Autonomy and heteronomy of the judiciary - a historical approach

Authors

  • Pia Letto-Vanamo University of Helsinki

Keywords:

Legal history, Nordic law, conflict resolution, lay judges, justice and law, legal reasoning, Dispute resolution

Abstract

In the paper, I will discuss about historical dimensions of heteronomy and autonomy of the judiciary. As an introduction, historical narratives (histories) of main legal actors (the legislator, the judiciary, and legal scholarship) will be discussed. In Section 2 characteristics of “pre modern” conflict resolution and the legitimacy of judicial decision making will be studied. I will argue that during the era of non state law and in circumstances without an authoritative judiciary (like in rural areas in the Nordic Countries) the participation of the conflicting parties and the local community played an important role for guaranteeing legitimacy and acceptance of conflict resolution and judicial decision making in local courts. In addition, various - and historically determined - justifications of lay participation will be analyzed. Hence, questions of public / democratic control over the judiciary, and those of social background of judges will be enlightened. In Section 3 the interplay between and interdependence of various legal actors will be in focus. I will argue for the importance of historical-comparative studies on legal scholarship, through which one can better understand variations in functions and roles of the judiciary, and particularities of judicial argumentation in certain times and geographical/ cultural areas, as well.

DOWNLOAD THIS PAPER FROM SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1989396

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Views 144
Downloads:
PDF 141


Downloads

How to Cite

Letto-Vanamo, P. (2012) “Autonomy and heteronomy of the judiciary - a historical approach”, Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 1(9), p. 17. Available at: https://opo.iisj.net/index.php/osls/article/view/174 (Accessed: 25 November 2024).

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 9 (2011): Autonomy and Heteronomy of the Judiciary in Europe

Section

Ensuring legitimacy: conform interpretation

License

OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence, further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.

The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.

For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.

The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.