In and beyond the camp
The rise of resilience in refugee governance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1050Palabras clave:
resiliencia, gobernanza de refugiados, neoliberalismo, ACNURResumen
El artículo analiza los cambios recientes en políticas y prácticas según las cuales poblaciones desplazadas quedan bajo el gobierno de actores humanitarios y estatales. Concretamente, examinamos cómo la Agencia de la ONU para los Refugiados (ACNUR) está llevando a la práctica su mandato de protección al vincular la lógica tradicional de la autosuficiencia con la idea más nueva de resiliencia, compuesta por ejes micro (individuo) y macro (sociedad y, especialmente, lo urbano). Utilizando el caso de Uganda, damos a entender que el vínculo del concepto más arraigado de autosuficiencia con el de resiliencia es un paso adelante en la combinación del mandato humanitario de ACNUR con los objetivos de desarrollo promovidos por otras organizaciones de ayuda globales. La resiliencia surge, en este contexto, como un ideal político que congrega varias corrientes de aspiraciones operativas en un único objetivo polifacético de gobernar a los refugiados tanto dentro como más allá de la estructura del campo o asentamiento.
Descargas
Metrics
Downloads:
PDF (English) 936
Citas
Agier, M., 2012. From refuge the ghetto is born: Contemporary figures of heterotopias. In: R. Hutchison and B.D. Haynes, eds., The Ghetto: Contemporary Global Issues and Controversies. Boulder: Westview Press, 265–292.
Ahimbisibwe, F., 2014. The self-reliance strategy and refugee livelihoods: Evidence from Oruchinga Refugee Settlement, South Western Uganda. International Research Journal of Social Sciences [online], 4(5), 59–65. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317427507_The_Self_Reliance_Strategy_and_Refugee_Livelihoods_Evidence_from_Oruchinga_Refugee_Settlement_South_Western_Uganda [Accessed 13 December 2018].
Aradau, C., 2014. The promise of security: resilience, surprise, and epistemic politics. Resilience: International Policies, Practices, and Discourses [online], 2(2), 73–87. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21693293.2014.914765 [Accessed 18 December 2018].
Barnett, L., 2002. Global governance and the evolution of the international refugee regime. International Journal of Refugee Law [online], 14(2/3), 238–262. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/14.2_and_3.238 [Accessed 13 December 2018].
Béné, C., et al., 2014. Review article: resilience, poverty, & development. Journal of International Development [online], 26, 598–623. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.2992 [Accessed 13 December 2018].
Bernstein, J., and Okello, M.C., 2007. To be or not to be: Urban refugees in Kampala. Refuge [online], 24(1), 46–56. Available from: https://refuge.journals.yorku.ca/index.php/refuge/article/view/21367 [Accessed 13 December 2018].
Betts, A., et al., 2014. Refugee economies: rethinking popular assumptions [online]. Refugee Studies Centre, University of Oxford. June. Available from: https://www.rsc.ox.ac.uk/files/files-1/refugee-economies-2014.pdf [Accessed 13 December 2018].
Buscher, D., 2011. New approaches to urban refugee livelihoods. Refuge, 28(2), 17–29.
Chandler, D., 2014. Resilience: The Governance of Complexity. London/New York: Routledge.
Chimni, B., 2009. The birth of a “discipline”: from refugee to forced migration studies. Journal of Refugee Studies [online], 22(1), 11–29. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fen051 [Accessed 13 December 2018].
Crisp, J., 2003a. No solutions in sight: the problem of protracted refugee situations in Africa. New Issues in Refugee Research [online], Working Paper nº. 75. Geneva: UNHCR. January. Available from: https://www.unhcr.org/research/working/3e2d66c34/solutions-sight-problem-protracted-refugee-situations-africa-jeff-crisp.html [Accessed 13 December 2018].
Crisp, J., 2003b. UNHCR, refugee livelihoods and self-reliance: a brief history [online]. Geneva: UNHCR. Available from: http://www.unhcr.org/research/eval/3f978a894/unhcr-refugee-livelihoods-self-reliance-brief-history.html [Accessed 13 December 2018].
Diken, B., and Laustsen, C., 2006. The Camp. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography [online], 88(4), 443–452. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0435-3684.2006.00232.x [Accessed 13 December 2018].
Dryden-Peterson, S., and Hovil, L., 2003. Local integration as a durable solution: refugees, host populations, and education in Uganda. New Issues in Refugee Research [online], Working Paper nº. 93. Geneva: UNHCR. September. Available from: https://www.unhcr.org/research/working/3f8189ec4/local-integration-durable-solution-refugees-host-populations-education.html [Accessed 13 December 2018].
Dryden-Peterson, S., and Hovil, L., 2004. A remaining hope for durable solutions: local integration of refugees and their hosts in the case of Uganda. Refuge [online], 22(1), 26–38. Available from: https://refuge.journals.yorku.ca/index.php/refuge/article/view/21315 [Accessed 13 December 2018].
Duffield, M., 2012. Challenging environments: danger, resilience and the aid industry. Security Dialogue [online], 43(5), 475–492. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0967010612457975 [Accessed 13 December 2018].
Easton-Calabria, E., 2016. “Refugees asked to fish for themselves”: the role of livelihoods trainings for Kampala’s urban refugees. New Issues in Refugee Research [online], Research Paper nº. 277. Geneva: UNHCR. Available from: https://www.unhcr.org/research/working/56bd9ed89/refugees-asked-fish-themselves-role-livelihoods-trainings-kampalas-urban.html [Accessed 13 December 2018].
Easton-Calabria, E., and Omata, N., 2018. Panacea for the refugee crisis? Rethinking the promotion of “self-reliance” for refugees. Third World Quarterly [online]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2018.1458301 [Accessed 13 December 2018].
Evans, B., and Reid, J., 2014. Resilient Life: The Art of Living Dangerously. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Gorman, R., 1986. Beyond ICARA II: implementing refugee-related development assistance. The International Migration Review [online], 20(2), 283–298. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12267852 [Accessed 13 December 2018].
Government of Uganda and UNHCR, 2004. Self-reliance strategy (1999–2003): For refugee hosting areas in Moyo, Arua, and Adjumani districts, Uganda, Report of the Mid-term Review (RLSS Mission Report 2004/03) [online]. April. Available from: https://www.unhcr.org/41c6a4fc4.pdf [Accessed 1 April 2018].
Government of Uganda, 2017. ReHoPE – Refugee and host population empowerment – Strategic Framework, Uganda [online]. Government of Uganda. June. Available from: https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/64166_0.pdf [Accessed 13 December 2018].
Government of Uganda, 2018. Road map for the implementation of the comprehensive refugee response framework in Uganda, 2018–2020 [online]. Government of Uganda. Available from: https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/64290.pdf [Accessed 13 December 2018].
Haldrup, S.V., and Rosén, F., 2017. Developing resilience: a retreat from grand planning. In: D. Chandler and J. Coaffee, eds., The Routledge Handbook of International Resilience. London/New York: Routledge, 358–369.
Hammerstad, A., 2000. Whose security? UNHCR, refugee protection and state security after the Cold War. Security Dialogue [online], 31(4), 391–403. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0967010600031004002 [Accessed 13 December 2018].
Hansen, R., 2018. The comprehensive refugee response framework: A commentary. Journal of Refugee Studies [online], 31(2), 131–151. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fey020 [Accessed 13 December 2018].
Harild, N., 2016. Forced displacement: a development issue with humanitarian elements. Forced Migration Review [online], nº. 52, 4–7. Available from: https://www.fmreview.org/sites/fmr/files/FMRdownloads/en/solutions/harild.pdf [Accessed 13 December 2018].
Hovil, L., 2007. Self-settled refugees in Uganda: an alternative approach to displacement? Journal of Refugee Studies [online], 20(4), 599–620. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fem035 [Accessed 13 December 2018].
Hovil, L., 2014. Local integration. In: E. Fiddian-Qasmiyeh et al., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Refugee and Forced Migration Studies. Oxford University Press, 488–498.
Hunter, M., 2009. The failure of self-reliance in refugee settlements. POLIS Journal [online], vol. 2, 1–46. Available from: http://www.polis.leeds.ac.uk/assets/files/students/student-journal/ma-winter-09/meredith-hunter-winter-09.pdf [Accessed 14 December 2018].
Hyndman, J., 2000. Managing Displacement: Refugees and the Politics of Humanitarianism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Hyndman, J., and Giles, W., 2011. Waiting for what? The feminization of asylum in protracted situations. Gender, Place and Culture [online], 18(3), 361–379. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2011.566347 [Accessed 14 December 2018].
Ilcan, S., and Rygiel, K., 2015. “Resiliency humanitarianism”: Responsibilizing refugees through humanitarian emergency governance in the camp. International Political Sociology [online], 9, 333–351. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/ips.12101 [Accessed 14 December 2018].
Ilcan, S., Oliver, M., and Connoy, L., 2015. Humanitarian assistance and the politics of self-reliance: Uganda’s Nakivale Refugee Settlement. CIGI Papers [online], nº. 86. Available from: https://www.cigionline.org/publications/humanitarian-assistance-and-politics-self-reliance-ugandas-nakivale-refugee-settlement [Accessed 14 December 2018].
Ilcan, S., Oliver, M., and Connoy, L., 2017. Humanitarian assistance, refugee management, and self-reliance schemes: Nakivale refugee settlement. In: L. Good-Gingrich and S. Köngeter, eds., Transnational Social Policy: Social Support in a World on the Move. London/New York: Routledge.
International Refugee Rights Initiative (IRRI), 2014. Conflict in South Sudan: Refugees seek protection in Uganda and a way home [online]. April. Available from: https://www.refworld.org/docid/53aa78294.html [Accessed 29 November 2018]
International Refugee Rights Initiative (IRRI), 2015. South Sudanese refugees in Adjumani District, Uganda: Telling a new story? [online]. July. Available from: https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/TellingADifferentStory.pdf [Accessed 22 November 2018]
International Refugee Rights Initiative (IRRI), 2018. Uganda’s refugee policies: The history, the politics, the way forward. Rights in Exile Series [online], Policy Paper. October. Available from: https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/IRRI-Uganda-policy-paper-October-2018-Paper.pdf [Accessed 22 November 2018)
Jacobsen, K., 2002. Livelihoods in conflict: the pursuit of livelihoods by refugees and the impact on the human security of host communities. International Migration [online], 40(5), 95–123. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2435.00213 [Accessed 14 December 2018].
Johnson, H., 2011. Click to donate: Visual images, constructing victims and imagining the female refugee. Third World Quarterly [online], 32(6), 1015–1037. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2011.586235 [Accessed 14 December 2018].
Johnson, H., 2014. Borders, Asylum and Global Non-Citizenship: The Other Side of the Fence. Cambridge University Press.
Joseph, J., 2013. Resilience as embedded neoliberalism: governmentality approach. Resilience: International Polices, Practices, and Discourses [online], 1(1), 38–52. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/21693293.2013.765741 [Accessed 14 December 2018].
Kibreab, G., 2007. Why governments prefer spatially segregated settlement sites for urban refugees. Refuge [online], 24(1), 27–35. Available from: https://refuge.journals.yorku.ca/index.php/refuge/article/view/21365 [Accessed 14 December 2018].
Kigozi, D., 2017. The reality behind Uganda’s refugee model. News Deeply [online], Refugees Deeply, 30 May. Available from: https://www.newsdeeply.com/refugees/community/2017/05/30/the-reality-behind-ugandas-glowing-reputation [Accessed 5 November 2018]
Krause, U., 2016. Limitations of development-oriented assistance in Uganda. Forced Migration Review [online], nº. 52, 51–53. Available from: https://www.fmreview.org/sites/fmr/files/FMRdownloads/en/solutions/krause.pdf [Accessed 14 December 2018].
Larner, W., and Moreton, S., 2016. Creating resilient subjects: the coexist project. In: M. Brady and R. Lippert, eds., Governing Practices: Neoliberalism, Governmentality, and the Ethnographic Imaginary. University of Toronto Press, 35–56.
Loescher, G., and Milner, J., 2011. UNHCR and the global governance of refugees. In: A. Betts, ed., Global Migration Governance. Oxford University Press, 189–209.
Methmann, C., and Oels, A., 2015. From “fearing” to “empowering” climate refugees: governing climate-induced migration in the name of resilience. Security Dialogue [online], 46(1), 51–68. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0967010614552548 [Accessed 14 December 2018].
Meyer, S., 2006. The “refugee aid and development” approach in Uganda: empowerment and self-reliance of refugees in practice. New Issues in Refugee Research [online], Research Paper nº. 131. Geneva: UNHCR. Available from: https://www.unhcr.org/research/working/4538eb172/refugee-aid-development-approach-uganda-empowerment-self-reliance-refugees.html [Accessed 14 December 2018].
Milner, J., 2014. Protracted refugee situations. In: E. Fiddian-Qasmiyeh et al., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Refugee and Forced Migration Studies. Oxford University Press, 151–162.
Newhouse, L., 2015. More than mere survival: violence, humanitarian governance, and practical material politics in a Kenya refugee camp. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space [online], 47(11), 2292–2308. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1068%2Fa140106p [Accessed 14 December 2018].
O Ensor, M., 2010. Education and self-reliance in Egypt. Forced Migration Review [online], nº. 34, 25–26. Available from: https://www.fmreview.org/sites/fmr/files/FMRdownloads/en/urban-displacement/ensor.pdf [Accessed 14 December 2018].
O’Connor, D., et al., 2017. Living with insecurity: Food security, resilience, and the World Food Programme (WFP). Global Social Policy [online], 17(1), 3–20. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468018116658776 [Accessed 14 December 2018].
Oliver, M., and Ilcan, S., 2018. The politics of protection: the right to food in protracted refugee situations. Refugee Survey Quarterly [online], 37(4), 440–457. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdy013 [Accessed 14 December 2018].
Omata, N., 2013. “Community resilience or shared destitution?” Refugees’ internal assistance in a deteriorating economic environment. Community Development Journal [online], 48(2), 264–279. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bss057 [Accessed 14 December 2018].
Omata, N., and Kaplan J., 2013. Refugee livelihoods in Kampala, Nakivale and Kyangwali refugee settlements: patterns of engagement with the private sector. Refugee Studies Centre Working Paper Series [online], nº. 95. Available from: https://www.rsc.ox.ac.uk/files/files-1/wp95-refugee-livelihoods-kampala-nakivale-kyangwali-2013.pdf [Accessed 14 December 2018].
Owens, P., 2009. Reclaiming “bare life”?: Against Agamben on refugees. International Relations [online], 23(4), 567–582. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117809350545 [Accessed 14 December 2018].
Ramadan, A., 2013. Spatialising the refugee camp. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers [online], 38(1), 65–77. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2012.00509.x [Accessed 14 December 2018].
Refugee Law Project, 2007. “Giving out their daughters for their survival”: Refugee self-reliance, “vulnerability”, and the paradox of early marriage [online]. Working Paper nº. 20. Kampala: RLP/Makerere University. Available from: https://www.refugeelawproject.org/resources/working-papers/60-giving-out-their-daughters-for-their-survival-refugee-self-reliance,-vulnerability-,-and-the-paradox-of-early-marriage [Accessed 14 December 2018].
Refugee Law Project, 2009. Critique of the Refugees Act (2006) [online]. Kampala: RLP/Makerere University. Available from: https://www.refugeelawproject.org/files/legal_resources/RefugeesActRLPCritique.pdf [Accessed 14 December 2018].
Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 19 September 2016. New York Declaration for Refugees and Migrants (A/RES/71/1) [online]. New York: UN General Assembly, seventy-first session. Available from: http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_RES_71_1.pdf [Accessed 14 December 2018].
Rogers, P., 2015. Researching resilience: an agenda for change. Resilience: International Polices, Practices, and Discourses [online], 3(1), 55–71. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/21693293.2014.988914 [Accessed 14 December 2018].
Rose, N., O’Malley, P., and Valverde, M., 2006. Governmentality. Annual Review of Law & Social Science [online], vol. 2, 83–104. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.2.081805.105900 [Accessed 14 December 2018].
Sharpe, M., and Namusobya. S., 2012. Refugee status determination and the rights of recognized refugees under Uganda’s Refugees Act 2006. International Journal of Refugee Law, 24(3), 561–78.
Slaughter, A., and Crisp, J., 2009. A surrogate state? The role of the UNHCR in protracted refugee situations. New Issues in Refugee Research [online], Research Paper nº. 168. Geneva: UNHCR. January. Available from: https://www.unhcr.org/research/working/4981cb432/surrogate-state-role-unhcr-protracted-refugee-situations-amy-slaughter.html [Accessed 14 December 2018].
Summers, H., 2017. Tensions rise as Uganda neighbourly refugee policy starts to feel the strain. The Guardian [online], 21 May. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2017/may/21/uganda-refugee-policy-breaking-point [Accessed 3 December 2018].
The Refugees Act, 2006. The Uganda Gazette [online], nº. 47, vol. XCVIX, of 4 August 2006. Available from: http://www.judiciary.go.ug/files/downloads/Act%20No.%2021of%202006%20Refugees%20Act2006.pdf [Accessed 13 December 2018].
The Refugees Regulations, 2010 [online]. Available from: https://www.refworld.org/docid/544e4f154.html [Accessed 13 December 2018].
UNHCR, 2003. Framework for durable solutions for refugees and persons of concern [online]. Geneva: UNHCR. Available from: https://www.unhcr.org/partners/partners/3f1408764/framework-durable-solutions-refugees-persons-concern.html [Accessed 14 December 2018].
UNHCR, 2004. Country Operations Plan: Uganda [online]. Geneva: UNHCR. Available from: https://www.unhcr.org/3f7987397.pdf [Accessed 14 December 2018].
UNHCR, 2005. Handbook for self-reliance [online]. Geneva: UNHCR Reintegration and Local Settlement Section Division of Operational Support. August. Available from: https://www.unhcr.org/44bf7b012.pdf [Accessed 14 December 2018].
UNHCR, 2009. UNHCR policy on refugee protection and solutions in urban areas [online]. Geneva: UNHCR. September. Available from: https://www.unhcr.org/protection/hcdialogue%20/4ab356ab6/unhcr-policy-refugee-protection-solutions-urban-areas.html [Accessed 14 December 2018].
UNHCR, 2012. Livelihood programming in UNHCR: Operational guidelines [online]. Geneva: UNHCR. Available from: https://www.unhcr.org/publications/operations/4fbdf17c9/livelihood-programming-unhcr-operational-guidelines.html [Accessed 14 December 2018].
UNHCR, 2014a. Encouraging Self Reliance: UNHCR Global Appeal 2014–2015 [online]. Geneva: UNHCR. Available from: https://www.unhcr.org/5575a7888.pdf [Accessed 14 December 2018].
UNHCR, 2014b. Global strategy for livelihoods: A UNHCR strategy 2014–2018 [online]. Geneva: UNHCR Division of Programme Support and Management. Available from: https://cms.emergency.unhcr.org/documents/11982/81186/UNHCR%2C+Global+Strategy+for+Livelihoods+2014-2018/bbf30250-c485-49f6-9944-2fe9f3c0f97f [Accessed 14 December 2018].
UNHCR, 2014c. UNHCR’s policy on alternatives to camps [online]. Geneva: UNHCR. Available from: https://www.unhcr.org/protection/statelessness/5422b8f09/unhcr-policy-alternatives-camps.html [Accessed 14 December 2018].
UNHCR, 2017a. Comprehensive refugee response framework: Uganda, the way forward [online]. Geneva: UNHCR. Available from: https://data2.unhcr.org/en/documents/download/63266 [Accessed 14 December 2018].
UNHCR, 2017b. Resilience and self-reliance from a protection and solutions perspective (EC/68/SC/CRP.4) [online]. Paper. Executive Committee of the High Commissioner’s Programme, 68thmeeting of the Standing Committee. Geneva: UNHCR. Available from: https://www.unhcr.org/en-my/58ca4f827.pdf [Accessed 14 December 2018].
UNHCR, 2018. Uganda refugee response – monthly snapshot. June 2018 [online]. Geneva: UNHCR. Available from: https://data2.unhcr.org/en/documents/download/64914 [Accessed 14 December 2018].
UNHCR and OPM, 1999. Strategy paper: Self-reliance for refugee hosting areas in Moyo, Arua and Adjumani districts, 1999–2003: Actual State of Affairs and Strategy for Implementation.
UNHCR and World Bank Group, 2016. An Assessment of Uganda’s Progressive Approach to Refugee Management [online]. Washington, DC: The World Bank Group. Available from: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/259711469593058429/pdf/107235-WP-PUBLIC.pdf [Accessed 14 December 2018].
United Nations Development Programme, 2017. Uganda’s Contribution to Refugee Protection and Management [online]. Geneva: UNDP. Available from: https://data2.unhcr.org/en/documents/download/64687 [Accessed 14 December 2018].
Walker, J., and Cooper, M., 2011. Genealogies of resilience: from systems ecology to the political economy of crisis adaptation. Security Dialogue, 42(2), 143–160.
Welsh, M., 2014. Resilience and responsibility: governing uncertainty in a complex world. The Geographic Journal [online], 180(1), 15–26. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12012 [Accessed 14 December 2018].
Zetter, R., and Ruaudel, H., 2016. Refugees’ Right to Work and Access to Labor Markets – An Assessment. Part I: Synthesis (Preliminary). KNOMAD Working Paper and Study Series [online]. Washington, DC: World Bank. Available from: https://www.rsc.ox.ac.uk/publications/refugees-right-to-work-and-access-to-labor-markets-an-assessment-part-1/@@download/file [Accessed 14 December 2018].
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2020 Marcia Oliver, Philip Boyle
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Los autores conservan el copyright de sus trabajos, que se publicarán en OSLS bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento NoComercial SinObraDerivada. Puede consultar más detalles en: http://es.creativecommons.org/licencia/. Si no está de acuerdo con esta licencia, por favor, póngase en contacto con nosotros.
El autor concede los permisos necesarios para difundir la información bibliográfica del artículo, incluyendo el resumen, y autorizar a otros, incluyendo las bases de datos bibliográficas, de índices y servicios de alerta de contenidos, a copiar y comunicar esta información.
Para más información sobre los permisos para distribuir su artículo en cada fase de la producción, por favor, lea nuestra Política de Autoarchivo y Divulgación (en inglés).
Las condiciones de copyright con el nombre de autores y co-autores, y la licencia Creative Commons se mostrarán en el artículo. Estas condiciones se deben aceptar como parte del proceso de envío de un artículo a la revista. Por favor, asegúrese de que todos los co-autores se mencionan correctamente, y que entienden y aceptan estos términos.
