The formation of the modern legal subject and the development of citizenship in Iran between two revolutions (1906-1979)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1027Palabras clave:
ciudadanía, subjetividad, revolución, legalidad, derecho civil, derecho penal, constitucional, IránResumen
Este artículo examina la formación del sujeto jurídico moderno en el Irán posconstitucional y en la era de los Pahlaví (1906-1979) y su relación con la ciudadanía. En primer lugar, analiza, en un nivel abstracto, la relación entre derecho, formación de sujeto y ciudadanía; después, se fija en los aspectos históricos y comparativos de la persona en las tradiciones jurídicas occidental e islámica. Esto configura el panorama para el análisis de las reformas jurídicas impulsadas por la Revolución Constitucional de 1906, con especial atención en los códigos civil y penal que fueron promulgados durante el reinado de Reza Pahlaví, y las complejas y conflictivas nociones de subjetividad y ciudadanía que aquéllos alimentaron. El artículo concluye con algunas observaciones sobre la relación entre derecho, subjetividad y ciudadanía entre las dos revoluciones y más allá.
Descargas
Metrics
Downloads:
PDF (English) 501
Citas
Afary, J., 1996. The Iranian Constitutional Revolution: Grassroots Democracy, Social Democracy, and the Origins of Feminism. New York: Columbia University Press.
Agamben, G., 1998. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Trans.: D. Heller-Roazen. Redwood City: Stanford University Press.
Ahmed, S., 2016. What is Islam? The Importance of Being Islamic. Princeton University Press.
Arjomand, S.A., 1989. The Turban for the Crown: The Islamic Revolution in Iran. Oxford University Press.
Asad, T., 2003. Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity. Redwood City: Stanford University Press.
Baldwin, G.B., 1973. The Legal System of Iran. International Lawyer, 7/2, pp. 492-504.
Balibar, E., 2017. Citizen-Subject: Foundations for Political Anthropology. Trans.: S. Miller. New York: Fordham University Press.
Banakar, R., and Ziaee, K., 2018. The Life of the Law in the Islamic Republic. Iranian Studies [online], first published 26 June. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00210862.2018.1467266 [Accessed 8 April 2019].
Bellamy, R., 2008. Citizenship: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Brown, W., 2015. Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution. New York: Zone Books.
Butler, W.J., and Levasseur, G., 1976. Human Rights and the Legal System in Iran [online]. Report. Geneva: International Commission of Jurists. Available from: https://www.icj.org/wp-content/uploads/1976/01/Iran-human-righst-and-the-legal-system-thematic-report-1976-eng.pdf [Accessed 8 April 2019].
Coleman, J.L., and Leiter, B., 1993. Determinacy, Objectivity, and Authority. University of Pennsylvania Law Review [online], 142(2), pp. 549–637. Available from: https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/penn_law_review/vol142/iss2/8 [Accessed 8 April 2019].
Cooper, F., 2018. Citizenship, Inequality and Difference: Historical Perspectives. Princeton University Press.
Cronin, S., 2007. Resisting the New State: The Rural Poor, Land and Modernity in Iran, 1921–1941. In: S. Cronin, ed., Subalterns and Protest: History from Below in the Middle East and North Africa. London: Routledge, pp. 141–171.
De Lagasnerie, G., 2018. Judge and Punish: The Penal State on Trial. Redwood City: Stanford University Press.
Dupret, B., 2004. The Person and the Law: Contingency, Individuation and the Subject of the Law. In: B. Dupret, ed., Standing Trial: Law and the Person in the Modern Middle East. London: I.B. Tauris, pp. 9-39.
Enayat, H., 2013. Law, State and Society in Modern Iran: Constitutionalism, Autocracy and Legal Reform 1906–1941. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Fine, B., 2002. Democracy and the Rule of Law: Marx’s Critique of the Legal Form. Caldwell: The Blackburn Press.
Floor, W., 1983. Changes and Developments in the Judicial System of Qajar Persia (1800–1925). In: C.E. Bosworth and C. Hillenbrand, eds., Qajar Iran. Political, Social and Cultural Change 1800–1925. Edinburgh University Press, pp. 113–147.
Foucault, M. (with C. Gordon, ed.), 1980. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–77. Trans.: C. Gordon et al. New York: Pantheon Books.
Foucault, M., 2008. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France. Trans.: G. Burchell. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Friedman, L., 1990. The Republic of Choice: Law, Authority and Culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Gaakeer, J., 2016. Sua cuique persona? A Note on the Fiction of Legal Personhood and a Reflection on Interdisciplinary Consequences. Law and Literature [online], 28(3), pp. 287–317. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/1535685X.2016.1232920 [Accessed 8 April 2019].
Garland, D., 1990. Punishment and Modern Society: A Study in Social Theory. Oxford University Press.
Gheissari, A., 1998. Iranian Intellectuals in the Twentieth Century. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Gheissari, A., 2016. Iran’s Dialectic of the Enlightenment: Constitutional Experience, Transregional Connections and Conflicting Narratives of Modernity. In: A.M. Ansari, ed., Iran’s Constitutional Revolution of 1906: Narratives of the Enlightenment. London: Gingko Library.
Golder, B., and Fitzpatrick, P., 2009. Foucault’s Law. London: Routledge.
Greenawalt, H., 1990. How Law Can be Determinate. UCLA Law Review, 38, pp. 1–86.
Harris, K., 2017. A Social Revolution: Politics and the Welfare State in Iran. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Herzog, T., 2018. A Short History of European Law: The Last Two and a Half Millenia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hirschl, R., 2004. Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Holmes, S., 1993. The Anatomy of Illiberalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Holmes, S., 1995. Passions and Constraint: On the Theory of Liberal Democracy. Chicago University Press.
Isin, E., 2017. Citizenship Studies and the Middle East. In: R. Meijer and N. Butenschøn, eds., The Crisis of Citizenship in the Arab World. Leiden/Boston: Brill, pp. 511-534.
Katouzian, H., 2003. Iranian Politics and History: The Dialectic of State and Society. London: Routledge.
Kennedy, D., 1973. Legal Formality. The Journal of Legal Studies, 2(2), pp. 351–397.
Khachaturian, R., 2017. Poulantzas and the Juridicial Constitution of the Subject. Verso Blog [online], 7 November. Available from: https://www.versobooks.com/blogs/3473-poulantzas-and-the-juridical-constitution-of-the-subject [Accessed 8 April 2019].
Kia, M., 2015. Moral Refinement and Manhood in Persian [online]. In: M. Pernau et al., Civilising Emotions: Concepts in Nineteenth Century Asia and Europe. Oxford University Press, pp. 146–149. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198745532.003.0008 [Accessed 8 April 2019].
Kress, K., 1989. Legal Indeterminacy. California Law Review [online], 77(2), pp. 283–337. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2307/3480606 [Accessed 8 April 2019].
Künkler, M., 2017. Rule of Law or Rule by Law? Iran’s Bar Association as a pawn in Islamic-republican contestations. In: S. Tellenbach and T. Hanstein, eds., Beiträge zum Islamischen Recht XII. Reihe: Leipziger Beiträge zur Orientforschung, pp. 133–153.
Lee, C.K., 2007. Against the Law: Labour Protests in China’s Rustbelt and Sunbelt. Berkeley: California University Press.
Madani, S., 2006. The Evolution of Prisoners Rights: From the Constitutional Revolution to the Present Day. Etemad-e Melli, 7 November.
Madsen, M., and Dezalay, Y., 2002. The Power of the Legal Field. In: R. Banakar and M. Travers, eds., Law and Social Theory. Oxford: Hart, pp. 189–204.
Mann, M., 1986. The Autonomous Power of the State: Its Origins, Mechanisms and Results. In: J.A. Hall, ed., States in History. London: Blackwell, pp. 109-136.
Martin, V., 2005. The Qajar Pact: Bargaining, Protest and State in Nineteenth-Century Persia. London: I.B. Tauris.
Matine-Daftary, A., 1930. La Suppression des Capitulations en Perse. Paris: PUF.
Mir-Hosseini, Z., 2008. A Women’s Right to Terminate the Marriage Contract: The Case of Iran. In: A. Quraishi and F. Vogel, eds., The Islamic Marriage Contract: Case Studies in Islamic Family Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Moustafa, T., 2008. Law and Resistance in Authoritarian States: The Judicialization of Politics in Egypt. In: T. Ginsburg and T. Moustafa, eds., Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 132-156.
Mundy, M., and Smith, R.S., 2007. Governing Property, Making the Modern State: Law, Administration and Production in Ottoman Syria. London: I.B. Tauris.
Nachi, M., 2004. The Articulation of “I”, “We” and “The Person”: Elements for an Anthropological Approach within Western and Islamic Contexts. In: B. Dupret, ed., Standing Trial: Law and the Person in the Modern Middle East. London: I.B. Tauris, pp. 39–66.
Najmabadi, A., 1987. Land Reform and Social Change in Iran. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
Najmabadi, A., 1998. The Story of the Daughters of Quchan: Gender and National Memory in Iranian History. Ney York: Syracuse University Press.
Nayyeri, M., 2012. Iranian Bar Associations: Struggle for Independence. Iran Human Rights Documentation Centre [online], 27 November. Available from: https://iranhrdc.org/iranian-bar-associations-struggle-for-independence/ [Accessed 8 April 2019].
Poggi, G., 1978. The Development of the Modern State: A Sociological Introduction. Redwood City: Stanford University Press.
Power, R.W., 1975. Some Comments on Law Related Problems in Iran. Saint Louis University Law Journal, 19, pp. 277–292.
Randjbar-Daemi, S., 2016. Late Pahlavi Narratives on the Constitutional Revolution. In: A.M. Ansari, ed., Iran’s Constitutional Revolution of 1906: Narratives of the Enlightenment. London: Gingko Library
Rorty, A.O., ed., 1976. The Identities of Persons. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Rundle, K., 2012. Forms Liberate: Reclaiming the Jurisprudence of Lon Fuller. Oxford: Hart.
Ruthven, M., 2000. Islam: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Saffari, S., 2017. Beyond Shariati: Modernity, Cosmopolitanism and Islam in Iranian Political Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sait, S., and Lim, H., 2006. Land, Law and Islam. London: Zed Books.
Shapiro, M., 2008. Courts in Authoritarian Regimes. In: T. Ginsburg and T. Moustafa, eds., Rule by Law: Courts in Authoritarian Regimes. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 326–336.
Sharabi, H., 1988. Neopatriarchy: A Theory of Distorted Change in Arab Society. New York: Oxford University Press.
Stephenson, M., 2006. A Trojan Horse in China. In: T. Carothers, ed., Promoting the Rule of Law Abroad. Washington, DC: Carnegie University Press, pp. 191–217.
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, 2007. Drug and Crime Situation in Iran. Vienna: UNODC.
Vahdat, F., 2015. Reflections on the Iranian Revolution of 1979: The Rise of Subjectivity and Citizenship. Citizenship Studies [online], 19(1), pp. 83–100. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2015.982963 [Accessed 8 April 2019].
Weiner, M., 2013. The Rule of the Clan: What an Ancient Form of Organisation Reveals about the Future of Individual Freedom. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
What We Talk about When We Talk about Persons: The Language of a Legal Fiction, 2001. Harvard Law Review [online], 114(6), 1745-1768. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2307/1342652 [Accessed 8 April 2019].
Yamagishi, T., 2018. Individualism, Collectivism, the Rule of Law and General Trust. In: P.A.M. Van Lange, B. Rockenbach and T. Yamagishi, eds., Trust in Social Dilemmas. Oxford University Press.
Zirinsky, M., 2003. Reza Shah’s Abrogation of the Capitulations. In: S. Cronin, ed., The Making of Modern Iran: State and Society under Reza Shah 1921–1941. London: Routledge, pp. 81–99.
Zubaida, S., 2003. Law and Power in the Islamic World. London: I.B. Tauris.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2020 Hadi Enayat
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Los autores conservan el copyright de sus trabajos, que se publicarán en OSLS bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento NoComercial SinObraDerivada. Puede consultar más detalles en: http://es.creativecommons.org/licencia/. Si no está de acuerdo con esta licencia, por favor, póngase en contacto con nosotros.
El autor concede los permisos necesarios para difundir la información bibliográfica del artículo, incluyendo el resumen, y autorizar a otros, incluyendo las bases de datos bibliográficas, de índices y servicios de alerta de contenidos, a copiar y comunicar esta información.
Para más información sobre los permisos para distribuir su artículo en cada fase de la producción, por favor, lea nuestra Política de Autoarchivo y Divulgación (en inglés).
Las condiciones de copyright con el nombre de autores y co-autores, y la licencia Creative Commons se mostrarán en el artículo. Estas condiciones se deben aceptar como parte del proceso de envío de un artículo a la revista. Por favor, asegúrese de que todos los co-autores se mencionan correctamente, y que entienden y aceptan estos términos.
