The utopia of Rojava: A new world for stateless people

Bart van Klink

doi:10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1269

Autores/as

Bart van Klink Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7465-9292

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1269

Palabras clave:

utopía, cambio jurídico, arte participativo, democracia, revolución

Resumen

Este artículo investiga cómo el arte participativo puede contribuir al cambio jurídico. Como estudio de caso, analiza el proyecto de Jonas Staal de la Cumbre del Nuevo Mundo de Rojava, una región (aun a día de hoy) autónoma del norte y el este de Siria. Ofrece un caso interesante, ya que invita al derecho a incluir lo que hasta ahora ha excluido. Para empezar, se aclara cómo se concibe el cambio dentro de los sistemas jurídicos basados en el Estado de Derecho. Aunque el derecho se resiste a los cambios radicales, está implicado en un proceso constante de adaptación a su entorno. A continuación, se comenta el proyecto de Staal de la Nueva Cumbre Mundial desde una perspectiva utópica. Su aparente imposibilidad es lo que lo hace tan valioso para el derecho y su desarrollo. Al erigir un parlamento para Rojava, presenta una imagen de cómo podría ser el orden internacional si las cosas fueran diferentes. Como tal, es un ejercicio de “creación de un mundo utópico”.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Metrics

Views 613
Downloads:
PDF_12_4_Van_Klink_OSLS (English) 456
XML_12_4_Van_Klink_OSLS (English) 300

Biografía del autor/a

Bart van Klink, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

Prof. Dr. B.M.J. (Bart) van Klink

Professor of Legal Methodology

Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

Faculty of Law

Department of Legal Theory and Legal History

De Boelelaan 1105

1081 HV Amsterdam

The Netherlands

eMail: b.van.klink@vu.nl

Citas

Ademollo, F., 2011. The Cratylus of Plato: A commentary. Cambridge University Press.

Anker, K., 2005. The truth in painting: Cultural artifacts as proof of native title. Law Text Culture [online], vol. 9, 191–224. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2756010 [Accessed 7 February 2022].

Benmakhlouf, A., 2018. Jonas Staal’s plea for utopian realism. The Skinny [online], 6 June. Available from: http://www.jonasstaal.nl/site/assets/files/1855/2018-06-06-_adam_benmakhlouf-_jonas_staals_plea_for_utopian_realism-_the_skinny.pdf [Accessed 1 September 2021].

Berlin, I. (with H. Hardy, ed.), 2013. The crooked timber of humanity: Chapters in the history of ideas. Princeton University Press.

Bishop, C., 2012, Artificial Hells: Participatory art and the politics of spectatorship. London: Verso Books.

Bloch, E., 1995. The principle of hope: Volume two. Trans.: N. Plaice, S. Plaice and P. Knight. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Court, M., and Den Hond, C., 2020. Is this the end of Rojava? The Nation [online], 18 February. Available from: https://www.thenation.com/article/world/rojava-kurds-syria/ [Accessed 1 September 2021].

Cover, R., 1995. Nomos and narrative. In: M. Minow, M. Ryan and A. Sarat, eds., Narrative, violence and the law: Essays of Robert Cover. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 95–172.

Dworkin, R., 1986. Law’s empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Falk Moore, S., 1973. Law and social change: The semi-autonomous field as an appropriate subject of study. Law & Society Review, 7(4), 719–746.

Fuller, T., 2012. Radical temporality and the modern imagination: Two themes in the thought of Michael Oakeshott. In: P. Franco and L. Marsh, eds., A Companion to Michael Oakeshott. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 120–133.

Gadamer, H.G., 2004. Truth and method. Trans. J. Weinsheimer D.G. Marshall. London: Continuum. (Originally published in 1960).

Gadamer, H.G.,1985a. Plato und die Dichter. In: H.G. Gadamer, Gesammelte Werke. Band 5: Griechische Philosophie I. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 187–211.

Gadamer, H.G.,1985b. Platos Staat der Erzieher. In: H.G. Gadamer, Gesammelte Werke. Band 5: Griechische Philosophie I. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 249–262.

Habermas, J., 1981. Theory of communicative action, Volume one: Reason and the rationalization of society. Trans.: T.A. McCarthy). Boston: Beacon Press.

Hagen, I., 2017. New World Embassy: Rojava. Temporary Art Review [online], 11 January. Available from: http://temporaryartreview.com/new-world-embassy-rojava/ [Accessed 1 September 2021].

In der Maur, R., et al., eds., 2016. New worlds: The democratic self-administration of Rojava & New World Summit (Studio Jonas Staal) [online]. Oslo: KORO Public Art Norway/URO. Available from: http://www.jonasstaal.nl/site/assets/files/1521/new_worlds.pdf [Accessed 7 February 2022].

Kelsen, H., 1970. The pure theory of law. Trans.: M. Knight. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Kelsen, H., 2002. Introduction to the problems of legal theory. Trans.: B.L. Paulson and S.L. Paulson. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Knapp, M., Flach, A., and Ayboğa, E., 2016. Revolution in Rojava: Democratic autonomy and women’s liberation in Syrian Kurdistan. Trans.: J. Biehl. London: Pluto Press.

Kruger, R., 2017. Distopia: The utopia of dissidence and cultural pluralism in three generations of Dutch artists [online]. Thesis (PhD). University of Pretoria. Available from: https://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/60373 [Accessed 1 September 2021].

Laclau, E., 2007. On populist reason. London: Verso Books.

Latour, B., 2013. The making of law: An ethnography of the Conseil d’Etat. Trans.: M. Brilman and A. Pottage. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Levitas, R., 2010. The concept of utopia. Oxford: Peter Lang.

MacCormick, N., 1995. Time, narratives, and law. In: J. Bjarup and M. Blegvad, eds., Time, law, and society: Proceedings of a Nordic Symposium Held May 1994 at Sandbjerg Gods, Denmark. ARSP-Beiheft 64. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 111–125.

Marquard, O., 2007. Skepsis in der Moderne. Stuttgart: Philipp Reclam jun.

Mohr, R., 2002. Shifting ground: Context and change in two Australian legal systems. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law [online], 15(1), 1–24. Available from: https://ro.uow.edu.au/lawpapers/47/ [Accessed 7 February 2022].

Morphy, F., 2008. Enacting sovereignty in a colonized space: The Yolngu of Blue Mud Bay meet the native title process. In: D. Fay and D. James, eds., The rights and wrongs of land restitution: “Restoring what was ours”. Abingdon: Routledge-Cavendish, 31–57.

Müller-Mall, S., 2016, LAW/ART: Constructive interferences. In: Avi Feldman, ed., Imagine Law, OnCurating [online], 28 January. Available from: https://www.on-curating.org/issue-28-reader/lawart-constructive-interferences.html#.X2B0Ty2YPYU [Accessed 1 September 2021].

Oakeshott, M., 2002. Experience and its modes. Cambridge University Press.

Přibáň, J., 2007. Legal symbolism: On law, time and European identity. Hampshire: Ashgate.

Ricœur, P., 1986. Lectures on ideology and utopia. New York: Columbia University Press.

Rojava Information Center (RIC), 2019. Beyond the frontlines: The building of the democratic system in North and East Syria [online]. Report. 19 December. https://rojavainformationcenter.com/2019/12/report-beyond-the-frontlines/ [Accessed 1 September 2021].

Rojava: Syria’s Secret Revolution, 2014. Documentary, YouTube clip. BBC / Mehran Bozorgnia / Bozorgnia Films. Darius Bazargan [online], 14 November. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fKhjJfH0ra4 [Accessed 1 September 2021].

Sabio, O., 2015. Rojava: An alternative to imperialism, nationalism, and islamism in the Middle East (an introduction). Lulu.com.

Schleiermacher, F., 1838. Über die verschiedenen Methoden des Übersetzens’. In: F. Schleiermacher, Sämtliche Werke: 2. Band. Berlin: G. Reimer und Herbig, 201–238.

Staal, J., 2010a. Post-propaganda. Amsterdam: The Netherlands Foundation for Visual Arts, Design and Architecture.

Staal, J., 2010b. Power?...To which people?! Heiningen: Jap Sam Books.

Staal, J., 2015. To make a world: Part III. e-flux Journal [online], no. 63, March. Available from: https://www.e-flux.com/journal/63/60907/to-make-a-world-part-iii-stateless-democracy/ [Accessed 1 September 2021].

Staal, J., 2016a. Ideology = form. In der Maur, R., et al., eds., 2016. New worlds: The democratic self-administration of Rojava & New World Summit (Studio Jonas Staal) [online]. Oslo: KORO Public Art Norway/URO, 93–108. Available from: http://www.jonasstaal.nl/site/assets/files/1521/new_worlds.pdf [Accessed 1 September 2021].

Staal, J., 2016b. Law of the state, truth of art: Two case studies of art as evidence. In: A. Feldman, ed., Imagine law. OnCurating [online], 28, January. Available from: https://www.on-curating.org/issue-28-reader/law-of-the-state-truth-of-art-two-case-studies-of-art-as-evidence.html#.X2CkVi2YPYU [Accessed 1 September 2021].

Staal, J., 2018. Propaganda art from the 20th to the 21st century [online]. Thesis (PhD). Leiden University. Available from: https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/handle/1887/60210 [Accessed 1 September 2021].

Sumner, W.G., 1959. Folkways: A study of the sociological importance of usages, manners, customs, mores, and morals. New York: Dover.

Tamanaha, B.Z., 2004. On the rule of law: History, politics, theory. Cambridge University Press.

Tamanaha, B.Z., 2012. The history and elements of the rule of law. Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, 232–247.

Van Klink, B., 2018. Law at the right time: A plea for slow law in hasty times. In: L. Corrias and L. Francot, eds., Temporal boundaries of law and politics: Time out of joint. New York: Routledge, 33–52.

Weinrich, H., 2008. Knappe Zeit: Kunst und Ökonomie des befristeten Lebens. Munich: Beck.