Counter-hegemonic uses of law in struggles for freedom of movement in the Central Mediterranean
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.1921Palabras clave:
Búsqueda y Rescate, migración, Mediterráneo Central, hegemonía, intervenciones legales, justicia poscolonialResumen
El derecho constituye la arquitectura de la gobernanza de la movilidad mundial. Regula el impulso irreductible de desplazarse, vinculando a las personas a los territorios mediante la institución de la ciudadanía y limitando las posibilidades de cruzar las fronteras internacionales. El Derecho también puede movilizarse para garantizar los derechos de las personas en movimiento. En el Mediterráneo, diversos agentes interactúan en un panorama jurídico densamente enmarañado en el que intervienen el derecho del mar, los derechos fundamentales y el asilo, y las normas de derecho público que otorgan poderes de control y represión a los Estados para la protección de las fronteras y la prevención de la delincuencia. Este artículo se pregunta si -y en qué condiciones- el derecho puede adoptar cualidades contrahegemónicas en las luchas por la libertad de circulación. Sostiene que las intervenciones jurídicas que apoyan a los migrantes en movimiento pueden ser contrahegemónicas si combinan distintos enfoques sobre la responsabilidad jurídica de los Estados y cuando apoyan las demandas migratorias para entrar en territorio europeo sin centrarse únicamente en la cuestión de la protección internacional.
Descargas
Metrics
Downloads:
14(4)_Santer_Gennari_OSLS (English) 285
XML_14(4)_Santer_Gennari_OSLS (English) 15
Citas
Achiume, T.E., 2019. Migration as Decolonization. Stanford Law Review [online], 71(6), 1509–1574. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3330353
Affolter, L., 2022. Trained to Disbelieve: The Normalisation of Suspicion in a Swiss Asylum Administration Office. Geopolitics [online], 27(4), 1069–1092. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2021.1897577 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2021.1897577
Amighetti, S., and Nuti, A., 2016. A Nation’s Right to Exclude and the Colonies. Political Theory [online], 44(4), 541–566. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591715589764 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591715589764
Anghie, A., 2004. Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law [online]. Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614262 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614262
Arendt, H., 1951. The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.
Atak, I., and Crépeau, F., 2021. Refugees as Migrants. In: C. Costello, M. Foster and J. McAdam, eds., The Oxford Handbook of International Refugee Law [online]. Oxford University Press, 134–151. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198848639.003.0008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198848639.003.0008
Benhabib, S., and Nathwani, N., 2021. The Ethics of International Refugee Protection. In: C. Costello, M. Foster and J. McAdam, eds., The Oxford Handbook of International Refugee Law [online]. Oxford University Press, 114–133. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198848639.003.0007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198848639.003.0007
Bhambra, G.K., 2015. Europe won’t resolve the “migrant crisis” until it faces its own past. The Conversation [online], 1 September. Available at: https://theconversation.com/europe-wont-resolve-the-migrant-crisis-until-it-faces-its-own-past-46555
Buckel, S., and Fischer-Lescano, A., 2009. Gramsci Reconsidered: Hegemony in Global Law. Leiden Journal of International Law [online], 22(3), 437–454. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156509990033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156509990033
Buonamano, R., 1998. The Economy of Violence: Derrida on Law and Justice. Ratio Juris [online], 11(2), 168–179. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9337.00083 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9337.00083
Cancellaro, F., 2020. Dagli hotspot ai “porti chiusi”: quali rimedi per la libertà “sequestrata” alla frontiera? Diritto penale contemporaneo - Rivista trimestrale [online], n. 3. Available at: https://www.sistemapenale.it/it/articolo/cancellaro-hotspot-porti-chiusi-liberta-personale-rimedi
Carrera, S., and Cortinovis, R., 2019. Search and rescue, disembarkation and relocation arrangements in the Mediterranean: Sailing Away from Responsibility? CEPS Paper in Liberty and Security in Europe [online], 2019–10. Available at: https://www.ceps.eu/ceps-publications/search-and-rescue-disembarkation-and-relocation-arrangements-in-the-mediterranean/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429203275-10
Cover, R.M., 1983. Foreword: Nomos and Narrative. Harvard Law Review [online], 97(1), 4–68. https://doi.org/10.2307/1340787 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1340787
Danewid, I., 2017. White innocence in the Black Mediterranean: hospitality and the erasure of history. Third World Quarterly [online], 38(7), 1674–1689. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2017.1331123 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2017.1331123
Dann, P., and Eckert, J., 2020. Norm-creation beyond the state. In: M.C. Foblets et al., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Law and Anthropology [online]. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 808–826. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198840534.013.47 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198840534.013.47
De Vittor, F., 2023. La migrazione via mare nel diritto internazionale: libertà di movimento, obblighi di soccorso e rispetto dei diritti umani delle persone migranti. Naples: Editorial Scientifica.
Derrida, J., 1992. Force of Law: The “Mystical Foundation of Authority”. In: D. Cornell, M. Rosenfeld and D. Gray Carlson, eds., Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice. New York/London: Routledge.
Douzinas, C., 2000. The End of Human Rights: Critical Legal Thought at the Turn of the Century [online]. Oxford: Hart. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509955527 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509955527
Eckert, J., 2023. Decolonising the political: Presence, Law, and Obligation. Anthropological Theory [online], 23(4). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/14634996231185324 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14634996231185324
El-Enany, N., 2008. Who is the new European refugee? European Law Review [online], 33(3), 313–335. Available at: https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1033334 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1033334
Fassin, D., 2005. Compassion and Repression: The Moral Economy of Immigration Policies in France. Cultural Anthropology [online], 20(3), 362–387. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1525/can.2005.20.3.362 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/can.2005.20.3.362
Gil-Bazo, M.T., and Guild, E., 2021. The Right to Asylum. In: C. Costello, M. Foster, and J. McAdam, eds. The Oxford Handbook of International Refugee Law [online]. Oxford University Press, 867–882. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198848639.003.0049 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198848639.003.0049
il Fatto Quotidiano, 2019. Sea Watch, la Corte europea dei Diritti dell’uomo: “Sì assistenza dei migranti a bordo, no alla richiesta di sbarco”. Il Fatto Quotidiano [online], 29 January. Available at: https://www.ilfattoquotidiano.it/2019/01/29/sea-watch-la-corte-europea-dei-diritti-delluomo-si-assistenza-a-bordo-no-alla-richiesta-di-sbarco/4933936/
Kennedy, D., 1973. Legal formality. The journal of legal studies [online], 2(2), 351–398. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1086/467502 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/467502
Kennedy, D., 2002. The critique of rights in critical legal studies. Left legalism/left critique [online], 178, 216–227. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822383871-006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11hpn4c.9
Kukathas, C., 2016. Are Refugees Special? In: S. Fine and L. Ypi, eds., Migration in Political Theory [online]. Oxford University Press, 249–268. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199676606.003.0012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199676606.003.0012
Lorde, A., 1984. Sister Outsider. Toronto: The Crossing Press.
Mann, I., 2020. The Right to Perform Rescue at Sea: Jurisprudence and Drowning. German Law Journal [online], 21(special issue 3), 598–619. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2020.30 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2020.30
McAdam, J., 2021. Displacement in the Context of Climate Change and Disasters. In: C. Costello, M. Foster and J. McAdam, eds., The Oxford Handbook of International Refugee Law [online]. Oxford University Press, 832–847. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198848639.003.0047 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198848639.003.0047
McLoughlin, D., 2016. Post-Marxism and the Politics of Human Rights: Lefort, Badiou, Agamben, Rancière. Law and Critique [online], 27(3), 303–321. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-016-9177-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-016-9177-0
Moreno-Lax, V., and Giuffré, M., 2017. The Rise of Consensual Containment: From “Contactless Control” to “Contactless Responsibility” for Forced Migration Flows. In: S.S. Juss, ed., Research Handbook on International Refugee Law. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar, 82–108.
Morris, R.C., 2007. Legacies of Derrida: Anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology [online], 36, 355–389. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.36.081406.094357 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.36.081406.094357
Rajagopal, B., 1998. Locating the Third World in Cultural Geography. Third World Legal Studies [online], 15(1), 1–20. Available at: http://scholar.valpo.edu/twls/vol15/iss1/2
Rancière, J., 2004. Who Is the Subject of the Rights of Man? The South Atlantic Quarterly [online], 103(2), 297–310. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-103-2-3-297 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-103-2-3-297
Rancière, J., 2010. Dissensus: On Politics and Aesthetics [online]. London: Bloomsbury. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472547378.ch-001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472547378.ch-001
Rothberg, M., 2019. The Implicated Subject: Beyond Victims and Perpetrators [online]. Stanford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503609600 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503609600
Sanfilippo, A., 2021. La corte EDU adotta misure provvisorie contro Polonia e Lettonia. IARI [online], 5 October. https://iari.site/2021/10/05/la-corte-edu-adotta-misure-provvisorie-contro-polonia-e-lettonia/
Santos, B. S., 2020. Toward a New Legal Common Sense: Law, Globalization, and Emancipation, 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316662427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316662427
Santos, B.S., 2005. The counter-hegemonic use of law in the struggle for a globalization from below. Anales de la Cátedra Francisco Suárez, 39, 421–474.
Shachar, A., and Hirschl, R., 2007. Citizenship as Inherited Property. Political Theory [online], 35(3), 253–287. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591707299808 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591707299808
Sharma, N., 2020. Home Rule: National Sovereignty and the Separation of Natives and Migrants [online]. Durham: Duke University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781478002451 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781478002451
Trevisanut, S., 2014. Is there a right to be rescued at sea? A constructive view. Questions of International Law [online], 1, 3–15. Available at: https://www.qil-qdi.org/is-there-a-right-to-be-rescued-at-sea-a-constructive-view/
Trubek, D.M., 1984. Where the Action Is: Critical Legal Studies and Empiricism. Stanford Law Review [online], 36(1/2). Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/1228692 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1228692
Young, I.M., 2006. Responsibility and Global Justice: A Social Connection Model. Social Philosophy and Policy [online], 23(01), 102. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052506060043 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052506060043
Zirulia, S., and Cancellaro, F., 2019. Caso Sea Watch: cosa ha detto e cosa non ha detto la Corte di Strasburgo nella decisione sulle misure provvisorie. Diritto Penale Contemporaneo [online], 26 June. Available at: https://archiviodpc.dirittopenaleuomo.org/d/6760-cosa-ha-detto-e-cosa-non-ha-detto-la-corte-di-strasburgo-sul-caso-sea-watch
Zumbansen, P., 2010. Transnational legal pluralism. Transnational Legal Theory [online], 1(2), 141–189. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/20414005.2010.11424506 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20414005.2010.11424506
Zumbansen, P., 2019. Transnational Law as Socio-Legal Theory and Critique: Prospects for “Law and Society” in a Divided World. Buffalo Law Review [online], 67(3), 909–960. Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/buffalolawreview/vol67/iss3/
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Dr. des. Kiri Olivia Santer, Lucia Gennari
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Los autores conservan el copyright de sus trabajos, que se publicarán en OSLS bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento NoComercial SinObraDerivada. Puede consultar más detalles en: http://es.creativecommons.org/licencia/. Si no está de acuerdo con esta licencia, por favor, póngase en contacto con nosotros.
El autor concede los permisos necesarios para difundir la información bibliográfica del artículo, incluyendo el resumen, y autorizar a otros, incluyendo las bases de datos bibliográficas, de índices y servicios de alerta de contenidos, a copiar y comunicar esta información.
Para más información sobre los permisos para distribuir su artículo en cada fase de la producción, por favor, lea nuestra Política de Autoarchivo y Divulgación (en inglés).
Las condiciones de copyright con el nombre de autores y co-autores, y la licencia Creative Commons se mostrarán en el artículo. Estas condiciones se deben aceptar como parte del proceso de envío de un artículo a la revista. Por favor, asegúrese de que todos los co-autores se mencionan correctamente, y que entienden y aceptan estos términos.
