Doing the right thing
Young people’s legal consciousness and pandemic risk management
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.1992Palabras clave:
conciencia jurídica, moralidad cotidiana, gestión del riesgo, pandemia SARS-CoV-2, jóvenesResumen
El estudio explora la conciencia jurídica de los jóvenes en el contexto de la pandemia de COVID-19, en relación con la gestión de las relaciones personales frente a la regulación jurídica promulgada por el gobierno italiano. Pretendemos dar cuenta de las formas de legalidad que han concedido para sostener, criticar, comprometerse y resistirse a la ley, y comprender los mecanismos que contribuyeron a dar forma a experiencias específicas de legalidad. Nos referimos a un marco teórico basado en la conciencia jurídica, el enfoque neobourdieusiano del juicio moral y la teoría de los riesgos de Douglas. A partir del análisis de 70 narrativas, nuestros resultados muestran diferentes formas en las que los jóvenes experimentan la ley. Se pueden identificar diferentes narrativas recurrentes: traducción individual, confianza en el procedimiento, afirmaciones fatalistas y crítica cooperativa. Estas narrativas no son atributos fijos de los individuos, sino repertorios recurrentes de percepciones y prácticas que surgen de contextos de interacción concretos en los que se cruzan disposiciones prerreflexivas y deliberación consciente.
Descargas
Metrics
Downloads:
14(4)_Quadrelli_Uboldi_OSLS (English) 54
XML_14(4)_Quadrelli_Uboldi_OSLS (English) 0
Citas
Abrego, L.J., 2019. Relational Legal Consciousness of U.S. Citizenship: Privilege, Responsibility, Guilt, and Love in Latino Mixed-Status Families. Law & Society Review [online], 53(3), 641–670. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12414 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12414
Adams, M., 2016. Hybridizing Habitus and Reflexivity. Sociology [online], 40(3), 511–528. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/003803850663672 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/003803850663672
Alexander, J.C., 1996. Social Science and Salvation: Risk Society as Mythical Discourse. Zeitschrift für Soziologie [online], 25(4), 251–262. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsoz-1996-0401 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsoz-1996-0401
Alsarrani, A., et al., 2022. Association between friendship quality and subjective wellbeing among adolescents: a systematic review. BMC Public Health [online], 22(2420). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14776-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14776-4
Archer, L., Hollingworth, S., and Halsall, A., 2007. “University’s not for me—I’m a Nike person”. Sociology [online], 41(2), 219–237. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038507074798 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038507074798
Berrey, E., and Nielsen, L.B., 2007. Rights of Inclusion: Integrating Identity at the Bottom of the Dispute Pyramid. Law & Social Inquiry [online], 32(1), 233–260. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2007.00057.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2007.00057.x
Blatterer, H., 2015. Everyday Friendships: Intimacy as Freedom in a Complex World [online]. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137316400 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137316400
Bourdieu, P. (with R. Nice, trans., ed.), 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Bourdieu, P., 1986. The forms of capital. In: J. Richardson, ed., Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. Westport: Greenwood, 241–258.
Bourdieu, P., 1998. Practical Reason. On the Theory of Action. Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu, P., and Passeron, J.C. (with R. Nice, trans., ed.), 1970. The Inheritors: French Students and Their Relations to Culture. University of Chicago Press.
Boute, V., et al., 2007. The Importance of Friends: Friendship and Adjustment Among 1st-Year University Students. Journal of Adolescent Research [online], 22(6), 665–689. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558407306344 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558407306344
Caulkins, D., 1999. Is Mary Douglas’s Grid/Group Analysis Useful for Cross-Cultural Research? Cross-Cultural Research [online], 33(1), 108–128. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/106939719903300107 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/106939719903300107
Charlesworth, S.J., 2000. A phenomenology of working class experience [online]. Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511489419 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511489419
Chua, L.J., and Engel, D.M., 2019. Legal Consciousness Reconsidered. Annual Review of Law and Social Science [online], 15, 335–353. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042717 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042717
Cowan, D., 2004. Legal consciousness: some observations. Modern Law Review [online], 67(6), 928–958. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2004.00518.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2004.00518.x
De Keere, K., 2020. Finding the moral space. Poetics [online], 79. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2019.101415 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2019.101415
Docter, S.P., et al., 2011. Public perceptions of pandemic influenza resource allocation. Journal of Public Health Policy [online], 32(3), 350–36. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1057/jphp.2010.49 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jphp.2010.49
Dolby, N., and Dimitriadis, G. (with P. Willis), 2004. Learning to Labor in New Times. London: Routledge Falmer.
Douglas, M., 1966. Purity and Danger. London: Routledge.
Douglas, M., 1970. Natural Symbols: Explorations in Cosmology. London: Barrie & Rockliff.
Douglas, M., 2007. A history of grid and group cultural theory. University of Toronto.
Douglas, M., and Wildavsky, A., 1982. Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technical and Environmental Dangers. Berkeley: University of California Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520907393
Edgerton, J.D., and Roberts, L.W., 2014. Cultural Capital or Habitus? Bourdieu and Beyond in the Explanation of Enduring Educational Inequality. Theory and Research in Education [online], 12(2), 193–220. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878514530231 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878514530231
Elder-Vass, D., 2007. Reconciling Archer and Bourdieu in an Emergentist Theory of Action. Sociological Theory [online], 27(4), 325–346. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2007.00312.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2007.00312.x
Ewick, P., and Silbey, S., 1998. The common place of law. Stories from everyday life. University of Chicago Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226212708.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226212708.001.0001
Ewick, P., and Silbey, S., 2020. Looking for Hegemony in All the Wrong Places. In: J. Přibáň, ed., Studies of Legal Consciousness. Research Handbook on the Sociology of Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 163–176.
Ferrari, V., 2022. Reflections on some major changes in socio-legal studies (1989–2020). Oñati Socio-Legal Series [online], 12(S1), S132–S143. Available at: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1288 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1288
Galli, C., 2020. The Ambivalent U.S. Context of Reception and the Dichotomous Legal Consciousness of Unaccompanied Minors. Social Problems [online], 67(4), 763–781. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spz041. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spz041
Gonzalez, G., 2023. Undocumented Consciousness: Citizenship and Illegality in the Lives of US Citizen Youth. Law & Policy [online], 45(1), 45–65. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12207 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12207
Halliday, S., 2019. After Hegemony? The varieties of Legal Consciousness Research. Social & Legal Studies [online], 28(6), 859–878. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663919869739 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663919869739
Halliday, S., and Morgan, B., 2013. I Fought the Law and the Law Won? Current Legal Problems [online], 66(1), 1–32. Available at: https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2350262 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/cut002
Hertogh, M., 2018. Nobody’s law. Legal consciousness and legal alienation in everyday life. London: Palgrave MacMillan. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-60397-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-60397-5
Jarness, V., and Friedman, S., 2016. ‘I’m not a snob, but…’: class boundaries and the downplaying of difference. Poetics [online], 61, 14–25. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2016.11.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2016.11.001
Jenkins, R., 1992. Pierre Bourdieu. London: Routledge.
Juvonen, J., et al., 2022. Young Adult Adaptability to the Social Challenges of the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Protective Role of Friendships. Journal of Youth Adolescence [online], 51, 585–597. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-022-01573-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-022-01573-w
Lareau, A., 2000. Home Advantage: Social Class and Parental Intervention in Elementary Education, Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
Lareau, A., and Weininger, E.B., 2003. Cultural capital in educational research: A critical assessment. Theory and society [online], 32, 567–606. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2589-0_6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RYSO.0000004951.04408.b0
Liu, Q., 2023. “Kill the Chicken to Scare the Monkey”. Law & Policy [online] 45(3), 292–310. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12202 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12202
Lizardo, O., 2004. The Cognitive Origins of Bourdieu’s Habitus. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour [online], 34(4), 375–401. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2004.00255.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2004.00255.x
Lupton, D., 1999. Risk and sociocultural theory: new directions and perspectives. Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511520778 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511520778.001
Maleki, A., and Hendriks, F., 2015. Grid, group and Grade: Challenges in Operationalizing Cultural Theory for Cross-National Research. Cross-Cultural Research [online], 49(3), 250–280. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397114555843 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397114555843
Maxwell, C., and Aggleton, P., eds., 2013. Privilege, Agency and Affect. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137292636 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137292636
McNeeley, S.M, and Lazrus, H., 2014. The Cultural Theory of Risk for Climate Change Adaptation. Weather, Climate, and Society [online], 6, 506–519. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-13-00027.1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-13-00027.1
Melissaris, E., 2004. The More the Merrier? A New Take on Legal Pluralism. Social & Legal Studies [online], 13(1), 57–79. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663904040192 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663904040192
Merry, S.E., 1988. Legal Pluralism. Law and Society Review, 22(5), 869–896. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/3053638 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3053638
Mouzelis, N., 2007. Habitus and Reflexivity: Restructuring Bourdieu’s Theory of Practice. Sociological Research Online [online], 12(6). Available at: https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.1449 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.1449
Nash, R., 2002. Numbers and Narratives: Further Reflections in the Sociology of Education. British Journal of Sociology of Education [online], 23(3), 397–412. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/0142569022000015436 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0142569022000015436
Nielsen, L.B., 2000. Situating legal consciousness: experiences and attitudes of ordinary people about law and street harassment. Law & Society Review [online], 34(4), 1055–1090. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/3115131 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3115131
O’Rourke J., Harms, C., and Cohen L., 2019. They’re always there for me! Friendship and meaning in young people’s lives? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology [online], 60, 596–608. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12570 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12570
Ravaioli, P., 2002. Tra oggettivismo e soggettivismo. Problemi ed evoluzione della teoria sociale di Bourdieu. Rassegna italiana di sociologia [online], 43(3), 459–485. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1423/4583
Reay, D., 1995. “They Employ Cleaners to do that”. British Journal of Sociology of Education [online], 16(3), 353–371. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/0142569950160305 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0142569950160305
Reay, D., 2004. It’s All Becoming a Habitus. British Journal of Sociology of Education [online], 25(4), 431–444. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/0142569042000236934 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0142569042000236934
Reay, D., 2005. Beyond consciousness? Sociology [online], 39(5), 911–928. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038505058372 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038505058372
Reay, D., 2009. ‘Fitting in’ or ‘Standing out’. British Educational Research Journal [online], 1–18. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920902878925 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920902878925
Reay, D., 2015. Habitus and the Psychosocial. Cambridge Journal of Education [online], 45(1), 9–23. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2014.990420 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2014.990420
Robbins, D., 2005. The Origins, Early Development and Status of Bourdieu’s Concept of Cultural Capital. The British Journal of Sociology [online], 56(1), 13–29. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2005.00044.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2005.00044.x
Santos, B.S., 1987. Law: A Map of Misreading – Toward a Postmodern Conception of Law. Journal of Law and Society [online], 14, 3, 279–302. Available at: https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/jlsocty14&i=289 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1410186
Savage, M., Bagnall, G., and Longhurst, B., 2001. Ordinary, ambivalent and defensive. Sociology [online], 35(4), 875–892. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038501035004005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038501035004005
Sayer, A., 2005. The Moral Significance of Class [online]. Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511488863 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511488863
Sayer, A., 2011. Why things matter to people. Social science, values and ethical life [online]. Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511734779 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511734779
Schwarz, M., and Thompson, M., 1990. Divided we stand. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Scott, R.A., Stuart, J., and Barber, B.L., 2021. Contemporary friendships and social vulnerability among youth. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships [online], 38(12), 3451–3471. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075211029384 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075211029384
Silbey, S., 2001. Legal culture and legal consciousness. In: N. Smelser and B. Baltes, eds., International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences [online], 8623–8629. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/02913-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/02913-2
Silbey, S., 2018. Studying legal consciousness. Droit et société [online], 100, 733–788. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3917/drs1.100.0733 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/drs1.100.0733
Skeggs, B., 1997. Formations of Class and Gender: Becoming Respectable. London: Sage.
Skeggs, B., 2004. Class, Self, Culture. London: Routledge.
Skeggs, B., 2011. Imagining personhood differently. The Sociological Review [online], 59(3), 496–513. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2011.02018.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2011.02018.x
Skeggs, B., and Loveday, V., 2012. Struggles for value: Value practices, injustice, judgment, affect and the idea of class. The British Journal of Sociology [online], 63(3),472–490. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2012.01420.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2012.01420.x
Spanò, A., 2018. Studiare i giovani nel mondo che cambia : concetti, temi e prospettive negli Youth Studies. Milan: FrancoAngeli.
Spickard, J.V., 1989. A guide to Mary Douglas’s three versions of grid/group theory. Sociological Analysis [online], 50(2), 151–170. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/3710986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3710986
Sullivan, A., 2002. Bourdieu and education: How useful is Bourdieu’s theory for researchers? The Netherlands’ Journal of Social Sciences [online] 38(2), 144–166. Available at: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1473723/1/Sullivan2002Bourdieu.pdf
Threadgold, S., 2020. Bourdieu and Affect: Towards a Theory of Affective Affinities. Bristol University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781529206616.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781529206616.001.0001
Threadgold, S., and Nilan, P., 2009. Reflexivity of Contemporary Youth, Risk and Cultural Capital. Current Sociology [online], 57(1), 47–68. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392108097452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392108097452
Trnka, S., et al., 2021. Negotiating risks and responsibilities during lockdown. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand [online], 51(1), 555–574. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/03036758.2020.1865417 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03036758.2020.1865417
Verweij, M., 2007. Towards a Theory of Constrained Relativism: Comparing and Combining the Work of Pierre Bourdieu, Mary Douglas and Michael Thompson, and Alan Fiske. Sociological Research Online [online], 12(6). Available at: https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.1595 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.1595
Weis, L., 2004. Class reunion [online]. London: Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203311578 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203311578
Willis, P., 1981. Learning to Labor. New York: Columbia University Press.
Woodlock, J., 2022. Arbitrators of safety and authors of law – Legal consciousness, normative pluralism and modulated derogation among European licensed aircraft maintenance engineers Oñati Socio-Legal Series [online], 12(S1), S172–S215. Available at: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1292
Young, K.M., 2014. Legal Consciousness in the Hawaiian Cockfight. Law & Society Review, 48(3), 499–530. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12094 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12094
Young, K.M., and Billings, K., 2020. Legal consciousness and cultural capital. Law & Society Review [online], 54(1), 33–65. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12455
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Isabella Quadrelli, Anna Uboldi
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Los autores conservan el copyright de sus trabajos, que se publicarán en OSLS bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento NoComercial SinObraDerivada. Puede consultar más detalles en: http://es.creativecommons.org/licencia/. Si no está de acuerdo con esta licencia, por favor, póngase en contacto con nosotros.
El autor concede los permisos necesarios para difundir la información bibliográfica del artículo, incluyendo el resumen, y autorizar a otros, incluyendo las bases de datos bibliográficas, de índices y servicios de alerta de contenidos, a copiar y comunicar esta información.
Para más información sobre los permisos para distribuir su artículo en cada fase de la producción, por favor, lea nuestra Política de Autoarchivo y Divulgación (en inglés).
Las condiciones de copyright con el nombre de autores y co-autores, y la licencia Creative Commons se mostrarán en el artículo. Estas condiciones se deben aceptar como parte del proceso de envío de un artículo a la revista. Por favor, asegúrese de que todos los co-autores se mencionan correctamente, y que entienden y aceptan estos términos.
