Law as a weapon
Exploring prisoners' strategic use of the law in the prison field
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.2041Keywords:
Field theory, law, Bourdieu, Qualitative research, PrisonAbstract
Grounded in Bourdieu’s field theory and drawing from qualitative research conducted in a Northern Italy prison, this study aims to investigate how prisoners strategically utilize the law, rules, and regulations within the prison field. The law is conceptualized as a form of objectified cultural capital – a weapon wielded by prisoners to achieve specific objectives. Findings from this research reveal that despite the challenges and constraints prisoners encounter when asserting their rights through legal means, the utilization of the law is intricately linked to navigating the operational logic of the prison field. By aligning their actions with this logic, prisoners seek to mitigate unintended consequences and maximize benefits.
Downloads
Metrics
Downloads:
First_Online_Maculan_OSLS 35
References
Associazione Antigone, 2023. È vietata la tortura. XIX rapporto di Antigone sulle condizioni di detenzione [online]. Antigone. Available at: https://www.rapportoantigone.it/diciannovesimo-rapporto-sulle-condizioni-di-detenzione/
Benguigui, G., Chauvenet, A., and Orlic, F., 1994. Les surveillants de prison et la règle. Deviance et Société [online], 18(3), 275-295. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3406/ds.1994.1346 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/ds.1994.1346
Borghini, A., 2020. Tornare a studiare lo Stato. Alcune riflessioni sociologiche. Rivista Trimestrale di Scienze dell’Amministrazione [online], 1, 1-17. Available at: https://doi.org/10.32049/RTSA.2020.1.03
Bosworth, M., and Carrabine, E., 2001. Reassessing resistance: Race, gender and sexuality in prison. Punishment & Society [online], 3(4), 501-515. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/14624740122228393 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14624740122228393
Bottoms, A.E., 1999. Interpersonal violence and social order in prisons. Crime and Justice [online], 26, 205-281. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1086/449298 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/449298
Bourdieu, P. 1986a. Forms of capital. In: J. Richardson, ed., Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. Westport: Greenwood, 241–58.
Bourdieu, P., 1986b. The force of law: Toward a sociology of the juridical field. Hastings Law Journal, 38(5), 814-853.
Bourdieu, P., 1990a. Droit et passe-droit. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales [online], 81(1), 86-96. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3406/arss.1990.2928 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/arss.1990.2928
Bourdieu, P., 1990b. The logic of practice. Redwood City: Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu, P., 2000. Pascalian meditations. Redwood City: Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu, P., 2005. The Political Field, Social Science Field and the Journalistic Field. In: R. Benson and E. Neveu, eds., Bourdieu and the Journalistic Field. Cambridge: Polity Press, 29-47.
Bourdieu, P., 2009. Ragioni Pratiche. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Bourdieu, P., 2015. On the State: Lectures at the Collège de France 1989-1992. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bourdieu, P., and Wacquant, L.J.D., 1992. An invitation to reflexive sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Brindisi, G., 2010. La sociologia del campo giuridico di Pierre Bourdieu. Sotto giudizio, Annuario Kainos V. Milan: Punto Rosso, 9-33.
Calavita, K., and Jenness, V., 2013. Inside the pyramid of disputes: Naming problems and filing grievances in California prisons. Social Problems [online], 60(1), 50-80. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2013.60.1.50 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2013.60.1.50
Caputo-Levine, D.D., 2013. The yard face: The contributions of inmate interpersonal violence to the carceral habitus. Ethnography [online], 14(2), 165-185. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138112457299 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138112457299
De Vito, C.G., 2009. Camosci e girachiavi: Storia del carcere in Italia. Rome: Laterza.
Dezalay, Y., and Madsen, M.R., 2012. The force of law and lawyers: Pierre Bourdieu and the reflexive sociology of law. Annual Review of Law and Social Science [online], 8, 433-452. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102811-173817 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102811-173817
Drake, D., 2011. The “Dangerous Other” in Maximum-Security Prisons. Criminology & Criminal Justice [online], 11(4), 367-382. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895811408836 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895811408836
Edgar, K., O’Donnell, I., and Martin, C., 2003. Prison violence: The dynamics of conflict, fear and power. Cullompton: Willan.
Faccio, E., and Costa, N., 2013. The presentation of self in everyday prison life: Reading interactions in prison from a dramaturgic point of view. Global Crime [online], 14(4), 386-403. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/17440572.2013.831761 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17440572.2013.831761
Haggerty, K.D., and Bucerius, S.M., 2021. Picking Battles: Correctional Officers, Rules and Discretion in Prison. Criminology [online], 59(1), 137-157. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12263 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12263
Kolind, T., 2015. Drugs and discretionary power in prisons: The officer’s perspective. International Journal of Drug Policy [online], 26(9), 799-807. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.04.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.04.014
Liebling, A., 2000. Prison officers, policing and the use of discretion. Theoretical Criminology [online], 4(3), 333-357. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480600004003005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480600004003005
Maculan, A., 2019. Non Solo Detenuti: Chi Lavora nelle Nostre Carceri? In: Associazione Antigone, ed., Il Carcere Secondo la Costituzione. XV Rapporto di Antigone Sulle Condizioni di Detenzione Rome.
Maculan, A., 2022. La galera incorporata. Etnografia della polizia penitenziaria. Santancargelo di Romagna: Maggioli.
Maculan, A., 2023. Bourdieu in carcere. Appunti per una sociologia del campo penitenziario. Sociologia del Diritto [online], 1, 89-114. Available at: https://doi.org/10.54103/1972-5760/20943 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54103/1972-5760/20943
Maculan, A., and Sterchele, L. 2022. The” left” and” right” arm of the prison: Prison work and the local legal culture of the penitentiary. Oñati Socio-Legal Series [online], 12(6), 1492-1517. Available at: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1310 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1310
McCahill, M., and Finn, R.L., 2013. The Surveillance of ‘Prolific Offenders: Beyond ‘Docile Bodies’. Punishment & Society [online], 15(1), 23-42. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474512466198 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474512466198
Page, J., 2012. Punishment and the Penal Field. In: J. Simon and R. Sparks, eds., The SAGE Handbook of Punishment and Society [online]. London: Sage, 152-166. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446247624.n8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446247624.n8
Page, J., and Goodman, P., 2020. Creative Disruption: Edward Bunker, Carceral Habitus and the Criminological Value of Fiction. Theoretical Criminology [online], 24(2), 222-240. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480618769866 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480618769866
Quinn, K., 2023. Dispositions that matter: Investigating criminalized women’s resettlement through their (trans) carceral habitus. Criminology & Criminal Justice [online], 23(1), 20-38. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/17488958211017371 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17488958211017371
Rinaldi, C., 2017. Una sociologia delle imposture legittimate. La costruzione del campo giuridico. In: C. Rinaldi, ed., La forza del diritto. Elementi per una sociologia del campo giuridico. Rome: Armando.
Ronco, D., 2016. La competizione tra i reclusi. L’impatto della scarsità̀ di risorse e della logica del beneficio sulla comunità̀ carceraria. Etnografia e ricerca qualitativa, 9(2), 211-226.
Rubin, A.T., 2017. The consequences of prisoners’ micro-resistance. Law & Social Inquiry [online], 42(1), 138-162. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/lsi.12158 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lsi.12158
Salento, A., 2002. Diritto e campo giuridico nella sociologia di Pierre Bourdieu. Sociologia del Diritto, 38(1), 37-74.
Salle, G., and Chantraine, G., 2009. Le droit emprisonné? Sociologie des usages sociaux du droit en prison. Politix [online], 87(3), 93-117. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3917/pox.087.0093 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/pox.087.0093
Sandberg, S., 2008. Street Capital: Ethnicity and Violence on the Streets of Oslo. Theoretical Criminology [online], 12(2), 153-171. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480608089238 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480608089238
Sarzotti, C., 2000. Carcere e cultura giuridica: L’ambivalenza dell’istituzione totale. Dei delitti e delle pene, 1(2), 77-126.
Sarzotti, C., 2010. Il campo giuridico del penitenziario: appunti per una ricostruzione. In: E. Santoro, ed., Diritto come questione sociale. Turin: Giappichelli.
Sbraccia, A., and Vianello, F., 2016. Introduzione. Carcere, ricerca sociologica, etnografia. Etnografia e ricerca qualitativa, 9(2), 183-210.
Schlosser, J.A., 2013. Bourdieu and Foucault: A Conceptual Integration Toward an Empirical Sociology of Prisons. Critical Criminology [online], 21(1), 31-46. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-012-9164-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-012-9164-1
Shammas, V., 2018. Bourdieu’s Five Lessons for Criminology. Law and Critique [online], 29(2), 201-219. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-017-9218-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-017-9218-3
Shammas, V.L., and Sandberg, S., 2016. Habitus, capital, and conflict: Bringing Bourdieusian field theory to criminology. Criminology & Criminal Justice [online], 16(2), 195-213. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895815603774 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895815603774
Sims, J., 1994. Tougher than the rest? Men in prison. In: T. Newborn and E. Stanko, eds., Just boys doing business? Men, masculinities and crime. London: Routledge.
Sparks, R., Bottoms, A.E., and Hay, W., 1996. Prisons and the Problem of Order [online]. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198258186.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198258186.001.0001
Strauss, A., and Corbin, J., 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Los Angeles: Sage.
Sykes, G.M., 1958. The society of captives: A study of a maximum-security prison. Princeton University Press.
Torrente, G., 2018. Le regole della galera. Pratiche penitenziarie, educatori e processi di criminalizzazione. Turin: L’Harmattan Italia.
Ugelvik, T., 2014. Power and resistance in prison: Doing time, doing freedom [online]. Cham: Springer. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137307866 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137307866
Vianello F., 2018. Norme, codici e condotte: la cultura del penitenziario. Gli attori sociali di fronte alla criticità dell’ambiente carcerario, Sociologia del Diritto [online], 3, 67-85. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3280/SD2018-003004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3280/SD2018-003004
Vianello, F., and Grezzani, L., 2021. La “revisione critica delle condotte antigiuridiche”: prima riflessione sugli aspetti pragmatici e simbolici di un artefatto normativo. Studi Sulla Questione Criminale, 17(3), 7-33.
Wacquant, L., 2016. A concise genealogy and anatomy of habitus. The Sociological Review [online], 64(1), 64-72. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12356 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12356
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Alessandro Maculan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence, further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.