013. The Evolution of the Rule of Law: From Liberalism to Globalisation. Cambridge University Press.
José, A. C.; Araújo, S. (2016), "Redes de resolução de conflitos no bairro de Inhagoia B". In: A. C. José, ed., Retratos da justiça moçambicana: Redes informais de Resolução de conflitos em espaços urbanos e rurais. Maputo: Centro de Formação Jurídica e Judiciária, 45-122.Kapur, R., 2018. Gender, Alterity and Human Rights: Freedom in a Fishbowl [online]. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788112536 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788112536
Kilomba, G., 2008. Plantation Memories: Episodes of Everyday Racism. Münster: Unrast.
Llasag Fernández, R., 2023. Plurinational Constitutionalism: Plurinationality from Above and Plurinationality from Below. In: B.S. Santos, S. Araújo and O. Aragón Andrade, eds., Decolonizing Constitutionalism: Beyond False or Impossible Promises. [online]. London: Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003391920-14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003391920-14
Llewellyn, K.N., and Hoebel, E.A., 1941. The Cheyenne Way: Conflict and Case Law in Primitive Jurisprudence. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Lugones, M., 2008. The Coloniality of Gender. Worlds & Knowledges Otherwise, 2, 1–17.
Malinowski, B., 1926. Crime and Custom in Savage Society. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co.
Mamdani, M., 1996. Citizen and Subject: Contemporary Africa and the Legacy of Late Colonialism. Princeton University Press.
Mann, K., and Roberts, R., 1991. Law in Colonial Africa. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
Mattei, U., and Morpurgo, M., 2009. Global Law and Plunder: The Dark Side of the Rule of Law [online]. Bocconi School of Law Student-Edited Papers, No. 2009-03/EN. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1437530 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1437530
Matthews, R., 1988. Informal Justice? London: Sage.
Mcfadden, P., 2023. Subjectivity is the Critical Foundational Expression of Feminist Contemporarity. Feminist Formations [online], 36(3), 1–16. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1353/ff.2024.a950657 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/ff.2024.a950657
Meneses, M.P., et al., 2017. Para uma Justiça de Matriz Timorense: O Contributo das Justiças Comunitárias. Dili: CES/CRL.
Merry, S.E., 1988. Legal Pluralism. Law & Society Review [online], 22(5), 869–896. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/3053638 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3053638
Merry, S.E., 2006. Human Rights and Gender Violence: Translating International Law into Local Justice [online]. University of Chicago Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226520759.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226520759.001.0001
Mignolo, W., 2000. Local Histories/Global Designs: Coloniality, Subaltern Knowledges, and Border Thinking. Princeton University Press.
Mohanty, C.T., 1984. Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses. Boundary [online], 2(12), 333–358. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/302821 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/302821
Moore, S.F., 1986. Social Facts and Fabrications: “Customary” Law on Kilimanjaro, 1880–1980. Cambridge University Press.
Moore, S.F., 1992, Treating Law as Knowledge: Telling Colonial Officers what to Say to Africans about Running ‘Their Own’ Native Courts. Law and Society Review [online], 26(1), 11-46. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/3053835 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3053835
Moore, S.F., 2000. Law as a Process. An Anthropological Approach. Hamburg: LIT. (Originally published in 1978).
Moore, S.F., 2001. Certainties Undone: Fifty Turbulent Years of Legal Anthropology, 1949–1999. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute [online], 7(1), 95–116. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.00052 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.00052
Mudimbe, V.Y., 1988. The Invention of Africa: Gnosis, Philosophy, and the Order of Knowledge. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2979/2080.0
Oomen, B., 2005. Chiefs in South Africa: Law, Power and Culture in the Post-Apartheid Era [online]. Oxford: James Currey. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-06460-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-06460-8
Oyèwùmí, O., 1997. The Invention of Women: Making an African Sense of Western Gender Discourses. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Quijano, A., 2000. Coloniality of Power, Eurocentrism, and Latin America. Nepantla: Views from South [online], 15(2), 533–580. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580900015002005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580900015002005
Quraishi-Landes, A., 2023. Healing a Wounded Islamic Constitutionalism: Sharia, Legal Pluralism, and Unlearning the Nation-State Paradigm. In: B.S. Santos, S. Araújo and O. Aragón Andrade, eds., Decolonizing Constitutionalism: Beyond False or Impossible Promises [online]. London: Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003391920-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003391920-4
Ranger, T., 1994. The Invention of Tradition Revisited: The Case of Colonial Africa. In: T. Ranger and E. Hobsbawm, eds., The Invention of Tradition [online]. Cambridge University Press, 211–262. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107295636.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107295636.006
Roy, A., 2008. Postcolonial Theory and Law: A Critical Introduction. Adelaide Law Review, 29(1/2), 315−357.
Santos, B.S., 1982. Law and Revolution in Portugal: The Experiences of Popular Justice after the 25th of April 1974. Law & Society Review [online], 16, 623–654. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-041502-1.50013-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-041502-1.50013-9
Santos, B.S., 2002. Towards a New Legal Common Sense. London: Butterworths.
Sousa Júnior, J.G., 2019. O Direito Achado na Rua: Concepção e Prática. Universidade de Brasília.
Spivak, G.C., 1988. Can the Subaltern Speak? In: C. Nelson and L. Grossberg, eds., Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 271–313.
Tamale, S., 2020. Decolonization and Afro-Feminism. Ottawa: Daraja Press.
Tamanaha, B.Z., 2021. A Realistic Theory of Law. Cambridge University Press.
Twining, W., 2013. Globalisation and Legal Theory. Cambridge University Press.
Van Krieken, R., 2001. The Barbarism of Civilization: Cultural Genocide and the “Stolen Generations”. British Journal of Sociology [online], 50(2), 297–315. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.1999.00297.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/000713199358752
Walsh, C., 2018. Interculturalidad, Estado, Sociedad: Luchas (De)Coloniales de Nuestra Época. Quito: Abya-Yala.
Woessner, M., 2013. Provincializing Human Rights? The Heideggerian Legacy from Charles Malik to Dipesh Chakrabarty. In: J.M. Barreto, ed., Human Rights from a Third World Perspective: Critique, History and International Law. Cambridge Scholars, 65-101.
Wojkowska, E., 2006. Doing Justice: How Informal Justice Systems Can Contribute. Oslo: UNDP.
World Bank, 2006. Justice for the Poor: An Emerging Consensus? Washington, DC: World Bank.
Wyvekens, A., 2008. “Proximity justice” in France: anything but justice and community?. In J. Shapland, ed., Justice, Community and Civil Society. A contested terrain. Portland: Willan, 30-46. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781843925521. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781843925521
Yrigoyen Fajardo, R., 2017. Pluralismo jurídico e interculturalidad: hacia un derecho igualitario. In: B.S. Santos and A. García Villegas, eds., El caleidoscopio de las justicias en Colombia. Bogotá: Siglo del Hombre, 503–539.
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Sara Alexandre Domingues Araújo
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Los autores conservan el copyright de sus trabajos, que se publicarán en OSLS bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento NoComercial SinObraDerivada. Puede consultar más detalles en: http://es.creativecommons.org/licencia/. Si no está de acuerdo con esta licencia, por favor, póngase en contacto con nosotros.
El autor concede los permisos necesarios para difundir la información bibliográfica del artículo, incluyendo el resumen, y autorizar a otros, incluyendo las bases de datos bibliográficas, de índices y servicios de alerta de contenidos, a copiar y comunicar esta información.
Para más información sobre los permisos para distribuir su artículo en cada fase de la producción, por favor, lea nuestra Política de Autoarchivo y Divulgación (en inglés).
Las condiciones de copyright con el nombre de autores y co-autores, y la licencia Creative Commons se mostrarán en el artículo. Estas condiciones se deben aceptar como parte del proceso de envío de un artículo a la revista. Por favor, asegúrese de que todos los co-autores se mencionan correctamente, y que entienden y aceptan estos términos.
