Advocating access to justice: Facilitating or gatekeeping?

Kerstin Svensson

doi:10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1356

Autores/as

Kerstin Svensson School of Social Work, Lund University https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2503-0444

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1356

Palabras clave:

abogacía, acceso a la justicia, trabajo social, aspectos democráticos, mejores prácticas

Resumen

La abogacía es uno de los medios fundamentales para apoyar el acceso a la justicia. La profesión de trabajo social emplea la abogacía como una de sus principales vías de actuación. Este artículo analiza los componentes de las acciones que se consideran buenas prácticas para facilitar el acceso a la justicia en sus aspectos democráticos. Más explícitamente, aborda la defensa por parte de los trabajadores sociales de la promoción del valor y la dignidad de los seres humanos en la sociedad. Se presentan cuatro ideales diferentes del trabajo social: autoayuda, tratamiento, filantropía y burocracia. A continuación, se utilizan casos presentados por trabajadores sociales europeos como buenas prácticas, a fin de destacar los componentes descritos como centrales para una buena labor de defensa. Estos son: comunicación, inclusión y flexibilidad. En conjunto, todos estos aspectos se basan en el respeto a las personas que necesitan apoyo. Al abogar por el acceso a la justicia, es importante que los defensores sean activamente conscientes de su propio papel, de manera que sus esfuerzos faciliten dicho acceso.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Metrics

Views 511
Downloads:
13(4)_Svensson_OSLS (English) 289
XML_13(4)_Svensson_OSLS (English) 36

Biografía del autor/a

Kerstin Svensson, School of Social Work, Lund University

School of Social Work, Lund University. Email address: kerstin.svensson@soch.lu.se

Citas

Adams, R., 1990. Self-help, social work and empowerment. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Addams, J. (with M.M. Ockerbloom, ed.), 1910. Twenty years at Hull House [online]. University of Pennsylvania, Digital Library. Available from: https://digital.library.upenn.edu/women/addams/hullhouse/hullhouse.html

Albiston, C.R., and Sandefur, R.L., 2013. Expanding the empirical study of access to justice. Wisconsin Law Review, 2013(1), 101–120.

Anderberg, P., et al., 2007. Preserving dignity in caring for older adults: A concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 59(6), 635–643.

Arvidson, M., Johansson, H., and Scaramuzzino, R., 2018. Advocacy Compromised: How Financial, Organizational and Institutional Factors Shape Advocacy Strategies of Civil Society Organizations. Voluntas [online], 29, 844–856. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11266-017-9900-y

Barman, E., 2017. The social bases of philanthropy. Annual Reviews of Sociology [online], 43, 271–290. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11266-017-9900-y

Botvin, G.J., and Griffin, K.W., 2004. Life skills training: Empirical findings and future directions. Journal of Primary Prevention [online], 2, 211–223. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/B:JOPP.0000042391.58573.5b

DiMaggio, P.J., and Powell, W.W., 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.

European Association of Schools of Social Work (EASSW), 2012. The Global Agenda for Social Work and Social Development Commitment to Action [online]. March. Maastricht: EASSW. Available from: https://www.eassw.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/globalagenda2012.pdf

Franklin, D.L., 1986. Mary Richmond and Jane Addams: From moral certainty to rational inquiry in social work practice. Social Service Review [online], 60(4), 504–525. Available from: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdf/10.1086/644396

Gregory, S., 2010. Cameras everywhere: Ubiquitous video documentation of human rights, new forms of video advocacy, and considerations of safety, security, dignity and consent. Journal of Human Rights Practice [online], 2(2), 191–207. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huq002

Hasenfeld, Y., ed., 2010. Human services as complex organizations. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Helmersson, S., 2017. Mellan systerskap och behandling: Om förhandlingar inom ett förändrat stödfält för våldsutsatta kvinnor [online]. Lund Dissertations in Social Work uppl. Lund University. Available from: https://lucris.lub.lu.se/ws/portalfiles/portal/21513140/Sara_Helmersson_avhandling_fulltext.pdf

International Federation of Social Workers (IFSW), 2014. Global definition of social work [online]. Rheinfelden: IFSW. Available from: https://www.ifsw.org/what-is-social-work/global-definition-of-social-work/

International Federation of Social Workers (IFSW), 2016. Promoting the dignity and worth of peoples [online]. Global Agenda for Social Work and Social Development: Second Report. Rheinfelden: IFSW. Available from: https://www.ifsw.org/product/books/global-agenda-for-social-work-and-social-development-2nd-report/

Leitch, J.A., 2016. Having a say: Democracy, access to justice and self-represented litigants [online]. PhD Dissertation. Law School of York University. Available from: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/phd/23

Lindström, J., and Toikko, T., 2022. Survival stories as access to society: People with history of a crime as experts by experience. Nordic Journal of Criminology [online], 23(1), 3-22. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/2578983X.2021.1918435

Lipsky, M., 2010. Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. 30th anniversary expanded ed. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Mauss, M., 2002. The gift: The form and reason for exchange in archaic societies. London: Routledge.

Mowbray, C.T., et al., 2003. Fidelity criteria: Development, measurement and validation. American Journal of Evaluation [online], 24(3), 315–340. Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/109821400302400303

Nobel Prize Outreach, 2021. Jane Addams: Facts [online]. Available from: https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/peace/1931/addams/facts

Oxford English Dictionary [online], 2021. Available from: https://www.oed.com/

Piven, F.F., and Cloward, R.A., 1993. Regulating the poor: The functions of public welfare. Updated ed. New York: Vintage Books.

Platt, A.M., 2009. The child savers: The invention of delinquency. Expanded 40th anniversary ed. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

Quataert, J.H., 2009. Advocating dignity: Human rights mobilizations in global politics. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Richmond, M.E., 1965. Social diagnosis [online]. New York: Free Press. Available from: https://www.historyofsocialwork.org/PDFs/1917, Richmond, Social Diagnosis OCR C.pdf (Originally published in 1917).

Social Welfare History Project, 2011. Mary Ellen Richmond (1861–1928) Social work pioneer, administrator, researcher and author [online]. Richmond: Virginia Commonwealth University, Social Welfare History Project. Available from: http://socialwelfare.library.vcu.edu/social-work/richmond-mary/

Svensson, K., 2006. Socialt arbete med brottsoffer: sympati, empati och organisering. Stockholm: Carlsson.

Svensson, K., and Johnsson, E., 2008. Exploring Knowledge in Social Work through models. In: M. Michailidis, S. Fargion and R. Sanders, eds., Research Synergies in Social Professions. Rome: Carocci, 53-61.

Svensson, K., Johnsson, E., and Laanemets, L., 2021. Handlingsutrymme: utmaningar i socialt arbete. Stockholm: Natur & Kultur. (Originally published in 2008).