A new model for scientific publications

A Managing Editor’s view

Autores/as

  • Leire Kortabarria IISL / IISJ

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1112

Palabras clave:

acceso abierto, Oñati Socio-Legal Series, revistas científicas, IISJ

Resumen

En este artículo, primeramente dibujaremos el contexto en el que se creó Oñati Socio-Legal Series. A continuación, nos proponemos ofrecer una visión general de lo que constituye el acceso abierto y de sus implicaciones para académicos y editoriales, y las diferencias, a veces enormes, entre ambas perspectivas. Después, describiremos brevemente las implicaciones del escenario dominante en la publicación de revistas científicas, poniendo el acento en las implicaciones comerciales y económicas. Estrecharemos luego el ámbito y nos centraremos en el caso de Oñati Socio-Legal Series. Sirviéndonos del ejemplo de esa revista, argumentaremos por qué es posible expandir un modelo 100% de acceso abierto, sin imposición de cobros a los autores, y por qué un modelo así es necesario para la comunidad científica.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

        Metrics

Views 196
Downloads:
PDF (English) 181


Citas

Boucherie, S., 2018. “Predatory” vs trustworthy journals: What do they mean for the integrity of science? Elsevier [online], 15 August. Available from: https://www.elsevier.com/connect/predatory-vs-trustworthy-journals-what-do-they-mean-for-the-integrity-of-science

Budapest Open Access Initiative [online]. Available from: https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read

Buranyi, S., 2017. Is the staggeringly profitable business of scientific publishing bad for science? The Guardian [online], 27 June. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/jun/27/profitable-business-scientific-publishing-bad-for-science

Burtle, L., 2019. Open Access: Types of OA. Georgia State University Research Guides [online]. Available from: https://research.library.gsu.edu/c.php?g=115588&p=754380

Díez, E., 2017. El indignante nuevo sistema de acreditación para el profesorado universitario. [Blog post]. El diario de la educación [online], 22 November. Available from: https://eldiariodelaeducacion.com/blog/2017/11/22/el-indignante-nuevo-sistema-de-acreditacion-para-el-profesorado-universitario/

DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals), 2019. Myth-busting: All open access journals can be listed in DOAJ. DOAJ News Service [online], 17 September. Available from: https://blog.doaj.org/2019/09/17/myth-busting-all-open-access-journals-can-be-listed-in-doaj/

Evans, I., 2019. Pressures in system cause researcher concerns over quality, per new peer review survey. Elsevier [online], 16 September. Available from: https://www.elsevier.com/connect/pressures-in-system-cause-researcher-concerns-over-quality-per-new-peer-review-survey?sf221581182=1

Gershman, S., 2014. The Exploitative Economics of Academic Publishing. Footnote.co [online], 18 March. Available from: http://footnote.co/the-exploitative-economics-of-academic-publishing/

Gobierno Vasco, n.d. Fundación Instituto Internacional de Sociología Jurídica de Oñati. Registro de fundación [online]. Available from: http://www.euskadi.eus/gobierno-vasco/-/fundacion/fundacion-instituto-internacional-de-sociologia-juridica-de-onati/

Harington, R., 2017. Diamond Open Access, Societies and Mission. The Scholarly Kitchen [online], 1 June. Available from: https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2017/06/01/diamond-open-access-societies-mission/

Krisch, J.A., 2015. These Five Corporations Control Academic Publishing. Vocativ [online], 10 June. Available from: https://www.vocativ.com/culture/science/five-corporations-control-academic-publishing/

Larivière, V., Haustein, S., and Mongeon, P., 2015. The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era. PLoS ONE [online], 10(6). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127502

Lee, I., 2014. Publish or perish: The myth and reality of academic publishing. Language Teaching [online], 47(2). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000504

Mainwaring, D., 2016. Open access and UK social and political science publishing. European Political Science [online], 15(2). Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/eps.2015.83

May, C., 2019. Academic publishing and open access: Costs, benefits and options for publishing research. Politics [online], 1-16. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395719858571

Mietchen, D., 2015. What is the difference between “Green” and “Gold” Open Access? [Answer #1]. Stackexchange.com [online], 16 August. Available from: https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/51997

National Research Council (US) Committee on Responsibilities of Authorship in the Biological Sciences, 2003. Sharing Publication-Related Data and Materials: Responsibilities of Authorship in the Life Sciences [online]. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US). Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK97158/ doi: 10.17226/10613

Open Access Academy, n.d. Types of Open Access. Open Access Academy [online]. Available from: http://www.oaacademy.org/types-of-open-access.html

Price, D., 2018. Academic Publishing is An Exploitative Farce. Medium [online], 28 May. Available from: https://medium.com/@devonprice/academic-publishing-is-an-exploitative-farce-b367ceadd3c5

Sakellaropoulou, R., 2019. International Open Access Week: How open access engaged a global community about using material science to tackle climate change. The Source [online], 21 October. Available from: https://www.springernature.com/gp/researchers/the-source/blog/blogposts-open-research/open-access-publishing-australia/17274126

San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment [online]. Available from: https://sfdora.org/read/

Scribendi, n.d. Publish or Perish: How to Survive in Academia [online]. Blog post. Available from: https://www.scribendi.com/advice/publish_or_perish.en.html

Springer Nature, 2019. Open access journals. The world's most significant open access portfolio [online]. Available from: https://www.springernature.com/gp/open-research/journals-books/journals

Subarroca, M., 2019. «Existe un problema con las revistas científicas a las que se paga dos veces: por leerlas y por publicar en ellas en acceso abierto». Universitat Oberta de Catalunya. News [online], 18 October. Available from: https://www.uoc.edu/portal/es/news/entrevistes/2019/039-alex-lopez.html

Suber, P., n.d. Open Access Overview [online]. Available from: http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm

Tennant, J., 2015. What is the difference between “Green” and “Gold” Open Access? [Answer #3]. Stackexchange.com [online], 17 August. Available from: https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/51999

The Cost of Knowledge [online]. Manifesto. Available from: http://thecostofknowledge.com/

The Guardian, 2019. The Guardian view on academic publishing: disastrous capitalism. Editorial. The Guardian [online], 4 March. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/mar/04/the-guardian-view-on-academic-publishing-disastrous-capitalism

Descargas

Publicado

2024-05-28

Cómo citar

Kortabarria, L. (2024) «A new model for scientific publications: A Managing Editor’s view», Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 10(1), pp. 220–245. doi: 10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1112.