Rethinking legal time: The temporal turn in socio-legal studies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.1811Palabras clave:
personalidad jurídica, derechos de la naturaleza, tiempo jurídico, cambio climático, derecho privadoResumen
Este artículo introduce un enfoque temporal del derecho como potencialmente innovador para los estudios socio-jurídicos. Sostiene que centrar la atención en el tiempo en el análisis y la práctica jurídicas es un paso importante para descentrar al sujeto individual tal y como se concibe convencionalmente y para desarrollar instrumentos jurídicos capaces de reconocer las redes, los ensamblajes y los colectivos, así como de cuestionar el carácter antropocéntrico del derecho moderno. Considera el cambio climático y la crisis ecológica como un contexto para repensar una serie de formas jurídicas fundamentales, por ejemplo la propiedad y el contrato, como formas mediante las cuales el derecho moderno puede tratar simultáneamente con diferentes temporalidades: el presente, un tiempo intergeneracional y un tiempo planetario.
Descargas
Metrics
Downloads:
13(S1)_Pecile_OSLS (English) 349
XML_13(S1)_Pecile_OSLS (English) 55
Citas
Blomley, N., 1994. Law, Space, and the Geographies of Power. New York/London: Guilford Press.
Bresnihan, P., and Byrne, M., 2015. Escape into the City: Everyday Practices of Commoning and the Production of Urban Space in Dublin. Antipode [online], 47(1), 36–54. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12105
Browne, V., 2014. Feminism, Time, and Nonlinear History. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Burdon, P., 2015. Earth Jurisprudence: Private Property and the Environment. New York/London: Routledge.
Capra, F., and Mattei, U., 2015. The Ecology of Law: Toward a Legal System in Tune with Nature and Community. Oakland: Berrett-Koehler.
Carson, A., 1995. Glass, Irony and God. New York: New Directions.
Chakrabarty, D., 2000. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton University Press.
Chakrabarty, D., 2021. The Climate of History in a Planetary Age. University of Chicago Press.
Chowdhury, T., 2020. Time, Temporality and Legal Judgement. London: Routledge.
Crutzen, P., and Stoermer, E., 2000. The Anthropocene. Global Change Newsletter, 41(1), 17–18.
Cullmann, O., 2018. Christ and Time: The Primitive Christian Conception of Time and History. Eugene: Wipf and Stock.
Delaney, D., 1998. Race, Place, and the Law: 1836–1948. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Fitzpatrick, P., 1992. The Mythology of Modern Law. New York/London: Routledge.
Foster, S., and Iaione, C., 2015. The City as a Commons. Yale Law & Policy Review [online], 34(2), 281–349. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2653084
Foucault, M., 1980. Questions on Geography. In: C. Gordon, ed., Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977. New York: Pantheon Books.
Gilbert, J., et al., 2023. The Rights of Nature as a Legal Response to the Global Environmental Crisis? A Critical Review of International Law’s “Greening” Agenda. Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 2021: A Greener International Law—International Legal Responses to the Global Environmental Crisis [online], 47–74. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-587-4_3
Gosseries, A., 2008. On Future Generations’ Future Rights. Journal of Political Philosophy [online] 16(4), 446–74. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2008.00323.x
Grabham, E., 2016. Brewing Legal Times: Things, Form, and the Enactment of Law. Toronto/Buffalo/London: Toronto University Press.
Grear, A., 2015. Deconstructing Anthropos: A Critical Legal Reflection on “Anthropocentric” Law and Anthropocene “Humanity“. Law and Critique [online], 26(3), 225–49. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-015-9161-0
Grear, A., 2019. Anthropocene “Time”? A Reflection on Temporalities in the ‘New Age of the Human’. In: A. Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, ed., Routledge Handbook of Law and Theory. London/New York: Routledge, 297–315.
Greenhouse, C.J., 1989. Just in Time: Temporality and the Cultural Legitimation of Law. The Yale Law Journal [online], 98(8), 1631–51. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/796609
Greenhouse, C.J., 1996. A Moment’s Notice: Time Politics across Cultures. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Halberstam, J., 2005. In a Queer Time and Place: Transgender Bodies, Subcultural Lives / Sexual Cultures. New York University Press.
Hall, S., 1996. When Was “The Post-Colonial”? Thinking at the Limit. In: I. Chambers and L. Curti, eds., The Postcolonial Question: Common Skies, Divided Horizons. London/New York: Routledge, 242–273.
Haraway, D., 2016. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press.
Harvey, D., 2013. Rebel Cities: From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution. London: Verso.
Hermitte, M.A., 2011. La nature, sujet de droit? Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales [online], 66(1), 173–212. Available at: https://www.cairn.info/revue-annales-2011-1-page-173.htm
Jasanoff, S., 2010. A New Climate for Society. Theory, Culture & Society [online], 27(2–3), 233–53. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409361497
Knop, K., and Riles, A., 2017. Space, Time, and Historical Injustice: A Feminist Conflict-of-Laws Approach to the Comfort Women Agreement. Cornell Law Review [online], 102(4), 853–928. Available at: https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr/vol102/iss4/1/
Koselleck, R., 2004. Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kracauer, S., 1966. Time and History. History and Theory [online], 6(6), 65–78. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/2504252
Latour, B., 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lefebvre, H., 2009. State, Space, World: Selected Essays. Minneapolis: University Of Minnesota Press.
Manderson, D., 2019. Danse Macabre: Temporalities of Law in the Visual Arts. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Marella, M.R., 2021. An Anthropology of the Legal Subject: On the Transformation of a Legal Concept. Osservatorio Del Diritto Civile e Commerciale [online], 1(2021), 71–104. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4478/101966
Massey, D., 1994. Space, Place and Gender. Minneapolis: University Of Minnesota Press.
McNeilly, K., and Warwick, B., 2022. Introduction. In: K. McNeilly and B. Warwick, eds., The Times and Temporalities of International Law. New York: Hart.
Merchant, C., 1990. The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution. New York: Harper One.
Muñoz, J., 2009. Cruising Utopia: The Then and There of Queer Utopia. New York University Press.
Orestano, R., 1968. Il problema delle persone giuridiche in diritto romano. Turin: Giappichelli.
Pecile, V., forthcoming 2023. I tempi del diritto: emergenza climatica e mutamento delle forme giuridiche. Sociologia del diritto.
Petersmann, M., 2022. Life Beyond the Law – From the “Living Constitution“ to the “Constitution of the Living“. Zeitschrift Für Ausländisches Öffentliches Recht Und Völkerrecht / Heidelberg Journal of International Law [online], 82(4), 769–800. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17104/0044-2348-2022-4-769
Rawson, A., and Mansfield, B., 2018. Producing Juridical Knowledge: “Rights of Nature” or the Naturalization of Rights? Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space [online], 1(1–2), 99–119. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/2514848618763807
Reisch, L., 2001. Time and Wealth: The Role of Time and Temporalities for Sustainable Patterns of Consumption. Time & Society [online], 10(2–3), 287–405. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X01010002012
Richardson, B.J., 2017. Doing Time: The Temporalities of Environmental Law. In: L. Kotzé, ed., Environmental Law and Governance for the Anthropocene. London: Bloomsbury, 55–74.
Riles, A., 2011. Collateral Knowledge: Legal Reasoning in the Global Financial Markets. University of Chicago Press.
Savigny, F.K., 1840–1849. System des heutigen Römischen Rechts. Berlin: Veit.
Scott, J.C., 1998. Seeing like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Soja, E.W., 1989. Postmodern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory. London: Verso.
Spanò, M., 2019. Making the Multiple: Toward a Trans-Subjective Private Law. The South Atlantic Quarterly [online], 118(4), 839–55. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-7825648
Spanò, M., 2020. “Perché non rendi poi quel che prometti allor?“ Tecniche e ideologie della giuridificazione della natura. In: M. Spanò, ed., L’istituzione della natura. Macerata: Quodlibet, 103–24.
Spanò, M., 2022a. Cose senza corpo. Forma e materia degli istituti giuridici. Milan: Meltemi, 149–163.
Spanò, M., 2022b. Fare il molteplice: Il diritto privato alla prova del comune. Turin: Rosenberg & Sellier.
Stone, C.D., 1972. Should Trees Have Standing? Toward Legal Rights for Natural Objects. Southern California Law Review [online], 45, 450–501. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4337/jhre.2012.02.02
Tanasescu, M., 2022. Understanding the Rights of Nature: A Critical Introduction. Bielefeld: Transcript.
Terré, F., 2012. Du juridique et du social. Paris: Mare et Martin.
Thomas, Y., 1991. Imago Naturae. Note sur l’institutionnalité de la nature à Rome. Publications de l’École Française de Rome [online], 147(1), 201–27. Available at: https://www.persee.fr/doc/efr_0000-0000_1991_act_147_1_4171
Thomas, Y., 2002. La valeur des choses. Le droit romain hors la religion. Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales [online], 57–6, 1431–62. Available at: https://www.persee.fr/doc/ahess_0395-2649_2002_num_57_6_280119
Thompson, E.P., 1967. Time, Work-Discipline, and Industrial Capitalism. Past & Present [online], 38, 56–97. Available at: https://dhayton.haverford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Thompson_1967.pdf
Valverde, M., 2014. “Time Thickens, Takes on Flesh“: Spatiotemporal Dynamics in Law. In: I. Braverman et al., eds., The Expanding Spaces of Law: A Timely Legal Geography [online]. Redwood City: Stanford University Press, 53–76. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804791878-005
Valverde, M., 2015. Chronotopes of Law: Jurisdiction, Scale and Governance. New York: Routledge.
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2023 Veronica Pecile
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Los autores conservan el copyright de sus trabajos, que se publicarán en OSLS bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento NoComercial SinObraDerivada. Puede consultar más detalles en: http://es.creativecommons.org/licencia/. Si no está de acuerdo con esta licencia, por favor, póngase en contacto con nosotros.
El autor concede los permisos necesarios para difundir la información bibliográfica del artículo, incluyendo el resumen, y autorizar a otros, incluyendo las bases de datos bibliográficas, de índices y servicios de alerta de contenidos, a copiar y comunicar esta información.
Para más información sobre los permisos para distribuir su artículo en cada fase de la producción, por favor, lea nuestra Política de Autoarchivo y Divulgación (en inglés).
Las condiciones de copyright con el nombre de autores y co-autores, y la licencia Creative Commons se mostrarán en el artículo. Estas condiciones se deben aceptar como parte del proceso de envío de un artículo a la revista. Por favor, asegúrese de que todos los co-autores se mencionan correctamente, y que entienden y aceptan estos términos.
