Norm, normal and disruption: Introductory notes

Richard Mohr; Francesco Contini; Patrícia Branco

doi:10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1308

Autores/as

Richard Mohr Social Research Policy & Planning https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2127-0440
Francesco Contini IGSG-CNR https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8099-9728
Patrícia Branco University of Coimbra https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5425-0887

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1308

Palabras clave:

perturbación, patológico, normalización, normas jurídicas

Resumen

Los once artículos de este número especial analizan la forma en que diferentes fuentes de perturbación colisionan con la normalidad, las consecuencias en la vida individual, social e institucional, y los esfuerzos para restablecer lo anterior o crear una nueva normalidad. Surgen de una serie de seminarios online de septiembre y octubre de 2020 que investigaban la normalidad, la perturbación y la normalización en la estela de los shocks medioambientales, tecnológicos, epidemiológicos y socioeconómicos de la actualidad. La perturbación es una ventana al tejido subyacente de los acuerdos sociales. Nos permite investigar el concepto de normalidad y sus implicaciones, las tensiones y los conflictos entre los medios económicos, sociales, jurídicos y tecnológicos empleados para restablecer la normalidad. Paradójicamente, las tecnologías de la normalización pueden causar más trastornos. La dignidad humana es un valor referente en estas investigaciones. La introducción y los artículos sugieren medidas posibles para anticiparnos a las perturbaciones y consiguientes daños, y nos alertan de los riesgos para la dignidad humana provenientes de la perturbación y de intentos de reimponer tipos de normalidad.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Metrics

Views 365
Downloads:
PDF_12_3_Intro_OSLS (English) 378
XML_12_3_Intro_OSLS (English) 88

Biografía del autor/a

Richard Mohr, Social Research Policy & Planning

Dr Richard Mohr is an urban and legal sociologist and a director of Social Research Policy and Planning Pty Ltd. He has worked as a community health coordinator, planning and evaluation consultant and academic in Law, Architecture and Sociology at the University of Wollongong, Sydney University, UNSW, and McGill University. Email address: rmohr@srpp.com.au

Francesco Contini, IGSG-CNR

Francesco Contini is a senior researcher at the National Research Council of Italy, Institute of Legal Informatics and Judicial Systems (www.igsg.cnr.it). He studies the institutional transformations of justice systems focusing on the intersections between the rule of law, technology and democratic legitimacy of the institutions. He collaborates with international organizations to promote judicial reforms in Europe, Africa, and Asia and is regularly called, as invited speaker, at the Italian School of Judges and the European Judicial Training Network. Some key publications: Judicial Evaluation with Richard Mohr (VDM, 2008), ICT and innovation in the public sector (Palgrave Macmillan, 2009) and The Circulation of Agency in e-Justice (Springer 2014) both edited with Giovan Francesco Lanzara, and Handle with Care: assessing and designing methods for evaluation and development of the quality of justice (IRSIG, 2017). With Sharyn Roach Anleu and David Rottman he has been editor of the OSLS special issue Evaluating Judicial Performance. Email address: francesco.contini@cnr.it

Patrícia Branco, University of Coimbra

Patrícia Branco is a researcher, hired under the Scientific Employment Stimulus Program (CEECIND / 00126/2017). Centro de Estudos Sociais, Universidade de Coimbra. Contact details: Colégio de S. Jerónimo, Apartado 3087, 3000-995 Coimbra, Portugal. Email: patriciab@ces.uc.pt

Citas

Branco, P., 2020. Adequate Food, Adequate Parenting? Critical Insights on Family Law (and Justice) and Parenthood Through Food. Law, Technology and Humans [online], 2(1), 19–39. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5204/lthj.v2i1.1477 [Accessed 19 May 2022].

Canguilhem, G., 1991. The Normal and the Pathological. Trans.: C.R. Fawcett. New York: Zone Books.

Carrington, K., 1989. Manufacturing Female Delinquency. Unpublished PhD thesis. Sydney: Macquarie University.

Donzelot, J., 1979. The Policing of Families. New York: Pantheon Books.

Fitzpatrick, P., 2001. Modernism and the Grounds of Law. Cambridge University Press.

Lanzara, G.F., 2016. Shifting Practices: Reflections on Technology, Practice, and Innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Latour, B., 2005. From Realpolitik to Dingpolitik - or how to make things public. In: B. Latour and P. Weibel, eds., Making Things Public - Atmospheres of democracy. Karlsruhe/Cambridge, MA: ZKM/MIT Press, 14–41.

Leader, 2021. As the pandemic fades, the climate crisis must take centre stage again. New Scientist, 2 January, p. 5.

Mohr, R., 2007. Identity Crisis: Judgment and the hollow legal subject. Law Text Culture [online], 11, 106–128. Available from: https://ro.uow.edu.au/lawpapers/44 [Accessed 19 May 2022].

Nader, L., 1972. Up the anthropologist: Perspectives gained from studying up. In: D. Hymes, ed., Reinventing anthropology. New York: Pantheon, 284–311.

Perez, C., 2002. Technological Revolutions and Financial Capital: The dynamics of bubbles and golden ages. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Schumpeter, J.A., 1954. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. 4th ed. London: Unwin University Books.

Smith, S.D., 2010. The Disenchantment of Secular Discourse. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Soumahoro, A., 2019. Umanità in rivolta: La nostra lotta per il lavoro e il diritto alla felicità. Milan: Feltrinelli.

Stiegler, B., 2019. The Age of Disruption: Technology and madness in computational capitalism. Trans : D. Ross. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Unger, R.M., 1987. False Necessity. Cambridge University Press.