The Struggle for Law
Legal strategies, environmental struggles and climate actions in Italy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1153Palabras clave:
movimientos sociales, estrategia jurídica, acción climáticaResumen
El campo del derecho constituye una herramienta tanto ventajosa como restrictiva para las luchas sociales. Los movimientos actuales confían en el derecho y el litigio como instrumentos favorables. Sin embargo, las estrategias jurídicas también se despliegan en contra de quienes protestan. Este artículo se origina en procesos de criminalización y “luchas por el derecho” infructuosas en casos en los que movimientos sociales han abrazado estrategias jurídicas para demostrar la naturaleza de Jano bifronte del derecho. El centro de atención es Italia, y nos basamos en la etnografía jurídica de dos años del movimiento en contra del Tren de Alta Velocidad y en trabajo de campo, así como en análisis documentales de la movilización contra el Gasoducto Trans-Adriático (TAP, en inglés). Por tanto, el análisis se centra en una selección de casos “positiva”, con especial atención a Giudizio Universale, la primera acción en Italia. El objetivo es entender tanto los aspectos en conflicto y los múltiples recursos del derecho a través de casos empíricos y jurisprudencia, a fin de evaluar prácticas de posible éxito para movimientos sociales en vigor.
Descargas
Metrics
Downloads:
PDF (English) 442
Citas
Bailey, S., and Mattei, U., 2013. Social Movements as Constituent Power: The Italian Struggle for the Commons. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies [online], 20(2), 965-1013. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2979/indjglolegstu.20.2.965 [Accessed 24 July 2020].
Barkan, S., 2003. Criminal Prosecution and Trial: A Neglected Dynamic in The Study of Law and Social Movements. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Sociological Association. Atlanta, August.
Barkan, S., 2006. Criminal Prosecution and the Legal Control of Protest. Mobilization: An International Quarterly [online], 11(2), 181–194. Available from: https://doi.org/10.17813/maiq.11.2.a8671t532kww2722 [Accessed 24 July 2020].
Boutcher, S.A., and McCammon, J., 2019. Social Movements and Litigation. In: H. Kriesi et al., eds., The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 306-321.
Burawoy, M., 2017. Social Movements in the Neoliberal Age. In: M. Paret, C. Runciman and L. Sinwell, eds., Southern Resistance in Critical Perspective. New York: Routledge, 21-35.
Calafati, A.G., 2006. Dove sono le ragioni del sì? La TAV in Val di Susa nella società della conoscenza. Turin: SEB.
Chatterjee, P., 2004. The Politics of the Governed. Reflections on Popular Politics in Most of the World. New York: Columbia University Press.
Chiaramonte, X., 2018. Social movements and the legal field: Becoming-Constituent. Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law [online], 22(1), 376-393. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1163/18757413_022001015 [Accessed 24 July 2020].
Chiaramonte, X., 2019a. Governare il conflitto: la criminalizzazione del movimento No TAV. Milan: Meltemi.
Chiaramonte, X., 2019b. The Right to Freedom of Assembly under the Test of Criminal Evidence. An Italian Case of Political Justice. Droit & Philosophie, 11, 169-187.
Chua, L., 2012. Pragmatic Resistance, Law, and Social Movements in Authoritarian States: The Case of Gay Collective Action in Singapore. Law & Society Review [online], 46(4), 713-748. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2012.00515.x [Accessed 24 July 2020].
Coccoli, L., 2012. Vita comune, beni comuni e uso del diritto Politica e Società, 1, 125-130.
Cummings, S., 2017. Law and Social Movements: An Interdisciplinary Analysis. In: C. Roggeband and B. Klandermans, eds., Handbook of Social Movements Across Disciplines, Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. New York: Springer, 233-270.
Cummings, S., and NeJaime, D., 2010. Lawyering for Marriage Equality. UCLA Law Review [online], 57, 1235-1331. Available from: https://www.uclalawreview.org/lawyering-for-marriage-equality/ [Accessed 24 July 2020].
Cummings, S., and Eagly, I., 2001. A Critical Reflection on Law and Organizing. UCLA Law Review [online], 48, 443-517. Available from: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/473524bg [Accessed 24 July 2020].
Davenport, C., Johnston, H., and Mueller, C., eds., 2005. Repression and Mobilization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Della Porta, D., and Diani, M., 2006. Social Movements. An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
Della Porta, D., and Reiter, H., 2003. Polizia e protesta: L’ordine pubblico dalla Liberazione ai “no global”. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Fernandez, L.A., 2008. Policing Dissent: Social Control and the Anti-Globalization Movement. Newark: Rutgers University Press.
Fiorentino, D., and Chiaramonte, X., 2019. Il caso 7 aprile: Il processo politico dall’Autonomia Operaia ai No TAV. Milan: Mimesis.
Foucault, M., 1982. The Subject and Power. Critical Inquiry [online], 8(4) 777-795. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1086/448181 [Accessed 24 July 2020].
Foucault, M., 1991. Governmentality. In: G. Burchell, C. Gordon and P. Miller, eds., The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. University of Chicago Press.
Franco Angeli, ed., 1987. I Nuovi Movimenti Sociali. Milan: Franco Angeli.
Friedman, L.M., 1975. The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Galanter, M., 1974. Why the “Haves” Come out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change. Law & Society Review [online], 9(1), 95-160. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2307/3053023 [Accessed 24 July 2020].
Ganguly, G., Setzer, J., and Heyvaert, V., 2018. If at First You Don’t Succeed: Suing Corporations for Climate Change. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies [online], 38(4), 841–868. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqy029 [Accessed 24 July 2020].
Haraway, D., 1988. Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies [online], 14(3), 575-599. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066 [Accessed 24 July 2020].
Hilbink, T., 2006. The Profession, the Grassroots and the Elite: Cause Lawyering for Civil Rights and Freedom in the Direct Action Era. In: A. Sarat and S.A. Scheingold, eds., Cause Lawyers and Social Movements. Stanford University Press, 60-83.
Hilson, C., 2002. New Social Movements: The Role of Legal Opportunity. Journal of European Public Policy [online], 9(1), 238-255. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760110120246 [Accessed 24 July 2020].
Jhering, R v. ,1915. The Struggle for Law. Trans.: J.L. Lalor. Chicago: Callaghan and Company.
Kitschelt, H., 1986. Political Opportunity Structures and Political Protests: Anti‐Nuclear Movements in Four Democracies. British Journal of Political Science [online], 16(1), 57-85. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/S000712340000380X [Accessed 24 July 2020].
Machado Aráoz, H., 2014. Potosí, el origen: Genealogía de la minería contemporánea. Buenos Aires: Mardulce.
McAdam, D., 1982. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930-1970. University of Chicago Press.
McCann, M., 2006. Law and Social Movements: Contemporary Perspectives Annual Review of Law and Social Science [online], 2, 17-38. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.2.081805.105917 [Accessed 24 July 2020].
Mezzadra, S., and Neilson, B., 2017. On the multiple frontiers of extraction: excavating contemporary capitalism. Cultural Studies [online], 31(2-3), 185-204. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2017.1303425 [Accessed 24 July 2020].
NeJaime, D., 2013. Constitutional Change, Courts, and Social Movements. Michigan Law Review, 111(6), 877-902.
Norris, J., 2016. Entrapment and Terrorism on the Left: an analysis of post-9/11 cases New Criminal Law Review [online], 19(2), 236-278. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1525/nclr.2016.19.2.236 [Accessed 24 July 2020].
Peel, J., and Lin, J., 2019. Transnational Climate Litigation: The Contribution of the Global South American Journal of International Law [online], 113(4), 679-726. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2019.48 [Accessed 24 July 2020].
Pellow, D., 2017. Environmental justice movements and political opportunity structures. In: B. Holifield, J. Chakraborty and G. Walker, eds., The Routledge Handbook of Environmental Justice. New York: Routledge.
Peñalver, E.M., and Katyal, S., 2010. Property Outlaws: How Squatters, Pirates, and Protesters Improve the Law of Ownership. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Polanyi, K., 1944. The Great Transformation. New York: Farrar & Rinehart.
Rajagopal, B., 2005. Limits of law in counter-hegemonic globalization: the Indian Supreme Court and the Narmada Valley struggle. In: C.A. Rodríguez-Garavito and B.d.S. Santos, eds., Law and Globalization from Below: Towards a Cosmopolitan Legality. Cambridge University Press.
Richardson, B.J., et al., eds., 2009. Climate Law and Developing Countries: Legal and Policy Challenges for the World Economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Rose, N., O’Malley, P., and Valverde, M., 2006. Governmentality. Annual Review of Law and Social Science [online], 2, 83-104. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.2.081805.105900 [Accessed 24 July 2020].
Setzer, J., and Byrnes, R., 2019.Global trends in climate change litigation: 2019 snapshot [online]. Policy report. London: Grantham Research Institute. Available from: https://www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/publication/global-trends-in-climate-change-litigation-2019-snapshot/ [Accessed 3 April 2020].
Shklar, J.N., 1964. Legalism. Law, Morals, and Political Trials. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sighele, S., 2018. The Criminal Crowd and Other Writings on Mass Society. University of Toronto Press. (Originally published in 1891).
Smith, R., 2008. “Ecoterrorism”? A critical analysis of the vilification of radical environmental activists as terrorists. Environmental Law, 38, 537-576.
Son, B.N., 2018. Constitutional Mobilization. Washington University Global Studies Law Review [online], 17(1), 113-179. Available from: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_globalstudies/vol17/iss1/7/ [Accessed 24 July 2020].
Tarabini, S., 2019 Gasdotto TAP in Italia. NO TAP né qui né altrove/2. Perunaltracittà [online], 17 June. Blog post/Transcription. Available from: https://www.perunaltracitta.org/2019/06/17/gasdotto-tap-in-italia-no-tap-ne-qui-ne-altrove-2/ [Accessed 3 April 2020].
Terwindt, C., 2013. Protesters as terrorists? An ethnographic analysis of the political process behind the broadened scope of anti-terrorism legislation. Crime, Law and Social Change [online], 62, 207-234. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-013-9470-x [Accessed 24 July 2020].
Terwindt, C., 2014. Criminalization of social protest: “Future research”. Oñati Socio-Legal Series [online], 4(1), 161-169. Available from: http://opo.iisj.net/index.php/osls/article/view/350/362 [Accessed 24 July 2020].
Terwindt, C., 2019. When Protest Becomes Crime: Politics and Law in Liberal Democracies. London: Pluto Press.
Triolo, L., 2004. Il legalismo giuridico. Riflessioni in margine ad una teoria critica della legalità. Diritto e questioni pubbliche, 4, 153-199.
Zibechi, R., 2016. La nuova corsa all’oro: Società estrattiviste e rapina. Rome: Museodei by Hermatena.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2020 Xenia Chiaramonte
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Los autores conservan el copyright de sus trabajos, que se publicarán en OSLS bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento NoComercial SinObraDerivada. Puede consultar más detalles en: http://es.creativecommons.org/licencia/. Si no está de acuerdo con esta licencia, por favor, póngase en contacto con nosotros.
El autor concede los permisos necesarios para difundir la información bibliográfica del artículo, incluyendo el resumen, y autorizar a otros, incluyendo las bases de datos bibliográficas, de índices y servicios de alerta de contenidos, a copiar y comunicar esta información.
Para más información sobre los permisos para distribuir su artículo en cada fase de la producción, por favor, lea nuestra Política de Autoarchivo y Divulgación (en inglés).
Las condiciones de copyright con el nombre de autores y co-autores, y la licencia Creative Commons se mostrarán en el artículo. Estas condiciones se deben aceptar como parte del proceso de envío de un artículo a la revista. Por favor, asegúrese de que todos los co-autores se mencionan correctamente, y que entienden y aceptan estos términos.
