A justification of basic income beyond a theory of justice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1265Palabras clave:
renta básica universal, conflicto, derecho, marxismo, bienestarResumen
La mayoría de las posturas teóricas a favor de la renta básica se basan en un modelo de “sociedad justa”. Incluso en un contexto posmarxista, la renta básica se concibe como un reconocimiento formal de una relación social, destinado a validar un proceso de liberación que ya ha tenido lugar. El presente trabajo parte de una perspectiva alternativa. Siguiendo una concepción dialéctica y conflictiva de la renta básica, propone un mecanismo de reapropiación del proceso de toma de decisiones, que abre espacios de deconstrucción y conflicto. Sin embargo, el concepto debe calibrarse para las condiciones en las que se reclama el derecho a una renta básica; también debe tener en cuenta las relaciones de poder imperantes. El documento presenta una teoría de la renta básica como mecanismo de liberación que facilita la desarticulación de la organización mercantil de las relaciones sociales y favorece la posibilidad de decidir autónomamente el propio futuro y las condiciones de la vida en común.
Descargas
Metrics
Downloads:
PDF_12_4_Pisani_OSLS (English) 456
XML_12_4_Pisani_OSLS (English) 583
Citas
Agamben, G., 1998. Homo sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Redwood City: Stanford University Press.
Arneson, R.J., 1991. A defense of equal opportunity for welfare. Philosophical Studies, 62(2), 187–195.
Arneson, R.J., 1992. Is socialism dead? A comment on market socialism and basic income capitalism. Ethics, 102(3), 485–511.
Arnsperger, C., and Van Parijs, P., 2000. Éthique économique et sociale. Paris: La Découverte.
Baccelli, L., 2003. Critica del repubblicanesimo. Bari: Laterza.
Baker, J., 1992. An egalitarian case for basic income. In: P. Van Parijs, ed., Arguing for Basic Income: Ethical Foundations for a Radical Reform. London: Verso Books, 101–127.
Barry, B., 1996. Real freedom and basic income. Journal of Political Philosophy, 4(3), 242–276.
Bascetta, M., and Bronzini, G., 1997. Il reddito universale nella crisi della società del lavoro. In: Manifestolibri, ed., La democrazia del reddito universale. Rome: Manifestolibri, 7–46.
Bauman, Z., 1999. In Search of Politics. Redwood City: Stanford University Press.
Bazzicalupo, L., 2018. La critica non normativa nel pensiero francese contemporaneo. I castelli di Yale online [online], 1, 19–38. Available from: http://cyonline.unife.it/article/download/1654/1493 [Accessed 18 January 2022].
Beck, U., 1986. Risikogesellschaft: Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
Benanav, A., 2020. Automation and the Future of Work. London: Verso Books.
Bidadanure, J., 2017. Basic income convergence. In: C. Joshua, ed., Work, Inequality, Basic Income. Boston Review, 51–55.
Birnbaum, S., 2010. Radical liberalism, Rawls and the welfare state: Justifying the politics of basic income. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 13(4), 495–516.
Boltanski, L., and Chiapello E., 1999. Le nouvel esprit du capitalisme. Paris: Gallimard.
Bourdieu, P., 1989. Social space and symbolic power. Sociological Theory, 7(1), 14–25.
Burgio, A., 2017. Il sogno di una cosa. Rome: DeriveApprodi.
Calnitsky, D., 2018. Does basic income assume a can opener? Catalyst [online], 2(3), 1–19. Available from: https://catalyst-journal.com/2018/12/does-basic-income-assume-a-can-opener [Accessed 18 January 2022].
Casadei, T., 2005. La traiettoria del repubblicanesimo conflittualista, Diritto e questioni pubbliche [online], 5, 131–155. Available from: http://www.dirittoequestionipubbliche.org/D_Q-5/contributi/testi_5_2005/rec_T_Casadei-Baccelli.pdf [Accessed 18 January 2022].
Casassas, D., 2007. Basic income and the republican ideal: Re-thinking material independence in contemporary societies. Basic Income Studies, 2(2), 1–7.
Cassese, S., 2013. Chi governa il mondo? Bologna: Il Mulino.
Castel, R., 2003. L'insécurité sociale. Qu'est-ce qu'être protégé? Paris: La République des idées.
Chatterjee, P., 2006. The Politics of the Governed. New York: Columbia University Press.
Chignola, S., 2018. Da dentro: Biopolitica, bioeconomia, Italian theory. Rome: DeriveApprodi.
Chignola, S., ed., 2011. Il diritto del comune: Crisi della sovranità, proprietà e nuovi poteri costituenti. Verona: Ombre Corte.
Colletti, L., 1969. Il marxismo e Hegel. Bari: Laterza.
Croce, M., 2010. Che cos’è un’istituzione. Rome: Carocci.
Cuono, M., 2013. Decidere caso per caso: Figure del potere arbitrario. Madrid/Barcelona/Buenos Aires/Sao Paulo: Marcial Pons.
Cuono, M., 2015. In principio era il mercato, poi venne la rete: Disintermediazione, libertà, legittimità. Iride, 28(2), 305–317.
Dardot, P., and Laval, C., 2010. La nouvelle raison du monde: Essai sur la société néolibérale. Paris: La Découverte.
Dardot, P., and Laval, C., 2014. Commun: Essai sur la révolution au XXIe siècle. Paris: La Découverte.
Del Bò, C., 2009. Basic income e teoria liberale. In: Basic Income Network Italia, ed., Reddito per tutti. Rome: Manifestolibri, 87–96.
Del Bò, C., and Murra, E., 2014. Per un reddito di cittadinanza: Perché dare soldi a Homer Simpson e ad altri fannulloni. Florence: goWare.
Elster, J., 1986. Comment on Van der Veen and Van Parijs. Theory and Society, 15(5), 709–721.
Elster, J., 1988. Is there (or should there be) a right to work). In: A. Gutmann, ed., Democracy and the Welfare State. Princeton University Press, 53–78.
Esposito, R., 1998. Bios: Biopolitics and Philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Ferrajoli, L., 2013. La democrazia attraverso i diritti. Bari: Laterza.
Ferrajoli, L., 2018. Manifesto per l’uguaglianza. Bari: Laterza.
Ferrarese, M.R., 2006. Diritto sconfinato: Inventiva giuridica e spazi nel mondo globale. Bari: Laterza.
Foucault, M., 2004. Naissance de la biopolitique: Cours au Collège de France 1978–1979. Paris: Gallimard.
Friedman, M., 1962. Capitalism and Freedom. University of Chicago Press.
Fumagalli, A., 2017. Economia politica del comune. Rome: DeriveApprodi.
Fumagalli, A., et al., 2019. Cognitive Capitalism. Welfare and Labour: The Commonfare Hypothesis. London: Taylor & Francis.
Gill, R., and Pratt, A., 2008. In the social factory? Immaterial labour, precariousness and cultural work. Theory, Culture & Society, 25(7–8), 1–30.
Goldoni, M., 2014. Il repubblicanesimo e la questione del potere costituente. Montesquieu.it [online], 6(1). Available from: https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2421-4124/5185 [Accessed 18 January 2022].
Gourevitch, A., 2016. The limits of a basic income: Means and ends of workplace democracy. Basic Income Studies [online], 11(1), 17–28. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1515/bis-2016-0008 [Accessed 18 January 2022].
Gourevitch, A., and Stanczyk, L., 2018. The basic income illusion. Catalyst, 1(4), 151–177.
Gramsci, A., (with F. Rosengarten, ed.), 2011. Letters from Prison. Trans.: R. Rosenthal. New York: Columbia University Press.
Hardt, M., and Negri, A., 2001. Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Howard, M.W., 2005. Basic income, liberal neutrality, socialism, and work. Review of Social Economy, 63(4), 613–631.
Howard, M.W., 2015. Exploitation, labor, and basic income. Analyse & Kritik [online], 37(1–2), 281–304. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-2015-1-217 [Accessed 18 January 2022].
Kenney, M., and Zysman, J., 2016. The rise of the platform economy. Issues in Science and Technology [online], 32(3). Available from: https://issues.org/rise-platform-economy-big-data-work/ [Accessed 18 January 2022].
Kosík, K., 1976. Dialectics of the Concrete. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
Labriola, A., 1973. Saggi sulla concezione materialistica della storia: Scritti filosofici e politici. Turin: Einaudi.
Lazzarato, M., 2012. The Making of the Indebted Man. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Lazzarato, M., 2015. Governing by Debt. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Lobo, S., 2014. Auf dem Weg in die Dumpinghölle. Spiegel online [online], 3 September. Available from: https://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/netzpolitik/sascha-lobo-sharing-economy-wie-bei-uber-ist-plattform-kapitalismus-a-989584.html [Accessed 18 January 2022].
Locke, J. (with P. Laslett, ed.), 1988. Two Treatises of Government. Cambridge University Press.
Lordon, F., 2010. Capitalisme, désir et servitude: Marx et Spinoza. Paris: La Fabrique.
Lovett, F., 2010. A General Theory of Domination and Justice. Oxford University Press.
Lyotard, J.F., 1979. La condition postmoderne. Paris: Minuit.
Macherey, P., 2014. Le sujet des norms. Paris: Éditions Amsterdam.
Marazzi, C., 2009. The Violence of Financial Capitalism. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Marx, K., 1968. Oekonomisch-philosophische Manuskripte aus dem Jahre 1844. In: K. Marx and F. Engels, eds., Werke. Berlin: Dietz, 465–588.
Marx, K., 2008. Zur Kritik der Hegelschen Rechtsphilosophie. In: K. Marx and F. Engels, eds., Werke. Berlin: Dietz, 378–391.
Marx, K., 2018. Capital. A critique of political economy: Vol. I, Book One: The process of production of capital. Champaign: Modern Barbarian Press.
McDowell, L., and Christopherson, S., 2009. Transforming work: New forms of employment and their regulation. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society [online], 2(3), 335–342. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsp024 [Accessed 18 January 2022].
McKinnon, C., 2003. Basic income, self-respect and reciprocity. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 20(2), 143–158.
Mészáros, I., 1976. Marx’s Theory of Alienation. London: Merlin Press.
Musto, M., 2010. Revisiting Marx’s concept of alienation. Socialism and Democracy, 24(3), 79–101.
Negri, A., 1999. Insurgencies. Trans.: M. Boscagli. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Offe, C., 2008. Basic income and the labor contract. Basic Income Studies, 3(1).
Otsuka, M., 2003. Libertarianism Without Inequality. Oxford University Press.
Paine, T., 1974. Agrarian Justice, in the Life and Major Writings of Thomas Paine. New York: Citadel Press.
Pannarale, L., 2008. Il diritto che guarda. Milan: Franco Angeli.
Pasquale, F., 2015. The Black Box Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Petrucciani, S., 2003. Modelli di filosofia politica. Turin: Einaudi.
Petrucciani, S., 2015. Da Marx al marxismo, attraverso Engels. In: S. Petrucciani, ed., Storia del marxismo. Vol. 1. Rome: Carocci, 11–32.
Pettit, P., 2007. A republican right to basic income? Basic Income Studies, 2(2).
Powell, B., 2012. Two libertarian arguments for basic income proposals. Basic Income Studies, 6(2).
Preterossi, G., 2017. Residui, persistenze e illusioni: il fallimento politico del globalismo. Scienza & Politica [online], 57(29), 105–126. Available from: https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1825-9618/7579 [Accessed 18 January 2022].
Raventós, D., 2007. Basic Income: The Material Conditions of Freedom. London: Pluto Press.
Rawls, J., 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rawls, J., 1987. The idea of an overlapping consensus. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 7(1), 1–25.
Rawls, J., 2001. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rodotà, S., 2012. Il diritto ad avere diritti. Bari: Laterza.
Rodotà, S., 2014. Solidarietà. Bari: Laterza.
Rouvroy, A., and Berns, T., 2013. Gouvernementalité algorithmique et perspectives d’émancipation, Réseaux [online], 177(1), 163–196. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3917/res.177.0163 [Accessed 18 January 2022].
Salvatore, I., 2018. La natura e gli scopi della filosofia politica: Rawls e l’idea di liberalismo politico. Notizie di Politeia, 34(132), 47–54.
Semerari, G., 1973. Filosofia e potere. Bari: Dedalo.
Sen, A., 2009. The Idea of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sgrò, G., 2017. Friedrich Engels e il punto d’approdo della filosofia classica tedesca. Naples/Salerno: Orthotes.
Steiner, H., 1992. Three just taxes. In: P. Van Parijs, ed., Arguing for Basic Income: Ethical Foundation for a Radical Reform. London: Verso Books, 81–92.
Stone Sweet, A., 2006. The new Lex Mercatoria and transnational governance. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(5), 627–646.
Vallentyne, P., 1997. Self-Ownership and equality: Brute luck, gifts, universal dominance, and leximin. Ethics, 107(2), 321–343.
Vallentyne, P., and Steiner, H., eds., 2000. Left-libertarianism and its Critics. London: Palgrave.
Van Parijs, P., 1991. Why surfers should be fed? The liberal case for an unconditional basic income. Philosophy and Public Affairs [online], 20(2). Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265291?origin=JSTOR-pdf [Accessed 18 January 2022].
Van Parijs, P., 1995. Real Freedom for All: What Can Justify Capitalism? Oxford University Press.
Van Parijs, P., and Vanderborght, Y., 2017. Basic Income: A Radical Proposal for a Free Society and a Sane Economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vanderborght, Y., and Van Parijs, P., 2005. L’allocation universelle. Paris: La Dècouverte. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3917/dec.vande.2005.01
Vattimo, G., and Rovatti, P.A., eds., 2012. Weak Thought. Albany: State University of New York Press.
White, S., 2006. Reconsidering the exploitation objection to basic income. Basic Income Studies, 1(2).
White, S., 2013. Liberal equality, exploitation, and the case for an unconditional basic income. In: K. Widerquist et al., eds., Basic Income: An Anthology of Contemporary Research. Milton: Wiley Blackwell.
Widerquist K., et al., eds., 2013. Basic Income: An Anthology of Contemporary Research. Milton: Wiley Blackwell.
Widerquist, K., 2011. Why we demand an unconditional basic income: The ECSO freedom case. In: A. Gosseries and Y. Vanderborght, eds., Arguing About Justice: Essays for Philippe Van Parijs. Presses Universitaires de Louvain, 387–394.
Wolgast, E.H., 1987. The Grammar of Justice. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Wright, E.O., 2015. Eroding capitalism: A comment on Stuart White’s “Basic Capital in the Egalitarian Toolkit”. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 32(4), 432–439.
Wright, E.O., 2019. How To Be an Anti-Capitalist for the 21st Century. London: Verso Books.
Zuboff, S., 2019. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. London: Profile Books.
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2022 Giacomo Pisani
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Los autores conservan el copyright de sus trabajos, que se publicarán en OSLS bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento NoComercial SinObraDerivada. Puede consultar más detalles en: http://es.creativecommons.org/licencia/. Si no está de acuerdo con esta licencia, por favor, póngase en contacto con nosotros.
El autor concede los permisos necesarios para difundir la información bibliográfica del artículo, incluyendo el resumen, y autorizar a otros, incluyendo las bases de datos bibliográficas, de índices y servicios de alerta de contenidos, a copiar y comunicar esta información.
Para más información sobre los permisos para distribuir su artículo en cada fase de la producción, por favor, lea nuestra Política de Autoarchivo y Divulgación (en inglés).
Las condiciones de copyright con el nombre de autores y co-autores, y la licencia Creative Commons se mostrarán en el artículo. Estas condiciones se deben aceptar como parte del proceso de envío de un artículo a la revista. Por favor, asegúrese de que todos los co-autores se mencionan correctamente, y que entienden y aceptan estos términos.
