Forthcoming

“Homo limes” — Cross-border people and cross-border citizenship

Sociolegal explorations

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.2518

Keywords:

cross-border, transfrontier, citizenship, European Union, lifeworld

Abstract

MacCormick made an important contribution to Jurisprudence and Sociology of Law through his distinction between the norm-giver and the norm-user perspectives. Norm-givers and norm users, in his scheme, are in the same political community, in distinct communities with distinct institutions: users and givers share the same jurisdiction. But there are special cases of norm-users that are carrying out their ordinary lives in different communities. We can call them cross-border people. They live one part of their lives in one community and another part of their lives in another community, and both are bordering, and often share some features besides territorial continuity. As norm users they can belong to two different communities of norm users. As citizens, they can belong to two different demoi at the same time. We shall be applying these considerations to the Basque border regions to ask whether cross-border relationships are generating a new type of cross-border citizenship.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

        Metrics

Global Statistics ℹ️

Cumulative totals since publication
51
Views
27
Downloads
78
Total

References

Acosta Pumarejo, E., 2024. Transciudadanía: hacia un nuevo paradigma de la ciudadanía en la Unión Europea. 1st ed. Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch.

Apalategui, U., 2022. Questionner l’identité transfrontalière. In: G. Bachoué-Pédrouzo and R. Colavitti, eds., La gouvernance transfrontalière. Brussels: Bruylant.

Aranzadi, J., 2000. Milenarismo vasco: edad de oro, etnia y nativismo. New ed., revised. Barcelona: Taurus.

Bachoué Pedrouzo, G., and Colavitti, R., eds., 2022. La gouvernance transfrontalière. Brussels: Bruylant.

Bachoué Pedrouzo, G., et al., 2025. La “ personne transfrontalière ”: poser les jalons d’une recherche juridique collective. Revue de l’Union européenne, 688, 263.

Barbero González, I., 2017. La readmisión de extranjeros en situación irregular entre Estados miembros: consecuencias empírico-jurídicas de la gestión policial de las fronteras internas. Cuadernos Electrónicos de Filosofía del Derecho [online], 36(diciembre), 1-26. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7203/CEFD.36.10640 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7203/CEFD.36.10640

Barbero, I., and Donadio, G., 2019. La externalización interna de las fronteras en el control migratorio en la UE. Revista CIDOB d’Afers Internacionals [online], 122(septiembre), 137-62. Available at: https://doi.org/10.24241/rcai.2019.122.2.137 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24241/rcai.2019.122.2.137

Bauböck, R., ed. 2019. Debating European citizenship [online]. 1st ed. Cham: Springer International. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89905-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89905-3

Beck, J., 2022. Horizontal integration: An administrative science perspective on cross-border cooperation in Europe. 1st ed. Baden-Baden. Nomos. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748914044-1

Begirune Foundation, 2023. Estudio de la migración en tránsito en Irun [online]. January. Available at: https://www.irun.org/images/informacion-temas/directorio-tematico/servicios-sociales/descargas/Estudio-migracion-Irun.pdf

Bengoetxea Caballero, J., 2019. Federalismo y Europa de los Pueblos: gobernanza y escalas fluctuantes. In: J. Bengoetxea Caballero, ed., Europa de las regiones y el futuro federal de Europa: Balance y perspectiva de la gobernanza multinivel de la Unión Europea. Madrid: Dykinson. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvk3gpds.22

Brunet-Jailly, E., 2022. Cross-border cooperation: A global overview. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political [online], 47(1), 3-17. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/03043754211073463 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03043754211073463

Castells, M., 2004. The network society: A cross-cultural perspective. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781845421663

Gasperini, M., et al., eds., 2025. Annual report on intra-EU labour mobility: 2024 edition [online]. Brussels: European Commission. Available at: https://www.cedefop.europa.eu/files/annual_report_on_intra-eu_labour_mobility-ke0125029enn.pdf

Geertz, C., 2001. Local knowledge: Further essays in interpretive anthropology. 3rd ed., repr. London: Basic Books.

Hart, H. L. A., 1972. The concept of law. Oxford University Press.

Ivić, S., 2016. European identity and citizenship: Between modernity and postmodernity. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Jiménez, A. S., 2023a. El sindicato Jupol afirma que llevan años fomentando las detenciones en Irun. El Diario Vasco [online], 8 June. Available at: https://www.diariovasco.com/gipuzkoa/jupol-afirma-llevan-anos-fomentando-detenciones-irun-20230608204942-nt.html

Jiménez, A. S., 2023b. La comisaría de la Policía Nacional de Irun detiene a cerca de 100 migrantes al mes. El Diario Vasco [online], 9 June. Available at: https://www.diariovasco.com/gipuzkoa/comisaria-policia-nacional-irun--20230609205403-nt.html

Jiménez, A. S., 2023c. La orden de dar festivos por detener a migrantes pone en cuestión la política de controles en Irun. El Diario Vasco [online], 8 June. Available at: https://www.diariovasco.com/gipuzkoa/controles-irun-migrantes-20230608202554-nt.html

Levrat, N., 2022. Construction de communautés citoyennes transfrontalières: nécessité ou chimère? In: G. Bachoué-Pédrouzo and R. Colavitti, eds., La gouvernance transfrontalière. Brussels: Bruylant.

MacCormick, N., 2007. Institutions of law: An essay in legal theory. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198267911.001.0001

Medeiros, E., 2018. The role of European Territorial Cooperation (ETC) in EU cohesion policy. In: E. Medeiros, ed., European territorial cooperation: Theoretical and empirical approaches to the process and impacts of cross-border and transnational cooperation in Europe. Cham: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74887-0

Medeiros, E., et al., 2021. Covidfencing effects on cross-border deterritorialism: The case of Europe. European Planning Studies [online], 29(5), 962-82. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2020.1818185 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2020.1818185

Moore, S. F., 1973. Law and social change: The semi-autonomous social field as an appropriate subject of study. Law & Society Review [online], 7(4), 719-46. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/3052967 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3052967

Neuvonen, P. J., 2019. Free movement as a means of subject-formation: Defending a more relational approach to EU Citizenship. In: R. Bäubock, ed., Debating European citizenship. Cham: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89905-3_22

Palacin Mariscal, I., 2025. Reflexiones sobre la Carta de Derechos Fundamentales de la Unión Europea y la ciudadanía europea transfronteriza: territorio eurorregional Nueva Aquitania-Euskadi-Navarra. In: M. Zelaia and S. Ripol, eds., La aplicación de la Carta de Derechos Fundamentales de la Unión Europea por los legislativos: Avances en la materialización de los derechos fundamentales. Vitoria: Instituto Vasco de Administración Pública.

Svensson, S., and Balogh, P., 2018. Limits to integration: Persisting border obstacles in the EU. In: E. Medeiros, ed., European territorial cooperation: Theoretical and empirical approaches to the process and impacts of cross-border and transnational cooperation in Europe. Cham: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74887-0_7

Thym, D., 2019. The failure of Union citizenship beyond the single market. In: R. Bäubock, ed., Debating European citizenship. Cham: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89905-3_20

Published

14-04-2026

How to Cite

Bengoetxea, J. and Palacin Mariscal, I. (2026) “‘Homo limes’ — Cross-border people and cross-border citizenship : Sociolegal explorations”, Oñati Socio-Legal Series. doi: 10.35295/osls.iisl.2518.

Issue

Section

Individual Articles