Considering strategies designed to counter radicalisation
Comparative reflections on approaches in the United Kingdom and Belgium
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1197Palabras clave:
Estrategia contra la radicalización, extremismo, terrorismo, prevenciónResumen
Este artículo se centra en la estrategia contra la radicalización, examinando la eficacia y los puntos débiles de las iniciativas políticas diseñadas para prevenir el extremismo violento. A fin de analizar varios abordajes para combatir el problema de la “radicalización”, comparamos y contrastamos políticas y prácticas del Reino Unido con contramedidas adoptadas en Bélgica. Utilizando ejemplos de ambos países, argumentamos que, para contrarrestar la radicalización, los abordajes de multiagencia adaptados al contexto tienen mayores probabilidades de atraer personas en riesgo de ser atraídas por el extremismo violento, y también tienen menores probabilidades de (re)producir efectos iatrogénicos. Nuestro análisis insinúa que, para comprender totalmente lo que puede ser percibido como proclividades individuales hacia la violencia, es significativo el papel de factores estructurales, institucionales y ambientales. Aducimos que se debería dar más peso a esos factores a la hora de explicar el “extremismo” y los procesos y prácticas aplicados para reducir el riesgo de daños.
Descargas
Metrics
Downloads:
PDF (English) 881
XML (English) 1310
Citas
Abbas, T., 2020. Islamophobia as racialised biopolitics in the United Kingdom. Philosophy and Social Criticism [online], 46(5), 497–511. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453720903468 [Accessed 19 February 2021].
Ahmed, W., 2017. Prevent Referrals: The Story Behind the Headlines. Huffington Post [online], 27 November. Available from: https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/prevent-referrals-the-story-beyond-the-headlines_uk_5a157af8e4b0f401dfa7ec29 [Accessed 11 March 2019].
Aked, H., 2020. False Positives: The Prevent Counter-extremism Policy in Healthcare. London: Medact.
Allen, C., Isakjee, A., and Ögtem-Young, Ö., 2019. Counter-Extremism, PREVENT and the Extreme Right Wing: Lessons Learned and Future Challenges. LIAS Working Paper Series [online], 2. Available from: https://doi.org/10.29311/lwps.201923074 [Accessed 19 February 2021].
Baillergeau, E., 2018. Médiation et radicalisme violent en Belgique. la prévention sociale/générale à l’ère de la lutte contre le terrorisme. Synthèse présentée à la journée européenne ‘Prévention des processus de radicalisation violente en Europe : quels rôles pour la médiation ?’ CreE.A/Haute Ecole de Liège, 2 février 2018.
Bonelli, L., and Ragazzi, F., 2019. La lutte contre la “radicalisation”. Genèse et expansion d’un nouveau lieu commun administrative en France et dans l’Union Européenne. Archives de politique criminelle [online], 41, 119-145. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3917/apc.041.0119 [Accessed 19 February 2021].
Busher, J., and Jerome, L., 2020. The Prevent Duty in Education Impact, Enactment and Implications. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
CAGE, 2013. The Prevent Strategy: A Cradle to Grave Police State [online]. London: CAGE. Available from: https://www.cage.ngo/prevent-strategy-cradle-grave-police-state [Accessed 19 February 2021].
CAGE, 2018. The “Science” of Pre-Crime: The Secret “Radicalisation” Study Underpinning Prevent [online]. London: CAGE. Available from: https://www.cage.ngo/the-science-of-pre-crime [Accessed 19 February 2021].
Cameron, D., 2015. [Speech on Extremism. Transcript] (online). Delivered at Ninestiles School, Birmingham, 20 July. London: Prime Minister’s Office, 10 Downing Street/The RT Hon David Cameron. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/extremism-pm-speech [Accessed 12 January 2020].
Department for Communities and Local Government, 2007. Preventing Violent Extremism: Winning Hearts and Minds. London: HMSO.
Dodd, V., 2009. Government anti-terrorism strategy spies on innocent. The Guardian [online], 16 October. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2009/oct/16/anti-terrorism-strategy-spies-innocents [Accessed 19 February 2021].
Dodd, V., 2020. Extinction Rebellion placed on terrorism police’s watchlist of extremist ideologies. The Guardian [online], 11 January. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/jan/11/extinction-rebellion-could-sue-police-listing-extremist-ideology [Accessed 19 February 2021].
Edmeades, A., 2016. Preventing Education? Human Rights and UK Counter-terrorism policy in schools [online]. London: Rights Watch (UK). Available from: https://www.rightsandsecurity.org/assets/downloads/preventing-education-final-to-print-3.compressed-1_.pdf [Accessed 19 February 2021].
Y (A Minor: Wardship) [2015] EWHC 2098 (Fam). Family Law Week [online]. Available from: https://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed145919 [Accessed 19 February 2021].
Gearty, C., 2000. Terror. London: Routledge.
Geertz, C., 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic books.
Grierson, J., 2019. My son was terrified: how Prevent alienates UK Muslims. The Guardian [online], 27 January. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/jan/27/prevent-muslim-community-discrimination [Accessed 19 February 2021].
Grierson, J., and Sabbagh, D., 2020. Largest number of Prevent referrals related to far-right extremism. The Guardian [online], 26 November. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/nov/26/just-one-in-10-prevent-referrals-found-at-risk-of-radicalisation [Accessed 19 February 2021].
Grierson, J., Dodd, V., and Walker, P., 2020. Putting Extinction Rebellion on extremist list “completely wrong”, says Keir Starmer. The Guardian, [online], 13 January. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/jan/13/priti-patel-defends-inclusion-of-extinction-rebellion-on-terror-list [Accessed 19 February 2021].
Halliday, J., 2016. Almost 4,000 people referred to UK deradicalisation scheme last year. The Guardian [online], 20 March. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/mar/20/almost-4000-people-were-referred-to-uk-deradicalisation-scheme-channel-last-year [Accessed 19 February 2021].
Heath-Kelly, C., 2017. The geography of pre-criminal space: epidemiological imaginations of radicalisation risk in the UK Prevent Strategy, 2007–2017. Critical Studies on Terrorism [online], 10(2), 297-319. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2017.1327141 [Accessed 19 February 2021].
Hebberecht, P., and Baillergeau, E., eds., 2012. Social Crime Prevention in Late Modern Europe: A Comparative Perspective. Brussels: VUB Press.
HM Government, 2008. The Prevent Strategy: A Guide for Local Partners in England. Stopping people becoming or supporting terrorists and violent extremists. London: HMSO.
HM Government, 2011. CONTEST: The United Kingdom’s Strategy for Countering Terrorism (Cm 8123) [online]. London: HMSO. Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/97995/strategy-contest.pdf [Accessed 19 February 2021].
Home Office, 2011. Prevent Strategy (Cm 8092) [online]. London: HMSO. Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/97976/prevent-strategy-review.pdf [Accessed 2 April 2018].
Home Office, 2015a. Channel Duty Guidance [online]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/channel-guidance [Accessed 17 June 2018].
Home Office, 2015b. Prevent Duty Guidance [online]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/prevent-duty-guidance [Accessed 20 February 2021].
Home Office, 2018. Individuals Referred to and Supported through the Prevent Programme Statistics, April 2016 to March 2017 [online]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/individuals-referred-to-and-supported-through-the-prevent-programme-statistics [Accessed 17 June 2018].
Hussain, A., et al., 2020. Talking Our Way Out of Conflict: Critical reflections on mediated dialogue as a tool for secondary level CVE [online]. University of Manchester. Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/834431/Ajmal_Hussain_Hilary_Pilkington_-_Talking_Our_Way_Out_of_Conflict_Post_Publication_Revision.pdf [Accessed 19 February 2021].
James, A., 2018. I’m a doctor, not a counter-terrorism operative: let me do my job. The Guardian [online], 21 March. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/mar/21/doctor-counter-terrorism-mental-health-patients-radicalisation-prevent [Accessed 19 February 2021].
Khaleeli, H., 2015. You worry they could take your kids: Is the Prevent strategy demonising Muslim schoolchildren? The Guardian [online], 23 September. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/sep/23/prevent-counter-terrorism-strategy-schools-demonising-muslim-children [Accessed 19 February 2021].
Lindekilde, L., 2013. Assessing the Impact of Counter-Radicalisation Prevention Policies on End Target Groups: The Case of Denmark. European Journal of Criminal Policy and Research [online], 18(4), 385-402. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-012-9178-y [Accessed 19 February 2021].
Massoumi, N., et al., 2019a. On the Frontline: is there any alternative to the Prevent counter terrorism policy? Discover Society [online], 4 September. Available from: https://discoversociety.org/2019/09/04/on-the-frontline-is-there-any-alternative-to-the-prevent-counter-terrorism-policy/ [Accessed 19 February 2021].
Massoumi, N., et al., 2019b. Secrecy, coercion and deception in research on “terrorism” and “extremism”. Contemporary Social Science [online], 15(2). Available from:https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2019.1616107 [Accessed 19 February 2021].
Modood, T., and Meer, N., 2019. The Racialisation of Muslims. In: I. Zempi and I. Awan, eds., The Routledge International Handbook of Islamophobia. London: Routledge.
Mythen, G., 2020. Against the Odds? Unravelling the Paradoxes of Risk Prevention in Counter Radicalisation Strategy. In: J. Pratt and J. Thompson, eds., Criminal Justice, Risk and the Revolt Against Uncertainty. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp 167–189.
Mythen, G., and Walklate, S., 2016. Counter-terrorism and the Reconstruction of (in)security: Divisions, Dualisms, Duplicities. British Journal of Criminology [online], 56(6), 1107–1124. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azw030 [Accessed 19 February 2021].
Mythen, G., et al., 2020. Disputing Security and Risk: The Convoluted Politics of Uncertainty. In: I. Scoones and A. Stirling, eds., The Politics of Uncertainty. London: Routledge.
Mythen, G., Walklate, S., and Khan, F., 2013. Why Should We Have to Prove we’re Alright? Counter-Terrorism, Risk and Partial Securities. Sociology [online], 47(2), 382–397. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038512444811 [Accessed 19 February 2021].
Mythen, G., Walklate, S., and Peatfield, E., 2017. Assembling and Deconstructing Radicalisation: A Critique of the Logic of Drivers. Critical Social Policy [online], 37(2), 180–201. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018316683463 [Accessed 19 February 2021].
O’Toole, T., 2015. Prevent: from hearts and minds to muscular liberalism. Public Spirit [online]. November. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/291997579_Prevent_from_%27hearts_and_minds%27_to_%27muscular_liberalism%27 [Accessed 11 March 2019].
Parker, D., et al., 2017. Challenges for effective counter-terrorism communication. Practitioner insights and policy implications for preventing radicalisation, disrupting attack planning and mitigating terrorist attacks. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism [online], 42(3), 264-291. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2017.1373427 [Accessed 19 February 2021].
Pilkington, H., and Acik, N., 2020. Not Entitled to Talk: (Mis)recognition, Inequality and Social Activism of Young Muslims. Sociology [online], 54(1), 181–198. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038519867630 [Accessed 19 February 2021].
Quinn, B., 2016. Nursery “raised fears of radicalisation over boy’s cucumber drawing”. The Guardian [online], 11 March. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/mar/11/nursery-radicalisation-fears-boys-cucumber-drawing-cooker-bomb [Accessed 19 February 2021].
Qurashi, F., 2018. The Prevent strategy and the UK “war on terror”: Embedding infrastructures of surveillance in Muslim communities. Palgrave Communications [online], 4, 17. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-017-0061-9 [Accessed 11 March 2019].
Qureshi, A., 2017. Our Criticism of Prevent is Based on Facts, not Myths. Al Jazeera [online], 4 July. Available from: https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2017/07/criticism-prevent-based-facts-myths-170703072558455.html [Accessed 8 April 2018].
Ratcliffe, P., 2012. Community cohesion: Reflections on a flawed paradigm. Critical Social Policy [online], 32(2), 262–281. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018311430455 [Accessed 19 February 2021].
Renard, T., and Coolsaet, R., 2018. From the Kingdom to the Caliphate and Back: Returnees in Belgium. In: T. Renard and R. Coolsaet, eds., Returnees: Who are they, why are they (not) coming back and how should we deal with them? Assessing Policies on Returning Foreign Terrorist Fighters in Belgium, Germany and the Netherlands. Egmont Paper 101 [online], 19–38. Available from: http://aei.pitt.edu/94367/1/egmont.papers.101_online_v1%2D3.pdf [Accessed 19 February 2021].
Robinson, G., 2016. The Rise of the Risk Paradigm in Criminal Justice. In: C. Trotter, G. McIvor and F. McNeill, eds., Beyond the Risk Paradigm in Criminal Justice. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 9–21.
Spence, S., 2020. Right-wing extremism: The new wave of global terrorism. The Conversation [online], 22 October. Available from: https://theconversation.com/right-wing-extremism-the-new-wave-of-global-terrorism-147975 [Accessed 19 February 2021].
Stein, J., and Townsend, M., 2021. Muslim boy, 4, was referred to Prevent over game of Fortnite. The Guardian [online], 31 January. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/jan/31/muslim-boy-4-was-referred-to-prevent-over-game-of-fortnite [Accessed 19 February 2021].
Thomas, P., 2017. Changing Experiences of Responsibilisation and Contestation within Counter-Terrorism Policies: the British Prevent Experience. Policy and Politics [online], 45(3), 305–321. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1332/030557317X14943145195580 [Accessed 19 February 2021].
Travis, A., 2011. Schools’ counter terrorism project reviewed. The Guardian [online], 11 February. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2011/feb/18/schools-counter-terrorism-project-review [Accessed 19 February 2021].
Travis, A., 2017. Only 5% of people referred to Prevent extremism scheme get specialist help. The Guardian [online], 9 November. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/nov/09/only-5-of-people-referred-to-prevent-extremism-scheme-get-specialist-help [Accessed 19 February 2021].
Traynor, I., 2015. The Belgian connections to Islamic radicalism. The Guardian [online], 16 January. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jan/16/belgium-connections-extremism-verviers [Accessed 19 February 2021].
Vertigans, S., 2011. The Sociology of Terrorism. London: Routledge.
Walklate, S., and Mythen, G., 2015. Contradictions of Terrorism: Security, Risk and Resilience. London: Routledge.
Webster, S., Kerr, J., and Tompkins, C., 2017. A Process Evaluation of the Structured Risk Guidance for Extremist Offenders [online]. Prepared for Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service. London: HMSO. Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/661787/process-evaluation-srg-extremist-offender-report.pdf [Accessed 19 February 2021].
Wight, C., 2015. Rethinking Terrorism: Terrorism, Violence and the State. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Willis, P., 1977. Learning to Labour: How Working Class Kids Get Working Class Jobs. New York: Columbia University Press.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2021 Gabriel Gray Mythen, Evelyne Baillergeau
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Los autores conservan el copyright de sus trabajos, que se publicarán en OSLS bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento NoComercial SinObraDerivada. Puede consultar más detalles en: http://es.creativecommons.org/licencia/. Si no está de acuerdo con esta licencia, por favor, póngase en contacto con nosotros.
El autor concede los permisos necesarios para difundir la información bibliográfica del artículo, incluyendo el resumen, y autorizar a otros, incluyendo las bases de datos bibliográficas, de índices y servicios de alerta de contenidos, a copiar y comunicar esta información.
Para más información sobre los permisos para distribuir su artículo en cada fase de la producción, por favor, lea nuestra Política de Autoarchivo y Divulgación (en inglés).
Las condiciones de copyright con el nombre de autores y co-autores, y la licencia Creative Commons se mostrarán en el artículo. Estas condiciones se deben aceptar como parte del proceso de envío de un artículo a la revista. Por favor, asegúrese de que todos los co-autores se mencionan correctamente, y que entienden y aceptan estos términos.