Introduction: A Special Issue on Niklas Luhmann’s systems theory and law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.1855Palabras clave:
Niklas Luhmann, teoría de sistemas, sistema jurídico, sociología jurídicaResumen
Combatir la corrupción, ordenar las prácticas empresariales y regular el uso de la inteligencia artificial son sólo algunos de los retos de la sociedad actual a los que se enfrenta la investigación sociojurídica. Estos retos son a menudo de carácter transnacional, por lo que requieren un conjunto de herramientas analíticas adecuadas para examinar fenómenos que trascienden el espacio y el tiempo. La teoría de sistemas de Niklas Luhmann ofrece una caja de herramientas de este tipo para examinar las complicadas prácticas comunicativas en el mundo globalizado de hoy. Este número especial reúne a investigadores sociojurídicos júniores y séniores del Sur Global y del Norte Global que ilustran y ejemplifican cómo el marco teórico de los sistemas de Luhmann puede aplicarse y debatirse teóricamente con el fin de analizar cuestiones sociojurídicas de relevancia para el mundo actual. Este artículo presenta en primer lugar la motivación y el objetivo del número especial. A continuación, el artículo introduce conceptos clave de la teoría de sistemas de Niklas Luhmann y la sociología del derecho, seguido de una presentación de los artículos que constituyen el Número Especial.
Descargas
Metrics
Downloads:
14(5)_Introduction_OSLS (English) 349
XML_14(5)_Introduction_OSLS (English) 20
Citas
Adam, B., 1994. Time and social theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Amato, L.F., 2024. The legacy of Luhmann’s sociology of law: a trialogue among social theory, jurisprudence and empirical research. Oñati Socio-Legal Series [online], 14(5-this issue). Available at: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.1923 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.1923
Banakar, R., 1998. The identity crisis of a “stepchild”: reflections on the paradigmatic deficiencies of sociology of law. Retfærd: Nordisk juridisk tidsskrift, 21(81), 3–21.
Banakar, R., and Travers, M., 2013. Law and social theory. 2nd ed. Oxford: Hart.
Banakar, R., and Travers, M., eds., 2005. Theory and method in socio-legal research. Oxford: Hart.
Barros, M.A.L.L., 2020. Observing courts: An organisational sociology of socio-legal research. In: C.F. Campilongo, L.F. Amato and M.A.L.L. Barros, eds., Luhmann and socio-legal research: an empirical agenda for social systems theory. Abingdon: Routledge
Baxter, H., 2013. Niklas Luhmann’s Theory of Autopoietic Legal Systems. Annual Review of Law and Social Science [online], 9(1), 167–184. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102612-134027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102612-134027
Borch, C., 2022. Niklas Luhmann om retssystemets autopoiesis. In: O. Hammerslev and M.R. Madsen, eds., Retssociologi - klassiske og moderne perspektiver. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels, 273–292.
Brier, S., 2006. Luhmann og den manglende korporligt situerede. In: J. Tække, ed., Luhmann og erkendelse: Epistemologi, anvendelse og nyorientering. Copenhagen: Unge Pædagoger.
Buhmann, K., 2024. The evolution of transnational sustainability governance through a systems theory lens: From rejection to acceptance of business responsibilities for human rights. Oñati Socio-Legal Series [online], 14(5-this issue). Available at: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.1863 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.1863
Buhmann, K., and Wu, J., 2024. Global crisis governance in response to scientific information: Comparing and understanding regulatory responses from WHO and IPCC concerning the COVID-19 and climate crises. Oñati Socio-Legal Series [online], 14(5-this issue). Available at: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.1856 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.1856
Campilongo, C.F., Amato, L.F., and Barros, M.A.L.L., 2020. Luhmann and socio-legal research: An empirical agenda for social systems theory. Abingdon: Routledge.
Esposito, E., 2011. The future of futures: the time of money in financing society [online]. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849809115 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849809115.00010
Esposito, E., 2013. The structures of uncertainty: performativity and unpredictability in economic operations. Economy and Society [online], 42(1), 102–129. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2012.687908 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2012.687908
Febbrajo, A., and Harste, G., 2013. Law and Intersystemic Communication. Abingdon: Routledge.
Harste, G., 2003. The Emergence of Autopoietic Organisation. In: T. Bakken and T. Hernes, eds., Autopoietic Organization Theory: Drawing on Niklas Luhmann’s Social Systems Perspective. Copenhagen Business School Publisher, pp. 75–102.
Hartzén, A.C., 2024. Swedish trade unions and in-work poverty: A critical approach to industrial relations using Luhmann’s systems theory as framework of analysis. Oñati Socio-Legal Series [online], 14(5-this issue). Available at: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.1857 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.1857
Hedler, L., 2024. Risk and danger in the introduction of algorithms to courts: A comparative framework between EU and Brazil. Oñati Socio-Legal Series [online], 14(5-this issue). Available at: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.1859 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.1859
Hydén, H., 1999. Even a Stepchild Eventually Grows Up: On the Identity of Sociology of Law. Retfærd: Nordisk juridisk tidsskrift, 22(85).
Khan, L.A., 2009. Temporality of Law. McGeorge Law Review [online], 40, 55. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1271262
King, M., 2013. The Radical Sociology of Niklas Luhmann. In: R. Banakar and M. Travers, eds., Law and social theory. Oxford: Hart.
King, M., and Thornhill, C., 2006. Luhmann on Law and Politics: Critical Appraisals and Applications. Hart Publishing.
Koselleck, R., 2018. Sediments of Time: On possible histories. Redwood City: Stanford University Press.
Luhmann, N. (with F. Kastner, ed.), 2004. Law as a social system [online]. Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198262381.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198262381.001.0001
Luhmann, N., 1979. Trust and Power: two works. University Microfilms International.
Luhmann, N., 1985. A sociological theory of law. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Luhmann, N., 1986. The Theory of Social Systems and Its Epistemology: Reply to Danila Zolo’s Critical Comments. Philosophy of the Social Sciences [online], 16(1), 129–134. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/004839318601600110 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/004839318601600110
Luhmann, N., 1987. Rechtssoziologie. Opladen: Westdeutscher.
Luhmann, N., 1997a. Limits of Steering. Theory, Culture & Society [online], 14(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/026327697014001003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026327697014001003
Luhmann, N., 1997b. Iagttagelse og paradoks. Gyldendal.
Luhmann, N., 1998. Erkendelse som konstruktion. In: M. Hermansen, ed., Fra læringens horisont. Klim.
Luhmann, N., 2000a. Sociale systemer : grundrids til en almen teori. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzel.
Luhmann, N., 2000b. Organisation und Entscheidung [online]. Opladen: Westdeutscher. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-97093-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-97093-0
Luhmann, N., 2002. Theories of Distinction: Redescribing the Descriptions of Modernity [online]. Redwood City: Stanford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503619340 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503619340
Luhmann, N., 2003. Organization. In: T. Bakken and T. Hernes, eds., Autopoietic Organization Theory: Drawing on Niklas Luhmann’s Social Systems Perspective. Copenhagen Business School Publisher, 31–52.
Luhmann, N., 2005a. The Concept of Autopoiesis. In: D. Seidl and K.H. Becker, eds., Niklas Luhmann and Organization Studies. Copenhagen/Malmö: Liber/Copenhagen Business School Press.
Luhmann, N., 2005b. The Paradox of Decision Making. In: D. Seidl and K.H. Becker, eds., Niklas Luhmann and Organization Studies. Copenhagen/Malmö: Liber/Copenhagen Business School Press.
Luhmann, N., 2014. A Sociological Theory of Law. 2nd ed. Abingdon: Routledge.
Luhmann, N., 2016. Samfundets samfund. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzel.
Luhmann, N., 2019a. Sociological observations of the law. In: A. Febbrajo, ed., Law, legal culture and society: Mirrored identities of the legal order. Abingdon: Routledge.
Luhmann, N., 2019b. Some problems with “reflexive law“. In: A. Febbrajo, ed., Law, legal culture and society: Mirrored identities of the legal order [online]. Abingdon: Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351040341-13 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351040341-13
Mathiesen, T., 1998. Is it all that bad to be a stepchild? Comments on the state of sociology of law. Retfærd: Nordisk juridisk tidsskrift 21(83), 67–76.
Nielsen, S.P.P., 2020. Ikke-jurister i et retligt højspændingsfelt – når sagsbehandlere og borgere samproducerer sagsbehandling [online]. PhD. Odense: University of Southern Denmark. Available at: https://doi.org/10.21996/9c7y-gr54
Nielsen, S.P.P., 2023. Minding the “Gap“ Problem: The Relevance of Combining Top-down and Bottom-up Approaches to the Study of Law’s Role in Everyday Life. In: H. Hydén et al., eds., Combining the Legal and the Social in Sociology of Law: An Homage to Reza Banakar [online]. Oxford: Hart. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509959419.ch-018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509959419.ch-018
Nobles, R., and Schiff, D., 2004. Introduction. In: N. Luhmann, ed., Law as a social system [online]. Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616594.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616594.002
Nobles, R., and Schiff, D., 2020. Sociology of the legal system. In: J. Přibáň, ed., Research Handbook on the Sociology of Law [online]. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 150–162. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789905182.00020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789905182.00020
Opitz, S., and Tellmann, U., 2015. Future Emergencies: Temporal Politics in Law and Economy. Theory, Culture & Society [online], 32(2), 107–129. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276414560416 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276414560416
Paterson, J., 2024. Decentralised finance, regulation, and systems theory. Oñati Socio-Legal Series [online], 14(5-this issue). Available at: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.1916 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.1916
Pedersen, K.H., 2024. Corruption in unlikely places – the case of Denmark seen through Luhmann’s systems theory. Oñati Socio-Legal Series [online], 14(5-this issue). Available at: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.1858 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.1858
Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, A., 2010. Niklas Luhmann: law, justice, society [online]. London: Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203872086 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203872086
Qvortrup, L., 2006. Systemer endogene uro - Luhmann som empirisk begrebseksperimentator. In: J. Tække, ed., Luhmann og erkendelse: Epistemologi, anvendelse og nyorientering. Copenhagen: Unge Pædagoger.
Sand, I.J., 2012. Hybrididization, Change and the Expansion of Law. In: N.Å. Andersen and I.J. Sand, eds., Hybrid Forms of Governance - Self-suspension of Power [online]. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 186–204. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230363007_11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230363007_11
Schirmer, W., and Michailakis, D., 2019. Systems Theory for Social Work and the Helping Professions [online]. London: Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429022104 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429022104
Schwartz, G., and Costa, R.A., 2024. Algonormative expectations. Oñati Socio-Legal Series [online], 14(5-this issue). Available at: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.1864 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.1864
Seidl, D., and Becker, K.H., 2006. Organizations as Distinction Generating and Processing Systems: Niklas Luhmann’s Contribution to Organization Studies. Organization [online], 13(1), 9–35. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508406059635 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508406059635
Spencer-Brown, G., 1969. Laws of form. New York: E.P. Dutton.
Teubner, G., 1983. Substantive and Reflexive Elements in Modern Law. Law & Society Review [online], 17(2), 239–286. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/3053348 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3053348
Teubner, G., 1985. After Legal Instrumentalism? Strategic Models of Post-regulatory Law. In: G. Teubner, ed., Dilemmas in the Welfare State [online]. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter & Co. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110921526.299 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110921526.299
Teubner, G., 1988. Refleksiv ret: Udviklingsmodeller for retten i sammenlignende perspektiv. In: A. Born et al., eds., Refleksiv ret. Copenhagen: Nyt fra Samfundsvidenskaberne.
Thyssen, O., 2006. Erkendelsesteori som kommunikationsteori: Kritik af Luhmanns teori om den forsvundne verden. In: J. Tække, ed., Luhmann og erkendelse: Epistemologi, anvendelse og nyorientering. Copenhagen: Unge Pædagoger.
Westerman, P.C., 2018. Outsourcing the law: a philosophical perspective on regulation [online]. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Available at: https://go.exlibris.link/jsgdJc8y
Åkerstrøm Andersen, N., 1999. Diskursive analysestrategier : Foucault, Koselleck, Laclau, Luhmann. Copenhagen: Nyt fra Samfundsvidenskaberne.
Åkerstrøm Andersen, N., and Pors, J.G., 2014. Velfærdsledelse : mellem styring og potentialisering. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzel.
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Stine Piilgaard Porner Nielsen
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Los autores conservan el copyright de sus trabajos, que se publicarán en OSLS bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento NoComercial SinObraDerivada. Puede consultar más detalles en: http://es.creativecommons.org/licencia/. Si no está de acuerdo con esta licencia, por favor, póngase en contacto con nosotros.
El autor concede los permisos necesarios para difundir la información bibliográfica del artículo, incluyendo el resumen, y autorizar a otros, incluyendo las bases de datos bibliográficas, de índices y servicios de alerta de contenidos, a copiar y comunicar esta información.
Para más información sobre los permisos para distribuir su artículo en cada fase de la producción, por favor, lea nuestra Política de Autoarchivo y Divulgación (en inglés).
Las condiciones de copyright con el nombre de autores y co-autores, y la licencia Creative Commons se mostrarán en el artículo. Estas condiciones se deben aceptar como parte del proceso de envío de un artículo a la revista. Por favor, asegúrese de que todos los co-autores se mencionan correctamente, y que entienden y aceptan estos términos.
