The Srebrenica exhibition
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1110Palabras clave:
Srebrenica, genocidio, exposición, verdad, justicia restaurativaResumen
En febrero de 2017, se inauguró en Srebrenica (Bosnia-Herzegovina) una exposición que narraba la historia de la Guerra de Bosnia (1992-1995) y el genocidio de Srebrenica (1995). En este artículo, describimos cómo se diseñó la exposición, y reflexionamos sobre el impacto de la exposición en los procesos de justicia restaurativa y reconstrucción social. La pregunta que nos guía es: ¿Consigue la exposición construir un sentido compartido de verdad sobre el genocidio de Srebrenica? Esta pregunta evaluativa exige indagar en el concepto de verdad y, más específicamente, en el debate sobre pluralidad de verdades y multiplicidad de narrativas.
Descargas
Metrics
Downloads:
PDF (English) 647
Citas
Alphen, E.v., 1997. Caught by History: Holocaust Effects in Contemporary Art, Literature, and Theory. Redwood City: Stanford University Press.
Attila Hoare, M., 2010. Bosnia-Hercegovina and International Justice. East European Politics and Societies [online], 24(2), 191-205. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325409356462 [Accessed 3 October 2018].
Bellamy, D., (with Reuters), 2018. Serbian peace group marks Srebrenica anniversary in Belgrade. Euronews [online], 11 July. Available from: https://www.euronews.com/2018/07/11/serbian-peace-group-marks-srebrenica-anniversary-in-belgrade [Accessed 3 October 2018].
Bergholz, M., 2018. Violence as a Generative Force: Identity, Nationalism, and Memory in a Balkan Community [online]. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Available from: https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501705885 [Accessed 3 October 2018].
Blom, J.C.H., and Romijn, P., 2002. Srebrenica, een “veilig” gebied: Reconstructie, achtergronden, gevolgen en analyses van de val van een Safe Area. Amsterdam: Boom.
Brosius, C., 2007. The unwanted offering: Ubiquity and success of failure in a ritual of the Hindu right [online]. In: U. Husken, ed., When Rituals Go Wrong: Mistakes, Failure, and the Dynamics of Ritual. Leiden/Boston: Brill, 296-324. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004158115.i-377.103 [Accessed 3 October 2018].
Cornelisse, E., 2006. Verdeeld verleden: De constructie van sociale herinneringen van Bosnische Moslims en Bosnische Serviers in naoorlogs Srebrenica. M.A. Thesis. University of Amsterdam.
Denich, B., 1994. Dismembering Yugoslavia: nationalist ideologies and the symbolic revival of genocide. American Ethnologist [online], 21(2), 367-390. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1994.21.2.02a00080 [Accessed 3 October 2018].
Faber, M.J., 2002. Srebrenica: De genocide die niet werd voorkomen. Utrecht: IKV.
Gallagher, T., 2003. The Balkans after the Cold War: From Tyranny to Tragedy [online]. London: Routledge. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203398180 [Accessed 3 October 2018].
Grebo, L., 2018. Bosniak Ex-Fighters Convicted over 1992 Srebrenica Murders. BalkanInsight [online], 14 September. Available from: https://balkaninsight.com/2018/09/14/bosniak-ex-fighters-convicted-over-1992-srebrenica-murders-09-14-2018/ [Accessed 29 November 2018].
Heynders, O., 2014. Speaking the Self, Narratives on Srebrenica. European Journal of Life Writing [online], vol. 3, 1-22. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5463/ejlw.3.43 [Accessed 3 October 2018].
Hoondert, M., 2018. Srebrenica. Conflict and ritual complexities. In: M. Hoondert, P. Mutsaers, and W. Arfman, eds., Cultural Practices of Victimhood [online]. London/New York: Routledge, 19-38. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315148335 [Accessed 3 October 2018].
Humphrey, M., 2012. Victims, civil society and transitional justice in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Temida [online], 15(1), 59-75. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2298/TEM1201059H [Accessed 3 October 2018].
International Committee of the Red Cross, 1997. Missing Persons on the Territory of Bosnia and Herzegovina. 3rd ed. Geneva: ICRC.
International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, 2008. Appeals Chamber Acquits Naser Orić [online]. Press release. The Hague: ICTY, 3 July. Available from: https://www.icty.org/en/press/appeals-chamber-acquits-naser-ori%C4%87 [Accessed 29 November 2018].
Jones, N.A., Parmentier, S., and Weitekamp, E.G.M., 2014. Transitional Justice in Bosnia-Herzegovina: Understanding Accountability, Reparations and Justice for Victims. In: J.A.M. Wemmers, ed., Reparation for Victims of Crimes Against Humanity: The Healing Role of Reparation [online]. London/New York: Routledge, ch. 9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315881867 [Accessed 18 November 2019].
MacDonald, D.B., 2003. Balkan Holocausts? Serbian and Croatian victim centred propaganda and the war in Yugoslavia [online]. Manchester University Press. Available from: https://doi.org/10.7228/manchester/9780719064661.001.0001 [Accessed 3 October 2018].
Meyer, E., 2010. Memory and Politics. In: A. Erll and A. Nunning, eds., A Companion to Cultural Memory Studies. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter, pp. 173-180.
N1 Sarajevo, 2018. Bosnian Serbs commemorate 1992 Zalazje killing. N1 [online], 12 July. Available from: http://rs.n1info.com/English/NEWS/a403566/Local-Serbs-mark-anniversary-of-killing-in-Bosnia.html [Accessed 28 November 2018].
Nettelfield, L.J., and Wagner, S., 2015. Srebrenica in the Aftermath of Genocide. Cambridge University Press.
Nils, C., 2005. Restorative and retributive justice in the context of war and war crimes. Temida, 8(4), 27-32. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2298/TEM0504027N [Accessed 3 October 2018].
Nora, P., 2001. Rethinking France=Les lieux de mémoire. Trans.: M.S. Trouille. University of Chicago Press.
PAX, 2014. Dutch contribution to the second phase of the Potočari Memorial Centre. Project proposal. April. Utrecht: PAX.
PAX, 2017. Dutch Contribution to the second phase of the Potočari Memorial Centre (June 2014-February 2017). Report. Utrecht: PAX.
Perica, V., 2002. Balkan Idols: Religion and Nationalism in Yugoslav States [online]. Oxford University Press. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/0195148568.001.0001 [Accessed 3 October 2018].
Pollack, CE., 2003. Intentions of burial: Mourning, politics, and memorials following the massacre at Srebrenica. Death Studies, 27(2), 125-142.
Reijnders, S., 2013. Places of the Imagination: Media, Tourism, Culture. Farnham: Ashgate.
Remijnse, S., and Baanders, I., 2018. Negotiating Narratives – the Case of Srebrenica [not yet published].
Sachs, A., 2000. The Soft Vengeance of a Freedom Fighter. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Shaheed, F., 2014. Memorialization processes: Report of the Special Rapporteur in the field of cultural rights (A/HRC/25/49) [online]. United Nations General Assembly, Human Rights Council, 25th session. 23 January. Available from: https://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/HRC/RegularSessions/Session25/Documents/A_HRC_25_49_ENG.DOC [Accessed 18 November 2019].
Simic, O., ed., 2017. An Introduction to Transitional Justice [online]. London/New York: Routledge. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315672649 [Accessed 18 November 2019].
Spaic, I., 2017. Srebrenica’s Serb Mayor Repeats Denial of Genocide. BalkanInsight [online], 13 April. Available from: https://balkaninsight.com/2017/04/13/srebrenica-s-serb-mayor-repeats-denial-of-genocide-04-13-2017/ [Accessed 5 October 2018].
Spijkers, O., 2016. Questions of legal responsibility for Srebrenica before the Dutch courts. Journal of International Criminal Justice [online], 14(4), 819-843. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqw043 [Accessed 18 November 2019].
van den Berg, D., 2014. Rekindling a National Debate. How Public and Private Recognition can shift the Dutch Discourse on Srebrenica. In: L. van Liere and K. Spronk, eds., Images of Enmity and Hope: The Transformative Power of Religions in Conflicts. Zurich/Berlin: LIT, 105-144.
Winter, J., 2010. Sites of Memory and the Shadow of War. In: A. Erll and A. Nunning, eds., A Companion to Cultural Memory Studies. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter, 61-74.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2020 Dion van den Berg, Martin J.M. Hoondert
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Los autores conservan el copyright de sus trabajos, que se publicarán en OSLS bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento NoComercial SinObraDerivada. Puede consultar más detalles en: http://es.creativecommons.org/licencia/. Si no está de acuerdo con esta licencia, por favor, póngase en contacto con nosotros.
El autor concede los permisos necesarios para difundir la información bibliográfica del artículo, incluyendo el resumen, y autorizar a otros, incluyendo las bases de datos bibliográficas, de índices y servicios de alerta de contenidos, a copiar y comunicar esta información.
Para más información sobre los permisos para distribuir su artículo en cada fase de la producción, por favor, lea nuestra Política de Autoarchivo y Divulgación (en inglés).
Las condiciones de copyright con el nombre de autores y co-autores, y la licencia Creative Commons se mostrarán en el artículo. Estas condiciones se deben aceptar como parte del proceso de envío de un artículo a la revista. Por favor, asegúrese de que todos los co-autores se mencionan correctamente, y que entienden y aceptan estos términos.
