The legal field as battleground for social struggle
Reclaiming law from the margins
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1216Palabras clave:
movimientos sociales, derecho, propiedad, bienes comunes, comunesResumen
El escepticismo acerca del potencial que tiene la ley para fomentar el cambio social es general en la teoría crítica y contribuyó a fortalecer la desconfianza de los movimientos sociales respecto al uso de instrumentos legales para reivindicar sus reclamaciones. Esta postura “antilegal” se basa en la idea de que el derecho formalizaría las relaciones de dominación ya existentes; y afirma la necesidad de una práctica política libre de cualquier “deriva legalista”. Este artículo analiza cómo las tácticas legales a favor del cambio social han sido empleadas por movimientos que han ejercido un uso contrahegemónico del derecho en la coyuntura posterior a la crisis económica de 2008. El ejemplo de la lucha italiana por los bienes comunes se analizará como paradigmático de cómo se pueden proteger los intereses de los marginalizados recurriendo a las formas de propiedad existentes, y cómo es posible reivindicar el derecho desde los márgenes.
Descargas
Metrics
Downloads:
PDF_11_6S_Pecile_OSLS (English) 224
XML_11_6S_Pecile_OSLS (English) 106
Citas
Althusser, L., 1971. Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses (Notes towards an Investigation). In: L. Althusser, Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Angiolini, C., 2016. Possibilità e limiti dei recenti regolamenti comunali in materia di beni comuni. In: A. Quarta and M. Spanò, eds., Beni Comuni 2.0: Contro-egemonia e nuove istituzioni. Milan-Udine: Mimesis, 147–156.
Arampatzi, A., 2017. The spatiality of counter-austerity politics in Athens, Greece: Emergent “urban solidarity spaces”. Urban Studies [online], 54(9), 2155–2171. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098016629311 [Access 27 May 2021].
Bailey, S., and Mattei, U., 2013. Social Movements as Constituent Power: The Italian Struggle for The Commons. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies [online], 20(2), 965–1013. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2979/indjglolegstu.20.2.965 [Access 27 May 2021].
Blank, Y., and Rosen-Zvi, I., 2010. The spatial turn in legal theory. HAGAR Studies in Culture, Polity and Identities [online], 10(1), 37–60. Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2937221 [Access 27 May 2021].
Blomley, N., 2016. The Boundaries of Property: Complexity, Relationality, and Spatiality. Law and Society Review [online], 50(1), 224–255. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12182 [Access 27 May 2021].
Bourdieu, P., 1987. The Force of Law: Toward a Sociology of the Juridical Field. Hastings Law Journal [online], 38(5), 814–853. Available from: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal/vol38/iss5/3 [Access 27 May 2021].
Brown, W., and Halley, J., eds., 2002. Left Legalism/Left Critique. Durham: Duke University Press.
Capone, N., 2016. Del diritto d’uso civico e collettivo dei beni destinati al godimento dei diritti fondamentali. Politica del diritto [online], 4(a. 48), 597–636. Available from: http://www.demaniocivico.it/attachments/article/1912/Capone%20N%20%20Del%20diritto%20duso%20civico%20e%20collettivo_politica%20del%20diritto_dicembre_2016.pdf [Access 27 May 2021].
Chatterjee, P., 2004. The Politics of the Governed: Popular Politics in Most of the World. New York: Columbia University Press.
Chatterton, P., 2010. Seeking the Urban Common: Furthering the Debate on Spatial Justice. City [online], 14(6): 625–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2010.525304 [Access 27 May 2021].
Chiaramonte, X., 2019. Governare il conflitto: La criminalizzazione del movimento No Tav. Milan: Meltemi.
Collins, H., 1984. Marxism and Law. Oxford University Press.
Constitution of the Italian Republic, 1948 [online]. Rome: Parliamentary Information, Archives and Publications Office of the Senate Service for Official Reports and Communication. Available from: https://www.senato.it/documenti/repository/istituzione/costituzione_inglese.pdf [Access 27 May 2021].
Cuff, D., 1998. Community Property: Enter the Architect or, The Politics of Form. In: M. Bell and S.T. Leong, eds., Slow Space. New York: Monacelli Press.
Cummings, S., and Eagly, I., 2000. A Critical Reflection on Law and Organizing. UCLA Law Review [online], 48, 443-517. Available from: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/473524bg [Access 27 May 2021].
Dardot, P., and Laval, C., 2014. Le Commun: Essai sur la révolution au XXIe siècle. Paris: La Découverte.
Della Porta, D., 2015. Social Movements in Times of Austerity: Bringing Capitalism Back Into Protest Analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Di Robilant, A., 2014. Property and Democratic Deliberation: The Numerus Clausus Principle and Democratic Experimentalism in Property Law. American Journal of Comparative Law [online], 62(2), 367–416. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5131/AJCL.2014.0004 [Access 27 May 2021].
Federici, S., 2016. Feminism and the Politics of the Commons. In: M. Hlavajova and S. Sheikh, eds., Former West: Art and the Contemporary After 1989. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 379–390.
Foucault, M., 1984. Nietzsche, Genealogy, History. In: P. Rainbow, ed., The Foucault Reader. New York: Pantheon Books, 76–100.
Foucault, M., 1995. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.
Foucault, M., 1998. The Will to Knowledge: The History of Sexuality (vol. 1). London: Penguin Books.
Foucault, M., 2009. Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France 1977-1978. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Guastini, R., ed., 1980. Marxismo e teorie del diritto. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Hardt, M., and Negri, A. 2009. Commonwealth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hardt, M., and Negri, A., 2017. Assembly. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hohfeld, W.N., 1913. Some Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning. The Yale Law Journal [online], 23(1), 16–59. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2307/785533 [Access 27 May 2021].
hooks, b., 1989. Choosing the margin as a space of radical openness. Framework: The Journal of Cinema and Media [online], 36, 15–23. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/44111660 [Access 27 May 2021].
Kennedy, D., 1991. The Stakes of Law or Hale and Foucault! In: D. Kennedy, Sexy Dressing, etc. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 83–119.
Kennedy, D., 2016. A World of Struggle: How Power, Law, and Expertise Shape Global Political Economy. 1st ed. Princeton University Press.
Liang, L., 2005. Porous Legalities and Avenues of Participation. Sarai Reader 2005: Bare Acts [online], 6–17. Available from: http://archive.sarai.net/files/original/8d57bfa1bcb57c80a7af903363c07282.pdf [Access 27 May 2021].
Llewellyn, K.N., 1940. The Normative, the Legal and the Law-Jobs. Yale Law Journal [online], 49(8), 1355–1400. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2307/792545 [Access 27 May 2021].
Lukács, G., 1978. The Ontology of Social Being: Marx's Basic Ontological Principles. Trans.: D. Fernbach. London: Merlin.
Marella, M.R., 2017a. “Queer eye for the straight guy”. Sulle possibilità di un’analisi giuridica queer. Politica del diritto [online], 3(48), 383–414. Available from: http://www.euronomade.info/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/MarellaQueer.pdf [Access 27 May 2021].
Marella, M.R., 2017b. The Commons as a Legal Concept. Law and Critique [online], 28(1), 61–86. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-016-9193-0 [Access 27 May 2021].
Marinelli, F., 2013. Gli usi civici. Milan: Giuffrè.
Marx, K., 1859. A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy. Moscow: Progress.
Mattei, U., 2011. Beni comuni: Un manifesto. Bari: Laterza.
Mattei, U., and Quarta, A., 2015. Right to the City or Urban Commoning? Thoughts on the Generative Transformation of Property Law. Italian Law Journal [online], 303(1), 303–325. Available from: https://repository.uchastings.edu/faculty_scholarship/1287 [Access 27 May 2021].
Monterossi, M.W., 2020. L'orizzonte intergenerazionale del diritto civile: Tutela, soggettività, azione. Pisa: ETS.
Nash, R.F., 1989. The Rights of Nature: A History of Environmental Ethics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
O’Donnell, E.L., and Talbot-Jones, J., 2018. Creating legal rights for rivers: Lessons from Australia, New Zealand, and India. Ecology and Society [online], 23(1). Available from: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09854-230107 [Access 27 May 2021].
Orestano, R., 1960. Diritti soggettivi e diritti senza soggetto. Linee di una vicenda concettuale. Jus [online], 1, 149-196. Available from: https://www.academia.edu/31024428/Riccardo_Orestano_Diritti_soggettivi_e_diritti_senza_soggetto_Linee_di_una_vicenda_concettuale_1960 [Access 27 May 2021].
Ostrom, E., 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press.
Parfitt, R., 2019. The Process of International Legal Reproduction: Inequality, Historiography, Resistance. Cambridge University Press.
Pashukanis, E., 2002. Preface to the Second Russian Edition. In: E. Pashukanis, The General Theory of Law and Marxism. London: Transaction, pp. 37–45. (Originally published in 1924).
Pecile, V., 2019. Beni comuni e discorso della legalità. Il caso di Palermo. Sociologia del diritto [online], 3, 139–155. Available from: https://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/Scheda_rivista.aspx?IDArticolo=65366 [Access 27 May 2021].
Pecile, V., 2021. Gli urban poor ai tempi della turistificazione neoliberale delle città. In: L. Coccoli, ed., I poveri possono parlare? Soggetti, problemi, alleanze. Rome: Ediesse, 119–137.
Peñalver, E., and Katyal, S.K., 2010. Property Outlaws: How Squatters, Pirates, and Protesters Improve the Law of Ownership. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Rodotà Commission Bill, 2007. Relazione per la modifica delle norme del codice civile in materia di beni pubblici. Atti parlamentari [online], no. 2031. Available from: http://www.senato.it/service/PDF/PDFServer/DF/217244.pdf [Access 27 May 2021].
Rolnik, R., 2019. Urban Warfare. Housing under the Empire of Finance. Trans.: G. Hirschhorn. London: Verso Books.
Rose, C., 1998. The Several Futures of Property: Of Cyberspace and Folk Tales, Emission Trades and Ecosystems. Minnesota Law Review [online], 83, 129–182. Available from: https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/1804/ [Access 27 May 2021].
Schlag, P., 2015. How to do things with Hohfeld. Law and Contemporary Problems [online], 78(185), 185–234. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2465148 [Access 27 May 2021].
Shiner, R.A., 1995. Legal Realism. In: R. Audi, ed., The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Singer, J., 1988. The Reliance Interest in Property. Stanford Law Review [online], 40(3), 611–751. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2307/1228814 [Access 27 May 2021].
Spanò, M., 2015. Le parole e le cose (del diritto). In: Y. Thomas, Il valore delle cose. Rome: Quodlibet.
Stone, C.D., 1972. Should trees have standing? Towards Legal Rights for Natural Objects. Southern California Law Review [online], 45, 450-501. Available from: https://iseethics.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/stone-christopher-d-should-trees-have-standing.pdf [Access 27 May 2021].
Thomas, Y., 1998. Le sujet de droit, la personne et la nature. Sur la critique contemporaine du sujet de droit. Le Débat [online], 3, 85-107. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3917/deba.100.0085 [Access 27 May 2021].
Umbach, G., and Wishnoff, D., 2008. Strategic Self-Orientalism: Urban Planning Policies and the Shaping of New York City’s Chinatown, 1950-2005. Journal of Planning History [online], 7(3), 214–238. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1538513207313915 [Access 27 May 2021].
van der Walt, A., 2009. Property in the Margins. Oxford/Portland: Hart.
Vercellone, A., 2016. Urban Commons e modelli di governo. Il Community Land Trust. In: A. Quarta and M. Spanò, eds., Beni Comuni 2.0: Contro-egemonia e nuove istituzioni. Milan: Mimesis, 171–184.
Voigt, C., ed., 2013. Rule of Law for Nature: New Dimensions and Ideas in Environmental Law. Cambridge University Press.
Xifaras, M., 2018. The Role of the Law in Critical Theory. The case of Property and the Commons (As a Commentary on the first chapter of Negri and Hardt’s Commonwealth). Critique and Praxis 13/13 [online], 2 December. Available from: http://blogs.law.columbia.edu/praxis1313/mikhail-xifaras-the-role-of-the-law-in-critical-theory-the-role-of-property-in-the-commons/ [Access 27 May 2021].
Žižek, S., 1989. The Sublime Object of Ideology. London: Verso.
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2021 Veronica Pecile
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Los autores conservan el copyright de sus trabajos, que se publicarán en OSLS bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento NoComercial SinObraDerivada. Puede consultar más detalles en: http://es.creativecommons.org/licencia/. Si no está de acuerdo con esta licencia, por favor, póngase en contacto con nosotros.
El autor concede los permisos necesarios para difundir la información bibliográfica del artículo, incluyendo el resumen, y autorizar a otros, incluyendo las bases de datos bibliográficas, de índices y servicios de alerta de contenidos, a copiar y comunicar esta información.
Para más información sobre los permisos para distribuir su artículo en cada fase de la producción, por favor, lea nuestra Política de Autoarchivo y Divulgación (en inglés).
Las condiciones de copyright con el nombre de autores y co-autores, y la licencia Creative Commons se mostrarán en el artículo. Estas condiciones se deben aceptar como parte del proceso de envío de un artículo a la revista. Por favor, asegúrese de que todos los co-autores se mencionan correctamente, y que entienden y aceptan estos términos.
